This study evaluates risk factors influencing fracture characteristics for postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) around cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty. Data were collected for PFF patients admitted to eight UK centres between 25 May 2006 and 1 March 2020. Radiographs were assessed for Unified Classification System (UCS) grade and AO/OTA type. Statistical comparisons investigated relationships by age, gender, and stem fixation philosophy (polished taper-slip (PTS) vs composite beam (CB)). The effect of multiple variables was estimated using multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Surgical treatment (revision vs fixation) was compared by UCS grade and AO/OTA type.Aims
Methods
To compare the periprosthetic fracture mechanics between a collared and collarless fully coated cementless femoral stem in a composite femur. Two groups of six composite femurs (‘Osteoporotic femur’, SawBones, WA USA) were implanted with either a collared (collared group) or collarless (collarless group) cementless femoral stem which was otherwise identical by a single experienced surgeon. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur were simulated using a previously published technique. High speed video recording was used to identify fracture mechanism. Fracture torque and angular displacement were measured and rotational work and system stiffness were estimated for each trial. Results were compared between collared and collarless group and the comparison was evaluated against previously published work using fresh frozen femurs and the same protocol.Abstract
Objective
Methods
To estimate the effect of calcar collar contact on periprosthetic fracture mechanics using a collared fully coated cementless femoral stem. Three groups of six composite femurs were implanted with a fully coated collared cementless femoral stem. Neck resection was increased between groups (group 1 = normal, group 2 = 3mm additional, group 3 = 6mm additional), to simulate failure to obtain calcar collar contact. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur were simulated using a previously published technique. Fracture torque and rotational displacement were measured and torsional stiffness and rotational work prior to fracture were estimated. High speed video recording identified if collar to calcar contact (CCC) occurred. Results between trials where calcar contact did and did not occur where compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.Abstract
Objective
Methods
To estimate the effect of calcar collar separation on the likelihood of calcar collar contact during in vitro periprosthetic fracture. Three groups of six composite femurs were implanted with a collared cementless femoral stem. Neck resection was increased between groups (group 1 = normal, group 2 = 3mm additional, group 3 = 6mm additional), to simulate failure to obtain calcar collar contact. Prior to each trial, the distances between anterior (ACC) and posterior (PCC) collar and the calcar were measured. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur were simulated using a previously published technique. High speed video recording identified when collar to calcar contact (CCC) occurred. The ACC and PCC were compared between trials where the CCC was and was not achieved. Regression estimated the odds of failing to achieve CCC for a given ACC or PCC.Abstract
Objective
Methods
The angle of acetabular inclination is an important measurement in total hip replacement (THR) procedures. Determining the acetabular component orientation intra-operatively remains a challenge. An increasing number of innovators have described techniques and devices to achieve it. This paper describes a mechanical inclinometer design to measure intra-operative acetabular cup inclination. Then, the mechanical device is tested to determine its accuracy. The aim was to design an inclinometer to measure inclination without existing instrumentation modification. The device was designed to meet the following criteria: 1. measure inclination with acceptable accuracy (+/− 5o); 2. easy to use intra-operatively (handling & visualization); 3. adaptable and useable with majority of instrumentation kits without modification; 4. sterilizable by all methods; 5. robust/reusable. The prototype device was drafted by computer aided design (CAD) software. Then a prototype was constructed using a 3D printer to establish the final format. The final device was CNC machined from SAE 304 stainless steel. The design uses an eccentrically weighted flywheel mounted on two W16002-2RS ball bearings pressed into symmetrical housing components. The weighted wheel is engraved with calibrated markings relative to its mass centre. Device functioning is dependent on gravity maintaining the weighted wheel in a fixed orientation while the housing can adapt to the calibration allowing for determining the corresponding measurement. The prototype device accuracy was compared to a digital device. A digital protractor was used to create an angle. The mechanical inclinometer (user blinded to digital reading) was used to determine the angle and compared to the digital reading. The accuracy of the device compared to the standard freehand technique was assessed using a saw bone pelvis fixed in a lateral decubitus position. 18 surgeons (6 expert, 6 intermediate, 6 novice) were asked to place an uncemented acetabular cup in a saw bone pelvis to a target of 40 degrees. First freehand then using the inclinometer. The inclination was determined using a custom-built inertial measurement unit with the user blinded to the result. Comparison between the mechanical and digital devices showed that the mechanical device had an average error of −0.2, a standard deviation of 1.5, and range −3.3 to 2.6. The average root mean square error was 1.1 with a standard deviation of 0.9. Comparison of the inclinometer to the freehand technique showed that with the freehand component placement 50% of the surgeons were outside the acceptable range of 35–45 degrees. The use of the inclinometer resulted all participants to achieve placement within the acceptable range. It was noted that expert surgeons were more accurate at achieving the target inclination when compared to less experienced surgeons. This work demonstrates that the design and initial testing of a mechanical inclinometer is suitable for use in determining the acetabular cup inclination in THR. Experimental testing showed that the device is accurate to within acceptable limits and reliably improved the accuracy of uncemented cup implantation in all surgeons.
The aim of this study was to determine whether fixation, as opposed to revision arthroplasty, can be safely used to treat reducible Vancouver B type fractures in association with a cemented collarless polished tapered femoral stem (the Exeter). This retrospective cohort study assessed 152 operatively managed consecutive unilateral Vancouver B fractures involving Exeter stems; 130 were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 22 with revision arthroplasty. Mean follow-up was 6.5 years (SD 2.6; 3.2 to 12.1). The primary outcome measure was revision of at least one component. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed. Regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for revision following ORIF. Secondary outcomes included any reoperation, complications, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and mortality.Aims
Methods
The mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) is recommended to be performed with the leg in the hanging leg (HL) position, and the thigh placed in a stirrup. This comparative cadaveric study assesses implant positioning and intraoperative kinematics of OUKA implanted either in the HL position or in the supine leg (SL) position. A total of 16 fresh-frozen knees in eight human cadavers, without macroscopic anatomical defects, were selected. The knees from each cadaver were randomized to have the OUKA implanted in the HL or SL position.Aims
Methods
We investigated predictors of poor outcomes following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (MoMHA) revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD), to help inform the revision threshold and type of reconstruction. A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 346 MoMHAs revised for histologically confirmed ARMD at two specialist centres (245=hip resurfacing, 101=total hip arthroplasty). Numerous preoperative (blood metal ions and imaging) and intraoperative (findings, and components removed/implanted) factors were used to predict poor outcomes. Poor outcomes were postoperative complications (including re-revisions), 90-day mortality, and poor Oxford Hip Scores (<27/48). Multivariable logistic regression models for predicting poor outcomes were developed using stepwise selection methods.Introduction
Patients and Methods
Method of fixation in THA is a contentious issue, with proponents of either technique citing improved implant survival and outcomes. Current comparisons rely on insufficiently powered studies with short-term follow up or larger poorly controlled registry studies. Patient factors are considered a key variable contributing to the risk of implant failure. One way to overcome this confounder is to compare the survival of cementless and cemented THAs patients who have undergone bilateral THAs with cemented hip on one side and cementless hip on the other. We compared stem survival of patients who have bilateral THA with one cemented stem in one hip and a cementless stem in the contralateral hip in the National Joint Registry. UK National Joint Registry is the largest registry of its kind in the world. This study included 2934 patients with 5868 THAs who underwent bilateral THAs s between 2003 and 2016. These patients had undergone bilateral sequential THAs within 3 years of each other: cemented THA on one side and cementless on the other, Patients had identical pre-operative American Society of Anaesthesiologists group for both THAs and same indication for surgery. Implant survival was compared using Cox regression with an endpoint of stem revision.Background
Methods
Smoking, a modifiable factor, may adversely affect post-operative outcomes. Healthcare providers are increasingly denying smokers access to total hip arthroplasty (THA) until they stop smoking. Evidence supporting this is unclear. We assessed the effect of smoking on outcomes following THA. We performed a retrospective observational study involving 60,812 THAs (12.4%=smokers, 31.2%=ex-smokers, 56.4%=non-smokers) from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Data were linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and the Office for National Statistics to identify outcomes. The effect of smoking on post-operative outcomes (complications, medications, revision, mortality, PROMs) was assessed using adjusted regression.Introduction
Patients and Methods
Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) are a devastating complication associated with high mortality and are costly. Few risk factors are modifiable apart from implant choice. The design features governing risk of PFF are unknown. We estimated the 90-day risk of revision for PFF associated with design features of cementless femoral stems and to investigate the effect of a collar on early PFF risk using a biomechanical in-vitro model. 337 647 primary THAs from the National Joint Registry (UK) were included in a multivariable survival and regression analysis to identify the adjusted hazard of PFF revision following primary THA using cementless stems. The effect of a collar in cementless THA on early PFF was evaluated in an in-vitro model using paired fresh frozen cadaveric femora.Background
Patients, materials and methods
Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFF) lead to reduced implant survival. A deeper understanding of predictors enables surgeons to modify techniques and patient selection to reduce the risk of IOPFF. The aim of this study was to estimate predictors of IOPFF and each anatomical subtype (calcar crack, trochanteric fracture, femoral shaft fracture) during primary THA. This retrospective cohort study included 793823 primary THAs between 2004 and 2016. Relative risks for patient, surgical and implant factors are estimated for any IOPFF fracture and for all anatomical subtypes of IOPFF.Introduction
Methods
Component alignment and soft tissue constraints are key factors affecting function and implant survival after total knee replacement (TKR). Knee kinematics contribute to knee function whilst soft tissue constraints and component alignment impact polyethylene wear. This study experimentally investigated the effect of soft tissue constraints and component alignment on the kinematics and wear of a TKR. A six station electromechanical ProSim knee simulator was used with the ISO 14243-1:2009 standard force control inputs; axial force, flexion-extension (FE), tibial rotation (TR) torque and anterior-posterior (AP) force. This allowed the kinematics to vary with the test conditions. The soft tissue constraints were simulated using virtual springs. DePuy Sigma XLK fixed bearing TKRs were tested in 25% bovine serum (in 0.04% sodium azide) lubricant. The average output kinematics across 6 stations were found for each test and the peak values compared. The wear rates were calculated over 2 million cycles (MC), the serum was changed every 350,000 cycles and the tibial inserts weighed after every MC. A one way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test was used to compare the kinematics and wear with significance taken at p<0.05. The kinematics and wear rates for three soft tissue conditions were established under ideal alignment (Table 1). The ISO standard springs for a cruciate substituting (CS) and a cruciate retaining (CR) prosthesis were used to represent a knee with a resected ACL and PCL and a knee with a resected ACL respectively. The third spring condition was based on clinical data to represent a “stiff” knee. Three other alignment conditions were then assessed using “stiff” knee springs; 4° varus, 14° rotational mismatch and 10° posterior tibial slope. These alignments were chosen to represent the range found in clinical data. Under ideal alignment the “stiff” knee springs had significantly lower peak AP and TR displacements (0.9mm, 2mm, 2mm and 3.6°, 7.1°, 7.8° for the “stiff”, CR and CS springs respectively) than the other springs (p<0.01). The “stiff” knee spring had a significantly lower wear rate than the CR spring; 1.58 ±1.20mm³/MC compared to 4.71±1.29 mm³/MC (p<0.01). The varus and rotated components had significantly larger peak AP displacements of 2.56mm and 2.42mm respectively, than the ideal and tibial slope fixtures (1.97mm and 0.92mm respectively) (p<0.01). The rotated components had significantly higher internal rotation of 12.2° compared to 4.4°, 3.7° and 3.5° for the tibial slope, varus and ideal components respectively (p<0.01). The ideal and varus components had significantly lower wear than the tibial slope and rotated components (1.58±1.20mm³/MC and 0.15±0.83mm³/MC compared to 8.24±7.72mm³/MC and 5.19±1.12mm³/MC respectively) (p<0.01). This may be due to increased AP and TR displacements with the rotated components and the increased anterior AP displacement with the tibial slope components, resulting in wear on the posterior edge of the tibial insert. Soft tissue constraints and component alignment had a significant effect on the kinematics and wear. Experimental simulation should test a variety of soft tissue and alignment conditions to reflect the range observed clinically and determine causes for early failure. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
The revision rate of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in national joint registries is much higher than that of total knee replacements and that of UKR in cohort studies from multiple high-volume centres. The reasons for this are unclear but may be due to incorrect patient selection, inadequate surgical technique, and inappropriate indications for revision. Meniscal bearing UKR has well defined evidence based indications based on preoperative radiographs, the surgical technique can be assessed from post-operative radiographs and the reason for revision from pre-revision radiographs. However, for an accurate assessment aligned radiographs are required. The aim of the study was to determine why the revision rate of UKR in registries is so high by undertaking a radiographic review of revised UKR identified by the United Kingdom's (UK) National Joint Registry (NJR). A novel cross-sectional study was designed. Revised medial meniscal bearing UKR with primary operation registered with the NJR between 2006 and 2010 were identified. Participating centres from all over the country provided blinded pre-operative, post-operative, and pre-revision radiographs. Two observers reviewed the radiographs.Introduction
Methods
Reverse hybrid total hip replacement (THR) offers significant theoretical benefits but is uncommonly used. Our primary objective was to evaluate implant survival with all cause revision and revision for aseptic loosening of either component as endpoints. Data was collected prospectively on 1, 088 (988 patients) consecutive reverse hybrid THRs. Mean patient age was 69.3 years (range, 21–94) and mean follow-up was 8.2 years (range, 5–11.3). No patients were lost to follow-up. Overall, 194 (17.8%) procedures were performed in patients under 60 years, 666 (61.1%) were performed in female patients and 349 (32.1%) were performed by a trainee. Acetabular components were ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in 415 (38.1%) hips, highly cross-linked polyethylene in 669 (61.5%) hips and vitamin E stabilised polyethylene in 4 (0.4%) hips. Femoral stems were collared in 757 (69.7%) hips and collarless in 331 (30.3%) hips. Femoral head sizes were 28 mm in 957 (87.9%) hips and 32 mm in 131 (12.1%) hips. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methodology. Log rank tests were used to asses differences in survival by age, gender, head size and surgeon grade.Introduction
Patients/Materials & Methods
Pseudotumours have recently been reported in non-metal-on-metal total hip replacements (non-MoM THRs), however the magnitude and risk factors for this complication are unknown, as is the outcome of its treatment. 3340 primary THR undergoing revision for pseudotumour between 2008 and 2015 were identified in the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 7.5% (n=249) of these pseudotumour revisions, had non-MoM bearing surfaces. The risk of revision for pseudotumour in non-MoM hips was 0.032% (249/789,397; 95% CI 0.028%–0.036%). The risk of pseudotumour revision was 2.35 times (95% CI 1.76–3.11) higher in ceramic-on-ceramic compared with hard-on-soft bearings, and 2.80 times (95% CI 1.74–4.36) higher in 36mm metal-on-polyethylene bearings compared to 28mm and 32mm metal-on-polyethylene bearings. The outcome of revision for pseudotumour non-MoM hips was studied in 185 hips. 13.5% (n=25) had re-revisions at a mean of 1.2 years (range 0.1–3.1 years). Infection (32%), dislocation/subluxation (24%), and aseptic loosening (24%) were the commonest indications for re-revision. The 4-year survival rate was 83.8% (95% CI=76.7%–88.9%). Multiple revision indications (Hazard Ratio (HR)=2.78; 95% CI=1.03–7.49) and incomplete revision procedures (HR=5.76; 95% CI=1.28–25.9) increased the risk of re-revision Although the overall risk of revision for pseudotumour in non-MoM THRs is low, the risk is increasing and is significantly higher in ceramic-on-ceramic and large head metal-on-polyethylene THR. These revisions have a high early failure rate.
Recent studies have demonstrated that implant-specific blood metal ion thresholds exist in unilateral and bilateral metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty patients, with these thresholds being most effective for identifying patients at low-risk of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). We investigated whether these new blood metal ion thresholds could effectively identify patients at risk of ARMD in an external cohort of MoM hip arthroplasty patients. We performed a validation study involving 803 MoM hip arthroplasties implanted in 710 patients at three European centres (323=unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR); 93=bilateral BHR; 294=unilateral Corail-Pinnacle). All patients underwent whole blood metal ion sampling. Patients were divided into those with ARMD (revised for ARMD or ARMD on imaging; n=75), and those without ARMD (n=635). Previously devised implant-specific blood metal ion thresholds (cobalt=2.15μg/l for unilateral BHR; maximum cobalt or chromium=5.5μg/l for bilateral BHR; cobalt=3.57μg/l for unilateral Corail-Pinnacle) were applied to the validation cohort, with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis used to establish the discriminatory characteristics for each respective threshold. The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for distinguishing between patients with and without ARMD for each implant-specific threshold were respectively: unilateral BHR=89.4% (95% CI=82.8%-96.0%), 78.9%, 86.7%, 44.1%, 96.9%; bilateral BHR=89.2% (95% CI=81.3%-97.1%), 70.6%, 86.8%, 54.5%, 93.0%; unilateral Corail-Pinnacle=76.9% (95% CI=63.9%-90.0%), 65.0%, 85.4%, 24.5%, 97.1%. The 7μg/l UK MHRA threshold missed significantly more patients with ARMD compared with the implant-specific thresholds (4.9% vs. 2.8%; p=0.0003). This external multi-centre validation study has confirmed that MoM hip arthroplasty patients with blood metal ion levels below newly devised implant-specific thresholds have a low-risk of ARMD. Compared to implant-specific thresholds, the currently proposed fixed MHRA threshold missed more patients with ARMD. We recommend using implant-specific thresholds over fixed thresholds when managing MoM hip arthroplasty patients.
Recent studies have reported on non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (non-MoMHA) patients requiring revision surgery for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). Although the outcomes following revision surgery for ARMD in MoMHA patients are known to generally be poor, little evidence exists regarding outcomes following non-MoMHA revision surgery performed for ARMD. We determined the outcomes following non-MoMHA revision surgery performed for ARMD, and identified predictors of re-revision. We performed a retrospective observational study using data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. All primary non-MoMHA patients who subsequently underwent revision surgery for ARMD between 2008–2014 were included (n=185). Outcome measures following ARMD revision were intraoperative complications, mortality, and re-revision surgery. Predictors of re-revision surgery were identified using Cox regression analysis. Intra-operative complications occurred in 6.0% (n=11) of ARMD revisions. The cumulative 4-year patient survival rate was 98.2% (95% CI=92.9–99.5%). Re-revision surgery was performed in 13.5% (n=25) of hips at a mean time of 1.2 years (range 0.1–3.1 years) following ARMD revision. Infection (32%), dislocation/subluxation (24%), and aseptic loosening (24%) were the commonest re-revision indications. The cumulative 4-year implant survival rate was 83.8% (95% CI=76.7%-88.9%). Significant predictors of re-revision were: multiple revision indications (Hazard Ratio (HR)=2.78; 95% CI=1.03–7.49; p=0.043), incomplete revision procedures (including modular component exchange only) (HR=5.76; 95% CI=1.28–25.9; p=0.022), and ceramic-on-polyethylene revision bearings (HR=3.08; 95% CI=1.01–9.36; p=0.047). Non-MoMHA patients undergoing ARMD revision have a high short-term risk of re-revision. Infection, dislocation/subluxation, and aseptic loosening were the commonest re-revision indications. Furthermore, important and potentially modifiable predictors of future re-revision were identified. Although the poor prognostic factors identified require validation in future studies, our findings may be used to counsel patients about the risks associated with ARMD revision surgery, and guide decisions about the reconstructive procedure.
Outcomes following metal-on-metal hip replacement (MoMHR) revision surgery for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) have been poor, and inferior compared with non-ARMD revisions. Subsequently, surgeons and worldwide authorities widely recommended early revision for ARMD, with a lower surgical threshold adopted. However, the impact of early surgery for ARMD is unknown. We compared the rates of adverse outcomes following MoMHR revision surgery in matched ARMD and non-ARMD patients. We performed a retrospective observational study using data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. All MoMHR patients subsequently undergoing revision surgery for any indication between August 2008 and August 2014 were eligible. ARMD and non-ARMD revisions were matched one-to-one for multiple potential confounding factors using propensity scores. Adverse outcomes following revision surgery (intra-operative complications, mortality, re-revision surgery) were compared between matched groups using regression analysis. In 2,576 matched MoMHR revisions (ARMD=1,288 and non-ARMD=1,288), intra-operative complications were similar between ARMD (2.4%) and non-ARMD (2.5%) revisions (odds ratio=0.97, 95% CI=0.59–1.60; p=0.899). All-cause mortality rates were lower following ARMD revision compared with non-ARMD revision (hazard ratio (HR)=0.43, 95% CI=0.22–0.86; p=0.018). All-cause re-revision rates were lower following ARMD revision compared with non-ARMD revision (HR=0.52, 95% CI=0.36–0.75; p<0.001). Compared with ARMD revision (5-years=94.3%), MoMHR revisions for infection (5-years=81.2%) and dislocation/subluxation (5-years=81.9%) had the lowest implant survival rates. Contrary to previous observations, MoMHRs revised for ARMD have approximately half the risk of re-revision and death compared to non-ARMD revisions. We suspect worldwide regulatory authorities have positively influenced outcomes following ARMD revision by widely recommending that surgeons exercise a lower revision threshold. Our findings suggest the threshold for ARMD revision surgery need not be lowered further. The high risk of failure following MoMHR revision for infection and dislocation is concerning.
We recently published a paper comparing the incidence
of adverse outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty
(UKA and TKA). The conclusion of this study, which was in favour
of UKA, was dismissed as “biased” in a review in Cite this article:
