FREE-HAND INSERTION OF THE ACETABULAR CUP: THE REFERENTIAL EFFECT

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Dislocation of total hip arthroplasty remains a frequent complication, occurring for 0.5% to 10% of implants depending on the series. In about 30% of the cases, the orientation of the acetabular cup is involved. It is sometimes difficult to visualize the acetabular landmarks during surgical procedures performed for revision or with a minimally invasive technique. The surgeon uses the position of the pelvis on the operative table as a guide. It can be noted however that the patient’s weight bearing on the table is not constant during the entire operation, potentially changing the position of the pelvis during the procedure. We evaluated the use of a visual referential visible within the operative field for implanting the prosthetic cup.

Material and methods: The method materialized the anterior plane of the pelvis then transferred geometrically this plane for display on the ipsilateral iliac crest. The pelvis was masked under a drape, in lateral decubitus. The cup was implanted 12 times using the plane of the floor as the reference, 8 times using the acetabular rim as the reference, and 10 times using the iliac reference. The goal was 20° anteversion in the sagittal plane and 45° inclination in the frontal plane. The position of the pelvis was randomized. The final positions of the cup, of the iliac reference, of the anterior plane of the pelvis and of the floor were recorded with an optical system. Spearman’s test was used to search for correlations.

Results: Using the floor referential, mean anteversion was 21.8° (15–30.9°) and mean inclination 43.2° (37–47.6°). Using the acetabular referential, mean anteversion was 21.7° (18.1–26.6°) and mean inclination 45.8° (40.9–48.6°). With the iliac referential, mean anteversion was 20.3° (17.3–25.5°) and mean inclination 43.3° (41.1–44.8°). Mean error between the pelvic plane and the iliac referential was, for anteversion −0,32° (−1.07 to 0.8°) and for inclination, −0.1° (−0.95 to 1.43°). Implantation with the iliac referential was not correlated to the position of the pelvis. When the plane of the floor was used, the position of the implant was correlated with pelvic anteversion (p< 0.01) and inclination (p< 0.01).

Discussion: Insertion of the cup was independent of the position of the pelvis within a 3D referential in the operative field. In addition to computer-assisted navigation, simple tools can be developed to improve the surgeon’s perception in difficult indications, especially when they can provide satisfactory accuracy. A clinical feasibility study is currently under way.