To date, the literature has not yet revealed superiority of Minimally Invasive (MI) approaches over conventional techniques. We performed a systematic review to determine whether minimally invasive approaches are superior to conventional approaches in total hip arthroplasty for (1) clinical and (2) functional outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence to determine whether (3) minimally invasive approaches are superior to conventional approaches for clinical outcomes.

All studies comparing MI approaches to conventional approaches were eligible for analysis. The PRISMA guidelines were adhered to throughout this study. Registries were searched using the following MeSH terms: ‘minimally invasive’, ‘muscle-sparing’, ‘THA’, ‘THR’, ‘hip arthroplasty’ and ‘hip replacement’. Locations searched included PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU clinical trials register and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (World Health Organisation).

Twenty studies were identified. There were 1,282 MI THAs and 1,351 conventional THAs performed.

Intermuscular MI approaches are equivalent to conventional THA approaches when considering all-cause revision, aseptic revision, infection, dislocation, fracture rates and functional outcomes. Meta-analysis of level 1 evidence supports this claim.

Hip resurfacing may be a useful surgical procedure when patient selection is correct and only implants with superior performance are used. In order to establish a body of evidence in relation to hip resurfacing, pseudotumour formation and its genetic predisposition, we performed a case-control study investigating the role of HLA genotype in the development of pseudotumour around MoM hip resurfacings.

All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacings performed in the history of the institution were assessed. A total of 392 hip resurfacings were performed by 12 surgeons between February 1st 2005 and October 31st 2007. In all cases, pseudotumour was confirmed in the preoperative setting on Metal Artefact Reduction Sequencing (MARS) MRI. Controls were matched by implant (ASR or BHR) and absence of pseudotumour was confirmed on MRI. Blood samples from all cases and controls underwent genetic analysis using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) assessing for the following alleles of 11 HLA loci (A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/4/5, DQA1, DQB1, DPB1, DPA1). Statistical significance was determined using a Fisher's exact test or Chi-Squared test given the small sample size to quantify the clinical association between HLA genotype and the need for revision surgery due to pseudotumour.

Both groups were matched for implant type (55% ASR, 45% BHR in both the case and control groups). According to the ALVAL histological classification described by Kurmis et al., the majority of cases (63%, n=10) were found to have group 2 histological findings. Four cases (25%) had group 3 histological findings and 2 (12%) patients had group 4 findings. Of the 11 HLA loci analysed, 2 were significantly associated with a higher risk of pseudotumour formation (DQB1*05:03:01 and DRB1*14:54:01) and 4 were noted to be protective against pseudotumour formation (DQA1*03:01:01, DRB1*04:04:01, C*01:02:01, B*27:05:02).

These findings further develop the knowledge base around specific HLA genotypes and their role in the development of pseudotumour formation in MoM hip resurfacing. Specifically, the two alleles at higher risk of pseudotumour formation (DQB1*05:03:01 and DRB1*14:54:01) in MoM hip resurfacing should be noted, particularly as patient-specific genotype-dependent surgical treatments continue to develop in the future.

The benefits of HXLPE in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have not been as evident as total hip arthroplasty (THA). A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of highly-crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) on TKA outcomes compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE) is described.

All studies comparing HXLPE with CPE for primary TKA were included for analysis. The minimum dataset included revision rates, indication for revision, aseptic component loosening and follow-up time. The primary outcome variables were all-cause revision, aseptic revision, revision for loosening, radiographic component loosening, osteolysis and incidence of radiolucent lines. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative functional knee scores. A random-effects meta-analysis allowing for all missing data was performed for all primary outcome variables.

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, there were 2,234 knees (1,105 HXLPE and 1,129 CPE). The combined mean follow-up for all studies was 6 years. The aseptic revision rate in the HXLPE group was 1.02% compared to 1.97% in the CPE group. There was no difference in the rate of all-cause revision (p = 0.131), aseptic revision (p = 0.298) or revision for component loosening (p = 0.206) between the two groups. Radiographic loosening (p = 0.200), radiolucent lines (p = 0.123) and osteolysis (p = 0.604) was similar between both groups. Functional outcomes were similar between groups.

The use of HXLPE in TKA yields similar results for clinical and radiographic outcomes when compared to CPE at midterm follow-up. HXLPE does not confer the same advantages to TKA as seen in THA.

Increased femoral head size reduces the rate of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). With the introduction of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners in THA there has been a trend towards using larger size femoral heads in relatively smaller cup sizes, theoretically increasing the risk of liner fracture, wear, or aseptic loosening. Short to medium follow-up studies have not demonstrated a negative effect of using thinner HXLPE liners. However, there is concern that these thinner liners may prematurely fail in the long-term, especially in those with thinner liners. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival and revision rates of HXLPE liners in primary THA, as well as the effect of liner thickness on these outcomes. We hypothesized that there would be no significant differences between the different liner thicknesses.

We performed a retrospective database analysis from a single center of all primary total hip replacements using HXLPE liners from 2010 and earlier, including all femoral head sizes. All procedures were performed by fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons. Patient characteristics, implant details including liner thickness, death, and revisions (all causes) were recorded. Patients were grouped for analysis for each millimeter of PE thickness (e.g. 4.0-4.9mm, 5.0-5.9mm). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were estimated with all-cause and aseptic revisions as the endpoints.

A total of 2354 patients (2584 hips) were included (mean age 64.3 years, min-max 19-96). Mean BMI was 29.0 and 47.6% was female. Mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range 11.0-18.8). Liner thickness varied from 4.9 to 12.7 mm. Seven patients had a liner thickness <5.0mm and 859 had a liner thickness of <6.0mm. Head sizes were 28mm (n=85, 3.3%), 32mm (n=1214, 47.0%), 36mm (n=1176, 45.5%), and 40mm (n=109, 4.2%), and 98.4% were metal heads. There were 101 revisions, and in 78 of these cases the liner was revised. Reason for revision was instability/dislocation (n=34), pseudotumor/aseptic lymphocyte-dominant vasculitis associated lesion (n=18), fracture (n=17), early loosening (n=11), infection (n=7), aseptic loosening (n=4), and other (n=10). When grouped by liner thickness, there were no significant differences between the groups when looking at all-cause revision (p=0.112) or aseptic revision (p=0.116).

In our cohort, there were no significant differences in all-cause or aseptic revisions between any of the liner thickness groups at long-term follow-up. Our results indicate that using thinner HXPE liners to maximize femoral head size in THA does not lead to increased complications or liner failures at medium to long term follow-up. As such, orthopedic surgeons can consider the use of larger heads at the cost of liner thickness a safe practice to reduce the risk of dislocation after THA when using HXLPE liners.

The benefit of using acetabular screws in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been questioned in recent years. The disadvantages of using screws include increased operative time, risk of injury to surrounding neurovascular structures and metal ware breakage. Recent large registry studies have reported that screws do not confer a protective effect against acetabular loosening or the presence of osteolysis. Other studies have even described an increased risk of aseptic acetabular loosening with the selective use of screws. We report findings from a multicentre cohort study.

This large cohort study compared clinical outcomes between primary acetabular components that were inserted with and without screws. Independent variables included the presence (or absence) of screws, the total number of screws used and the cumulative screw length (CSL). Outcome measures included all-cause revision, acetabular component revision and acetabular component loosening. Statistical software (Stata/IC 13.1 for Mac [64-bit Intel]) was used to conduct all statistical analyses. A p-value < 0 .05 taken to be significant.

There were 4,583 THAs performed in total. Screws were used in 15.9% (n=733). At a mean follow-up of 5.2 years, the all-cause revision rate in the screw cohort was 1.5% compared to 0.83% in the no screw cohort (p=0.085). There was no difference in acetabular component revision rates for screws (3/733, 0.41%) versus no screws (12/3,850, 0.31%) (p=0.439). The rate of acetabular loosening noted during the time of revision surgery was significantly higher when screws were used in the index procedure (2/733, 0.2%) compared to the no screw cohort (1/3,850, 0.02%) (p=0.017). There was no difference in outcomes when stratifying by the number of screws used or the cumulative screw length.

Primary acetabular components do not require screws for fixation. All cause revision rates and acetabular component revision rates are comparable for the screw and the no screw cohorts. The rate of acetabular component loosening, as observed during revision surgery, is significantly higher when screws are used in the index total hip replacement.

The demand for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has grown significantly in recent years. The two major fixation methods for stems in revision TKA include cemented and ‘hybrid’ fixation. We explore the optimal fixation method using data from recent, well-designed comparative studies.

We performed a systematic review of comparative studies published within the last 10 years with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. To allow for missing data, a random-effects meta-analysis of all available cases was performed. The odds ratio (OR) for the relevant outcome was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. The effects of small studies were analyzed using a funnel plot, and asymmetry was assessed using Egger's test. The primary outcome measure was all-cause failure. Secondary outcome measures included all-cause revision, aseptic revision and radiographic failure.

There was a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems when compared to cemented stems (p = 0.006) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.87). Heterogeneity was 4.3% and insignificant (p = 0.39). There was a trend toward superior hybrid performance for all other outcome measures including all-cause re-revision, aseptic re-revision and radiographic failure.

Recent evidence suggests a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems in revision TKA. There is also a trend favoring the use of hybrid stems for all outcome variables assessed in this study. This is the first time a significant difference in outcome has been demonstrated through systematic review of these two modes of stem fixation. We therefore recommend the use, where possible, of hybrid stems in revision TKA.

With the introduction of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), orthopaedic surgeons have moved towards using larger femoral heads at the cost of thinner liners to decrease the risk of instability. Several short and mid-term studies have shown minimal liner wear with the use HXLPE liners, but the safety of using thinner HXPLE liners to maximize femoral head size remains uncertain and concerns that this may lead to premature failure exist. Our objective was to analyze the outcomes for primary THA done with HXLPE liners in patients who have a 36-mm head or larger and a cup of 52-mm or smaller, with a minimum of 10-year follow-up. Additionally, linear and volumetric wear rates of the HXLPE were evaluated in those with a minimum of seven-year follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be minimal wear and good clinical outcome.

Between 2000 and 2010, we retrospectively identified 55 patients that underwent a primary THA performed in a high-volume single tertiary referral center using HXLPE liners with 36-mm or larger heads in cups with an outer diameter of or 52-mm or smaller. Patient characteristics, implant details including liner thickness, death, complications, and all cause revisions were recorded. Patients that had a minimum radiographic follow-up of seven years were assessed radiographically for linear and volumetric wear. Wear was calculated using ROMAN, a validated open-source software by two independent researchers on anteroposterior X-rays of the pelvis.

A total of 55 patients were identified and included, with a mean age of 74.8 (range 38.67 - 95.9) years and a mean BMI of 28.98 (range 18.87 - 63-68). Fifty-one (94.4%) of patients were female. Twenty-six (47.7%) patients died during the follow-up period. Three patients were revised, none for liner wear, fracture or dissociation. Twenty-two patients had a radiographic follow-up of minimum seven years (mean 9.9 years, min-max 7.5 –13.7) and were included in the long-term radiographic analysis. Liner thickness was 5.5 mm at 45 degrees in all cases but one, who had a liner thickness of 4.7mm, and all patients had a cobalt-chrome head. Cup sizes were 52mm (n=15, 68%) and 50mm (n=7, 32%). Mean linear liner wear was 0.0470 mm/year (range 0 - 0.2628 mm) and mean volumetric wear was 127.69 mm3/year (range 0 - 721.23 mm3/year).

Using HXLPE liners with 36-mm heads or bigger in 52-mm cups or smaller is safe, with low rates of linear and volumetric wear in the mid to long-term follow-up. Patients did not require revision surgery for liner complications, including liner fracture, dissociation, or wear. Our results suggest that the advantages of using larger heads should outweigh the potential risks of using thin HXLPE liners.

Fully constrained liners are used to treat recurrent dislocations or patients at high risk after total hip replacements. However, they can cause significant morbidities including recurrent dislocations, infections, aseptic loosening and fractures. We examine long term results of 111 patients with tripolar constrained components to assess their redislocation and failure rate.

The purpose of this study was to assess survivorship, complications and functional outcomes at a minimum 10 years after the constrained tripolar liners used in our institute.

We retrospectively identified 111 patients who had 113 revision tripolar constrained liners between 1998 and 2008. Eighty-nine were revised due to recurrent dislocations, 11 for pseudotumor with dysfunctional abductors, and 13 for periprosthetic infection with loss of soft tissue stabilizers. All patients had revision hip arthroplasty before the constrained liner was used: 13 after the first revision, 17 after the second, 38 after the third, and 45 had more than 3 revisions. We extracted demographics, implant data, rate of dislocations and incidence of other complications. Kaplan Meier curves were used to assess dislocation and failure for any reason. WOMAC was used to assess quality of life.

At 10 years, the survival free of dislocation was 95.6% (95%CI 90- 98), and at 20 years to 90.6% (95% CI 81- 95.5). Eight patients (7.1%) had dislocations of their constrained liners: 1 patient had simultaneous periprosthetic infection identified at the time of open reduction, and 1 patient sustained stem fracture 3 months prior to the liner dislocation. At 10 years, the survival to any further surgery was 89.4% (95% CI 82–93.8), and at 20 years, this was 82.5 (95% CI 71.9–89.3). Five patients (4.4%) had deep infection: 4 of these had excision arthroplasty due to failure to control infection, while 1 patient was treated successfully with debridement, exchange of mobile components and intravenous antibiotics. Two patients (1.8%) had dissociated rings that required change of liner, ring and head. Two patients (1.8%) had periprosthetic femoral fractures that were treated by revision stems and exchange of constrained liners. The mean WOMAC functional and pain scores were 66.2 and 75.9 of 100, respectively.

Constrained tripolar liners in our institute provided favourable results in the long term for recurrent dislocation hip arthroplasty with dysfunctional hip stabilizers. Infection in these patients can prove to be difficult to treat due to their poor soft tissue conditions from repeated surgeries. Comparing long terms results from other types of constrained liners is essential to evaluate these salvage liners.

High complication rates and poor outcomes have been widely reported in patients undergoing revision of large head metal-on-metal arthroplasty. A previous study from our centre showed high rates of dislocation, nerve injury, early cup loosening and pseudotumor recurrence. After noting these issues, we implemented the following changes in surgical protocol in all large head MOM revisions: One: Use of highly porous shells in all cases. Two: Use of largest femoral head possible. Three: Low threshold for use of dual mobility and constrained liners when abductors affected or absent posterior capsule. Four: Use of ceramic head with titanium sleeve in all cases. Five: Partial resection of pseudotumor adjacent to sciatic and femoral nerves.

The purpose of the present study is to compare the new surgical protocol above to our previously reported early complications in this group of patients

We specifically looked at (1) complications including reoperations, (2) radiologic outcomes, and (3) functional outcomes. Complication rates after (Group 1), and before (Group 2) modified surgical protocol were compared using Chi-square test, assuming statistical significance p < 0 .05.

Major complications occurred in 4 (8.3%) of 48 patients who had modified surgical technique, compared to 12 (38%) of 32 revisions prior to modification (p < 0 .05). Two hips of 48 (4.17%) endured dislocations in Group 1, compared to 9 of 32 (28%) in Group 2 (p < 0 .05). Four patients of 48 had repeat revision in Group 1: 2 for recurrence of pseudotumor, 1 for dislocation, and 1 for infection, compared to 6 patients who had 7 repeat revisions of 32 patients in Group 2: 3 for acetabular loosening, 3 for dislocation, and 1 for recurrence of pseudotumor (p=0.1). None of 48 revisions in Group 1 had acetabular loosening, compared to 4 of 32 in Group 2 (p=0.02). Two patients had nerve injury in Group 2, compared to none in Group 1 (p=0.16). The mean WOMAC pain score was 87.1 of 100 and the function score was 88.4 of 100 in Group 1, compared to a mean WOMAC pain score of 78 of 100 (p=0.6) and a function score of 83 of 100 in Group 2 (p=0.8).

Modification of the surgical techniques described in the introduction has resulted in a significant decrease in complications in revision of large head MOM total hips. We continue to use this protocol and recommend it for these difficult cases.

Two stage exchange has been the gold standard in North America for the treatment of infected knee replacements. The choice of static vs. articulated spacers has been debated for a number of years.

At our institution our choice of spacer for 2 stage exchanges is an articulated spacer. This allows motion between stages which facilitates recovery, and makes the second stage technically easier. In a study from our institution we followed 115 infected TKAs treated with the PROSTALAC articulated spacer for 5–9 years. Success for eradication of infection was 88%. With a repeat 2 stage, overall infection control was 98%. In addition, we compared functional outcomes to a group of aseptic knee revisions and found no difference in functional outcomes with standard quality of life outcome scores.

While the articulated spacer was our treatment of choice in 2 stage exchange around 2012, the company that manufactured the PROSTALAC knee components ceased to manufacture them. At that time, based on the work of 2 previous studies (Hofmann, Lee), we continued to use articulated spacers. However, this was now the so-called Hofmann technique with a new standard femoral component with an all polyethylene tibia. The only difference from a standard knee revision was no stems and the utilization of high dose antibiotics. We also followed the principles from Europe of one stage exchange, such as wide debridement and soaking in dilute betadine for 15 minutes.

More recently as of Sept 2015 we have used an all polyethylene tibia with a keel. The hope being that this will give a more stable tibia than previous and perhaps make a second stage unnecessary. Our first case was September 2015. The intention was not to do a second stage if the infection was eradicated and the patient had good pain relief and function. To date we have implanted 28 of these and in 80% of cases we have not had to do a second stage revision. Further study will reveal where this inadvertent one stage fits in our practi

I believe ceramic-on-polyethylene should be used in all patients undergoing THA. I believe the issues that one must look at include wear and osteolysis, bearing fracture and in 2018 corrosion/adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR). If one looks at these aspects it is clear ceramic-on-polyethylene is the bearing of choice.

In the literature, there is a paucity of studies comparing metal-on-polyethylene with ceramic-on-polyethylene total hips. The data suggests no real difference in survivorship but less wear. However, most studies are not comparative studies and are underpowered to see these differences. The only data that is powered to see these differences is registry data. In first decade survivorship of metal-on- polyethylene is similar to ceramic-on-polyethylene. However, in the second decade the advantage is clearly with ceramic-on-polyethylene.

However, in 2018, the major issue is corrosion and subsequent ALTR. While corrosion at the femoral head and stem taper has been seen for many years, in 2012 an article by Cooper et al. highlighted that this corrosion may lead to ALTR. They reported on 10 cases with variable presentation and no specific factor was found in their study or any study to date that will lead to corrosion and ALTR. More recently, a study from our center highlighted that dislocation may be the first presentation of ALTR. In this study, 10 cases of dislocation presented at an mean of 8 months with their first dislocation. Components were well positioned and it was concluded that the ALTR was the cause for the dislocation. Today any patient with new onset pain, stiffness or instability with a metal-on-polyethylene THA should be worked up for ALTR.

The question of why this is happening now is important to answer. Numerous theories have been proposed, most likely it is a combination of these factors: change in trunnion dimension/surface, increasing head size, trunnion preparation and impaction force. It also appears to be stem dependent. In a study by McGrory et al. they found a 1% prevalence of ALTR in just over 1300 cases with one particular femoral stem.

At present, however, we cannot predict at all which patient will develop ALTR and therefore we have gone to ceramic-on-polyethylene in all our THAs.

In summary, the ideal bearing has low wear, low corrosion potential, generalizable, easy to revise, versatile, biocompatible and safe. In 2018, ceramic-on-polyethylene as a bearing fulfills all these criteria and should be the bearing of choice in total hip replacement.

The goals of revision total hip on the femoral side are to achieve long term stable fixation, improve quality of life and minimise complications such as intra-operative fracture or dislocation. Ideally these stems will preserve or restore bone stock. Modular titanium stems were first introduced in North America around 2000. They gained popularity as an option for treating Paprosky 3B and 4 defects.

Several studies at our institution have compared modular titanium stems with monoblock cobalt chromium stems. The main outcomes of interest were quality of life. We also looked at complications such as intra-operative fracture and post-operative dislocation. We also compared these 2 stems with respect to restoration or preservation of bone stock. In 2 studies we showed that modular titanium stems gave superior functional outcomes as well as decreased complications compared to a match cohort of monoblock cobalt chromium stems.

As mentioned, one of the initial reasons for introduction of these stems was to address larger femoral defects where failure rates with monoblock cobalt chromium stems were unacceptably high. We followed a group of 65 patients at 5–10 years post revision with a modular fluted titanium stem. Excellent fixation was obtained with no cases of aseptic loosening. However, there were 5 cases of fracture of the modular junction.

Due to concerns of fracture of the modular junction, more recently, at our institution, we have switched to almost 100% monoblock fluted titanium stems. We recently reviewed our first 100 cases of femoral revision with a monoblock stem. Excellent fixation was achieved with no cases of aseptic loosening. Quality of life outcomes were similar to our previous reported series on modular tapered titanium stems.

Both monoblock and modular fluted titanium stems can give excellent fixation and excellent functional outcomes. This leaves a choice for the surgeon. For the low volume revision surgeon modular tapered stems are probably the right choice.

Higher volume surgeons or surgeons very comfortable with performing femoral revision may want to consider monoblock stems. If one is making the switch it would be easiest to start with a simple case. Such a case would be one that can be done with a endofemoral approach. In this approach the greater trochanter is available as the key landmark for reaming. After the surgeon is comfortable with this stem more complex cases can easily be handled with the monoblock stem.

In summary, both modular and monoblock titanium stems are excellent options for femoral revision. As one becomes more familiar with the monoblock stem it can easily become your workhorse for femoral revision. At our institution we introduced a monoblock titanium stem in 2011. It started out at 50% of cases and now it is virtually used in almost 100% of revision cases.

Intra-operative fractures of the femur are on the rise mainly due to the increased use of cementless implants and the desire to get a tight press fit. The prevalence has been reported to be between 1–5% in cementless THAs. The key to preventing these fractures is to identify patients at high risk and careful surgical technique. Surgical risk factors include the use of cementless devices, revision hip surgery, the use of flat tapered wedges and MIS surgery. Patient factors that increased risk include increasing age, female gender, osteopenia and rheumatoid arthritis. These risk factors tend to be additive and certainly when more than one is present extra caution needs to be taken.

Surgical technique is critical to avoid these intra-operative fractures. Fractures can occur during exposure and dislocation, during implant removal (in revision THA), during canal preparation and most commonly during stem insertion. In both primary, and especially in revision, THA be wary of the stiff hip in association with osteopenia or osteolysis. These patients require a very gentle dislocation. If this cannot be achieved, then alteration of the standard approach and dislocation may be needed. Examples of these include protrusion with an osteopenic femur and revision THA with a very stiff hip with lysis in the femur. Lastly, in cases with retained hardware, dislocate prior to removing plates and screws.

After dislocation, the next challenge is gentle preparation of the femoral canal. A reasonable exposure is required to access the femoral canal safely. MIS procedures do not offer good access to femoral canal and this probably results in increased risk of fracture during broaching or implant insertion. When broaching, stop when broach will not advance further. When inserting a tapered wedge stem, be worried if stem goes further in than broach.

In revision surgery, when taking the stem out from above, make sure the area of the greater trochanter does not overhang the canal. A high speed burr can clear the shoulder for easier access for removal. In revision THA with an ETO, place a cerclage wire prior to reaming and retighten prior to stem insertion.

Even with careful surgical technique intra-operative femoral fractures will still occur. When inserting the stem, a sudden change in resistance is highly suggestive of fracture. Wide exposure of the entire proximal femur is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. The distal extent of the fracture must be seen. Only on occasion is an intra-operative radiograph needed. Management is directed to ensuring component stability and good fracture fixation. In primary total hip arthroplasty, calcar fractures are by far the most common. If using proximal fixation and you are certain the stem is stable, then all that is needed is cerclage wiring. As already mentioned, you must follow the fracture line distally so you are aware of how far down it goes. Often what appears to be a calcar split actually propagates distal to the lesser trochanter. In these cases, one would probably go for distal fixation plus wiring.

In conclusion, intra-operative femoral fractures are on the rise. Prevention is the key.

The goals of revision total hip on the femoral side are to achieve long term stable fixation, improve quality of life and minimise complications such as intra-operative fracture or dislocation. Ideally these stems will preserve or restore bone stock. Modular titanium stems were first introduced in North America around 2000. They gained popularity as an option for treating Paprosky 3B and 4 defects.

Several studies at our institution have compared the modular titanium stems with monoblock cobalt chromium stems. The main outcomes of interest were quality of life. We also looked at complications such as intra-operative fracture and post-operative dislocation. We also compared these 2 stems with respect to restoration or preservation of bone stock. In 2 studies we showed that modular titanium stems gave superior functional outcomes as well as decreased complications compared to a match cohort of monoblock cobalt chromium stems.

As mentioned one of the initial reasons for introduction of these stems was to address larger femoral defects where failure rates with monoblock cobalt chromium stems were unacceptably high. We followed a group of 65 patients at 5–10 years post-revision with a modular fluted titanium stem. Excellent fixation was obtained with no cases of aseptic loosening. However, there were 5 cases of fracture of the modular junction.

Due to concerns of fracture of the modular junction more recently at our institution we have switched to almost 100% monoblock fluted titanium stems. We recently reviewed our first 100 cases of femoral revision with monoblock stem. Excellent fixation was achieved with no cases of aseptic loosening. Quality of life outcomes were similar to our previous reported series on modular tapered titanium stems.

Both monoblock and modular fluted titanium stems can give excellent fixation and excellent functional outcomes. This leaves a choice for the surgeon. For the low volume revision surgeon modular tapered stems are probably the right choice.

Higher volume surgeons or surgeons very comfortable with performing femoral revision may want to consider monoblock stems. If one is making the switch it would be easiest to start with a simple case. Such a case would be one that can be done with an endofemoral approach. In this the greater trochanter is available as the key landmark for reaming. After the surgeon is comfortable with this stem more complex cases can easily be handled with the monoblock stem.

In summary, both modular and monoblock titanium stems are excellent options for femoral revision. As one becomes more familiar with the monoblock stem it can easily become your workhorse for femoral revision. At our institution we introduced a monoblock titanium stem in 2011. It started out at 50% of cases and now it is virtually used in almost 100% of revision cases.

Two stage exchange has been the gold standard in North America for the treatment of infected knee replacements. The choice of static versus articulated spacers has been debated for a number of years.

At our institution our choice of spacer for two-stage exchanges is an articulated spacer. This allows motion between stages which facilitates recovery, and makes the second stage technically easier. In a study from our institution we followed 115 infected TKAs treated with the PROSTALAC articulated spacer for 5–9 years. Success for eradication of infection was 88%. With a repeat two stage overall infection control was 98%. In addition we compared functional outcomes to a group of aseptic knee revisions and found no difference in functional outcomes with standard quality of life outcome scores.

While the articulated spacer was our treatment of choice in two-stage exchange around 2012 the company that manufactured the PROSTALAC knee components ceased to manufacture them. At that time based on the work of 2 previous studies (Hofmann, Lee), our institution continued to use articulated spacers. However, this was now the so-called Hofmann technique with a new standard femoral component with an all-polyethylene tibia. The only difference from a standard knee revision was no stems and the utilisation of high dose antibiotics. We also followed the principles from Europe of one-stage exchange, such as wide debridement and soaking in dilute betadine for 15 minutes.

More recently, as of Sept 2015, we have used an all-polyethylene tibia with a keel. The hope being that this will give a more stable tibia than previous and perhaps make a second stage unnecessary. Our first case was September 2015. The intention was not to do a second stage if the infection was eradicated and the patient had good pain relief and function. To date we have implanted 12 of these and in all cases we have not had to do a second stage revision. Further study will reveal where this inadvertent one stage fits in our practice.

Trunnionosis, due to mechanical wear and/or corrosion at the head stem taper junction, can occur in metal on polyethylene (MOP) hip implants. In some patients this results in severe soft tissue destruction or Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris (ARMD). The amount of material required to cause ARMD is unknown but analyses of retrieved hips may provide the answer to this clinically important question.

We collected implants from 20 patients with failed hips with MOP bearings, revised due to ARMD. We collected clinical, imaging and blood test data. We graded the severity of taper corrosion (1 to 4), and quantified the volume of material loss from this junction. We compared our results with previous data collected for metal-on-metal (MOM) hips.

The median time to revision of the MOP hips was 51.3 (23.1–56.4) months. All head tapers were moderately to severely corroded with a median corrosion score of 4. The median (range) of total material loss at the taper of the MOP hips was 3.9 mm³ (2.96 – 7.85 mm³) and the material loss rate was 1.4 mm³ / year (0.56 – 1.82).

Comparison with MOM hips revealed no significant difference in taper material loss (p=0.7344) with a median rate of 0.81 mm³ / year (0.01–3.45).

We are the first to quantify the volume of material loss at the head taper of hip implants with MOP bearings that were revised due to trunnionosis. This data indicates that a clinically significant dose of cobalt and chromium to induce ARMD is approximately 1.4 mm³ / year.

We have identified a clinically significant volume of taper material loss in MOP hips.

Intra-operative fractures of the femur are on the rise mainly due to the increased use of cementless implants and the desire to get a tight pressfit. The prevalence has been reported to be between 1–5% in cementless total hip arthroplasties (THAs). The key to preventing these fractures is to identify patients at high risk and careful surgical technique. Surgical risk factors include the use of cementless devices, revision hip surgery, the use of flat tapered wedges and MIS surgery. Patient factors that increased risk include increasing age, female gender, osteopenia and rheumatoid arthritis. These risk factors tend to be additive and certainly when more than one is present extra caution needs to be taken.

Surgical technique is critical to avoid these intra-operative fractures. Fractures can occur during exposure and dislocation, during implant removal (in revision THA), during canal preparation and most commonly during stem insertion. In both primary and especially in revision THA, be wary of the stiff hip in association with osteopenia or osteolysis. These patients require a very gentle dislocation. If this cannot be achieved, then alteration of the standard approach and dislocation may be needed. Examples of these include protrusion with an osteopenic femur and revision THA with a very stiff hip with lysis in the femur. Lastly, in cases with retained hardware, dislocate prior to removing plates and screws.

After dislocation, the next challenge is gentle preparation of the femoral canal. A reasonable exposure is required to access the femoral canal safely. MIS procedures do not offer as good access to femoral canal and this probably results in increased risk of fracture during broaching or implant insertion. When broaching, stop when broach will not advance further. When inserting a tapered wedge stem, be worried if stem goes further in than broach.

In revision surgery when taking the stem out from above, make sure the greater trochanter does not overhang the canal. A high speed burr can clear the shoulder for easier access for removal. In revision THA with an ETO place a cerclage wire prior to reaming and retighten prior to stem insertion.

Even with careful surgical technique intra-operative femoral fractures will still occur. When inserting the stem a sudden change in resistance is highly suggestive of fracture. Wide exposure of the entire proximal femur is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. The distal extent of the fracture must be seen. Only on occasion is an intra-operative radiograph needed. Management is directed to ensuring component stability and good fracture fixation. In primary total hip arthroplasty calcar fractures are by far the most common. If using proximal fixation and you are certain the stem is stable, then all that is needed is cerclage wiring. As already mentioned, you must follow the fracture line distally so you are aware of how far down it goes. Often what appears to be a calcar split actually propagates distal to the lesser trochanter. In these cases, one would probably go for distal fixation plus wiring.

In conclusion intra-operative femoral fractures are on the rise. Prevention is the key. If a fracture, exposure is the key to deciding on a treatment plan.

Two stage exchange has been the gold standard in north America for the treatment of infected knee replacements. The choice of static versus articulated spacers has been debated for a number of years.

At our institution our choice of spacer for 2 stage exchanges is an articulated spacer. This allows motion between stages which facilitates recovery, and makes the second stage technically easier. In a study from our institution we followed 115 infected TKAs treated with the PROSTALAC articulated spacer for 5–9 years. Success for eradication of infection was 88%. With a repeat two stage overall infection control was 98%. In addition we compared functional outcomes to a group of aseptic knee revisions and found no difference in functional outcomes with standard quality of life outcome scores.

While the articulated spacers was our treatment of choice in 2 stage exchange around 2012 the company that manufactured the PROSTALAC knee components ceased to manufacture them. At that time based on the work of 2 previous studies (Hofmann, Lee), at our institution we continued to use articulated spacers. However, this was now the so called Hofmann technique with a new standard femoral component with an all polyethylene tibia. The only difference from a standard knee revision was no stems and the utilization of high dose antibiotics. We also followed the principles from Europe of one stage exchange, such as wide debridement and soaking in dilute betadine for 15 minutes.

More recently as of Sept 2015 we have used an all-polyethylene tibia with a keel. The hope being that this will give a more stable tibia than previous and perhaps make a second stage unnecessary. Our first case was September 2015. The intention was not to do a second stage if the infection was eradicated and the patient had good pain relief and function. To date we have implanted 12 of these and in all cases we have not had to do a second stage revision. Further study will reveal where this inadvertent one stage fits in our practice.

In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), acetabular reconstruction while dealing with severe bone loss is a challenge. The porous tantalum revision acetabular shells have been in use for the past decade. Several reports have documented successful use at early to mid-term follow up. There is, however, very little literature around the long-term survival and quality of life outcome with the use of these shells.

We reviewed the results of 46 acetabular revisions with Paprosky 2 and 3 acetabular bone defects reconstructed with a hemispheric, tantalum acetabular shell and multiple supplementary screws. There were 31 females. Average age at revision was 64 years (range 23–85 years). The mean and median follow up was 11 years (range 10–12 years, SD 1). Morselised femoral allograft was used in 34 hips to fill contained cavitary defectes. Bulk femoral allografting was performed in 2 hips.

At a minimum follow-up of 10 (range 10–12) years, the survivorship of the porous tantalum acetabular shell, with revision of the shell as end point was 96%. The minimum 10-year survivorship with hip revision for any reason as end point was 92%. We noted excellent pain relief (mean WOMAC pain 92.6) and good functional outcome (mean WOMAC function 90.3, mean UCLA 5); and generic quality of life measures (mean SF-12 physical component 48.3; mean SF-12 mental component 56.7). Patient satisfaction with pain relief, function and return to recreational activities were noted to be excellent.

Cementless acetabular revision with the tantalum acetabular shell demonstrated excellent clinical and quality of life outcomes at minimum 10-year follow-up. As far as we are aware this is the first report of minimum 10-year follow up of use of this technique for revision hip arthroplasty.

Revision surgery for pelvic discontinuity in the presence of bone loss is challenging. The cup-cage reconstruction option has become popular for the management of pelvic discontinuity in the recent years. The aim of this study was to review the clinical, radiological and patient reported outcomes with the use of cup cage construct for pelvic discontinuity at our institution.

Twenty-seven patients (27 cup-cage reconstructions) were identified at median 6-year (minimum 2 year, maximum 10 years) follow up. Eight were female patients. The median age was 77 years [mean 72, range 37–90, SD 13.6]. There were 5 deaths and 2 were lost to follow up.

Two patients were converted to excision arthroplasty; one for infection and one for failure of the construct. A further 3 patients required revision for instability but the cup cage construct was not revised (2 revisions of cemented cups to a constrained cup and one revision of proximal modular component of the femoral prosthesis). Revision of the cup cage construct was not necessary in any of these cases. We noted excellent pain relief (mean WOMAC pain 85.6) and good functional outcome (mean WOMAC function 78.2, mean UCLA 5, mean OHS 78.6). Patient satisfaction with regards pain relief; function and return to activities were noted to be excellent. Radiological changes were noted in further 4 patients (cup migration in one case; fracture of ischial spike in one case and breakage of the cage screws in 2 patients). No migration of the construct was noted in any of the cases.

In conclusion, the cup cage construct is an excellent method of dealing with complex pelvic discontinuity. Our study suggests a low failure rate; high patient satisfaction and pain relief and moderate functional outcome at median 6 year follow up.

The prevalence of pseudotumours in patients with large-head metal-on-metal (MOM) THA has been the subject of implant recalls and warnings from various regulatory agencies. To date, there is no consensus on whether ultrasound or MRI is superior for the detection and following the progression of pseudotumours. Ultrasound is relatively cheap but can be operator dependent. MARS MRI has the advantage of excellent visibility of the soft tissue. However, MRI comes at a marked increase cost and takes about twice as long to perform.

At our institution, we prospectively compared ultrasound to MRI for pseudotumour detection in an asymptomatic cohort of patients with MOM THAs.

We enrolled 40 patients with large-head MOM THAs in the study. The mean age was 54 years (range, 34–76 years). The mean time from surgery was 54 months (range, 40–81 months). There were 28 men and 12 women. All patients underwent ultrasound and MRI using slice encoding for metal artifact correction. The gold standard was defined as follows: if both ultrasound and MRI agreed, this was interpreted as concordant and the result was considered accurate.

Ultrasound and MRI agreed in 37 of 40 patients (93%). The prevalence of pseudotumours was 31% (12 of 39) in our cohort. Twenty-three of 39 patients (59%) had completely normal tests and four (10%) had simple fluid collections. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96% while MRI had a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 100%.

Conclusions: A negative ultrasound rules out pseudotumour in asymptomatic patients as this test is 100% sensitive. Given its lower cost, we recommend ultrasound as the initial screening tool for pseudotumours.

More recently, Kwon et al have compared ultrasound to MARS MRI for following the progression of pseudotumours. They found a strong agreement between the 2 modalities for assessing change in size and consistency of pseudotumours.

Two-stage exchange has been the gold standard in North America for the treatment of infected knee replacements. The choice of static versus articulated spacers has been debated for a number of years.

At our institution our choice of spacer for 2-stage exchanges is an articulated spacer. This allows motion between stages which facilitates recovery, and makes the second stage technically easier. In a study from our institution we followed 115 infected TKAs treated with the PROSTALAC articulated spacer for 5–9 years. Success for eradication of infection was 88%. With a repeat two-stage, overall infection control was 98%. In addition, we compared functional outcomes to a group of aseptic knee revisions and found no difference in functional outcomes with standard quality of life outcome scores.

While the articulated spacers were our treatment of choice in 2-stage exchange, around 2012 the company that manufactured the PROSTALAC knee components ceased to manufacture them, based on the work of 2 previous studies (Hofmann, Lee). At our institution, we continued to use articulated spacers. However, this was now the so-called Hofmann technique with a new standard femoral component with an all-polyethylene tibia. The only difference from a standard knee revision was no stems and the utilization of high dose antibiotics.

Around the same time as we instituted the change in articulated spacers, results out of Europe were showing promising results with one-stage exchange. In September 2015, our technique was modified to now include an all-polyethylene tibia with a keel. To date we have no results but it is our hope that a high percent of these will achieve stable fixation and will then have a one-stage exchange.

The goals of revision total hip on the femoral side are to achieve long term stable fixation, improve quality of life and minimise complications such as intra-operative fracture or dislocation. Ideally these stems will preserve or restore bone stock. Modular titanium stems were first introduced in North America around 2000. They gained popularity as an option for treating Paprosky 3B and 4 defects.

Several studies at our institution have compared the modular titanium stems with monoblock cobalt chromium stems. The main outcomes of interest were quality of life. We also looked at complications such as intra-operative fracture and post-operative dislocation. We also compared these 2 stems with respect to restoration or preservation of bone stock. In two studies we showed that modular titanium stems gave superior functional outcomes as well as decreased complications compared to a matched cohort of monoblock cobalt chromium stems.

As mentioned one of the initial reasons for introduction of these stems was to address larger femoral defects where failure rates with monoblock cobalt chromium stems were unacceptably high. We followed a group of 65 patients at 5–10 years post-revision with a modular fluted titanium stem. Excellent fixation was obtained with no cases of aseptic loosening. However, there were 5 cases of fracture of the modular junction.

Due to concerns of fracture of the modular junction more recently, at our institution we have switched to almost 100% monoblock fluted titanium stems. We recently reviewed our first 100 cases of femoral revision with monoblock stem. Excellent fixation was achieved with no cases of aseptic loosening. Quality of life outcomes were similar to our previous reported series on modular tapered titanium stems.

Both monoblock and modular fluted titanium stems can give excellent fixation and excellent functional outcomes. This leaves a choice for the surgeon. For the low volume revision surgeon modular tapered stems are probably the right choice.

Higher volume surgeons or surgeons very comfortable with performing femoral revision may want to consider monoblock stems. If one is making the switch it would be easiest to start with a simple case. Such a case would be one that can be done through an endofemoral approach. In this the greater trochanter is available as the key landmark for reaming. After the surgeon is comfortable with this system more complex cases can easily be handled with the monoblock stem.

In summary, both modular and monoblock titanium stems are excellent options for femoral revision. As one becomes more familiar with the monoblock stem it can easily become your workhorse for femoral revision. At our institution, we introduced a monoblock titanium stem in 2011. It started out at 50% of cases and now it is virtually used in almost 100% of revision cases

The anterior pelvic plane (APP) is used as a reference in various pelvic surgeries in orthopaedics. Current methods for identifying the APP are limited in accuracy and efficiency. A quick and accurate method for registering the pelvis orientation can be very useful. Previously, we have introduced a Tracked C-arm (TC-arm) system for use with any C-arm fluoroscopy for producing spatially calibrated imaging views. This system has been tried for estimating the APP. Early results, however, has shown limited repeatability in identifying the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) landmarks. This study improves the previous algorithms for a robust registration of the APP.

A Sawbone pelvis was used, and its APP was marked by radio-dense ball-bearings. In the new addition, the TC-arm allowed segmenting the ASIS in an interactive user-interface by taking guidance from a reference line tangential to the ipsilateral pubic tubercle for marking the most anterior point on the iliac-crest. The imaging and analysis was repeated 10 times. The results were compared to reconstruction of the fiducial markers placed on the true APP.

Accuracy of 1.4° and 4.4° were found for registering the pelvic tilt and rotation, correspondingly. The overall accuracy and precision of registration of the APP were 4.7° and 0.82°, correspondingly. The new method showed 7.5 times improvement in repeatability of measuring the pelvic tilt (SD<0.4°) compared to the previous fluoroscopic methods. This technique addresses an important challenge in estimation of the pelvic bone which is crucial for reliable device placement and producing standard radiographic views in surgery.

The prevalence of pseudotumours in patients with large-head metal-on-metal (MOM) THA has been the subject of implant recalls and warnings from various regulatory agencies. To date, there is no consensus on whether ultrasound or MRI is superior for the detection of pseudotumours. Ultrasound is relatively cheap but can be operator dependent. MARS MRI has the advantage of excellent visibility of the soft tissue. However MRI comes at a marked increase cost and takes about twice as long to perform.

At our institution we prospectively compared ultrasound to MRI for pseudotumour detection in an asymptomatic cohort of patients with MOM THAs.

Segmental defects of the acetabulum are often encountered in revision surgery. Many times these can be handled with hemispherical cups. However when larger defects are encountered particularly involving the dome and/or posterior wall structural support for the cup is often needed. In the past structural allograft was used but for the last 12 years at our institution trabecular metal augments have been used in the place of structural allograft in all cases. This talk will focus on technique and mid-term results using augments in association with an uncemented revision shell.

The technique can be broken down into 6 steps outlined below: 1. Exposure, 2. Reaming, 3. Trialing, 4. Augment Inserted, 5. Cup Insertion/Stabilization, 6. Trial Reduction/Liner Cementation

A recent study was undertaken to assess the mid-term results of this technique. We prospectively followed the first 56 patients in whom these augments were utilised in combination with a trabecular metal acetabular component in our unit. Details of this study will be presented.

The median follow up of the surviving patients was 110 months (range 88–128 months). Survivorship of the augments at 10 years was 92.2% (95% CI: 97.0–80.5%). In one case the augment was revised for infection and in 3 for loosening. In 1 of the revised cases there was a pre-operative pelvic discontinuity, the other 2 discontinuities in the series were not revised and remain asymptomatic.

MRSA/MRSE infections appear to be increasing in prevalence and virulence. Prevalence has increased from 2.4% of all infected TJAs in 1975 to 37% in 2006.

In addition work from several centers has shown that cure rates for these infections are far below that of nonresistant organisms. In a recent study from our institution 50 consecutive cases of MRSA/MRSE were treated with two-stage exchange with a Prostalac spacer as the interval operation. Final reinfection rate was 18% which was far worse than the 4% failure reported from our center in MS staph species. This high failure rate is supported by work from other centers.

Clearly with the increasing prevalence and virulence of MRSA/MRSE new strategies are needed. The rest of this talk will focus on 2 different strategies: prevention and treatment.

Prevention strategies can either target carriers or all patients. In a study by Kim et al. carriers were targeted and they reported a 50% reduction in surgical site infections. At our institution a recent program was implemented where all surgical patients were targeted. Results from this will be presented.

While prevention strategies seem quite hopeful new treatment options have to be looked at. Traditionally vancomycin has been the mainstay of local and systemic treatment. Other options currently being explored include such agents as fusidic acid, daptomycin and liniazid. Research is looking at the effectiveness of these agents both locally and systemically.

MRSA/MRSE infections are becoming increasingly difficult to treat. New strategies for combatting these will include both new prevention and treatment strategies as outlined in this talk.

INTRODUCTION

Poor acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can cause dislocation and impingement, and lead to osteolysis (Little et al., 2009) and inflammatory soft tissue reactions (Haan et al., 2008). While the intrinsic accuracy of cup positioning in navigation is reported as low as 1° (Parratte et al., 2009), a large anterior pelvic tilt may lead to an offset of the same magnitude in the final cup anteversion (Wolf et al., 2005). The objectives of this study are to demonstrate feasibility of a new, non-invasive radiographic tool for accurate preoperative determination of a patient's specific pelvis angle, and intraoperative and postoperative assessment of the acetabular cup orientation with respect to boney landmarks.

Introduction

Achieving durable implant–host bone fixation is the major challenge in uncemented revision hip arthroplasty when significant bone stock deficiencies are encountered. The purpose of this study was to develop an experimental model which would simulate the clinical revision hip scenario and to determine the effects of alendronate coating on porous tantalum on gap filling and bone ingrowth in the experimental model.

Introduction

Despite advances in surgical technique and prosthetics there continues to be a number of patients who are dissatisfied with the results of their knee replacement procedure. The outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported frequently with use of condition-specific measures, but patient satisfaction has not been well studied.

Purpose: Recently, there has been concern raised on the occurrence of pseudotumors after metal on metal hip resurfacing. A pseudotumor is defined as a local soft tissue mass associated with localized bony and/or tissue (muscle) destruction. The primary purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of this complication in several high volume Canadian academic centres.

Method: Nine of the 11 Canadian academic centres who perform metal on metal hip resurfacings were surveyed. The number of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties performed at each centre was first determined, as were the number of those who have presented with a pseudotumour, and subsequently gone on to revision surgery. The basic demographics of the group were recorded, as were the radiographic and implant design variables for those cases presenting with a pseudotumour.

Results: A sample of 3,400 hip resurfacing arthroplasties performed between 2002 and December 2008 were surveyed. Demographics were tabulated for a sub-sample of these patients. 76% were male, the mean length of follow-up was 3.02 years, mean BMI was 28.65, and mean age was 52.10 years. Three of 3,400 cases presented with a pseudotumour, an incidence of .09%.

Conclusion: Although pseudotumors remain a concern after metal on metal hip resurfacing, the incidence at short to mid term follow-up is very low in this multi-centre academic survey. This information is significantly lower than what other groups have recently reported. Continued close monitoring is required in order to determine what clinical factors are at play.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and outcomes of the ‘abductor sparing’ MIS Anterolateral approach (MIS Watson Jones/G3) in comparison to the MIS Direct Lateral and MIS Posterolateral approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Method: A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate for the superiority of the new MIS Anterolateral approach (MIS Watson Jones/ G3). The sample size calculation was performed for alpha .05, power .90, to evaluate for effect size 0.5 in WOMAC using repeated measures analyses with baseline WOMAC as covariate. A total of 156 patients consented to participate in the trial and patients were assigned to MIS Antero-lateral approach or alternate MIS approach (MIS Direct Lateral or MIS Posterolateral). Patients were subjected to standardized anaesthetic and perioperative management protocols and were evaluated at standardized intervals to evaluate endpoints of early recovery (3 months) as well as endpoints of 12 and 24 months respectively. The primary outcome of interest was WOMAC, however secondary outcomes included SF-36, as well as parameters of health resource utilization and complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were perfomed.

Results: Patient groups were found to be similar at baseline with regards to demographics and baseline quality of life outcomes (p> .05). Multivariate and repeated measures analyses demonstrated no superiority of the MIS Anterolateral approach on outcomes of WOMAC and other quality of life measures in comparison to MIS Direct Lateral and MIS Posterolateral approaches (p> .05). Health care resource utlization was also similar with length of stay, blood transfusion requirements and complications (p> .05).

Conclusion: Our multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial demonstrates that the MIS Anterolateral approach is not superior to alternate MIS surgical approaches when evaluating outcomes of quality of life, complications, and health resource utilization. Surgeons should consider these outcomes, complications, and other relevant advantages and disadvantages of select surgical approaches when deciding on a technique for use in their orthopaedic practice.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate a consecutive series of patients receiving metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty with regards to outcomes and complications at minimum of 2 years follow-up.

Method: A prospective evaluation of all patients receiving hip resurfacing was performed including baseline evaluation (demographics, WOMAC, SF12, Oxford Hip Score) and minimum 2 year follow-up assessment (WOMAC, SF12, Oxford Hip Score, UCLA activity score, Patient Satisfaction, Complications). No patients were lost to follow-up.

Results: 143 hips in 127 patients received metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The mean age was 52 years and the primary diagnosis was osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis, Significant improvements were noticed across all baseline quality of life instruments (p< .05) with final mean WOMAC and Oxford Scores 95 (normalized 0–100). Final post-op satisfaction was mean 95 out of 100. Two patient sustained post-operative femoral neck fractures and required revision. An additional two patients required revision for ongoing hip pain. One patient sustained a sciatic nerve palsty and one additional patient required acetabular component repositioning on the same day as the index procedure. Revision procedures involved conversion of resurfacing femoral component to cementless total hip stem with large diameter metal head and preservation of acetabular component. Acetabular component survivorship is 99% and femoral component survivorship is 97% at 2 year follow-up.

Conclusion: Our short to midterm data, from an independant center, suggests excellent improvement in quality of life with high levels of patient satisfaction and postop acitivity level. Our comprehensive post-operative quality of life assessment demonstrates restoration of the hip to rival that of the normal non-arthritic hip joint. Complications unique to resurfacing arthroplasty occur and were not predictable based on pre-operative or intra-operative patient-specific features.

Revision surgery is an important outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty among patients with osteoarthritis (OA). The objective of this study was to determine the risk of revision over time in a large, geographically defined population in North America, and to assess the effects of age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES) on knee and hip revision rates in this population.

We used data on admissions to all acute care hospitals in British Columbia (BC), Canada (population of four million people) from 1986 until 2004 (eighteen years of follow-up). Primary knee and hip replacement surgery for OA and revision procedures were identified using diagnostic (ICD-9, ICD-10) codes and surgical procedure codes. We excluded cases admitted due to injury or neoplasm. SES was assigned based on residential address linked to census data at the level of enumeration area (ecological variable), and analyzed according to quintiles or deciles of the distribution. In the analysis, we used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to describe the risk of first revision following first primary replacement surgery over time and parametric (Weibull) survival regression models to analyze the effects of joint (hip vs. knee) age, sex, and SES on revision rates. Death, emigration, and another primary joint replacement were treated as censoring events.

Between 1986 and 2004, we observed 24,169 first primary hip replacements and 22,875 first primary knee replacements. In these patients, there were 1,313 hip revisions and 914 knee revisions following a primary replacement. The risk of revision at five, ten and fifteen years after primary replacement according to joint and sex were identified The overall risks were 10.1% for the hip and 8.7% for the knee at ten years, and 15.5% and 14.7%, respectively, at fifteen years. Risk of revision (%) following first primary joint replacement surgery Hip Knee Years Men Women Men Women 5 5.0 3.9 4.6 3.8 10 11.0 9.4 9.7 8.0 15 17.8 14.1 18.5 12.4 In a multivariate survival regression model including joint, age, sex, and SES, only age and sex were significantly associated with revisions. The hazard ratio was 1.2 for men compared with women (p< 0.0001). Revision rates were higher in younger persons, with hazard ratios increasing from 1.7 for age 70–79 (p< 0.0001) to 3.9 for age < 49 (p< 0.0001) compared with age 80+. After adjusting for age and sex, SES was not significantly associated with revision risk following primary hip or knee replacement surgery in this population (p=0.75).

This is one of the largest and longest cohort studies in North America to look at the epidemiology of revision procedures following hip and knee replacement for OA. Higher rates in men and in younger persons are consistent with previous reports. The lack of association between revision risk and SES in BC is an important finding given current concerns about socioeconomic disparities in access to and outcomes of treatment for OA.

Introduction: Achieving durable implant–host bone fixation is the major challenge in uncemented revision hip arthroplasty when significant bone stock deficiencies are encountered. The purpose of this study was

to develop an experimental model which would simulate the clinical revision hip scenario and

Methods: Thirty-six porous tantalum plugs were implanted into the distal femur, bilaterally of 18 rabbits for four weeks. There were 3 groups of plugs inserted; control groups of porous tantalum plugs (Ta) with no coating, a 2nd control group of porous tantalum plugs with micro-porous calcium phosphate coating, (Ta-CaP) and porous tantalum plugs coated with alendronate (Ta-CaP-ALN). Subcutaneous fluorochrome labelling was used to track new bone formation. Bone formation was analysed by backscattered electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy on undecalcified histological sections.

Results: The relative increase in mean volume of gap filling, bone ingrowth and total bone formation was 124 %, 232 % and 170 % respectively in Ta-CaP-ALN compared with the uncoated porous tantalum (Ta) controls, which was statistically significant. The contact length of new bone formation on porous tantalum implants in Ta-CaP-ALN was increased by 700% (8-fold) on average compared with the uncoated porous tantalum (Ta) controls.

Discussion: Alendronate coated porous tantalum significantly modulated implant bioactivity compared with controls. This study has demonstrated the significant enhancement of bone-implant gap filling and bone ingrowth, which can be achieved by coating porous tantalum with alendronate. It is proposed that, when faced with the clinical problem of revision joint replacement in the face of bone loss, the addition of alendronate as a surface coating would enhance biological fixation of the implant and promote the healing of bone defects.

This single incision, anterolateral intermuscular approach (AL-IM) utilises the interval between gluteus medius and tensor fascia lata. The aims of the study were to compare the quality of life, satisfaction and complications of this approach with two of the most commonly used limited incision transmuscular (TM) approaches, namely the mini-posterior (P-TM) and the mini-direct lateral (L-TM).

One hundred and ninety-nine patients receiving MIS THA surgical procedures were evaluated prospectively (63 AL-IM, 68 P-TM and 68 L-TM). The outcome variables were WOMAC function, pain, stiffness, SF-12 (physical & mental), Oxford-12, satisfaction and radiological outcome. Parametric and non-parametric analyses were performed.

There were no significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics including age, sex, BMI, co-morbidity, or pre-op WOMAC, SF-12, Oxford-12 (p> 0.05). However, the AL-IM group was associated with superior outcomes (p< 0.05) in WOMAC function, WOMAC pain, global WOMAC, Oxford-12 and SF-12 physical component.

In the short term the AL-IM approach provides significant improvements in quality of life scores over other limited incision approaches. It provides minimal soft tissue disruption and maintains the abductor musculature and posterior soft tissue envelope, with similar complications and radiological outcomes.

We report the outcomes ten to fifteen years after two stage revision for hip infection in one hundred and three patients.

All patients or their next of kin were contacted to determine their current functional status and whether they had required repeat surgery or had recurrent infection. The Oxford-12, SF-12, and WOMAC questionnaires were administered. A comprehensive chart review was undertaken to review the infective organisms, surgery, approach, complications, and need for further revision surgery.

Ten patients had re-infection, six of whom responded to repeat surgery with no further sequelae. Two patients required resection arthroplasty, one patient underwent hip disarticulation after eventual failure of treatment and bone loss, and one immunocompromised patient developed osteomyelitis and was subsequently lost to follow-up. Long-term success rate for two stage- revision is thus 90.3%, or 96.1% with additional surgery. Since then, three patients required revisions for aseptic loosening, one for recurrent dislocation. We were able to follow up forty-one patients, 85 % of whom provided health-related quality of life outcome scores. Thirty-nine patients were deceased, with their outcome confirmed via their last follow-up or with family members, for a total follow-up rate of 78 %. Twenty-three patients were lost to follow-up, but did not undergo further surgery or have reinfections treated at our centre.

Two-stage revision for hip infection, which includes an interim prosthesis of antibiotic loaded cement, offers a predictable and lasting solution for patients with this difficult problem.

Purpose of the study: Dislocation of total hip arthroplasty remains a frequent complication, occurring for 0.5% to 10% of implants depending on the series. In about 30% of the cases, the orientation of the acetabular cup is involved. It is sometimes difficult to visualize the acetabular landmarks during surgical procedures performed for revision or with a minimally invasive technique. The surgeon uses the position of the pelvis on the operative table as a guide. It can be noted however that the patient’s weight bearing on the table is not constant during the entire operation, potentially changing the position of the pelvis during the procedure. We evaluated the use of a visual referential visible within the operative field for implanting the prosthetic cup.

Material and methods: The method materialized the anterior plane of the pelvis then transferred geometrically this plane for display on the ipsilateral iliac crest. The pelvis was masked under a drape, in lateral decubitus. The cup was implanted 12 times using the plane of the floor as the reference, 8 times using the acetabular rim as the reference, and 10 times using the iliac reference. The goal was 20° anteversion in the sagittal plane and 45° inclination in the frontal plane. The position of the pelvis was randomized. The final positions of the cup, of the iliac reference, of the anterior plane of the pelvis and of the floor were recorded with an optical system. Spearman’s test was used to search for correlations.

Results: Using the floor referential, mean anteversion was 21.8° (15–30.9°) and mean inclination 43.2° (37–47.6°). Using the acetabular referential, mean anteversion was 21.7° (18.1–26.6°) and mean inclination 45.8° (40.9–48.6°). With the iliac referential, mean anteversion was 20.3° (17.3–25.5°) and mean inclination 43.3° (41.1–44.8°). Mean error between the pelvic plane and the iliac referential was, for anteversion −0,32° (−1.07 to 0.8°) and for inclination, −0.1° (−0.95 to 1.43°). Implantation with the iliac referential was not correlated to the position of the pelvis. When the plane of the floor was used, the position of the implant was correlated with pelvic anteversion (p< 0.01) and inclination (p< 0.01).

Discussion: Insertion of the cup was independent of the position of the pelvis within a 3D referential in the operative field. In addition to computer-assisted navigation, simple tools can be developed to improve the surgeon’s perception in difficult indications, especially when they can provide satisfactory accuracy. A clinical feasibility study is currently under way.

Purpose of the study: Hip resurfacing with a metal-on-metal bearing gives good mid-term clinical results. The design of the femoral piece has an effect on implant longevity, as does the vitality of the underlying cephalic bone. Computer-assisted surgery has been helpful in position the implant but the choice of the best position is still empirical. Prosthesis designers recommend valgus, but with too much there is a risk of a superolaterl notch which would weaken the neck. This leads the surgeon to use a larger femoral implant, and consequently to resect more acetabular bone. Anteversion is not evaluated. The purpose of this study was test mechanically different valgus/varus, anteversion/retroversion positions of the femoral implant.

Material and methods: We implanted 15 femurs made of resin which were geometrically and mechanically identical. The following angles were tested: varus/valgus (−10°, neutral, +10°, +20°) and ante/retroversion (−10°, neutram, +10). A valgus notch (+20° and +10°) and a varus notch (−10°) were simulated. The femurs thus prepared were tested with Instron 8874. Load at failure was noted as well as the type of fracture: distance from the fracture line to the greater trochanter (FGT). Student’s t test was applied.

Results: All of the femurs fractured at the neck. The fracture was closer to the implant (FGT: 11.0 mm) for the 20° valgus implantation (p< 0.05). The displacement was lesser with a valgus notch (mean 2.2 mm) then without a notch (mean 3.3 mm (p< 0.05). The varus notch had no effect. The failure load was lower for 20° valgus (1236 N, range 1117–1356N) then for the other angles (1664N, range 1142–2113 N) with near statistical significance (p=0.08). Retroversion had no effect. Anteversion allowed greater displacement (4.1 mm) and supported greater loading (1879 N) before failure.

Discussion: This study, unlike clinical studies, did not demonstrate any static mechanical superiority of the valgus position for the femoral piece. Another study on cadaver bones is planned for confirmation. Clinical studies reflect the vitality of the trabecular bone supporting the implant, a vitality which could be stimulated by the valgus position.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative quality of life in patients with dysplasia who underwent Bernese periacetabular osteotomy to those who had total hip arthroplasty.

Methods: Patients were included who had a diagnosis of dysplasia and were greater than 40 years old. Cases were patients who had a periacetabular osteotomy. Controls were patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty. Patients were matched for gender, age, and comorbidity. There were 26 cases and 33 controls. Outcome tools were the Western Ontario McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index, the SF-12, and the Arthroplasty Satisfaction Scale. T-tests were used to compare means between the groups. The chi-squared test was used to compare the percentage of patients who had very good, good, or poor outcomes between the groups. WOMAC scores were normalized on a 0–100 scale with 0 being worst and 100 being best. A WOMAC score > 75 was considered very good, 65–75 good, and below 65 poor.

Results: The mean follow-up was just over 4 years in both groups. There was a clinically and statistically significant difference in WOMAC pain and function scores favouring the total hip patients. Mean WOMAC pain scores were 89 vs 71 (p< 0.0050). Mean WOMAC function scores were 91 vs74 (p< 0.005). Ninety-seven percent of total hip patients had a good or very good result vesus 73% of the osteotomy patients (p< 0.05).

Conclusions: Total hip arthroplasty gives a more consistent and better return of quality of life in patients over 40 when measured at a mean of 4 years after operation. Future research should be directed toward preoperative and intraoperative factors that could improve the outcome of patients having an osteotomy in this age group.

We compare two applications of minimally invasive hip arthroplasty (MISTHA) with regards to early complication rate and consumption of health care resources. Complications are associated with both manifestations of MIS surgical technique. Two- incision MIS THA is associated with fewer days in hospital in comparison with one incision MIS THA, however requires a greater amount of operating room resources. This paper is among the first to compare two- incision with one incision MISTHA. Two- incision MISTHA may benefit efforts to reduce health resource utilization associated with hip arthroplasty procedures providing that operating room resource consumption and complication rates are not excessive.

A comparative cohort study to evaluate two-incision versus single-incision minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: assessment of early complication rate and health care resource utilization

To evaluate and compare two applications of minimally invasive hip arthroplasty (MISTHA) with regards to early complication rate and consumption of health care resources

One hundred and sixty-five patients received MISTHA from 2002–2004 at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients received two incision (sixty-six patients) or one incision surgery (ninety-nine patients) which was performed according to standard technique. T-test, chi square, fisher’s exact test were used to compare cohorts of MISTHA patients with regards to early complications and consumption of health care resources while in hospital.

At baseline the two cohorts were not different with regards to age, gender, comorbid status, BMI, and pre-operative WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12 (p> .05). Major and minor complication rates were similar in the two cohorts (p> .05). Utilization of operating room resources was greater with the two incision group (mean twentyfive minutes more OR time) however length of stay (mean two days less in hospital) and post-operative analgesic use was significantly reduced (p< .05). Complications and operating room resource consumption were highest early in the surgeons’ experience with these procedures.

Complications are associated with both manifestations of MIS surgical technique. Two- incision MISTHA is associated with fewer days in hospital, however requires a greater amount of operating room resources.

This paper is among the first to compare two- incision with one incision MISTHA. Two- incision MISTHA may benefit efforts to reduce health resource utilization associated with hip arthroplasty procedures providing that operating room resource consumption and complication rates are not excessive.

This study evaluated the effect of prosthetic patellar resurfacing on outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty. One hundred and twenty-six patients who underwent consecutive revision of total knee arthroplasty were identified. The status of the patella was ascertained post revision as to the presence or absence of patellar prosthesis. WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12 and patient satisfaction data were obtained at a minimum of two years follow-up. Follow-up was obtained in one hundred and ten patients. There was no significant difference between the two cohorts with regards to outcomes. A patellar prosthesis does not appear to significantly affect pain, function, or satisfaction outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of prosthetic patellar resurfacing on outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty in a matched cohort study.

The presence or absence of a patellar prosthesis does not appear to significantly affect pain, function, or satisfaction outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Attempting to resurface the patella in revision cases may not be worthwhile.

Follow-up was obtained in one hundred and ten patients (fifty-two with patellar component, fifty-eight bony shell), matched for age, sex and co-morbidity scores and followed for a minimum of two years. There was no significant difference between the two cohorts with regards to outcomes of WOMAC pain (mean seventy-two and sixty-five, p=0.17), WOMAC function (mean sixty-four and fifty-nine, p=0.26) scores, Oxford −12 (mean sixty-three and sixty-seven, p=0.2), SF-12 (mean forty and thirty-six, p=0.27) and satisfaction outcomes (mean eight and nine, p=0.07), (power of 0.8, beta=0.2).

From January 1997 to December 1999 one hundred and twenty-six patients who underwent consecutive revision total knee arthroplasty were identified. The status of the patella was ascertained post revision as to the presence or absence of patellar prosthesis. At a minimum of two years follow-up, pain and function were assessed by questionnaire for WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12 and patient satisfaction data. Co-morbidity, surgical exposure, HSS knee scores and ROM were also collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

It is questionable whether patient’s pain, function and satisfaction are affected in revision total knee arthroplasty by patellar prosthetic resurfacing.

Funding: One or more of the authors has received funding from a commercial party. This was DePuy, Inc, Warsaw, IN.

A concern with diaphyseal-fitting cementless stems in revision total hip arthroplasty is intra-operative fractures. Two hundred and eleven patients consecutively underwent revision hip arthroplasty using Solution stems (DePuy, Warsaw, IN). Intra-operative fractures or perforations occurred in sixty-four patients (30% prevalence), with diaphyseal splits in thirty-nine patients (18% prevalence). Risk factors were pre-operative osteolysis, cortex to canal ratio, under-reaming the cortex and large diameter stems. The majority of diaphyseal linear cracks occurred at the distal end of extended trochanteric osteotomies during stem insertion. Intra-operative fracture is associated with an average two days longer length of stay (p< 0.05).

The purpose of this study was to determine the identification of the risk factors and outcomes of intra-operative fractures using a diaphyseal fitting revision stem.

There is an association of intra-operative fracture associated using a diaphyseal-fitting stem in revision total hip arthroplasty with a longer length of stay in hospital.

Identifying preoperative risk factors will allow avoidance of such fractures and prolonged hospital stay.

Intra-operative fractures or perforations occurred in sixty-four patients (30% prevalence) and thirty-nine patients (18% prevalence) sustained diaphyseal splits. Risk factors associated with intra-operative fracture were pre-operative osteolysis, a low cortex to canal ratio, under-reaming the cortex and the use of a large diameter stem. Surgical approach was not directly related to fracture occurrence but the majority of diaphyseal undisplaced linear cracks occurred at the distal end of extended trochanteric osteotomies during stem insertion. Cortical perforation occurred most often with cement removal. Duration of stay was on average two days longer (p< 0.05) for patients with an intraoperative fracture.

Two hundred and eleven patients who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty using the Solution stem (DePuy, Warsaw, IN) between December 1998 and March 2002 were identified. Patients who sustained an intra-operative fracture were compared to controls patients who underwent hip revision at the same time frame but with no fracture. Multiple factors were analyzed to see which were risk factors for intra-operative fractures.

There is a surprisingly high incidence of intra-operative fracture associated with using a diaphyseal-fitting stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. This was associated with a longer length of stay

The prospective evaluation of two hundred and seven symptomatic total knee arthroplasties presenting for revision total knee arthroplasty is reported. On univariate analysis patients who had infection differed significantly (p< .001) from those without infection with regards to: elevated ESR, CRP, positive aspiration, and history of; revision procedure less than two years since last surgery, early wound problems, ongoing pain since index procedure, and discharging wound. On multivariate analysis elevated ESR or CRP, positive aspiration, pain since index procedure and early wound complications were significant predictors of infection (p< .05). These variables were then used to formulate an evidence-based multivariate predictive algorithm to assist the clinician in decision making prior to surgery.

Differentiating septic from aseptic failure of total knee arthroplasty on the basis of clinical features and diagnostic tests can be troublesome for the clinician. The purpose of this paper is to describe significant differences between cases of septic and aseptic failure of total knee arthroplasty. The incorporation of these variables into a practical multivariate clinical prediction algorithm can provide assistance in establishing the diagnosis of infection prior to revision knee arthroplasty.

A simple clinical prediction algorithm can assist in the diagnosis of infection in patients with painful total knee arthroplasty. Patients with five of five criteria have a 99% probability of infection whereas patients with zero of five criteria have a 1% probability of infection.

This is the first multivariate evidence-based clinical prediction algorithm presented for use in decision making prior to revision total knee arthroplasty. The surgeon can use the information derived from clinical and laboratory assessment to compute an approximate pre-operative probability of infection prior to surgery (see table).

On multivariate analysis elevated ESR or CRP, positive aspiration, pain since index procedure and early wound complications were significant predictors of infection (p< .05). These variables were then used to formulate an evidence-based multivariate predictive algorithm to assist in clinical decision making.

Prospective data was collected on two hundred and seven symptomatic knee arthroplasties presenting for revision arthroplasty. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the probability of infection using five significant variables. Combinations of these five variables can provide the clinician with an estimate of the probability of infection prior to revision knee arthroplasty.

Please contact author for tables and/or charts.

Purpose: Hip resurfacing techniques utilize mechanical jigs to align a femoral guide-pin that directs implant placement. Errors in alignment may lead to premature failure. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral guide-pin placement using a computer-assisted surgical (CAS) navigation system to a currently available manual alignment device.

Methods: A computer-assisted navigation system was developed by our group. Target guide-pin position was determined for each cadaveric hip from radiographs. A guide-pin was driven into each hip using either the CAS method or a manual alignment jig (Durom; Zimmer) by a novice or expert surgeon respectively. Radiographic pin position was compared to the target and accuracy was compared between the two techniques.

Results: Guide-pin insertion trajectory using the CAS system was significantly less variable in varus/valgus alignment than the mechanical jig (2.0° SD vs. 5.5° SD; p < 0.05). Ante/retroversion variability was also lower using CAS (4.4° SD vs. 7.7° SD) as was alignment error (CAS: 2.0° ± 2.2° SD valgus vs. Durom: 3.3° ± 5.5° SD varus, p=0.17; CAS: 0.1° ± 4.6° SD anteverted; Durom 3.2° ± 7.7° SD retroverted, p=0.48) but not significantly. Both methods proved accurate in placing the pin within 2 mm from the centre of the neck axis. Procedure time was similar between the two methods

Conclusions: Computer-assisted surgical navigation significantly improves reliability of guide-pin placement. This technique may help achieve better femoral implant alignment regardless of experience and contribute to improving hip resurfacing outcomes.

Funding : Other Education Grant

Funding Parties : Zimmer/UBC Research Fund

Patient satisfaction is not uniform or consistent following revision total knee arthroplasty. This study evaluates ninety-nine patients with a self-administered patient satisfaction questionnaire at a minimum of two years following the revision procedure (1997–99) to determine differences between satisfied (sixty-six patients) and dissatisfied patients (thirty-three patients). Univariate analysis revealed that patients satisfied with their results were significantly different (p< .05) than dissatisfied patients with regards to post op scores including those of the WOMAC pain and function, oxford, and SF-12. Patients were not different with regards to (p> .05) age, comorbidity score, surgical approach, or sepsis as a reason for the revision procedure. Regression analysis demonstrated that gender, post-op WOMAC score, and pre-op arc of motion were significant determinants of satisfaction.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate determinants of patient satisfaction following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Patient satisfaction with revision knee surgery is most strongly associated with both pre and post-operative descriptors of knee function as well as gender.

Understanding the variables associated with satisfaction/dissatisfaction following revision knee arthroplasty may further assist ongoing research efforts to improve the outcomes of this procedure.

Univariate analysis revealed that patients satisfied with their results were significantly different (p< .05) than dissatisfied patients with regards to WOMAC pain and function score, oxford knee score, and SF-12. Patients were not different with regards to (p> .05) age, comorbidity score, surgical approach, or presence of sepsis as a reason for the revision procedure. Regression analysis demonstrated that gender, post-op WOMAC score, and pre-op arc of motion were significant determinants of satisfaction (p< .05).

A self-administered patient satisfaction survey was completed by ninety-nine patients at a minimum of two years following revision total knee arthroplasty. Fifty-nine patients were females and forty were males. Sixty-six patients were satisfied and thirty-three patients were dissatisfied with the outcome of their surgery at two years post-op. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression suggest that pre and post-operative joint function and gender are the most significant determinants of patient satisfaction

Purpose: To examine whether neutral or valgus placement results in greater fracture strength ex vivo, when the femoral neck is notched superolaterally as sometimes occurs during hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Methods: We loaded 10 paired fresh-frozen notched proximal cadaveric femora (8F/2M, 66 to 80 years) to failure. In each case, the right femur was implanted, using bone cement, with a machined resurfacing component aligned neutrally with respect to the femoral neck whereas the left femur was implanted at 10° valgus. The superolateral notch was 3 mm wide by 2 mm deep directly beside the component. Potted femurs were loaded to failure using an Instron materials testing machine. All 20 femora were scanned using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Results: The effect of neutral versus valgus placement was complex. (1) Two pairs slowly crushed; the remaining femurs exhibited a clear fracture. When only the fracture-type failures were analyzed, valgus placement resulted in fracture loads on average 22% higher than for neutral placement (paired t-test, p< 0.05). All femurs failed within the notch, as occurs clinically. (2) Femurs with high bone density (BMD> 0.65 g/cm2) showed a significant increase in fracture load (p< 0.05) whereas femurs with low BMD (< 0.65 g/cm2) were unaffected by component placement. BMD was highly correlated with fracture load (Pearson r=0.87, p=0.0003). (3) The greatest improvements occurred when the neck-shaft angle was relatively low, 128°–132°. (4) Two of ten femurs required larger head sizes at 10° valgus.

Conclusions: (1) Fracture load was primarily controlled by bone quality (BMD); (2) nevertheless, varus/valgus placement did affect the fracture load; (3) the magnitude and direction of this effect depended on fracture type, bone mineral density and the original neck-shaft angle; (4) for the level of bone quality typical of patients undergoing hip resurfacing, and for low-to-average neck-shaft angles (up to 132°), the fracture load for 10° valgus placement was significantly higher than for neutral placement. Funding: Other Education Grant

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of prosthetic patellar resurfacing on outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty in a matched cohort study.

From January 1997 to December 1999 126 patients who underwent revision of total knee arthroplasty were identified. The status of the patella was ascertained post revision as to the presence or absence of patellar prosthesis. At a minimum of two years follow-up, pain and function were assessed by questionnaire for WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12 and patient satisfaction data. Co-morbidity, surgical exposure, HSS knee scores and ROM were also collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. Follow-up was obtained in 110 patients (52 with patellar component, 58 bony shell), matched for age (mean 70 and 67 years), sex and co-morbidity scores and followed for a minimum of two years. There was no significant difference between the two cohorts with regards to outcomes of WOMAC pain scores (mean 66 and 74, p=0.14), WOMAC function scores (mean 59 and 65, p=0.22), Oxford- 12 scores (mean 57 and 64, p=0.17), and satisfaction score outcomes (57 and 68, p=0.14). It remains controversial whether the patient’s pain, function and satisfaction are affected in revision total knee arthroplasty by patellar prosthetic resurfacing. Insufficient patellar bone stock may preclude prosthetic resurfacing in which case patel-loplasty is performed. From this series, the presence or absence of a patellar prosthesis does not appear to sig-nificantly affect pain, function, or satisfaction outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty.

This prospective cohort study examined the relationship between waiting time for elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and changes in pre- to post-operative quality of life. It included one hundred and forty-seven patients who entered the waiting list for primary THA with osteoarthritis. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire was used to assess patients at surgical consultation time (baseline) and one year post-operation. Baseline WOMAC score was a significant predictor for follow-up WOMAC score. Expedited access to THA results in a larger proportion of patients showing “better than expected” function at twelve months after the operation.

This study examined the relationship between waiting time for elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and changes in pre- to post-operative quality of life.

Expedited access to THA results in a larger proportion of patients showing “better than expected” function at twelve months after the operation. The odds of a “better than expected” functional outcome decreased by 8% for each additional month on the wait list.

The study provides the estimates of decreased probability of “better than expected” outcome given a prolonged waiting time. Our study indicates that timely access to THA is needed for optimal post-operative outcome.

Baseline WOMAC score was a significant predictor for the follow-up WOMAC score in function (p=0.0005), pain (p=0.0036), and stiffness (p= 0.0004). Waiting for six months or less doubled the odds of achieving a “better than expected” functional outcome compared to longer waits (p= 0.05).

This prospective cohort study included one hundred and forty-seven patients who entered the waiting list for primary THA with osteoarthritis. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire was used to assess patients at the surgical consultation time (baseline) and one year post operation. Regression models were used to determine the “expected” outcome for a certain individual baseline score. By using expected HRQOL outcome, we identified patients whose benefit from THA is better than expected. Logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between waiting time and the probability of “better than expected” outcome.

Purpose: To evaluate and compare patient reported quality of life and satisfaction following metal on metal hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty procedures.

Methods: Patients receiving metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and primary total hip arthroplasty were assessed at baseline and followed prospectively with regards to outcomes of quality of life (WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12) and satisfaction. Patients receiving resurfacing were matched (1:3) to a cohort of THA on characteristics of age, gender, and comorbidity status. Sample size was selected to evaluate superiority using WOMAC function score with effect size of 0.5, alpha .05, power 80%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results: 222 patients were evaluated with regards to baseline socio-demographic characteristics and quality of life scores(56 resurfacing, 166 THR). Patient cohorts were not different at baseline pre-operatively with regards to age, gender, comorbidity status, WOMAC, Oxford-12, and SF-12 (p> .05). At minimum one year post-op both cohorts reported excellent outcomes. Patients receiving hip resurfacing had superior outcomes with regards to WOMAC function, WOMAC pain, and Oxford-12 hip scores (p< .05). However patients were similar with regards to outcomes of SF-12 mental status and patient-reported satisfaction.

Conclusions: Hip resurfacing and THA patients report excellent outcomes, however, patients receiving hip resurfacing report superior quality of life compared to a matched cohort of THA.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of outpatient physiotherapy versus a self-adminstered home exercise program on recovery following primary total hip arthroplasty.

Methods: Subjects awaiting primary total hip arthroplasty consented to participate in this prospective randomized clinical trial. Patients were assigned to participate in either an outpatient physiotherapy program or self-administered/self-directed home exercise program following discharge home from hospital. Multiple longitudinal measures were performed to adequately assess recovery over time. Primary outcome for comparison was WOMAC function at 4 months postoperatively, additional outcomes of timed-up-and-go, SF-36, HUI3, FSI. Primary outcome was evaluated using repeated measures analyses and regression models for longitudinal data.

Results: 100 patients were randomized to their respective interventions. The two cohorts were similar with regards to baseline characteristics of age, gender, and pre-op quality of life measures (p> .05). At 4 months post-op both groups demonstrated significant change from baseline function and were similar with regards to recovery and rate of recovery (p> .05).

Conclusions: While all patients demonstrated excellent recovery, patients receiving self-adminstered home exercise program did not demonstrate inferior outcome at the interval(s) assessed. Self-adminstered home exercise program may be an effective alternative rehabilitation program where physiotherapy services are limited or in specific subgroups of patients.

Funding : Educational Grant from the Canadian Orthopaedic Foundation

The two most common surgical approaches used in primary hip arthroplasty are the anterolateral and posterolateral approach. While both approaches have potential advantages and disadvantages in comparison to the other, there are no reports with sufficient power to compare their effect on post-operative function and quality of life. This prospective cohort study evaluates and compares the independent effect of surgical approach on function and quality of life among patients who have received their total hip arthroplasty through one of these techniques. Results suggest that there is no significant difference in function or quality of life among these respective cohorts.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of anterolateral versus posterolateral approach on function and quality of life following primary total hip arthroplasty.

There is no significant difference in outcome as a result of surgical approach. Significance: This is the first report with sufficient power to evaluate and compare outcomes of these two approaches among high volume hip surgeons. This study suggests that surgeons need not worry that the anterolateral or posterolateral approach may compromise patient function or generic quality of life more-so than the alternative approach.

Univariate and regression analyses demonstrate similar outcomes on WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12 and satisfaction among cohorts of patients receiving the anterolateral or posterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty.

A prospective evaluation of function and quality of life outcomes was performed on patients receiving the anterolateral or posterolateral approach for primary hip arthroplasty. All participating surgeons were considered to be high volume arthroplasty surgeons. One hundred and sixty procedures were followed and provided complete outcomes data including WOMAC, Oxford, SF-12, and satisfaction scores. Univariate analyses demonstrated no differences among the two cohorts with regards to baseline variables. Regression analyses were performed for the outcome measures with surgical approach treated as an independent covariate while controlling for other potential confounders. The results suggest that there is no independent effect of surgical approach on patient reported outcomes. This suggests that the surgeon should continue to employ the approach which is the most familiar and most likely to result in consistent results in their clinical environment.

Introduction and Aims: Functional results following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for infection may be inferior to those done for aseptic causes. This cross-sectional study compared the results of patients who had two-stage revision for infection using an articulating spacer device, with those of a control group who had revision for aseptic causes.

Method: Patients admitted between December 1997 and December 2000 for two-stage revision of an infected hip replacement using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer were included. They were compared to patients who had revision of both components for aseptic causes over the same time period. Patients with periprosthetic fractures were excluded.

Pre-operative function was assessed using the Charnley score and bone loss was determined from pre-operative radiographs using the Paprowsky femoral and acetabular classifications. At a minimum two years follow-up, quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the WOMAC, Oxford-12 and SF-12 questionnaires. Patient satisfaction and co-morbidity data were also collected.

Results: There were 44 septic and 105 aseptic revision arthroplasties included in the study. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to co-morbidities, Charnley group, pre-operative pain, function or range of movement or loss of acetabular bone stock. The aseptic group had significantly worse femoral bone stock than the septic group (p=0.008).

All infected patients were treated with the PROSTA-LAC system at the first stage, and 40 patients were reimplanted at the second stage procedure. In four cases, a Girdlestone procedure was performed for persistent infection, although two were re-implanted later.

Re-operations in the septic group were required in six patients for: instability (three), fractured femoral component (one), failure of ingrowth (one), and for recurrence of infection (one). Eight aseptic patients had further revisions for: instability (four), failure of component fixation (three), and for periprosthetic fracture (one).

Although the functional results for both groups were good, the results following revision for sepsis were significantly worse. The mean normalised WOMAC score for infected patients was 66.1, compared to 74.4 for aseptic patients (p=0.028) and the mean Oxford score following infection was 22.4 compared to 18.9 for controls (p=0.007). The satisfaction scores following septic revision were also significantly worse (p=0.02).

Conclusion: Use of an articulated spacer in two-stage revision was successful in eradicating infection, allowing re-implantation in more than 90% of patients, and with good recovery of function. However, the functional results and satisfaction scores were significantly worse than those of a matched control group revised for aseptic causes.

Introduction and Aims: The aim was to study: 1) Patients’ ability to recall their pre-operative function following total hip replacement and how this recall alters with time. 2) Whether validated quality of life (QOL) assessment tools can be administered in the post-operative period to assess pre-operative function.

Method: The null hypothesis was: There is no correlation between functional scores collected pre-operatively and those collected post-operatively. Patients admitted for primary and revision hip arthroplasty between September 2002 and January 2003 were included.

Subjects completed the same questionnaire regarding pre-operative function before surgery, and then three days, six weeks and three months post-operatively. The questionnaire was a combination of the WOMAC, Oxford-12 and SF-12 questionnaires. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between the pre- and post-surgery scores, and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess agreement. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by Kendall’s Tau-b statistic.

Results: One hundred and four patients with a mean age of 61 years were included. There were 57 female patients and 47 males, 79 patients had primary hip replacements and 25 had revisions.

The results showed excellent correlation between pre-operative scores and those from all three postoperative time points. Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the WOMAC score was 0.75, 0.78 and 0.87 at three days, six weeks and three months respectively. The values for the Oxford-12 were 0.83, 0.78 and 0.92 at the same time points, and for the SF-12 they were 0.71, 0.63 and 0.81.

Agreement between pre- and post-operative scores was high. The ICC results for the WOMAC score at the same time points were 0.86, 0.88, and 0.93. For the Oxford-12 they were 0.91, 0.88 and 0.96 and for the SF-12 they were 0.83, 0.77 and 0.9.

Kendall’s Tau-b statistic showed high degrees of reliability for all three measures. The values for the WOMAC score at the three time points were 0.64, 0.61 and 0.72, and the results for the Oxford-12 and SF-12 scores were similarly high.

The effects on the statistics of age, sex, unilateral versus bilateral disease, and primary versus revision surgery were assessed, and no differences were found.

Conclusion: We found a high degree of correlation, agreement and test-retest reliability between QOL scores taken before hip replacement and those taken up to three months afterwards. Patients were able to recall their pre-operative functional status after surgery, and accurate pre-operative data may be collected retrospectively during the early post-operative period.

This study was performed to assess the relationship between patients’ pre-operative symptoms and their expectations at the time of revision hip arthroplasty. The WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index) scale for osteoarthritis of the hip and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) general health status scale have both been validated for the assessment of the outcome of hip arthroplasty. We prospectively assessed 60 patients using these scales as well as the “expectation WOMAC” that asked the patients to estimate how they expected to feel 6 months after revision hip replacement. All the questions were completed prior to informed consent, and were scored form 1 to 5 with increasing severity with a Likert scale. The maximum possible scores for pain, stiffness and difficulty with physical activity were therefore 25, 10 and 85 respectively.

The mean preoperative WOMAC score for pain was 13.4 (CI 12.2.-14.6), for stiffness 5.9 (CI 5.6-6.2) and for physical activity 50.9 (CI 47.2-54.6) The mean expectation WOMAC scores for these modalities were 7.4 (CI 6.2-8.6), 3.5 (CI 3.0-4.0) and 28.1 (CI 24.0-32.2.) respectively. Although there was a wide spread of expectations, we were unable to find any significant correlation between the patients’ preoperative pain and The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom. stiffness levels and their expectations for pain and stiffness after revision hip arthroplasty. There was however a statistical association between their preoperative difficulty with physical activity and their expectations for physical activity (r=0.38; p=0.02) There was no significant correlation between the SF-36 scores and the patients’ expectations.

The expectations of patients awaiting revision hip replacements are high, and do not appear to be closely related to their level of pre-operative disability. Even patients with severe symptoms have high expectations that in some cases may be unrealistic. The use of the “expectation WOMAC” may help us to identify such patients, and to improve patient education and satisfaction.

This study constitutes the minimum 5-year follow-up (mean 8.8 years; range 5 – 11.5 years) of a consecutive series of 40 proximal femoral allografts performed for failed total hip arthroplasties using the same technique. Nine of these cases had been two stage reconstructions for the management of infected total hip replacements with bone loss. In all these cases the stem was cemented into both the allograft and the host femur. The host bone was resected in 37 cases, and the greater trochanter reattached with a cable grip in 33 cases and with wire and mesh in 3 cases.

The patients were reviewed by an independent observer. There were 4 early revisions (10%): one for infection, one for non-union of the allograft host junction, and two following revision of a failed acetabular reconstruction. Three further acetabular revisions have since also been performed. Junctional nonunion was seen in 3 cases (8%), two of which were managed successfully with bone grafting and bone grafting and plating respectively. Instability was observed in 6 cases (15%). Trochanteric non-union was seen in 17 cases (42.5%) and trochanteric escape in 10 of these (25%). The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 39 to 79. Severe resorption involving the full thickness of the allograft was seen in 7 cases. This progressed rapidly and silently but has yet to lead to the failure of any of the reconstructions.

Although there was a high early complication rate, the medium term survivorship is excellent, and the clinical outcomes highly satisfactory. The striking observation of severe allograft resorption may be related to a combination of factors. These include the absence of any masking or protective effect that the host bone may have proximally, and surface revascularisation with stress shielding secondary to solid cemented distal fixation. Although continued surveillance is warranted, these results justify the use of structural allografts for selected cases.

This study was performed in order to review the medium term clinical and radiographic outcome of long stem cemented femoral revisions using second generation cementing technique and identify factors predictive of success or failure.

110 long stem revision hip replacements in 106 patients were performed between 1983–1994. There were 51 males and 55 females of an average age of 69 years with a mean follow up of 6.7 years and a minimum follow-up of five years. Clinical assessment included chart review, and assessment by an independent observer using the Harris Hip Score and the Short Form-36. Radiographic review was performed by two independent observers assessing quality of cementing, loosening, trochanteric union, and heterotopic ossification. The cementing technique was evaluated in both the areas of previous fixation, as well as in the new bone below the tip of the previous stem. We reviewed 93 hips in 90 patients, the remainder having either died or been lost to follow-up. 89% of the patients had improved Harris hip score by more than 20 points. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, fifteen-year survivor-ship was calculated at 92.8%. Three (3.2 %) femoral components were revised, six (6.4%) additional femoral components subsided but were not revised; five of these showed poor cementing technique in the virgin zones beyond the area of the previous stem, and two had cortical perforations. Complications included; 7 (7.5%)dislocations, 6 (6.4%) periprosthetic fractures, 2 (2.2%) infections, and 14 (15%) trochanteric non-unions.

Most reports of femoral revision with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty have shown poor results. However, there are no reports that rely solely on long-stem components. This study shows that long stem cemented femoral revisions have an excellent medium term survivorship, good clinical results and high satisfaction rates. The quality of distal cementing is of great importance, as distal radiolucencies and poor cement technique are predictive of failure.

We report 11 patients having revision of total hip arthroplasty using massive structural allografts for failure due to sepsis and associated bone loss. All patients had a two-stage reconstruction and the mean follow-up was 47.8 months (24 to 72). Positive cultures were obtained at the first stage in nine of the 11 patients, with Staphylococcus epidermidis being the most common organism. The other two patients had draining sinuses with negative cultures.

There was no recurrence of infection in any patient. The mean increase in the modified Harris hip score was 45 and all the grafts appeared to have united to host bone. Two patients required additional procedures, but only one was related to the allograft. Complications included an incomplete sciatic nerve palsy and one case of graft resorption. Our results support the use of massive allografts in failed septic hip arthroplasty in which there is associated bone loss.

In 33 dogs we implanted femoral stems made either of carbon composite, some coated with hydroxyapatite, or of titanium alloy with a porous coating. Osseointegration was greater in the hydroxyapatite-coated than in the un-coated stems (p less than 0.001). Push-out tests, at an average of 7.2 months after implantation, showed a six-fold increase in interface shear strength and a twelve-fold increase in shear stiffness in the hydroxyapatite-coated group compared with noncoated implants. The highest shear-strength values were found in the porous-coated titanium alloy stems, around which there was also the most resorptive bone remodelling.