Introduction: There is an impression among Orthopaedic surgeons that mobile bearing knee replacement has a better functional outcome than fixed bearing knee replacement. Since kneeling demands a high level of function after knee replacement this study was undertaken to see if mobile bearings in either total or unicompartmental replacement conferred an advantage.

Methods: A prospective randomised study of 207 TKR patients receiving the same prosthesis (Rotaglid, Corin, UK) was performed. Patients were randomised into a mobile bearing group (102 patients with a mean age of 53 years) and a fixed bearing group (105 patients with a mean age of 55 years). Data was also prospectively collected on 215 UKR patients who received the same unicompartmental implant (AMC, Uniglide, Corin, UK). 136 patients (Mean age: 62 yrs) had a mobile insert and 79 (mean age: 65 yrs) a fixed insert.

All patients completed the Oxford Knee Questionnaire preoperatively as well as at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Their stated kneeling ability and total scores were analysed with a perfect score for kneeling ability being 4, and 48 the maximum total score.

Results: In all groups both the kneeling ability and the total scores improved markedly from their preoperative state. At two years the total score for the fixed bearing devices was marginally better than for the mobile (Rotaglide 36;31 and Uniglide 37;33)

There was a more striking difference with respect to kneeling ability with the fixed bearing variants performing better, (Rotaglide 1.4; 0.9 and Uniglide 1.9; 1.4), However, the greatest difference was between the UKR and TKR groups (UKR 1.7; TKR 1.2). Pre-operatively less than 2% of TKR patients (7% of the UKR patients) could kneel. Post-operatively, the patients’ kneeling ability improved with 21% for the mobile bearing, 32% of fixed bearing UKR patients. The TKR patients kneeling ability was 13% of the mobile, 26% of fixed bearing patients were able to kneel with little or no difficulty. In all groups the stated kneeling ability was poor with less than 50% of any group being able to kneel with ease or only minor difficulty.

Conclusion: Those undergoing UKR appeared to perform better than those with a TKR. None of the forms of knee replacement used resulted in good kneeling ability, though this function was improved by arthroplasty in all groups. Mobile bearing inserts

Purpose: Revision patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is a relatively uncommon procedure, with no published reviews identified in the literature. Revision PFAs performed at our institution were reviewed to determine the reasons for PFA failure, the technical ease of revision and to document patient-reported outcomes after revision.

Methods: A prospective review of a cohort of 411 Avon PFA patients identified 31 subsequent revision knee procedures in 27 patients. Data was collected from the institution’s prospective data base, operative reports, X-rays and medical records. Post-operative knee scores (Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index, Bristol Knee Score) were available on 26 knees.

Results: The commonest reason for revision was progression of osteoarthritis (18 cases) followed by undetermined pain (7 cases). Patients with undetermined pain were found to be revised sooner than patients with disease progression (33 months vs 63 months) and also reported poorer outcome scores at 2 years post revision than the disease progression group.

Only two trochlea components were loose at the time of revision and one patella had a large amount of macroscopic wear. All other components were found to be well fixed with minimal wear at the time of revision. There were no difficulties in removing either component. No cases required augments or stemmed femoral components due to bone loss.

Patients undergoing revision surgery did report improvement in their post revision outcome scores compared with their pre-operative scores. The average Oxford Knee Score improved from 17 to 23, Bristol Knee Pain Scores improved from 11 to 20 and Bristol Knee Functional Scores improved from 15 to 16. These results are poorer than those recorded by the overall cohort of primary PFA.

Conclusion: PFA is easy to revise to a primary total knee. Results of revision knees are improved from pre-operative scores but not as good as expected.

Introduction: There is an impression among Orthopaedic surgeons that mobile bearing knee replacement has a better functional outcome than fixed bearing knee replacement. Since kneeling demands a high level of function after knee replacement this study was undertaken to see if mobile bearings in either total or unicompartmental replacement conferred an advantage.

Methods: A prospective randomised study of 207 TKR patients receiving the same prosthesis (Rotaglid , Corin, UK) was performed. Patients were randomised into a mobile bearing group (102 patients with a mean age of 53 years) and a fixed bearing group (105 patients with a mean age of 55 years).

Data was also prospectively collected on 215 UKR patients who received the same Unicompartmental implant (AMC, Uniglide, Corin, UK). One hundred and thirty six patients (Mean age: 62 yrs) had a mobile insert and 79 (mean age: 65 yrs) a fixed insert.

All patients completed the Oxford Knee Questionnaire preoperatively as well as at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Their stated kneeling ability and total scores were analysed with a perfect score for kneeling ability being 4 and 48 the maximum total score.

Results: In all groups both the kneeling ability and the total scores improved markedly from their preoperative state. At two years the total score for the fixed bearing devices was marginally better than for the mobile (Rotaglide 36;31 and Uniglide 37;33)

There was a more striking difference with respect to kneeling ability with the fixed- bearing variants performing better, (Rotaglide 1.4; 0.9 and Uniglide 1.9; 1.4), However, the greatest difference was between the UKR and TKR groups (UKR 1.7; TKR 1.2). Pre-operatively less than 2% of TKR patients (7% of the UKR patients) could kneel. Post-operatively, the patients’ kneeling ability improved with 21% for the mobile bearing, 32% of fixed bearing UKR patients.

The TKR patients kneeling ability was 13% of the mobile, 26% of fixed bearing patients were able to kneel with little or no difficulty. In all groups the stated kneeling ability was poor with less than 50% of any group being able to kneel with ease or only minor difficulty.

Conclusion: Those undergoing UKR appeared to perform better than those with a TKR. None of the forms of knee replacement used resulted in good kneeling ability, though this function was improved by arthroplasty in all groups. Mobile bearing inserts did not confer any advantage with respect to kneeling and in fact performed worse with regard to this particular knee function.

Objective: To review the results of the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty at 5 to 8 years.

Methods: The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty was introduced in clinical practice in September 1996. We present a prospective cohort review of all patients treated in the first three years. Patients were evaluated using the Bristol knee score (BSK), the Melbourne patella score (MPS) and the Oxford knee score (OKS).

Results: 109 patellofemoral arthroplasties were performed in 92 patients between September 1996 and November 1999. The median age was 68 years (range 46 to 86 years). Nine patients (12 knees) died and two patients (two knees) were unfit for follow-up. Ten knees in 9 patients were lost to follow-up giving a follow-up rate of 89%. The mean period of follow-up was 5.6 years.

The median pain score rose from 15/40 pre-operatively to 40 points at eight years. The median (MPS) rose from 10/30 points pre-operatively to 25 points at eight years. The median (OKS) rose from 18/48 pre-operatively to 38 at eight years. 87% of knees had mild or no pain at eight years. There were no cases of failure of the prosthesis itself. All 15 revisions resulted from progression of arthrititis in the tibio-femoral joint. The five-year survival rate for all causes with 86 cases at risk was 96%.

Conclusions: The results show that this type of arthroplasty can give predictable pain relief and excellent functional improvement in patients with isolated patello-femoral arthritis. Disease progression is the main reason for revision to total knee replacement and great care is required in assessing the indications for this procedure.

Purpose of Study: Fixed bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has become popular since several series have shown good 10 year survivorship and excellent function. However little is known about survival during the second decade.

Method: From the Bristol database of over 4000 knee replacements 203 St. George Sled UKR’s which had already survived 10 years were identified. The mean age at surgery was 67 years (48–85), with 64% being female. This cohort has been further reviewed at an average of 14.8 years (10–30) from surgery to determine survivor-ship and function.

Results: Survivorship during the second decade was 87.5%. 58 patients (69 knees) had deceased with implant in situ, only 2 after revision. A further 15 UKR’s have been revised at an average of 13 years post op; 7 for progression of disease, 4 for tibial loosening, 3 for polyethylene wear, 2 for femoral component fracture and 2 for infection.

99 knees were followed for 15 years and 21 knees for 20 years. The average Bristol knee score of the surviving knees fell from 86 to 79 during the second decade.

A previous study showed an 89% 10 year survivor-ship and this is now extended to 82% at 15 years and 76.5% at 20 years.

Conclusion: Satisfactory survival of fixed bearing UKR can be achieved in the second decade suggesting that the indications for mobile bearings require careful definition since there is a higher incidence of complications in many people’s hands.

Introduction: Anterior Knee pain is a very common presentation in Orthopaedic out patient clinics. However, Trochlear Dysplasia as a condition is still not very well understood.

Materials and Methods: Operative findings in patients undergoing Trochleaplasty and in young patients undergoing Patella-femoral arthroplasty were studied. Patients having trochlear dysplasia were identified. All these patients were sent a questionnaire to explore the variety of symptoms they experienced. 87 patients were identified for the study. 71(82%) patients responded to the questionnaire.

Results: Two subgroups were identified, one with dislocation of patella and the other without dislocation of the patella. Patients in patella dislocation group were younger (12 years vs 24) than those who presented without dislocation of patella. Patella dislocation group had more patients with anterior knee pain (71% vs 52%) as teenagers as compared to the group without dislocations. Symptoms such as giving way, lack of trust and unable to participate in sports were more commonly seen in the group with patella dislocation whereas, limited walking distance and difficulty with climbing the stairs were more commonly seen in the group without dislocation. Symptoms such as pain, catching and locking were seen equally amongst the two groups.

Conclusion: We believe that the patients with trochlear dysplasia have a bimodal presentation. Patients with dislocation of patella present earlier than those without patella dislocation. These two groups also have different symptoms at presentation. It is important to identify these subgroups correctly for appropriate management.

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of revision total knee replacement (TKR) within 5 years of the index procedure at a large multi-surgeon unit using a single prosthesis and to determine the cause of failure of those implants.

This was a retrospective review of all primary Kine-max Plus TKR performed at the Avon Orthopaedic Center between 1.1.1990 and 1.1.2000. Cases were identified that required revision arthroplasty in any form within 5 years of the index procedure. Case notes and Xrays were reviewed to determine causes of failure.

There were 2826 primary Kinemax Plus TKR performed during the study period. Of these 20 were known to have required revision surgery within 5 years. 8 were revised for deep infection of the prosthesis and 12 for aseptic causes. The overall incidence of premature failure of the Kinemax Plus TKR at 5 years was 0.71%. The incidence of aseptic premature failure at 5 years was 0.42%. Detailed examination of the clinical records indicated that some form of technical error at the time of the index arthroplasty was responsible for the early failure of 6 prostheses. This equates to 0.21% of the procedures performed. Aseptic loosening of the remaining 6 cases could not be attributed to a specific cause.

Introduction: Following previously gratifying results in older patients the study aims to quantify the outcomes and identify any contraindications in patient selection for patello-femoral replacements using the Avon pros-thesis in patients under 55 years old.

Method: We present early outcome results for a prospective cohort study of patients under 55 years of age.110 knees in 86 patients (median age 47years, range 25–54) have been treated with Avon patello-femoral replacement (88 in females and 22 in males). Diagnoses included lateral facet OA (59 knees), patella dislocation (36 knees), trochlear dysplasia (39 knees) and post patellectomy instability (7 knees). 108 knees had undergone previous surgery. 14 knees required additional intra-operative procedures (including 11 lateral releases and 2 patella realignments). All patients were assessed pre-operatively using the Oxford, Bristol and WOMAC scores.

Results: No knees have been lost to follow-up. 82 knees have post operative scores available (mean follow-up 27 months). 8 have been revised (6 due to progression of OA). The mean Oxford, Bristol and WOMAC scores all improved: 18 to 32, 56 to 83 and 39 to 25 respectively. Asymptomatic deterioration of the tibio femoral joint is seen in some cases of primary OA but not with trochlear dysplasia. 21 knees required post-operative additional procedures including 6 lateral releases, 3 patella realignments and 5 revisions. Equally good results were seen when comparing patients with the 3 main diagnoses. Trochlear dysplasia is strongly predicted by young age at onset of symptoms and patellar dislocation.

Conclusion: Many of this type of patient, with disabling symptoms, wish to “live now”. The short-term improvements are frequently dramatic. Comparison of underlying pathologies has not identified groups that are performing less well to suggest restricting current indications. As yet there is no suggestion of prosthetic failure. Revision has presented little difficulty since minimal bone is resected primarily.

Aim: To assess the results of aseptic and aseptic cases using the PFC/TC3 system, and to correlate this with the restoration of joint line height.

Method: 148 patients underwent revision TKR using the PFC/TC3 system. No re-revision cases were included in this series. Data was prospectively collected (using the Bristol Knee Score) pre-operatively and at a mean of 4.2 years post-revision. 31 revisions were for infection and 53 revisions were for aseptic loosening. Revision for infection was done as a two-stage procedure and aseptic as a single operation. Measurements of the joint line height were made pre and post-operatively using Figgie’s method. The cases were divided into 3 groups on the basis of joint line restoration:

Lowered by more than 5 mm

Results: The mean pre-op total score for the infection group was 35/100 and 40/100 for the aseptic loosening group. The total score post-operatively was 67 for the infection group and 73 for the aseptic loosening group. The joint line was restored in 50% of infected cases and in 60% of aseptic loosening cases.

Conclusion: although the overall results were slightly less satisfactory for the infected revision group, there was no significant difference between the two groups either in total BKS scores or in reproduction of the joint line. The average outcome was much less good than for primary TKR.

Purpose of study: To examine the fate of the non operated on compartment of the knee, following unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), by radiological assessment 10 years after operation.

Summary of methods and results: A total of 50 UKRs were performed on 45 carefully selected patients between 1989 and 1992. Fifteen patients died, two patients were lost to follow-up and two knees were revised. The radiographs of the remaining 30 knees were reviewed three times by blind and randomised assessment using Ahlback and Altman scoring systems to measure the progression of osteoarthritis within the joints. Standard long-leg weight-bearing anteroposterior views of the knee and skyline views of the patello-femoral joint were taken before, at eight months and ten years after operation. Two knees showed evidence of progression of osteoarthritis within the patello-femoral joint and three knees showed some progression of the opposite tibio-femoral compartment.

Statement of conclusion: Our study provides evidence that after ten years progressive OA within the retained compartments following UKR is rare and usually minor.

Introduction: Correct prosthesis alignment and joint line reproduction in total knee replacement (TKR) is vital for a successful clinical outcome. It is acknowledged that the ideal coronal alignment of the knee following TKR should be between 4–10 degrees of valgus. A neutral or varus knee is associated with a higher failure rate. Previous studies have shown that ideal alignment is achieved in only around two-thirds of cases.

Joint line elevation > 8mm has been associated with inferior clinical outcome, and depression associated with retropatellar pain and increased risk of patella subluxation.

Recently, modifications have been made to the Kine-max-Plus Total Knee System instrumentation, theoretically providing better internal fixation to prevent a varus cut and a 12 mm measured resection from the “normal” tibial plateau. This study aims to examine whether these changes result in an improvement in alignment, and a more reliable restoration of joint line.

Materials and Methods: Two consecutive series, each of 75 patients who had undergone TKR using either the old (Group A) or the new (Group B) instrumentation were included in the study. Antero-posterior and lateral preoperative and postoperative knee radiographs were assessed using the American knee society radiographic analysis for prosthesis postionoing by 2 independent observers. The Tibial and Femoral Component Angles in the coronal plane (cTCA and cFCA) and in the sagittal plane (sTCA and sFCA) were measured, as was the change in joint line height.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that use of the new instrumentation is associated with better restoration of joint line, and is more effective in preventing implantation of the tibial component in varus. These figures relating to a modern instrumentation system provide a yardstick against which computer assisted and robotic surgery can be judged. Long-term follow-up will be required to assess the clinical significance of these results.

Purpose: To assess the outcome of customised hinged knee replacements when used to salvage catastrophically failed knee replacements in elderly patients.

Methods: Since 1993, 30 of the 280 (10.7%) revision knee replacements at the Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Bristol have used Endo customised hinged knee pros-theses (21 rotating, 9 fixed) for salvage of limb threatening situations in elderly patients. All were prospectively recorded and regularly reviewed. The average age was 75 years with a predominance of females. Surgical indications were 22 periprosthetic fractures (with or without aseptic loosening), 5 massive aseptic osteolyses, and 3 deep infections.

Results: The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was just 14.6 days and all patients were discharged walking with aids. At follow up (mean 3.0 years, range 0.5–9.3 years) 9 patients had died with their prostheses in situ and functioning. 2 had undergone amputation for recurrent sepsis and 2 had received further surgery for septic problems. 2 patients required further surgery for prosthetic disarticulation and one patient had successful on table vascular repair. 25 patients had mid or long term follow up. Their mean American Knee Scores (AKS) were 69.8 for knee and 35.6 for function (maximum 100), with a mean total knee flexion of 83 degrees. Mean Oxford knee scores (OKS) and WOMAC scores (both scored between 12 and 60 with low score indicating less difficulties) were 34.0 and 30.5 respectively.

Conclusions: Customised hinge revision knee replacements gave extremely rapid rehabilitation and hospital discharge which justified the high prosthetic cost. Complications were high but at mid and long-term review, no prostheses had failed from an aseptic cause and most of the knees of this challenging group were providing both stability and flex

Purpose A new design of patello-femoral arthroplasty has been used to treat patients under 55 years suffering severe symptoms from chondral and early arthritic disease of the patello-femoral joint.

Materials and Methods and Results Fifty-two patello-femoral arthroplasties were performed in 45 patients under the age of fifty-five years when other treatments had failed. The average age was 48 years (range 36–54 years). Thirty-seven cases had undergone previous surgery for a variety of conditions, and the causes of the disorders were analysed. Results were assessed using pain scores and Bartlett’s and Oxford functional scores. 35 cases were reviewed at 8 months and 22 cases at two years. The median pain score improved from 10/40 points to 35 at two years. The Bartlett score increased from 10/30 points to 27 and the Oxford score from 19/48 points to 35 at two years. The range of movement increased from 114° to 121°. There have been no cases of deep infection, loosening, wear or instability. Disease progression, a potential risk has occurred in one case.

Conclusions This prosthesis offers a solution in younger patients with disabling symptoms of isolated early patello-femoral disease who have not responded to conservative surgical management.

The aim of this study was to examine causes of the failed knee arthroplasty.

Since 1980 the Bristol Knee Replacement Registry has prospectively recorded data on 3024 patients. Complete original and 5 year follow up data was available on 999 knees.

The surgery was judged a failure if there was no improvement in the American Knee Society score at 5 years or if there had been a revision within that time.

The prosthesis used was Kinematic in 471 knees, the Medial Unicompartmental Sled in 258 knees, the Kinemax Plus in 134 knees and a variety of other designs.

At 5 years, 79 (7. 9%) either showed no improvement in the American Knee Society score or had been revised. The failure rate was 7% for the Kinematic, 7% for the medial Sled and 5% for the Kinemax Plus. 20% of the less frequently used designs failed.

Five (0. 5%) knee replacements failed because of infection. 22 knees (2. 2%) had significant comorbidity that precluded a satisfactory functional outcome. For 7 knees (0. 7%), the patient exhibited patterns of abnormal illness behaviour that were thought to explain the poor outcome. A further 27 knees (2. 7%) failed because of technical errors either at the time of surgery (13 cases, 1. 3%), or in selecting a prosthesis which failed prematurely (14 cases 1. 4%). No cause for failure could be identified in 12 cases (1. 2%).

The high failure rate amongst infrequently used prosthesis emphasises the need to use established designs. No cause for failure could be identified in 12 cases and 5 were due to infection; such cases are hard to avoid. This study shows the importance of assessing both the overall physical and psychological state of the patient if disappointing results are to be avoided. The most frequent cause of an unsatisfactory outcome was a technical one, which should be avoidable.

Isolated patellofemoral arthritis occurs in up to 10% of patients suffering osteoarthritis of the knee. Previous reports of several different patellofemoral designs have given indifferent results. The Lubinus prosthesis has been shown to have a 50% failure rate at eight years in a study of 76 cases. The main reasons for failure were mal-alignment, wear, impingement and disease progression. As a result of these studies, a new prosthesis was designed to solve some of these problems.

The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty was first implanted in September 1996. The cases have been entered into a prospective review with evaluations at eight months, two years and five years. The outcome was assessed using pain scores, Bartlett’s patella score and the Oxford knee score. To date, 186 knees have been treated; over 100 knees have been reviewed at two years and 20 knees at five years. The main pain score improved from a pre-operative level of 13.5 points out of 40 to 33.5 points at two years and 36 at five years. The mean pre-operative movement was 109° and this increased to 120° at five years. The Bartlett patella score improved from a pre-operative level of 10.5 points out of 30 pre-operatively to 23 points at two years and 25 at five years. The Oxford knee score was 20 points out of 48 pre-operatively and this improved to 35 points at two years and 40 points at five years. One patient developed subluxation, which required distal soft tissue realignment. No other patient has developed problems with alignment or wear. Ten knees have developed evidence of disease progression usually in the medial compartment of which six have required revision to a total knee replacement.

The results to date suggest that this improved design has all but eliminated the previous problems of malalignment and early wear. The functional results are as good or better than those of a total knee replacement. There is a low complication rate and an excellent range of movement. Disease progression remains a potential problem. This type of prosthesis offers a reasonable alternative to total knee replacement in this small group of patients with isolated, early patellofemoral disease.

The aim of this study was to report our experience of patellofemoral arthroplasty in isolated osteoarthrosis.

Material and Methods: The Lubinus Patellofemoral Arthroplasty was performed between 1989 and 1995 in 76 knees. The Avon Patella Femoral Arthroplasty was used from 1996 to 2001 in 187 knees. The average age of the patients was 65.5 years (range 36–87) with a male to female ratio of 1: 5. All the patients have been prospectively reviewed with standard radiographs, the Bristol Knee Score, and more recently Bartlett and Oxford scores.

Results: Patients with the Lubinus prosthesis were followed for an average of 7.4 years (range 5–10 years). Eleven patients (14 knees) have died and the remaining 62 knees have a 100% follow-up. The cumulative revision rate was 28% (21 out of 76). Survivorship at 8 years was 65% (Cl 49 to 77) for revision and 48% (Cl 36 to 59) for revision plus moderate pain. The two main complications were Maltracking 32% and progressive tibio-femoral arthritis in 9%.

The Avon Arthroplasty with improved design features for better tracking and congruity was introduced in 1996 and 187 have now been inserted in 147 patients. One hundred and nine knees have been followed for 8 months and 82 have completed the 2 year follow-up. Two patients have undergone revision to a TKR 97.5% (survivorship 2 out of 82). Three patients have had a unicompartmental arthroplasty added for disease progression. There have been no cases of patella maltracking or subliaxation.

Four year survivorship for moderate pain and revision is 96% (79 out of 82). Functional scores compared favourably with parallel series of total knee replacements.

Conclusion: The medium-term results of the Lubinus Patello Femoral Arthroplasty are unsatisfactory. We suggest the use of this prosthesis should be discontinued. The Avon Arthroplasty has improved results in the short-term.

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of polyethylene wear in a fixed bearing knee replacement in order to establish a norm against which mobile bearing implants can be judged.

Method: Eighteen all polyethylene tibial components were retrieved when a St Georg Sled unicompartmental replacement was being revised. This prosthesis has a biconvex femoral component and a totally flat tibia; thus point loading occurs on at implantation. The implants had been in situ between 6 and 110 months, revision was predominantly for progression of the arthritic process.

Linear wear was measured using an electronic micrometer and volumetric wear by creating a mould of the defect using dental wax, and subsequently weighing the wax.

Results: All components developed dishing which varied in orientation but matched the alignment of the femoral component. A near congruous articulation was thus produced correctly aligned for that particular arthroplasty. The mean linear penetrative wear for the group was 0.33mm (0.09mm per year) and the volumetric wear 124mm³ (26mm³ per year). The rate of wear seemed greatest during the second year.

Conclusion: The wear rate for this totally non congruous implant was much less than anticipated. The linear penetrative wear is comparable to that reported for Charnley hip replacement though more than for a fully congruent mobile UKR. The volumetric wear is much lower than that thought to cause osteolysis. The surprisingly low wear rate suggests that the need for mobile bearing UKRs, with their greater technical demands, should be questioned.

The latest government targets state that by the end of 2005 the maximum waiting time for an outpatient appointment will be 3 months. These recommendations will not only increase the size of the outpatient clinics, but also the resources required thereafter. The purpose of this study was to analyse the outcome of new knee referrals to one consultant’s knee outpatient service in order to quantify the resources required to investigate and treat these patients.

All new patients attending one consultant’s knee out-patient service in the time period January 1st 1997 to December 31st 1997 were prospectively entered into a database recording patient details, source of referral and provisional diagnosis.

Eighteen months after the time period a cohort of 200 patients was randomly selected and the notes were analysed retrospectively. The number of outpatient appointment episodes (OPAs), MRI scans, physiotherapy referrals and surgical episodes generated were recorded for each patient.

Analysis of the initial database records show that a total of 662 new knee referrals were seen in 1997. 52% (341) were made up of the five most common diagnoses, these being osteoarthritis, anterior knee pain, major anterior cruciate ligament injury, medial ligament injury and medial meniscus injury.

Retrospective analysis of the 200 patient notes revealed that these patients required a total of 511 OPAs, 38 MRI scans, 178 courses of physiotherapy and 93 surgical episodes (53 elective and 40 daycase/emergency). These figures can be extrapolated to account for the total number of patients seen:

The resource implications of a new knee referral are substantial. Extra resources must accompany each new patient, otherwise, although government targets will be reached the time taken to complete each patient’s treatment will become longer. It is imperative that before an agreement is made to see new patients the resources required to manage them are in place.

Introduction: Traditionally adolescent anterior knee pain is considered to be a self limiting condition with no long term sequelae. However recently two publications have suggested the condition may be longer lasting. We wish to suggest that adolescent anterior knee pain may lead to patello femoral arthritis.

Method: We have carried out a comparative study assessing the incidence of previous adolescent anterior knee in patients who underwent patello femoral replacement for isolated patello femoral arthritis and have compared them with a matched group of patients who had medial unicompartmental replacement for isolated medial compartment arthritis without patello femoral disease.

All patients were sent a postal questionnaire enquiring about adolescent anterior knee pain, knee injury and patella instability.

Results: Ninety-three PFR patients and 86 UKR patients replied. The incidence of adolescent AKF and patella instability was higher in the PFR.group.

Conclusion: Adolescent anterior knee pain may not always be a benign self limiting condition since this as well as patella injury and instability was associated with subsequent isolated patello femoral arthritis.

The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) of a single arthritic tibio femoral compartment can slow the progression of arthritis to the other compartment.

Method: Since 1974, a prospective database has been established in Bristol to register and follow up the results of unicompartmental knee replacement. Forty two prostheses that had survived for more than 10 years were examined using the Ahlbach radiological scoring system and compared to a control group of patients from the Bristol “OA 500” series, in which patients being treated conservatively for gonarthritis were regularly reviewed by clinical scoring and radiological analysis. The groups were sex matched.

All AP and lateral standing knee radiographs at entry and 8 years were scored using the Ahlbach scoring system. The Ahlbach system has been shown to have good inter and intra observer correlation, and to relate closely to pathological findings at operation. An intra and inter observer error study of our results confirmed good correlation.

Results: The groups were well matched but the OA 500 group showed a lower average age, though not a significant difference (62 years compared to 67 years). The lateral compartment of all knees in both groups were Ahlbach grade 0 or 1 group before operation or entry to the OA 500 register.

In the UKR group, four out of 42 knees showed progression of a single Ahlbach grade (9.5%). 2 revisions for arthritic progression were added to this group making a total of six out of 42 (14.3%). In the control group 12 of the 42 knees progressed by one or two Ahlbach grades and a further case underwent surgery making a total of 13 (31%). This difference was significant (p< 0.01).

Conclusion: Recent studies have shown that with a better understanding of design, improved selection of patients and better surgical technique, a UKR can have at least as good, if not better, results than a TKR at 5 year follow up, and has benefits of preservation of anatomy, earlier rehabilitation, preservation of bone stock and easier revision. Our radiological findings in this study will need to be correlated with further randomised prospective clinical studies, but suggest that progression of Osteoarthritis is reduced by UKR, and that this should be an additional stated benefit of this surgical technique.