Abstract
Purpose of the study: Hip resurfacing with a metal-on-metal bearing gives good mid-term clinical results. The design of the femoral piece has an effect on implant longevity, as does the vitality of the underlying cephalic bone. Computer-assisted surgery has been helpful in position the implant but the choice of the best position is still empirical. Prosthesis designers recommend valgus, but with too much there is a risk of a superolaterl notch which would weaken the neck. This leads the surgeon to use a larger femoral implant, and consequently to resect more acetabular bone. Anteversion is not evaluated. The purpose of this study was test mechanically different valgus/varus, anteversion/retroversion positions of the femoral implant.
Material and methods: We implanted 15 femurs made of resin which were geometrically and mechanically identical. The following angles were tested: varus/valgus (−10°, neutral, +10°, +20°) and ante/retroversion (−10°, neutram, +10). A valgus notch (+20° and +10°) and a varus notch (−10°) were simulated. The femurs thus prepared were tested with Instron 8874. Load at failure was noted as well as the type of fracture: distance from the fracture line to the greater trochanter (FGT). Student’s t test was applied.
Results: All of the femurs fractured at the neck. The fracture was closer to the implant (FGT: 11.0 mm) for the 20° valgus implantation (p< 0.05). The displacement was lesser with a valgus notch (mean 2.2 mm) then without a notch (mean 3.3 mm (p< 0.05). The varus notch had no effect. The failure load was lower for 20° valgus (1236 N, range 1117–1356N) then for the other angles (1664N, range 1142–2113 N) with near statistical significance (p=0.08). Retroversion had no effect. Anteversion allowed greater displacement (4.1 mm) and supported greater loading (1879 N) before failure.
Discussion: This study, unlike clinical studies, did not demonstrate any static mechanical superiority of the valgus position for the femoral piece. Another study on cadaver bones is planned for confirmation. Clinical studies reflect the vitality of the trabecular bone supporting the implant, a vitality which could be stimulated by the valgus position.
Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.
