header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

KEY COMPONENTS OF IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY INTERVENTION FOR CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: PHYSIOTHERAPISTS’ VIEWS AND OPINIONS

The Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR) Annual General Meeting, ‘PANNING FOR GOLD’ 50+ Anniversary Meeting, Coventry, England, 30 June – 1 July 2022.



Abstract

Background

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) can be delivered using head mounted display (HMD) to interact with 3D virtual environment (VE). IVR has shown promising results in management of chronic pain conditions, using different mechanisms (e.g., exposure to movement and distraction). However, it has not been widely tested for CLBP. Future development of IVR intervention needs inputs from gatekeepers to determine key considerations, facilitators and barriers. This qualitative study aimed to explore views and opinions of physiotherapists about IVR intervention for adults with CLBP.

Methods

Four focus groups were conducted online, with 16 physiotherapists. A demonstration of existing IVR mechanisms was presented. The data were transcribed and analysed through descriptive thematic analysis.

Results

IVR was thought to be a suitable adjunct for a subgroup of patients who are reluctant to engage with standard care. Motivation to perform challenging physical tasks was believed to be a potential benefit. Safety, possibility of addiction, and transferability of acquired skills from VE to ‘real world’ and hygiene were concerns and the intervention was preferred to be used under clinical supervision. VE personalisation to patient's goal and preference with delivery and progression being gradual depending upon patient's abilities was suggested. Technical knowledge was seen as a facilitator, while cost and technology acceptance were barriers for future implementation.

Conclusion

Future studies would need to consider the reported views of physiotherapists to inform development and implementation of IVR intervention for CLBP.

Conflicts of interest: No conflict of interest

Sources of funding: Funded by the government of Saudi Arabia.


Email: