Aims

One method of femoral head preservation following avascular necrosis (AVN) is core decompression and insertion of a tantalum rod. However, there may be a high failure rate associated with this procedure. The purpose of this study was to document the clinical and radiological outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA) subsequent to failed tantalum rod insertion.

To compare the number of airborne bacteria and particles under laminar airflow (LAF) versus turbulent airflow (TAF) with 100% and 50% reduced fresh air exchange during simulated total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Two equally dimensioned operating rooms (OR) build in 2009 with modern ventilation systems of LAF and TAF respectively were used during 32 simulated THA-operations under four different ventilation conditions: LAF or TAF with either full (n=8+8) or 50% reduced (n=8+8) fresh air exchange volume.

We followed a protocol controlling the complete perioperative setup including interior cleaning, sterile materials, OR-personnel procedures, surgical clothing, instruments and 50-minute surgical procedure on a full-sized dummy at 37°C.

Microbial contamination was determined intra-operatively by ISO-validated Microbiological Active Sampler (MAS-100, Merck, 100 L/min) at two 10-minute intervals in 30 cm distance of the operating field. Blood-agar plates from each operation were incubated for 2 days at 35°C and the microbial concentration was determined by viable counting of colony-forming units (CFU) per m3 air.

Furthermore airborne particulate (0,5–10 µm) was sampled with ISO-validated light scattering particle analyzer (MET-one, Beckman Coulter, 28,3 L/min) during the 50-minute surgical procedure (1,42 m3/operation). Large particle sizes (>5 µm) are correlated with microbial contamination (Stocks, 2010). According to standards large-sized particle number must not exceed a 2.900/m3-threshold for cleanroom operations.

Microbial air concentration (mean CFU/m3 ±standard deviation) under LAF conditions with full and 50% reduced fresh air exchange were 0,4±0,8 and 0,4±0,4 respectively, whereas air contamination under TAF conditions were significantly higher with 7,6±2,0 and 10,3±8,1 (p<0,05).

Large (>5 µm) airborne particulate (mean no./m3 ±standard deviation) under LAF conditions with full and 50% reduced fresh air exchange were 1.581±2.841 and 1.018±1.084 respectively, whereas particulate under TAF conditions were 7.923±5.151 and 6.157±2.439 respectively.

Microbial air contamination was significantly lower under LAF ventilation compared to TAF during simulated THA under both full and 50% reduced fresh air exchange in modern operating theatres used in daily clinic. The number of particles measured under TAF conditions exceeded the threshold for cleanroom operations in 12/16 simulated operations. These findings indicate that LAF reduces the airborne microbial risk factor of surgical site infection in comparison to TAF.

The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the acetabular component introducer as a tool to intra-operatively predict implant inclination in total hip arthroplasty. This study investigated (1) the correlation between intra-operative photographic assessment of cup inclination using the acetabular introducer and that measured on post-operative radiograph; and (2) the accuracy of intra-operative prediction of abduction angle.

For this study, we prospectively recruited 56 patients scheduled to receive primary hip arthroplasty from one of two senior surgeons. During the procedure, the lead surgeon provided a prediction of the abduction angle based on the alignment of the impactor attached to the cup in its final seated position. A standardized anteroposterior (AP) photograph was then taken of the acetabular impactor in situ. Abduction angles were measured by two observers on the photographs and post-operative AP pelvis radiographs. Linear regression was used to determine the correlation between the angle of the guide measured on the photographs and the actual position of the implant measured on the radiograph. Descriptive statistics were further used to analyze the accuracy of the intra-operative prediction as compared with the abduction angle measured on the photographs.

Measurements of cup position made from post-operative radiographs were significantly correlated with the measurements as assessed by intra-operative photographs (r = 0.34, p = 0.00). Our findings demonstrate that radiological abduction angles tend to be greater than that assessed by intra-operative photographs by a mean of 5.6 degrees (SD = 6.6 degrees; 95% CI = 7.3 to 3.9 degrees). Conversely, surgeon prediction of cup inclination based on the acetabular introducer differed from the radiographic measurements by a mean of 6.8 degrees (SD = 8.7 degrees). There was good agreement between the two observers in both photographic and radiographic measurement (k = 0.95, k = 0.96, respectively).

In conclusion, we found that the intra-operative photographic assessment of acetabular cup inclination by acetabular impactor alignment tends to underestimate the abduction angle by a mean of approximately 5 degrees. In addition, intra-operative surgeon estimation of acetabular inclination did not appear accurate in this study demonstrating that cup position should rely on additional visual cues beyond that captured in the anteroposterior view of the cup introducer.

Introduction:

One method of femoral head preservation following avascular necrosis (AVN) is core decompression and Tantalum Rod insertion. There is, however, a published failure rate of up to 32% at 4 years. The purpose of the present study was to document the clinical and radiological outcome following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) subsequent to failed Tantalum Rod insertion.

Introduction:

Alignment of the initial femoral guidewire is critical in avoiding technical errors that may increase the risk of failure of the femoral component. A novel alternative to conventional instrumentation for femoral guidewire insertion is a computed tomography (CT) based alignment guide. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of femoral component alignment using a CT-based, patient specific femoral alignment guide.

Purpose:

The use of computer navigation has been shown to improve the accuracy of femoral component placement compared to conventional instrumentation in hip resurfacing. Whether exposure to computer navigation improves accuracy when the procedure is subsequently performed with conventional instrumentation without navigation has not been explored. We examinedwhether femoral component alignment utilizing a conventional jig improves following experience with the use of imageless computer navigation for hip resurfacing.

Purpose

Computer navigation for hip resurfacing has been shown to reduce the incidence of technical error during femoral head preparation and provides increased accuracy compared to conventional instrumentation for insertion of the initial femoral guidewire. Limitations to the widespread use of navigation in hip resurfacing include access and cost. A novel, patient specific nylon jig has been developed as a cost effective alternative for placement of the initial guidewire. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of femoral guidewire insertion between imageless navigation, conventional instrumentation and a new type of CT-based custom jig.

Purpose

The Birmingham Mid-Head Resection (BMHR) is a bone-conserving, short-stem alternative to hip resurfacing for patients with compromised femoral head anatomy. It is unclear, however, if an uncemented, metaphyseal fixed stem confers a mechanical advantage to that of a traditional hip resurfacing in which the femoral prosthesis is cemented to the prepared femoral head. Thus, we aimed to determine if a metaphyseal fixed, bone preserving femoral component provided superior mechanical strength in resisting neck fracture compared to a conventional hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

The aim of this study was to determine the mid-term survival and functional outcomes of the Scorpio Total Stabilised Revision Knee prosthesis.

Sixty seven prostheses were implanted between November 2001 and April 2008. 42 females and 23 males. Average patient age was 67.9 (37-89). Outcomes were assessed with WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index), Knee Society Scores, Short Form-8 scores, patient satisfaction and radiological review. Average follow-up was over 3 years (8-93mths) with 95% follow-up.

One patient died post operatively and 4 patients from 18 months to 5 years post-operatively. Average body mass index was 32.9 (21.5- 55.1). 65% (42 patients) of patients operated on had a Body Mass Index of greater than 30. 48 patients were ASA 3 or greater.

Thirteen second stage revision arthroplasties were performed after treatment for infected arthroplasty surgery. Twenty six prostheses were revised for aseptic loosening. Eight prostheses were revised for stiffness and 9 for worn polyethylene inserts. Five prostheses were revised for symptomatic tibio-femoral instability/ dislocation and one for patello-femoral instability. Two revisions were performed for peri-prosthetic fractures and 2 for previously operated tibial plateau fractures.

Seven patients required tibial tubercle osteotomy and seven a rectus snip. Thirty one patients had greater than a 15mm polyethylene insert. The average KSS increased from 49 pre-operatively to 64 at 7.5 years. The average KS function score increased from 21 to 45. 68% (44) of patients had other significant joint involvement which affected daily function. 24% of patients were unsatisfied with the outcome. 89.5% of patients radiographs were assessed for loosening or subsidence. 51% of femoral components and 36% of tibial components had radiosclerotic lines. The surface area of each implant including the stem was measured on antero-posterior and lateral images. The degree of lucency was calculated as a percentage and in mm from the component.

Two prostheses (3%) were revised for deep infection, one (1.5%) for stiffness and one for aseptic loosening (1.5%). Complications included a popliteal artery injury, two superficial wound infections, and one patella tendon avulsion.

Survival rate for revision of prosthesis was 87% at 7.5 years and 90% excluding infection. Success of second stage revision arthroplasty after treatment of infection was 92%.

Purpose: Surgeons performing hip resurfacing antevert and translate the femoral component anteriorly to maximize head/neck offset and reduce impingement. The anterior femoral neck is under tensile forces during gait similarly to the superior neck [6]. This study was designed to determine the risk of femoral neck fracture after anterior or posterior notching of the femoral neck.

Method: Forty seven fourth generation synthetic femora were implanted with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing prostheses (Smith & Nephew Inc. Memphis, USA). Implant preparation was performed using imageless computer navigation (VectorVision SR 1.0, BrainLAB, Germany). The prosthesis was initially planned for neutral version and translated anterior, or posterior, to create a femoral neck notch. The femora were fixed in a single-leg stance and tested with axial compression using a mechanical testing machine. This method enabled comparison with previously published data. The synthetic femora were prepared in eight experimental groups:two mm and five mm anterior notches, two mm and five mm posterior notches, neutral alignment with no notching (control), five mm superior notch, five mm anterior notch tested with the femur in 25° flexion and five mm posterior notch tested with the femur in 25° extension We tested the femora flexed at 25° flexion to simulate loading as seen during stair ascent. [3] The posterior five mm notched femoral necks were tested in extension to simulate sporting activities like running. The results were compared to the control group in neutral alignment using a one – way ANOVA:

Results: Testing Group Mean load to failure Significance (p-value) Anterior 2mm 3926.61 ± 894.17 .843 Anterior 5mm 3374.64 ± 345.65 .155 Neutral (Control) 4539.44 ± 786.44 – Posterior 2mm 4208.09 ± 1079.81 .994 Posterior 5mm 3988.06 ± 728.59 .902 Superior 5mm 2423.07 ± 424.17 .001 Anterior 5mm in 25° flexion 3048.11 ± 509.24 .027 Posterior 5mm in 25° extension 3104.62 ± 592.67 .038 Our data suggests that anterior and posterior two mm or five mm notches are not significantly weaker in axial compression. Anterior and posterior 5mm notches are significantly weaker in flexion/extension (p=0.027/ p=0.038). The five mm superior notch group was significantly weaker with axial compression supporting previous published data (p=0.001).

Conclusion: We conclude that anterior or posterior two mm notching of the femoral neck has no clinical implications, however five mm anterior or posterior femoral neck notching significantly weakens the femoral neck. Fracture is more likely to occur with stair ascent or activities involving weight bearing in extension. Hip resurfacing is commonly performed on active patients and five mm neck notching has clinically important implications.

Surgeons performing hip resurfacing ante-vert and translate the femoral component anterior to maximize head/neck offset and educe impingement. The anterior femoral neck is under tensile forces during gait similarly to the superior neck [6]. This study was esigned to determine the risk of femoral neck fracture after anterior or posterior notching of the femoral neck.

Method: Fortyseven 4th generation synthetic femora were implanted with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing pros-theses (Smith & Nephew Inc. emphis, USA). Implant preparation was performed using imageless computer navigation (VectorVision SR 1.0, BrainLAB, Grmany). The virtual prosthesis was initially planned for neutral version and translated anterior, or posterior, to create the notch. The femora were fixed in a single-leg stance and tested with axial compression using a mechanical testing machine. This method enabled comparison with previously published data. The synthetic femora were prepared in 8 experimental groups:2mm and 5mm anterior notches, 2mm and 5mm posterior notches, neutral alignment with no notching (control), 5mm superior notch, 5mm anterior notch tested with the femur in 25° flexion and 5mm posterior notch tested with the femur in 25° extension We tested the femora flexed at 25° flex-ion to simulate loading as seen during stair ascent. [3] The posterior 5mm notched femoral necks were tested in extension to simulate sporting activities like running. The results were compared to the control group in neutral alignment using a one-way ANOVA:

Results: Testing Group Mean load to failure Significance Neutral (Control) 4303.09 ± 911.04N Anterior 2mm 3926.62 ± 894.17N p=0.985 Anterior 5mm 3374.64 ± 345.65N p=0.379 Posterior 2mm 4208.09 ± 1079.81N p=1.0 Posterior 5mm 3988.07 ± 728.59N p=0.995 Superior 5mm 2423.07 ± 424.16N p=0.003 Anterior 5mm in 25° flexion 3048.11 ±509.24N p=0.087 Posterior 5mm in 25° extension 3104.61±592.67N p=0.117 Both the anterior 5mm notch tested in single-leg stance and anterior notch in flexion displayed lower compressive loads to failure (3374.64N and 3048.11N). The mean load to failure value for the posterior 5mm notches in extension was 3104.62N compared to 4303.09N for the control group. Our data suggests that anterior and posterior 2mm notches are not statistically significantly weaker in axial compression. The anterior 5mm notches tend towards significance in axial compression (p=0.38) and bordered significance in flexion (p=0.087). The 5mm posterior notches were not significantly weakened in axial compression (p=0.995), but tended towards significance in extension (p=0.117). The 5mm superior notch group was significantly weaker with axial compression supporting previous data published (p=0.003). We are currently assessing offset and other variables that may reduce data spread.

Conclusion: We conclude that anterior and posterior 2mm notching of the femoral neck has no clinical implications, however 5mm anterior notches may lead to fracture. The fracture is more likely to occur with stair ascent rather than normal walking. Posterior 5mm notches are not likely to fracture with normal gait, but may fracture with higher impact activities that promote weight bearing in extension. Hip resurfacing is commonly performed on active patients and ultimately 5mm notching in the anterior or posterior cortices has clinically important implications.

Oxidized Zirconium (Oxinium, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN) is a relatively new material that features an oxidized ceramic surface chemically bonded to a tough metallic substrate. This material has demonstrated the reduced polyethylene wear characteristics of a ceramic, without the increased risk of implant fracture. The purpose of the current investigation was to assess clinical outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty with Oxinium versus Cobalt Chrome femoral heads.

One hundred uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty procedures were prospectively performed in 100 patients. There were 52 males and 48 females with mean age at the time of surgery of 51 years (SD 11, range, 19–76). Using a process of sealed envelope randomization, patients were divided into 2 groups. Each group contained fifty patients. Those in group 1 received an Oxinium femoral head (OX), while those in group 2 a cobalt-chrome femoral head (CC).

The current study reports clinical outcome measures for both the OX and CC groups at a minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively. At the time of latest follow-up, stem survival for both groups was 98%. There was a significant improvement in all clinical outcome scores between preoperative and 2 year postoperative time periods for both bearing groups (p< 0.003). There were no significant differences between bearing groups for any of the clinical outcome scores at final follow-up (p> 0.159). Mean Harris Hip Scores at 2 years postoperatively were 92 and 92.5 for OX and CC, respectively (range; 65–100 OX, 60–100 CC). For SF-12, both the Physical Component Summary Scale (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary Scale (MCS) are reported. Mean PCS scores at final follow-up were 45.2 and 49.21 for OX and CC (range; 27.1–56.7 OX, 26.3–61.8 CC). Mean MCS scores were 53.8 and 52.57 for OX and CC (range; 39.2–65.5 OX, 34.3–64 CC). Mean final WOMAC scores are reported as 84.9 and 87 for OX and CC, respectively.

The current data suggest that total hip arthroplasty utilizing Oxinium femoral heads is safe and effective. Additional follow-up of the current cohort will be performed in order to fully assess mid-to long-term clinical outcomes.

Purpose: Minimizing tip-apex distance (TAD) has been shown to reduce clinical failure of extramedullary sliding hip screws used to fix peritrochanteric fractures. There is debate regarding the optimal position of the lag screw in the femoral head when a cephalomedullary nail is used to treat a peritrochanteric fracture. Some authors suggest the TAD should be minimized as with an extramedullary sliding hip screw, while others suggest the lag screw should be placed inferior within the femoral head. The primary goal of this study was to determine which of 5 possible lag screw positions in the femoral head provides greatest mechanical stiffness and/or load-to-failure for an unstable peritrochanteric fracture treated with a cepha-clomedullary nail. The secondary goal was to determine if there is a linear correlation between implant-femur mechanical stiffness and/or load to failure (dependent variables) with a series of five radiographic measurements (independent variables) of distance from the lag screw tip to the femoral head apex.

Method: Long Gamma 3 Nails (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) were inserted into 30 left synthetic femurs (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA). An unstable four-part fracture was created, anatomically reduced, and repaired using one of 5 lag screw placements in the femoral head:

superior (n=6),

All specimens were radiographed in the anterioposterior and lateral planes, and radiographic measurements including TAD and a calcar referenced tip-apex distance (CalTAD) were calculated. All specimens were tested for axial, lateral, and torsional stiffness, and then loaded-to-failure in the axial position using an Instron 8874 (Canton, MA). ANOVA was used to compare means of the five treatment groups. Linear regression analysis was used to compare stiffness and load-to-failure (dependant variables) with radiographic measurements (independent variables). A post hoc power analysis was performed.

Results: The inferior lag screw position had significantly greater mean axial stiffness than superior (p< 0.01), anterior (p=0.02) and posterior (p=0.04) positions. Analysis revealed significantly less mean torsional stiffness for the superior lag screw position compared to other lag screw positions (p< 0.01 all 4 pairings). No statistical differences were noted for lateral stiffness. Superior and central lag screw positions had significantly greater mean load-to-failure than anterior (p< 0.01 and p=0.02) and posterior (p< 0.01 and p=0.05) positions.

There were significant negative linear correlations between stiffness tests with CalTAD, and load-to-failure with TAD. Power was greater than 95% for axial stiffness, torsional stiffness and load-to-failure tests.

Conclusion: Position of the lag screw in the femoral head affects the biomechanical properties of the implant-femur construct. Central placement of the lag screw with minimization of TAD may provide the best combination of stiffness and load-to-failure.

Purpose: Cephalomedullary nails rely on a large lag screw that provides fixation into the femoral head. There is an option to statically lock the lag screw (static mode) or to allow the lag screw to move within the nail to compress the intertrochanteric fracture (dynamic mode). The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stiffness of static and dynamic modes for a cephalomedullary nail used to fix an unstable peritrochanteric fracture.

Method: Thirty intact synthetic femur specimens (Model #3406, Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA) were potted into cement blocks distally for testing on an Instron 8874 (Instron, Canton, MA). A long cephalomedullary nail (Long Gamma 3 Nail, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) was then inserted into each of the femurs. An unstable four-part fracture was created, anatomically reduced, and the cephallomedullary nail was reinserted. Mechanical tests were conducted for axial, lateral, and torsional stiffness with the lag screws in:

static and

A paired student’s t test was used to compare the 2 modes.

Results: The axial stiffness of the cephalomedullary nail was significantly greater (p< 0.01) in the static mode (484.3±80.2N/mm) than in the dynamic mode (424.1±78.0N/mm) (Fig.2A). Similarly, the lateral bending stiffness of the nail was significantly greater (p< 0.01) in the static mode (113.9±8.4N/mm) than in the dynamic mode (109.5±8.8N/mm). The torsional stiffness of the nail was significantly greater (p=0.02) in the dynamic mode (114.5±28.2N/mm) than in the static mode (111.7±27.0N/mm).

A post hoc power analysis with & #945;=0.05 and & #946;=0.20 revealed that the paired t test on 30 samples was sufficiently powered to determine a difference in mean axial stiffness of 33.0N/mm (6.8% of static stiffness), a difference in mean lateral bending stiffness of 3.6N/mm (3.2% of static stiffness) and a difference in mean torsional stiffness of 3.4N/mm (3.0% of static stiffness).

Conclusion: Our results show that there is a 60N/mm reduction in axial stiffness of the cephalomedullary nail when the lag screw is changed from static to dynamic mode. This represents a 12.4% reduction in axial stiffness with a change from axial to dynamic modes which may be clinically significant. The differences in lateral (4.4N/mm, 3.9%) and torsional (2.8N/mm, 2.4%) are small enough that they are likely not clinically significant. We felt that a difference of greater than 10% in axial stiffness and a difference of greater than 5% in lateral or torsional stiffness would be clinically significant. Our study was adequately powered to detect these differences. Given the significant reduction in axial stiffness with dynamization of the cephalomedullary nail construct, we recommend use of the static mode when treating unstable peritrochanteric fractures with a cephalomedullary nail.

Purpose: The use of UHMW polyethylene acetabular liners is known to cause polyethylene wear related osteolysis, the major limiting factor in its use in the younger active patient. Modern alumina ceramic articulations have been developed in order to reduce wear and avoid polyethylene debris. This prospective randomized long-term study aims to compare the outcome between an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic (CC) articulation with a ceramic on UHMW polyethylene articulation (CP).

Method: Fixty-six hips in 55 patients with mean age 42.2 (range 19–56) each received uncemented components (Wright Medical) and a 28mm alumina head with acetabular liner selected via sealed envelope randomization following anesthetic induction. Subsequent regular clinical and radiologic follow up measured patient outcome scores and noted any radiological changes.

Results: Twenty-six CP hips and 30 CC hips were evaluated. One failure required revision in each group. Mean St Michael’s outcome score for each group with up to 10 years follow-up (median 8 years, range 1–10) was 22.8 and 22.9 respectively (p=0.057). Radiographs with a minimum 5 years post-operative follow-up were analyzed in 42 hips (23 CC and 19 CP). The mean time of wear measurement for the CC group was 8.3 years (SD 1.3, Range 4.8–10.1 years) and for the CP group was 8.1 years (SD 0.9, Range 6.1–9.2 years)(p=0.471). Wear was identified in all but one CP hip but in only 12 of 23 CC replacements. Mean wear in the CP group was 0.11mm per year and 0.02mm per year in the CC group (p< 0.001).

Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first long term randomized trial comparing in-vivo ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-polyethylene hip articulations. Other than significantly greater wear in the polyethylene group there was no significant difference in long-term outcome scores between the two groups with up to 10 years of follow-up. The use of a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing is a safe and durable option in the young patient avoiding the concerns of active metal ions and osteolytic polyethylene debris.

Purpose: While the durability of most uncemented femoral stems remains unknown, it is the aim of this study to demonstrate Echelon Primary femoral stem performance with regard patient outcome and overall implant survival.

Method: Between February 1998 and March 2007, 428 patients received the Echelon Primary stem. The mean age of each patient was 58.1 (SD 11.1, Range 20–87). Body mass index averaged 30.5 kg/m2 (SD 5.8, Range 17.7–58.2). The majority of patients received a Reflection uncemented acetabular component (91%) and an ultra high molecular weight polyethylene liner (76.5%), although the highly cross linked polyethylene is now used with increased frequency, used in 31% of hips since 2005. The majority of femoral heads were cobalt chrome (79.3%).

Results: Kaplan Meier survivorship for the Echelon Femoral stem with revision for aseptic loosening as end point at 100 months is 99.3% (95% CI 97.1–99.8). Taking revision for any reason as the end point the Kaplan Meier survivorship is 98.3% at 100 months (95% CI 95.9–99.3). A pre-operative WOMAC score was available for 345 of the 392 patients with mean score of 43.5 (95% CI 41.6–45.4). At the three-month post-operative review the mean WOMAC score was significantly increased to 74.54 (95% CI 72.7–76.3)(p< 0.001) and by 1 year 84.3 (95% CI 80.5–88.1). At subsequent years, the modified WOMAC score remained at a plateau of around 80. General health assessment using the SF-36 shows an improvement in the physical component score from 33.1 (95% CI 32.3–33.9) preoperatively to 42.6 (95% CI 41.7–43.6)(p< 0.001) at three months and 48.19 (95% CI 44.2–52.2) at latest follow up. The mental component scores increased from 48.7 (95% CI 47.6–49.9) to 51.4 (95% CI 50.3–52.4)(p< 0.001) and 53.5 (95% CI 50.3–56.6) respectively.

Conclusion: This large prospective review of the Echelon Primary femoral stems reveals an excellent survivorship of the stem with a 99.3% survival at 8 years with regard aseptic loosening and 98.3% survival including revision for any reason. Patient outcome scores are significantly improved and subsequently maintained. There have been no changes with regard to manufacture or design of the stem within the period of review.

Purpose: Hip resurfacing is a technically demanding alternative to total hip arthroplasty. Placement of the initial femoral guidewire utilizing traditional mechanical jigs may lead to preparatory errors and a high degree of variability in final implant stem-shaft angle (SSA). Intraoperative computer navigation has the potential to decrease preparatory errors and provide a reliable method of femoral component placement. The current study evaluated the accuracy and learning curve of 140 consecutive navigated hip resurfacing arthroplasties.

Method: Between October 2005 and May 2007, 140 consecutive Birmingham Hip Resurfacings were performed on 132 patients (107 male, 25 female). The mean age of the cohort was 51.2 years (range 25–82). Indications for surgery included osteoarthritis (n=136) and avascular necrosis (n=4). Preoperative templating was performed using digital AP unilateral hip radiographs. Neck-shaft angles (NSA) were digitally measured and relative implant stem-shaft angles planned. The central guidewire was drilled and verified intra-operatively using an imageless navigation system. Implant stem-shaft angles were assessed using 3 month post-operative radiographs.

Results: Pre-operative templating determined a mean NSA of 132.2 degrees (SD 5.3 degrees, range 115–160). The planned SSA was a relative valgus alignment of 9.5 degrees (SD 2.6 degrees). The post-operative SSA differed from the planned SSA by 2.5 degrees (SD 1.9 degrees, range 0–8). The final SSA measured within ±5 degrees of the planned SSA in 89% of cases. Of the remaining 11% of cases, all measurements erred in valgus. No cases of neck notching or varus implant alignment occurred in the series. The mean navigation time for the entire series was 18 minutes (SD 6.6 minutes, range 10–50). A learning curve was observed with respect to navigation time, with a significant decrease in navigation time between the first 20 cases and the remainder of the series. There was no evidence of a learning curve for implant placement accuracy.

Conclusion: Imageless computer navigation shows promise in optimizing preparation of the femoral head and reducing the introduction of mechanical preparatory factors that predispose to femoral neck fracture. Navigation may afford the surgeon an accurate and reliable method of femoral component placement with negligible learning curve.

This study was designed to determine the risk of femoral neck fracture after anterior or posterior notching of the femoral neck. The anterior femoral neck is under tensile forces during gait similarly to the superior neck [6].

Method: Fortyseven 4th generation synthetic femora were implanted with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing pros-theses (Smith & Nephew Inc. Memphis, USA). Implant preparation was performed using imageless computer navigation (VectorVision SR 1.0, BrainLAB, Germany). The prosthesis was initially planned for neutral version and translated anterior, or posterior, to create a femoral neck notch. The femora were fixed in a single-leg stance and tested with axial compression. This method enabled comparison with previously published data. The synthetic femora were prepared in 8 experimental groups: 2mm and 5mm anterior notches, 2mm and 5mm posterior notches, neutral alignment with no notching (control), 5mm superior notch, 5mm anterior notch tested with the femur in 25° flexion and 5mm posterior notch tested with the femur in 25° extension

We tested the femora flexed at 25° flexion to simulate loading as seen during stair ascent. [3] The posterior 5mm notched femoral necks were tested in extension to simulate sporting activities like running. The results were compared to the control group in neutral alignment using a one- way ANOVA:

Results: Testing Group Mean load to failure Significance

Neutral (Control) 4303.09 ± 911.04N

The anterior 5mm notch tested in single-leg stance and anterior notch in flexion displayed lower compressive loads to failure (3374.64N and 3048.11N). The mean load to failure value for the posterior 5mm notches in extension was 3104.62N compared to 4303.09N for the control group.

Our data suggests that anterior and posterior 2mm notches are not significantly weaker in axial compression. The anterior 5mm notches was not significant in axial compression (p=0.38), but trended towards significance in flexion (p=0.087). A 5mm posterior notch was not significant. (p=0.995, p=0.117). The 5mm superior notch group was significantly weaker with axial compression supporting previous published data (p=0.003).

Conclusion: We conclude that anterior and posterior 2mm notching of the femoral neck has no clinical implications, however a 5mm anterior femoral neck notch may lead to fracture. The fracture is more likely to occur with stair ascent rather than normal walking given the reduction in strength noted after testing in flexion. Posterior 5mm notches are not likely to fracture. Hip resurfacing is commonly performed on active patients and 5mm notching of anterior cortex has clinically important implications.

Minimizing tip-apex distance has been shown to reduce clinical failure of sliding hip screws used to fix peritro-chanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine if such a relationship exists for the position of the lag screw in the femoral head using a cephalomedullary device.

Methods: Thirty intact synthetic femur specimens (Model #3406, Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA) were potted into cement blocks distally for testing on an Instron 8874 (Instron, Canton, MA). A long cephalomedullary nail (Long Gamma 3 Nail, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) was inserted into each of the femurs. An unstable four-part fracture was created, anatomically reduced, and repaired using one of 5 lag screw placements in the femoral head:

Superior (N=6),

Mechanical tests were repeated for axial, lateral and torsional stiffness. All specimens were radiographed in the anterioposterior and lateral planes and tip-apex (TAD) distance was calculated. A calcar referenced tip-apex distance (CalTAD) was also calculated.

ANOVA was used to compare means of the five treatment groups. Linear regression analysis was used to compare axial, lateral and torsional stiffness (dependant variables) to both TAD and CalTAD (independent variables).

Results: ANOVA testing proved that the mean axial (p< 0.01) and torsional stiffness (p< 0.01) between the 5 groups was significantly different, but lateral stiffness was not statistically different (p=0.494). Post hoc analysis showed that the inferior lag screw position provided significantly higher mean axial stiffness (568.14±66.9N/ mm) than superior (428.0±45.6N/mm; p< 0.01), anterior (443.2±45.4N/mm; p=0.02) and posterior (456.7±69.3N/ mm; p=0.04) lag screw positions. There was no significant difference in mean axial stiffness between inferior (568.14±66.9N/mm) and central (525.4±81.7N/mm) lag screw positions (p=0.77). Post hoc analysis revealed significantly less mean torsional stiffness for the superior lag screw position compared to other lag screw positions (p< 0.01 all 4 pairings). There were no significant correlations between TAD and axial (r=−0.33, p=0.08), lateral (r=−0.22, p=0.24) or torsional (r=0.08, p=0.69) stiffness. There were significant correlations between CalTAD and axial (r=−0.66, p< 0.01), lateral (r=−0.38, p=0.04) and torsional (r=−0.38, p=0.04) stiffness.

Discussion: Our results suggest that placement of the lag screw inferiorly in the femoral head when using a cephalomedullary nail to treat an unstable peritrochanteric fracture results in the stiffest construct in axial and torsional biomechanical testing. A simple radiographic measurement, CalTAD, provides an intraoperative method of determining optimal cephalomedullary nail lag screw position to achieve greatest construct stiffness.

The use of metal on polyethylene articulations was a key development in establishing total hip arthroplasty as a successful and reproducible treatment for end stage osteoarthritis. In order to ensure implant durability in relatively younger populations, there is a need for alternative, wear resistant bearing surfaces. Oxidized Zirconium (Oxinium, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN) is a relatively new material that features an oxidized ceramic surface chemically bonded to a tough metallic substrate. This material has demonstrated the reduced polyethylene wear characteristics of a ceramic, without the increased risk of implant fracture. The purpose of the current investigation was to assess early clinical outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty with Oxinium versus Cobalt Chrome femoral heads.

One-hundred primary THA procedures were prospectively performed in 100 patients. There were 52 males and 48 females. Using a process of sealed envelope randomization, patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of fifty patients, each receiving primary THA implants with an Oxinium femoral head (OX). The mean age of each patient was 51 years (SD 10.8, Range 22–74) with 26 males and 24 females. Group 2 also consisted of 50 patients. Within this group again each patient received primary THA implants however with a cobalt-chrome femoral head (CC). Demographics were similar with mean age 51 years (SD 11.0, Range 19–76) and again 26 males and 24 females.

The current study reports clinical outcome measures for both the OX and CC groups at a minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively. At the time of latest follow-up, stem survival for both groups was 98%. There was a significant improvement in all clinical outcome scores between preoperative and 2 year postoperative time periods for both bearing groups (p< 0.003). There were no significant differences between bearing groups for any of the clinical outcome scores at final follow-up (p> 0.159). Mean Harris Hip Scores at 2 years postoperatively were 92 and 92.5 for OX and CC, respectively (range; 65–100 OX, 60–100 CC). For SF-12, both the Physical Component Summary Scale (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary Scale (MCS) are reported. Mean PCS scores at final follow-up were 45.2 and 49.21 for OX and CC (range; 27.1–56.7 OX, 26.3–61.8 CC). Mean MCS scores were 53.8 and 52.57 for OX and CC (range; 39.2–65.5 OX, 34.3–64 CC). Mean final WOMAC scores are reported as 84.9 and 87 for OX and CC, respectively.

The current data suggest that total hip arthroplasty utilizing Oxinium femoral heads is safe and effective. Additional follow-up of the current cohort will be performed in order to fully assess mid- to long-term clinical outcomes.

Purpose: The mechanical behavior of human scapholunate ligaments is not described well in the literature regarding torsion. Presently, intact scapholunate specimens were mechanically tested in torsion to determine if any tensile forces were generated as a result.

Method: Scapholunate specimens (n=19) were harvested and inspected visually. Scaphoid and lunate bones were potted in square chambers using epoxy cement. The interposing ligaments remained exposed. Specimens were mounted in a specially designed test jig and remained at a fixed axial length during testing. Using angular displacement control, ligaments were subjected to a torsional motion regime that included cyclic preconditioning (25 cycles, 1 Hz, triangular wave, 5 deg max), ramp-up to 15 deg at 180 deg/min, stress relaxation for 120 sec duration, ramp-down to 0 angulation at 180 deg/min, rest period for 5–10 minutes, and torsion-to-failure at 180 deg/min. Torque and axial tension were monitored simultaneously.

Results: Tests showed a coupled linear relationship between applied torsion and the resultant tensile forces generated for the ligament during ramp-up (Torsion/Tension Ratio = 38.86 +/− 29.00 mm, Linearity Coefficient R-squared = 0.89 +/− 0.15, n=19), stress relaxation (Ratio = 23.43 +/− 15.84 mm, R-squared = 0.90 +/− 0.09, n=16), and failure tests (Ratio = 38.81 +/− 26.39 mm, R-squared = 0.77 +/− 0.20, n=16). No statistically significant differences were detected between the Torsion/Tension ratios (p=0.13) or between the linearity (R-squared) of the best-fit lines (p> 0.085).

Conclusion: A strong linear relationship between applied torsion and resulting tensile forces for the ligament was exhibited during all testing phases. This may suggest that there is interplay between torsion and tension in both the stabilization of the scapholunate ligament during normal physiological motion and during resistance to injury processes. This is the first report in the literature of the coupling of torsion with tension for the scapholunate ligament.

Total hip replacement in the young active patient remains one of the major challenges in orthopaedics today. The use of ultra high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene acetabular liners is known to cause polyethylene wear related osteolysis, the major limiting factor in its use in the younger active patient. Modern alumina ceramic articulations have been developed in order to reduce wear and avoid polyethylene debris. This prospective randomized long-term study aims to compare the outcome between an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic (CC) articulation with a ceramic on UHMW polyethylene articulation (CP). In the younger active patient, is one option superior to the other with regard to patient satisfaction, osteolysis and implant longevity?

56 hips in 55 patients with mean age 42.2 (range 19–56) each received uncemented components (Wright Medical) and a 28mm alumina head with acetabular liner selected via sealed envelope randomization following anesthetic induction. Subsequent regular clinical and radiologic follow up measured patient outcome scores and noted any radiological changes.

26 CP hips and 30 CC hips were evaluated. One failure required revision in each group. Mean St Michael’s outcome score for each group with up to 10 years follow-up (median 8 years, range 1–10) was 22.8 and 22.9 respectively (p=0.057). Radiographs with a minimum 5 years post-operative follow-up were analyzed in 42 hips (23 CC and 19 CP). Radiolucency of all 3 acetabular zones was identified in one of the CP hips. There was no evidence of osteolysis or loosening identified in the remaining hips. The mean time of wear measurement for the CC group was 8.3 years (SD 1.3, Range 4.8–10.1 years) and for the CP group was 8.1 years (SD 0.9, Range 6.1–9.2 years)(p=0.471). Wear was identified in all but one of the CP replacements but only 12 of 23 CC articulations. The mean wear for the CC group was 0.14 mm (SD 0.16, Range 0–0.48 mm) and for the CP group was 0.89 mm (SD 0.6, Range 0–2.43 mm)(p< 0.001). Extrapolating the annual wear rate from these figures, the respective wear is 0.02mm for the CC group compared to 0.11mm per year for the CP group.

To our knowledge this is the first long term randomized trial comparing in vivo ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene hip articulations. Other than significantly greater wear in the polyethylene group there was no significant difference in long-term outcome scores between the two groups with up to 10 years of follow-up. The use of a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing is a safe and durable option in the young patient avoiding the concerns of active metal ions and osteolytic polyethylene debris. These patients remain under review.

The computed neck-shaft angle and the size of the femoral component were recorded in 100 consecutive hip resurfacings using imageless computer-navigation and compared with the angle measured before operation and with actual component implanted. The reliability of the registration was further analysed using ten cadaver femora. The mean absolute difference between the measured and navigated neck-shaft angle was 16.3° (0° to 52°). Navigation underestimated the measured neck-shaft angle in 38 patients and the correct implant size in 11. Registration of the cadaver femora tended to overestimate the correct implant size and provided a low level of repeatability in computing the neck-shaft angle.

Prudent pre-operative planning is advisable for use in conjunction with imageless navigation since misleading information may be registered intraoperatively, which could lead to inappropriate sizing and positioning of the femoral component in hip resurfacing.

To assess the accuracy of plain digitised radiographic images for measurement of neck-shaft and stem-shaft angles in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Fifteen patients having undergone hip resurfacing arthroplasty with the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) were selected at random. Digital radiographs were analyzed by three observers. Each observer measured the femoral neck-shaft angles (NSA) of the pre-operative and stem-shaft angles (SSA) of the postoperative radiographs on two separate occasions spanning one week. The effect of femur position on SSA measured by digital radiographs was also analyzed. A BHR prosthesis was cemented into a third generation Sawbone composite femur. Radiographs were taken with the synthetic specimen positioned in varying angles of both flexion and external rotation in increments of 10° ranging from 0° to 90°.

The mean intraobserver difference in measured angle was 3.13° (SD 2.37°, 95% CI +/−4.64°) for the NSA group and 1.49° (SD 2.28°, 95% CI +/−4.47°) for the SSA group. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the NSA group was 0.616 and for the SSA group was 0.855. Flexion of the synthetic femur of twenty degrees resulted in a five degree discrepancy in measured SSA and flexion of forty degrees resulted in a thirteen degree discrepancy. External rotation of the synthetic specimen of twenty and forty degrees resulted in a three and nine degree discrepancy in measured SSA, respectively.

Patient malposition during radiographic imaging can contribute to erroneous NSA and SSA results. Significant intra- and inter-observer variation was noted in the measurement of neck shaft angle however, variation was less marked for measurement of stem shaft angle.

We aimed to establish if radiological parameters, dual energy x-ray absorbtiometry (DEXA) and quantitative CT (qCT) could predict the risk of sustaining a femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing.

Twenty-one unilateral fresh frozen femurs were used. Each femur had a plain AP radiograph, DEXA scan and quantitative CT scan. Femurs were then prepared for a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing femoral component with the stem shaft angle equal to the native neck shaft angle. The femoral component was then cemented onto the prepared femoral head. No notching of the femoral neck occurred in any specimens. A repeat radiograph was performed to confirm the stem shaft angle. The femurs were then potted in a position of single leg stance and tested in the axial direction to failure using an Instron mechanical tester. The load to failure was then analysed with the radiological, DEXA and qCT parameters using multiple regression.

The strongest correlation with the load to failure values was the total mineral content of the femoral neck at the head/neck junction using qCT r= 0.74 (p< 0.001). This improved to r=0.76 (p< 0.001) when neck width was included in the analysis. The total bone mineral density measurement from the DEXA scan showed a correlation with the load to failure of r=0.69 (p< 0.001). Radiological parameters only moderately correlated with the load to failure values; neck width (r=0.55), head diameter (r= 0.49) and femoral off-set (r=0.3).

This study suggests that a patient’s risk of femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing is most strongly correlated with total mineral content at the head/neck junction and bone mineral density. This biomechanical data suggests that the risk of post-operative femoral neck fracture may be most accurately identified with a pre-operative quantitative CT scan through the head/neck junction combined with the femoral neck width.

We aimed to establish if radiological parameters, dual energy x-ray absorbtiometry (DEXA) and quantitative CT (qCT) could predict the risk of sustaining a femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing. 21 unilateral fresh frozen femurs were used. Each femur had a plain AP radiograph, DEXA scan and quantitative CT scan. Femurs were then prepared for a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing femoral component with the stem shaft angle equal to the native neck shaft angle. The femoral component was then cemented onto the prepared femoral head. No notching of the femoral neck occurred in any specimens. A repeat radiograph was performed to confirm the stem shaft angle. The femurs were then potted in a position of single leg stance and tested in the axial direction to failure using an Instron mechanical tester. The load to failure was then analysed with the radiological, DEXA and qCT parameters using multiple regression. The strongest correlation with the load to failure values was the total mineral content of the femoral neck at the head/neck junction using qCT r= 0.74 (p< 0.001). This improved to r=0.76 (p< 0.001) when neck width was included in the analysis. The total bone mineral density measurement from the DEXA scan showed a correlation with the load to failure of r=0.69 (p< 0.001). Radiological parameters only moderately correlated with the load to failure values; neck width (r=0.55), head diameter (r= 0.49) and femoral off-set (r=0.3). This study suggests that a patient’s risk of femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing is most strongly correlated with total mineral content at the head/neck junction and bone mineral density. This biomechanical data suggests that the risk of post-operative femoral neck fracture may be most accurately identified with a pre-operative quantitative CT scan through the head/neck junction combined with the femoral neck width.

Introduction: We aimed to examine the effect of neck notching during hip resurfacing on the strength of the proximal femur.

Methods: Third generation composite femurs that have been shown to replicate the biomechanical properties of human bone were utilised. Imageless computer navigation was used to position the initial guide wire during head preparation. Six specimens were prepared without a superior notch being made in the neck of the femur, six were prepared in an inferiorly translated position to cause a 2mm notch in the superior femoral neck and six were prepared with a 5mm notch. All specimens had radiographs taken to ensure that the stem shaft angle was kept constant. The specimens were then loaded to failure in the axial direction with an Instron mechanical tester.

A three dimensional femoral finite element model was constructed and molded with a femoral component constructed from the dimensions of a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. The model was created with a superior femoral neck notch of increasing depths.

Results: The 2mm notched group (mean load to failure 4034N) were significantly weaker than the un-notched group (mean load to failure 5302N) when tested to failure (p=0.017). The 5mm notched group (mean load to failure 3121N) were also significantly weaker than the un-notched group (p=0.0003) and the 2mm notched group (p=0.046). All fractures initiated at the superior aspect of the neck, at the component bone interface. The finite element model revealed increasing Von Mises stresses with increasing notch depth.

Discussion: A superior notch of 2mm in the femoral neck weakens the proximal femur by 24% and a 5mm notch weakens it by 41%. This study provides biomechanical evidence that notching of the femoral neck may lead to an increased risk of femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing due to increasing stresses in the region of the notch.

We have investigated the accuracy of placement of the femoral component using imageless navigation in 100 consecutive Birmingham Hip Resurfacings. Pre-operative templating determined the native neck-shaft angle and planned stem-shaft angle of the implant. The latter were verified post-operatively using digital anteroposterior unilateral radiographs of the hip.

The mean neck-shaft angle determined before operation was 132.7° (118° to 160°). The mean planned stem-shaft angle was a relative valgus alignment of 9.7° (sd 2.6). The stem-shaft angle after operation differed from that planned by a mean of 2.8° (sd 2.0) and in 86% of cases the final angle measured within ± 5° of that planned. We had no instances of notching of the neck or varus alignment of the implant in our series. A learning curve was observed in the time taken for navigation, but not for accurate placement of the implant.

Navigation in hip resurfacing may afford the surgeon a reliable and accurate method of placement of the femoral component.

A total of 20 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver femurs were assigned to four alignment groups consisting of relative varus (10° and 20°) and relative valgus (10° and 20°), 75 composite femurs of two neck geometries were also used. In both the cadaver and the composite femurs, placing the component in 20° of valgus resulted in a significant increase in load to failure. Placing the component in 10° of valgus had no appreciable effect on increasing the load to failure except in the composite femurs with varus native femoral necks. Specimens in 10° of varus were significantly weaker than the neutrally-aligned specimens.

The results suggest that retention of the intact proximal femoral strength occurs at an implant angulation of ≥ 142°. However, the benefit of extreme valgus alignment may be outweighed in clinical practice by the risk of superior femoral neck notching, which was avoided in this study.

Introduction: It has been suggested that femoral component alignment in the coronal plane affects the risk of sustaining femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing. Previous literature suggests that increasing the stem shaft angle to an extreme valgus position produces the most favourable biomechanical properties following femoral component insertion. We examined the effects of femoral component alignment during hip resurfacing on proximal femur strength.

Methods: 3^rd generation composite femurs shown to replicate biomechanical properties of human bone were used. The bones were secured in a position of single leg stance and tested with an Instron mechanical tester. Imageless computer navigation was used to position the guide wire during femoral head preparation. Specimens were placed in 115, 125 and 135 degrees of stem shaft angulation. No notching was made in the femoral neck during head preparation. The femoral components were cemented in place. Radiographs were taken ensuring that stem shaft angles were correct. Specimens were loaded to failure in the axial direction.

Results: A component position of 115 degrees compared to 125 degrees reduced load to failure from 5475N to 3198N (p=0.009). A position of 135 degrees (5713N) compared to 125 degrees (5475N) did not significantly alter the load to failure (p=0.347). Component positioning at a stem shaft angle below 125 degrees resulted in a significant reduction in strength of the proximal femur. Placement of the component at 115 degrees reduced the load to failure by 42%.

Discussion: Our findings suggest that a varus orientation may be at risk for causing femoral neck fracture. The advantages of increasing valgus angle beyond 125 degrees may not provide as much reduction in the incidence of femoral neck fracture as previously suggested, particularly when considering the inherent risk of femoral neck notching in these positions.

Introduction: Notching of the femoral neck during preparation of the femur during hip resurfacing has been associated with an increased risk of femoral neck fracture. We aimed to evaluate this with the use of a finite element model.

Methods: A three dimensional femoral model was used and molded with a femoral component constructed from the dimensions of a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. Multiple constructs were made with the component inferiorly translated in order to cause a notch in the superior femoral neck. The component angulation was kept constant. Once constructed the model was imported into the Ansys finite element model software for analysis. Elements within the femoral model were assigned different material properties depending on cortical and cancellous bone distributions. Von Misses stresses were evaluated near the notches and compared in each of the cases.

Results: In the un-notched case the maximum Von Mises stress was only 40MPa. However, with the formation of a 1mm notch the stress rose to 144MPa and in the 4 mm notch the stress increased to 423MPa. These values demonstrated that a 1mm notch increased the maximum stress by 361% while a 4mm notch increased the maximum stress by 1061%.

Discussion: This study demonstrated that causing a notch in the superior femoral neck dramatically increases the stress within the femoral neck. This may result in the weakening of the femoral neck and potentially predispose it to subsequent femoral neck fracture. The data suggests that even a small notch of 1mm may be detrimental in weakening the femoral neck by dramatically increasing the stress in the superior neck. This study suggests that any femoral neck notching should be avoided during hip resurfacing.

Introduction: It has been suggested that notching of the femoral neck during hip resurfacing weakens the proximal femur and predisposes to femoral neck fracture. We aimed to examine the effect of neck notching during hip resurfacing on the strength of the proximal femur.

Methods: 3^rd generation composite femurs that have been shown to replicate the biomechanical properties of human bone were utilised. The bone was secured in a position of single leg stance and tested with an Instron mechanical tester. Imageless computer navigation was used to position the initial guide wire during head preparation. Six specimens were prepared without a superior notch being made in the neck of the femur, six were prepared in an inferiorly translated position to cause a 2mm notch in the superior femoral neck and six were prepared with a 5mm notch. The femoral component was then cemented in place. All specimens had radiographs taken to ensure that the stem shaft angle was kept constant. The specimens were then loaded to failure in the axial direction.

Results: The 2mm notched group (mean load to failure 4034N) were significantly weaker than the un-notched group (mean load to failure 5302N) when tested to failure (p=0.017). The 5mm notched group (mean load to failure 3121N) were also significantly weaker than the un-notched group (p=0.0003) and the 2mm notched group (p=0.046). All fractures initiated at the superior aspect of the neck, at the component bone interface. All components were positioned in the same coronal alignment +/−2 degrees.

Discussion: A superior notch of 2mm in the femoral neck weakens the proximal femur by 24% and a 5mm notch weakens it by 41%. This study provides biomechanical evidence that notching of the femoral neck may lead to an increased risk of femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing.