header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

LONG TERM CLINICO-RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS FOLLOWING SURGERY FOR SCHEUERMANN’S KYPHOSIS (SK): A NINE YEARS FOLLOW-UP STUDY



Abstract

Purpose: There is no consensus regarding indications for anterior release and causative factors of junction kyphosis(JK) in Scheuermann’s Kyphosis(SK).

Methods: A retrospective review of 35 patients(19♂; 16♀) who underwent surgery for SK with a minimum follow-up of 5 years was undertaken. The mean age & follow-up were 20.5(13.25–45.75y) and 9 years(5–22y) respectively. Patient demographics, clinicoradiological parameters & functional outcomes (ODI/SRS-22) were assessed. The incidence of JK was correlated with radiographic parameters & instrumentation levels. Outcomes of posterior instrumentation(GroupI-13) were compared with anterior release & posterior instrumentation(GroupII-22).

Results: Cobb Λle of ≥600 hyperextension radiographs and presence of anterior bony bridge required anterior release. JK(≥100) was seen in 12 cases (7 proximal & 5 distal). PJK was seen in cases where T3-4 was the upper instrumented vertebra(UIV). DJK was seen in patients with body mass index(BMI) of ≥30 and when LIV did not include 1st lordotic disc. There was significant difference in mean thoracic kyphosis(TK) correction between the 2 groups (35.70vs44.50;p=0.003). The mean loss of correction at 9 yrs was 5.90 and 3.40 respectively. 33/35 were subjectively satisfied with cosmesis and 28/35 patients returned to their previous occupation. Three were off work due to chronic back pain and four patients had job modifications.

Conclusion: Stiff curves require anterior release. PJK could be overcome by including T2 as UIV.

DJK could be prevented by including 1st lordotic disc in LIV. Extending lower Instrumentation to L3 would reduce the risk of implant failure in obese patients. There was no advantage of cages over rib grafts.

Ethics approval: Not applicable

Interest Statement: None (No grants obtained from any agency)

Correspondence should be addressed to BSS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.