Mechanical loading of joints with osteoarthritis (OA) results in pain-related functional impairment, altered joint mechanics and physiological nociceptor interactions leading to an experience of pain. However, the current tools to measure this are largely patient reported subjective impressions of a nociceptive impact. A direct measure of nociception may offer a more objective indicator. Specifically, movement-induced physiological responses to nociception may offer a useful way to monitor knee OA. In this study, we gathered preliminary data on healthy volunteers to analyse whether integrated biomechanical and physiological sensor datasets could display linked and quantifiable information to a nociceptive stimulus. Following ethical approval, 15 healthy volunteers completed 5 movement and stationary activities in 2 conditions; a control setting and then repeated with an applied quantified thermal pain stimulus to their right knee. An inertial measurement unit (IMU) and an electromyography (EMG) lower body marker set were tested and integrated with ground reaction force (GRF) data collection. Galvanic skin response electrodes for skin temperature and conductivity and photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors were manually timestamped to the integrated system. Pilot data showed EMG, GRF and IMU fluctuations within 0.5 seconds of each other in response to a thermal trigger. Preliminary analysis on the 15 participants tested has shown skin conductance, PPG, EMG, GRFs, joint angles and kinematics with varying increases and fluctuations during the thermal condition in comparison to the control condition. Preliminary results suggest physiological and biomechanical data outputs can be linked and identified in response to a defined nociceptive stimulus. Study data is currently founded on healthy volunteers as a proof-of-concept. Further exploratory statistical and sensor readout pattern analysis, alongside early and late-stage OA patient data collection, can provide the information for potential development of wearable nociceptive sensors to measure disease progression and treatment effectiveness.
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) can be delivered using head mounted display (HMD) to interact with 3D virtual environment (VE). IVR has shown promising results in management of chronic pain conditions, using different mechanisms (e.g., exposure to movement and distraction). However, it has not been widely tested for CLBP. Future development of IVR intervention needs inputs from gatekeepers to determine key considerations, facilitators and barriers. This qualitative study aimed to explore views and opinions of physiotherapists about IVR intervention for adults with CLBP. Four focus groups were conducted online, with 16 physiotherapists. A demonstration of existing IVR mechanisms was presented. The data were transcribed and analysed through descriptive thematic analysis.Background
Methods
Patients with low back pain are increasing globally. Physical dysfunction and psychosocial factors such as stress, anxiety, and fear of movement, often referred to as yellow flags, play a role in the persistence of low back pain. What is not known is the extent to which yellow flags are screened for and treatment adjusted accordingly by Physiotherapists in India. The aim was to determine the current knowledge and awareness of physiotherapists in India regarding psychosocial factors for managing patients with low back pain. Semi-structured interviews gathered data from of six physiotherapists, The interviews were conducted online. The data was transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.Purpose and Background
Methods
Patients’ engagement with self-management strategies (SMS) is key when managing low back pain (LBP) and relies on appropriate information being delivered by the treating Clinician. However, patients have differing coping mechanisms which may affect success with SMS. This study aimed to determine Patient and Physiotherapist's perceptions of coping responses and SMS in patients with LBP. Patient completed a Pain Coping strategies questionnaire, before and after LBP treatment. Semi-structured interviews gathered data from of 10 patients (6 males; and 6 physiotherapists. Questionnaire data was described descriptively, and qualitative data was transcribed/analysed thematically.Purpose and Background
Methods
Current tools to measure pain are broadly subjective impressions of the impact of the nociceptive impulse felt by the patient. A direct measure of nociception may offer a more objective indicator. Specifically, movement-induced physiological responses to nociception may offer a useful way to monitor knee OA. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated whether integrated biomechanical and physiological sensor datasets could display linked and quantifiable information to a nociceptive stimulus. Following ethical approval, we applied a quantified thermal pain stimulus to a volunteer during stationary standing in a gait lab setting. An inertial measurement unit (IMU) and an electromyography (EMG) lower body marker set were tested and integrated with ground reaction force (GRF) data collection. Galvanic skin response electrodes and skin thermal sensors were manually timestamp linked to the integrated system.Abstract
Objectives
Method
To determine the effects of self-management interventions (SMIs) including an exercise component (EC) on low back pain (LBP) and disability and to determine whether SMIs with tailored exercises (TEs) have superior outcomes compared to SMIs with general exercises (GEs). An electronic systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed in 5 electronic databases. RCTs compared SMIs with an EC to control interventions. Data were extracted at 3 follow-up points (short-term, intermediate and long-term) and meta-analyses were performed. Reviewed RCTs were divided into subgroups based on whether the EC was tailored or generic. A subgroup meta-analysis was performed at the short-term follow-up to assess whether the SMIs with TEs have superior outcomes compared to SMIs with GEs.Abstract
Objectives
Methods
Trunk muscle activity and thoraco-lumbar kinematics have been shown to discriminate non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) subgroups from healthy controls. Thoracic spine kinematics and muscle activity whilst intuitively associated with NSCLBP, has received less attention and the possibility of intra-regional interactions remains an area for exploration. Determine relationships between muscle activation and kinematics in active extension pattern (AEP) and flexion pattern (FP) subgroups and no-low back pain controls during a sagittal bending task.Background
Purpose
The preliminary study aimed to establish clinical and research expert opinion with regards to the key components of an assessment of a person with Mechanical Low Back Pain (MLBP). We aimed to identify the key subjective questions and objective tests which would be helpful for clinicians to develop the most appropriate self-management exercise programme. This is the first part of the study to develop the ‘Back-to-Fit’ digital tool offering personalised self-management exercise solutions for people with MLBP. Summary of the methods A Bristol online survey which included a questionnaire with a series of open and closed questions was developed using the literature and was distributed among clinicians/researchers with a background in the clinical management of MLBP. The questionnaire included 6 demographic questions followed by sections related to subjective questions and objective tests of the MLBP assessment. 71 participants responded to the survey. In the subjective assessment component, ≥80% level of agreement was obtained for 17 of 26 proposed subjective questions and 05 of the 21 suggested objective tests. Two more questions and two objective tests to be included in the assessment had been suggested by the partcipants.Purpose of the study and background
Results
To assess the test-retest reliability, construct validity and determine the cut-off scoret of BACKonLINE™ for people with LBP. Appropriate treatment for Low back pain (LBP) is vital, however patients can wait for 14–24 weeks on NHS Physiotherapy lists. Many factors contribute to LBP and initially can be due to peripheral tissue damage. However, persistent LBP is associated with amplification in pain processing in the central nervous system (central sensitisation-CS). CS often results in poorer outcomes and often requires longer management making timely assessment and appropriate management crucial. An online self-assessment and self-management tool (BACKonLINE™) for discerning between characteristics of predominantly centrally (CD) or peripherally (PD) driven LBP was developed using a Delphi study.Purpose of the Study
Background
Back and lower limb injuries are prevalent in athletes who perform novel weight-lifting techniques with inappropriate kinematics. Visual-auditory instructions and knowledge of performance (KP) verbal instructions are utilised to help novices execute novel skills. Effectiveness of these methods on executing appropriate front-squat lifting kinematics is limited. Aim: to investigate the effects of visual-auditory instructions compared to KP verbal instructions on front-squat kinematics at sticking point in novice lifters, with improvement determined by proximity to the kinematics of an expert lifter at sticking point when performing optimal front-squat lift. Twenty-four novices were randomised into two groups and performed front-squat lift. The novices in visual-auditory group (n = 12, age = 24.33 ± 2.93 years) received videoaudio instructions, verbal group (n = 12, Age= 22.66 ± 2.34 years) received KP verbal instructions. MATLAB software measured kinematic lumbar angles, Kinovea software measured hip, knee, ankle angles at sticking point of front-squat. Data were collected from video recordings of novices and an expert pre-and post-instructions in one session and expert data were used as reference values of proximity for both groups.Purpose & Background
Methods
The ability to jump higher is a key factor for athletic performance and relies on many factors including spinal movement and trunk muscle activity. Manual therapy including Mulligan' Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) techniques are proposed to increase spinal movement and thus function. The evidence pf the effect of manual therapy on muscle activity is limited. We aimed to determine the immediate effects of an extension SNAG on the lower lumbar spine on jump height and rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), multifidus (M) and iliocostalis Lumborum (IL) muscle activity during the flight phase of vertical jump compared to a placebo intervention (flat hand pressure). Eighteen healthy participants (16 males, age 28.11±5.01 years, weight 70.58±11.9 kg, height 1.70±0.07m, body mass index 24.28±3.30)from Cardiff University were randomly allocated to either an extension SNAG or placebo intervention. Surface Electromyography was normalised to maximum voluntary contraction and was collected during the flight phase of the jump and jump height was measured using jump and reach test.Purpose & Background
Method
To develop an online self-assessment and self-management tool (BACKonLINE™) for discerning between people with characteristics of predominantly centrally (CD) or peripherally (PD) driven LBP. Low back pain (LBP) may worsen with time, making appropriate treatment important. In the NHS Physiotherapy services LBP patients may wait for 14–24 weeks for treatments. Many factors contribute to LBP, but it is predominantly initially viewed as a result of peripheral tissue damage. However, evidence show that persistent LBP is associated with amplification in pain processing in the central nervous system (central sensitisation). Sometimes, this may drive symptoms, resulting in poorer outcomes and requiring longer management. Timely assessment and appropriate management is therefore paramount.Purpose of the Study
Background
Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common knee disorder in active individuals. Movement dysfunction of valgus positioning at the knee during weight-bearing is frequently seen in PFPS. A single-leg squat (SLS) is a test commonly used in physiotherapy to assess for movement dysfunction. Kinesio-Tape (KT) is gaining in popularity in treating PFPS and claims to alter muscle recruitment and motor control, however evidence is weak. Objective: To evaluate the effect of KT applied to the quadriceps on muscle activity with electromyography (EMG) of the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis and vastus medialis oblique and motor control via the frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) using 2-dimensional video analysis. A convenience sample of healthy females were recruited and performed 5 single-leg squats with and without KT. EMG of the quadriceps was recorded and dynamic valgus assessed via the FPPA using Dartfish video analysis software. Eccentric and concentric EMG data was recorded and the FPPA measured in single-leg stance and the depth of the squat. Institutional ethical approval was obtained for the study. 16 active females were assessed (mean age 28.94 +6.58 years). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests found no significant change in eccentric or concentric EMG of the quadriceps (%MVC) with KT compared to without ( KT did not affect EMG activity of the quadriceps or the FPPA in a SLS when applied to the quadriceps of healthy females, questioning proposed effects of KT on normal muscle tissue. Further research is required into the efficacy of using KT in physiotherapy.
Differences in regional lumbar angles in sitting have been observed between subgroups of NSCLBP patients exhibiting motor control impairments (MCI) (O'Sullivan, 2005; Dankaerts et al, 2006). However, differences in standing posture and other spinal regions are unknown. This study aimed to compare regional spinal angles in healthy and MCI subgroups in sitting and standing. An observational, cross-sectional study investigated spinal kinematics of 28 Flexion Pattern (FP), 23 Active Extension Pattern (AEP) (O'Sullivan, 2005) and 28 healthy controls using 3D motion analysis (Vicon) during usual sitting and standing. Mean sagittal angle for Total Lumbar (TotLx), Total Thoracic (TotTx), Upper Thoracic (UTx), Lower Thoracic (LTx), Upper Lumbar (ULx) and Lower Lumbar (LLx) regions between groups were compared using one-way ANOVA.Background and Purpose of Study:
Methods:
CB-CFT targeting specific pain provoking posture/movements in NSCLBP patients was shown more beneficial than current best practice. Resources for such interventions are substantial and so modifications for today's NHS are warranted. This study investigated feasibility and effect of CB-CFT delivered in a group setting (CB-CFT/G). Twenty three patients referred to Physiotherapy with NSCLBP undertook (i) 6 week CB-CFT/G(n=13) or (ii) current best practice (C)(n=10). Outcomes: Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), pain (VAS), fear avoidance (Tampa Scale of Kinaesiophobia;TSK), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire;IPAQ), distress&risk assessment (DRAM), StarTBack and satisfaction. Unpaired t-tests assessed between-group difference in mean change of each outcome (p<0.05).Background
Methods
To determine the effect of leg dominance on trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises on the floor and a gym ball. Perturbation training including bridging exercises and unstable surfaces have been shown to increase trunk activity. Trunk muscle activity increases on the contralateral side to the stabilising leg during bridging, however, no studies exist on the effect of leg dominance on trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises. This study will investigate whether trunk muscle activity differs when stabilising on the dominant versus non-dominant leg.Purpose
Background
Evidence suggests classification system (CS) guided treatments are more effective than generalized and practice guidelines based treatments for low back pain (LBP) patients. This study evaluated clinicians' and managers' attitudes towards LBP classification and its usefulness in guiding LBP management. Data from 3 semi-structured interviews with physiotherapy service managers and advanced spinal physiotherapy practitioner and a focus group (5 physiotherapists) in two NHS Health Boards, South Wales, UK, was thematically analysed.Background
Methods
Subjects with Low Back Pain (LBP) often have altered trunk muscle activity and postural sway during perturbations. Research suggests different perturbations have differing results on abdominal muscle activity and postural sway, however, the majority of perturbations investigated are not realistic daily tasks and little evidence exists if the changes are still present following resolution of symptoms. Aim: to determine trunk muscle activity, Lumbar multifidus (M), iliocostalis lumborum (IL), external oblique (EO), transversus abdominus/internal oblique TrA/IO and postural sway during two reaching tasks between subjects with history of LBP (HLBP) and those without. 20 volunteers, 8 HLBP (22±2yrs, 174.9±6.0cm, 68.3±6.22kgs,) and 12 without HLBP (20.58±2.23 yrs, 174.5±9.8cm, 68.6±13.9kgs) gave informed consent. Surface Electromyography (sEMG) measured muscle activity of M, IL, TrA/IO, EO and VICON force plate measured postural sway (anterior posterior (AP)centre of pressure (CoP), medial lateral(ML)CoP during high (HRT) and low reaching tasks (LRT). sEMG data was normalized to maximum voluntary contractions. Force plate data was processed using Matlab R2009b. Results: Mann-Whitney U tests noted a significant increase in EO sEMG activity in HLBP group for HRT (p=0.03). Results were insignificant for HRT: M(p=0.64), IL(0.19), TrA/IO,(p=0.14), AP CoP(p=0.44), ML CoP(p=0.69), LRT: M(p=0.58), IL(0.35) TrA/IO(p=0.58), EO(p=0.28), AP CoP (p=0.39), ML CoP (p=0.24).Background
Method
Movement dysfunction resulting in a knee valgus position during weight bearing activity is associated with increased risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury and Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome especially in young active females. In clinical practice determining the critical knee flexion angle (CKFA) during a single leg squat (SLS) test is used to assess this dysfunction, yet its reliability is unknown. This study aimed to determine rater agreement in determining the presence of knee valgus movement (yes/no) during a SLS test in recreational females (n = 16, age 24.3 ±7.9 yrs, height 165.7±4.8m, mass 62.5±6.4kg) and the intra and inter-rater reliability of measuring CKFA using SiliconCoach™. Three experienced physiotherapists viewed 48 randomised SLS test videos. One physiotherapist repeated the viewing for test-retest analysis. Test-retest agreement for rating SLS test was acceptable (weighted kappa (k) = 0.667). Inter-rater agreement was moderate to substantial (weighted k = 0.284–0.613). Intra-rater reliability of CKFA was acceptable for all three raters (ICC>0.6). Inter-rater absolute reliability was below 5% of the mean CKFA (SEM 4.26 degrees). As previous research reports intra-rater agreement is better than inter-rater agreement when assessing movement dysfunction during functional activity via visual rating. Intra-rater within session and between session reliability for measuring the CKFA using SiliconCoach™ was acceptable and better than inter-rater reliability. Further research is needed to assess the concurrent and construct validity of the protocols used in this study. It is recommended that qualitative research be performed to identify factors that affect physiotherapist's rating of functional activities.
Active therapeutic exercises during unstable and unilateral conditions using body weight for resistance are often used in the rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP). In LBP patient's unilateral atrophy of the spinal muscles is reported. To address these deficits understanding side to side muscle activity using surface Electromyography (SEMG) can help clinicians design exercises that specifically address these deficits. Aim: To identify the effects of unilateral and unstable bridging exercises on trunk muscle activity. Using a repeated measures design, SEMG side to side measurements of lumbar Multifidus (MF), Iliocostalis Thoracis (ICT), Rectus Abdominis (RA) and External Oblique (EO) were conducted on 20 healthy subjects (16 female, age 25.45±3.57 years, height 166±0.8 cm, weight 63.35±12.70 kg. Mean Body Mass Index 23) during 8 supine bridging exercises with stable, unstable and unilateral conditions.Background
Methods
Assessing the efficacy of cervical orthoses in restricting spinal motion has historically proved challenging due to a poor understanding of spinal kinematics and the difficulty in accurately measuring spinal motion. This study is the first to use an 8 camera optoelectronic, passive marker, motion analysis system with a novel marker protocol to compare the effectiveness of the Aspen, Aspen Vista, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars. Restriction of cervical spine motion was assessed for physiological and functional range of motion (ROM). Nineteen healthy volunteers (12 female, 7 male) were fitted with collars by an approved physiotherapist. ProReflex (Qualisys, Sweden) infra-red cameras were used to track the movement of retro-reflective marker clusters attached to the head and trunk. 3-D kinematic data was collected from uncollared and collared subjects during forward flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation for physiological ROM and during five activities of daily living (ADLs). ROM in the three clinical planes was analysed using the Qualisys Track Manager (Qualisys, Sweden) 6 Degree of Freedom calculation to determine head orientation relative to the trunk. For physiological ROM, the Aspen and Philadelphia were more effective at restricting flexion/extension than the Vista (p<0.001), Miami-J (p<0.001 and p<0.01) and Miami-J Advanced (p<0.01 and p<0.05). The Aspen was more effective at restricting rotation compared to the Vista (p<0.001) and Miami-J (p<0.05). The Vista was least effective at restricting lateral bending (p<0.001). Through functional ROM, the Vista was less effective than the Aspen (p<0.001) and other collars (p<0.01) at restricting flexion/extension. The Aspen and Miami-J Advanced were more effective at restricting rotation than the Vista (p<0.01 and p<0.05) and Miami-J (p<0.05). All the collars were comparable when restricting lateral bending. The Aspen is superior to, and the Aspen Vista inferior to, the other collars at restricting cervical spine motion through physiological ROM. Functional ROM observed during ADLs are less than those observed through physiological ROM. The Aspen Vista is inferior to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ROM. The Aspen collar again performs well, particularly at restricting rotation, but is otherwise comparable to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ranges.
Evidence suggests that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured individuals do not use the same movement strategies as healthy individuals. It is unknown how this may affect them in more challenging activities of daily living and sport. The aim of this study is to evaluate how ACL injured patients perform a single leg squat (SLS) compared to healthy controls. SLS was evaluated as it is more challenging than gait and therefore more relevant to clinical decision making about progressing to sporting maneuvers. To date, 6 ACL deficient (ACLD) (5 males, 1 female; mass=88±22 kg; height=1.78±0.11 m; age=35±11 years), 5 ACL reconstructed (ACLR) (5 males; mass= 83±12 kg; height=1.74±0.07 m; age=29±10 years) and 5 controls (3 males, 2 females; mass= 72±13 kg; height=1.70±0.09 m; age=30±3 years) performed a SLS on the injured leg for the ACL injured participants and the dominant leg for the control group. Motion analysis was performed using a Vicon Nexus system and a Kistler force platform. Knee extension moments and angles were calculated using Vicon Nexus software. The ACLD group had reduced peak flexion angles compared to ACLR and control groups (65±5, 77±7 and 82±9 degrees respectively). Peak extension moments were similar across all groups (ACLD= 0.94±0.26 Nm/kg, ACLR=1.06±0.37 Nm/kg, control=1.04±0.36 Nm/kg). Peak knee moments occurred just after peak flexion and therefore at a smaller flexion angle for the ACLD group compared to the ACLR and control group (59±13, 75±7 and 80±6 degrees). Extension moments were similar when evaluated at a consistent angle of 50 degrees (ACLD=0.70±0.30Nm/kg, ACLR=0.63±0.34Nm/kg control=0.61±0.32Nm/kg). In this sample, the controls squatted deepest followed by the ACLR group, with the ACLD group squatting least deep. This did not translate to an identical pattern for the knee extensor moments. Performance of ACL injured individuals needs to be evaluated on more challenging tasks to fully assess recovery. Further research, with more subjects, will clarify if ACLD individuals are using a strategy to protect their knee or if others factors are preventing them from squatting deeper. This would suggest that these individuals may not have fully recovered and will not be able to perform more challenging activities
Knee injuries in cyclists are often thought to result from an imbalance of load during the cycling motion as a consequence of inappropriate bike set-up. Recently, it has been postulated that incorrect foot positioning may be a significant factor in lower limb injury and poor cycling performance. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of changing the foot position at the shoe-pedal interface on Vastus Medialis (VM) and Vastus Lateralis (VL) activity (mean and mean peak), knee angle and knee displacement. Maximum power tests were completed on a first visit, with data collection on a second visit recorded at 60% of the subjects maximum. Video footage and surface electromyography (SEMG) from VM and VL muscles was obtained. Data was recorded over 10 crank cycles in 3 experimental conditions; neutral, 10 degrees inversion and 10 degrees eversion using Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) wedges fitted between the cyclists shoe and the shoe cleat. Raw data (mean SEMG, mean peak SEMG) was obtained using Noraxon and SiliconCOACH measured knee angle and knee displacement. Data was analyzed using Friedmans test with appropriate post hoc tests. 12 male subjects (range 26-45, mean 35.9 years) completed the study. Mean and mean peak SEMG data showed no significant differences between the 3 experimental conditions for VM and VL. VM:VL ratios from raw mean SEMG data demonstrated a decrease in synchronicity in inversion and eversion compared to neutral. Pronators demonstrated most synchronicity in inversion and least synchronicity in eversion. There were statistically significant differences in knee angle and knee displacement between neutral, inversion and eversion (p<0.05). Inversion promoted smaller knee valgus angles and greater knee displacement from the bike. Eversion promoted larger knee valgus angles and a smaller displacement from the bike. By altering the foot position to either 10 degrees inversion or 10 degrees eversion, knee angle and knee displacement can be significantly influenced. Clinically, subjects who foot type is classified as pronating may benefit from some degree of forefoot inversion posting. Further research on subjects with knee pain needs to be undertaken.
To compare the effectiveness of the Aspen, Aspen Vista, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars at restricting cervical spine movement in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes. Nineteen healthy volunteers (12 female, 7 male) were recruited to the study. Collars were fitted by an approved physiotherapist. Eight ProReflex (Qualisys, Sweden) infra-red cameras were used to track the movement of retro reflective marker clusters placed in predetermined positions on the head and trunk. 3D kinematic data was collected during forward flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation from uncollared and collared subjects. The physiological range of motion in the three planes was analysed using the Qualisys Track Manager system.Objective
Methods
To determine differences in knee valgus angles produced during a single leg squat and hip muscle strength between healthy subjects and patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). To determine correlations between variables of hip muscle strength, knee valgus angle and pain. Study design: Observational study of 20 (8 male 12 female) healthy (H) subjects, matched for age height and weight with 20 (8 male 12 female) PFP patients (mean symptom duration 46.75 weeks). All subjects fulfilled specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Appropriate Ethical approval was obtained. Measures for both groups were Knee valgus angle during a single leg squat using 2D motion capture and SiliconCoach software for measurement of knee valgus angles, hip abduction, internal and external rotation muscle strength using hand held dynamometry, visual analogue scale for pain. Strength was reported as a percentage of body weight. All measures were taken on the affected leg for PFP subjects and matched for the equivalent leg in healthy group. SiliconCoach was determined to be reliable for intra-rater reliability of knee valgus angle (ICC.996). There were no significant differences in age, height and weight (p=.59,.51,.26 respectively). Significant differences existed in hip abduction strength p=.001(PFP 19.93(9.2), H 32.22(8.26)), Hip internal rotation p=0.001 (PFP 12.94(4.35), H 19.53(6.36)), Hip external rotation p=0.001(PFP 10.00(3.07), H 16.26 (4.62)), Knee Valgus Angles p=0.001(PFP 5.31(2.59), H 2.29 (2.35)). No correlations existed between any of the variables including pain. This preliminary study shows that patients with PFP have larger knee valgus angles when doing a single leg squat and significantly weaker hip muscle strength when compared to healthy subjects. The reason for larger knee angles during single leg squat could be hypothesised as being due to weak hip abductor muscles not sufficiently controlling the alignment of the femur. However no correlations were found for these measures, nor were they found for any of the other variables including pain level. In summary the results indicate that hip musculature strengthening of the rotators and abductors and measures to reduce knee valgus angle should be included in the rehabilitation programme of patients with PFP. Further research with larger numbers of subjects should be developed to investigate this subject.Aim
Results
To identify differences in hip muscle strength, knee valgus during a single leg squat (SLS),and function between subjects with Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome (GTPS) and healthy(H) subjects. To determine associations between pain, function, hip strength and SLS in GPTS subjects. Study Design: Observational study of 14 (3 male 11 female) PFP patients (mean symptom duration 17 months), matched for age height and weight with 14 healthy (H) subjects, All subjects fulfilled specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Appropriate Ethical approval was obtained. Measures for both groups were Knee valgus angle during SLS using 2D motion capture and SiliconCoach software for measurement of knee valgus angles, hip abduction, internal and external rotation muscle strength using hand held dynamometry, visual analogue scale for pain. Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). All measures were taken on the affected leg for GPTS subjects and matched for the equivalent leg in healthy group. Strength was reported as a percentage of body weight. SiliconCoach was reliable for intra-rater reliability of knee valgus angle (ICC.996). There were no significant differences in age, height and weight (p=.85,.57,.51 respectively). Significant differences existed in hip abduction strength p=.005(GPTS13.72 (7.65), H21.49 (5.55)) and LEFS p=0.001(GPTS 57.28(16.55), H76.92(4.44)). There were no significant differences in internal and external rotation and knee valgus angles p=.509, p=.505, p=.159 respectively. There was a negative correlation between pain and function r=.879) p=0.001) and a moderate positive correlation between function and hip abduction strength r=.428 (p=.127). This preliminary study shows that patients with GPTS have reduced strength in hip abductor musculature when compared to healthy subjects. This may be due to pain inhibition; however the true causes of pain need to be determined. Pain and to a lesser extent hip abductor strength appears to have an effect on function in GPTS patients. In summary the results indicate that hip abductor muscle strengthening and management strategies to reduce pain should be included in the rehabilitation programmes of patients with GPTS. Further research with larger numbers of subjects should be developed to investigate this subject.Aim
Results
Staying active, including walking is promoted as being beneficial for patients with low back pain (LBP). The abdominal muscles appear to influence the stability of the spine and their activity has been shown to change when patients have LBP. Walking with Nordic walking poles has been shown to influence forces on the lower limbs, but little research has investigated the effect on the trunk muscles. Aim: to study the effect of walking using Nordic walking poles on abdominal muscle activity and lower limb forces. Method 15 healthy subjects gave informed consent (5 males. 10 females, age 21.06 yrs.(±88), height 174.45cms (±11.1), weight 71.44 kg (±15.2)). Following a period of walking training with Nordic walking poles data was obtained during a period of walking for internal IO) and external oblique (EO) using surface electromyography activity and vertical lower limb forces (Newtons, (N)) with (WP) and without Nordic walking poles (NP). SEMG data was normalised to maximum voluntary contraction. There were significant increases in IO (p=0.02, NP 31.94 (±39.9) WP 53.05 (±40.61)), EO (p=0.02, NP 46.45, (±30.9), WP 87.93 ± (±60.5)) and vertical forces with poles (p=0.008, NP871.6 (±237.00)N, WP 968.33, (±210.8) N). Using Nordic walking poles significantly increases activity of IO and EO, which may be of value in the rehabilitation of some patients with LBP. Vertical forces increased when walking with poles which is contrary to previous research. This may be due to the data collection setting of a research laboratory or the subjects being novice walkers.Results
Discussion
Some studies report greater repositioning error in LBP patients compared to healthy subjects with other studies showing no differences. This conflicting evidence may be due to different methodologies. A new tool, the Flexchair¯Back Balance Trainer measures consistency of lumbo-pelvic movement during visual tracking tasks which challenge the lumbo-pelvic region. This study aimed to establish the within day (WD) and between day (BD) reliability of a lumbo-pelvic tracking task using the Flexchair in healthy subjects, 22 subjects gave informed consent (10 females, 12 males (age 38.40(±9.29) Height 171.35cms (±8.07) weight 76.21kg (±18.55) Subjects completed six different tracking tasks on the Flexchair, 3 times in the first day with 2 hour of intervals between each test and once on a second and third visit with 2 days in between. Tests 1-6 are of increasing difficulty.Background
Method
No significant difference was detected between groups or time points for either muscle (p>
0.05).
