Purpose of the study: When repairing rotator cuff tears, injury to the infraspinatus is generally a posterior extension of a supraspinatus tear. The description of isolated tears of the infraspinatus has not been to our knowledge reported in the literature. We report a series of 13 cases with more than one year follow-up.

Material and methods: Thirteen patients underwent surgery for an isolated tear of the infraspinatus between 1995 and 2004. There were ten men and three women. Mean age at surgery was 47 years (range 34–62). The right shoulder was involved in seven of the thirteen cases, and the dominant shoulder in eight. A progressive onset was observed in eleven patients and nine had a history of treated calcified tendinopathy. Clinically, pain was the predominant symptom. The Jobe test was deficient in all patients as was external rotation (except one patient). The preoperative Constant score was 70 (range 62–87). X-rays revealed type C posterior calcification in nine patients. A full-thickness tear was observed in seven cases, a partial deep tear in three, and a partial superficial tear in three. Isolated fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus noted Goutallier grade 2 or greater was observed in seven patients. Open surgical repair was preformed in all patients.

Results: Mean time to revision was 29 months (range 12–82). Subjectively, six patients were very satisfied, six were satisfied, and one was disappointed (failure by secondary tear). Two shoulder-hand syndromes were noted in the postoperative period. At last follow-up, the Constant score was 83.5 (range 64–97). All patients except one were satisfied with pain relief but the lack of force was significant.

Discussion and conclusion: Isolated tears of the infra-spinatus are rare, but there is a notable relationship with calcifying tendinopathy of the same tendon. Repair should be undertaken before the development of fatty degeneration in order to improve the chances of force recovery.

We retrospectively identified 18 consecutive patients with synovial chrondromatosis of the shoulder who had arthroscopic treatment between 1989 and 2004. Of these, 15 were available for review at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years (2.3 to 16.5). There were seven patients with primary synovial chondromatosis, but for the remainder, the condition was a result of secondary causes. The mean Constant score showed that pain and activities of daily living were the most affected categories, being only 57% and 65% of the values of the normal side. Surgery resulted in a significant improvement in the mean Constant score in these domains from 8.9 (4 to 15) to 11.3 (2 to 15) and from 12.9 (5 to 20) to 18.7 (11 to 20), respectively (unpaired t-test, p = 0.04 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Movement and strength were not significantly affected. Osteoarthritis was present in eight patients at presentation and in 11 at the final review. Recurrence of the disease with new loose bodies occurred in two patients from the primary group at an interval of three and 12 years post-operatively. In nine patients, loose bodies were also present in the bicipital groove; seven of these underwent an open bicipital debridement and tenodesis.

We found that arthroscopic debridement of the glenohumeral joint and open debridement and tenodesis of the long head of biceps, when indicated, are safe and effective in relieving symptoms at medium-term review.

Over the long term, the results of the insertion of a Grammont inverted shoulder prothesis are unknown. The present study reports survivorship curves and the role of the initial aetiology in patients re-examined after 5 to 10 years.

Patients and methods Eighty prostheses (for 77 patients) were implanted between 1992 and 1998: 66 cases of massive cuff tear arthropathy (MCTA) and 24 cases for another aetiology (mainly rheumatoid arthritis and revision).

At the time of follow-up, 18 patients had died and 2 could not be traced. The remaining patients (57 representing 60 prostheses) were seen by an independent examiner. The minimum follow-up was 5 years. The average follow-up was 69,6 months.

Kaplan-Meir survivorship curves for the 60 prostheses were established in order to show the probability of failure as defined by: revision of the prothesis, glenoid loosening, and a functional level< 30 points according to the Constant score.

Results The survivorship curves were as follow:

- for non revision of the prosthesis at 10 years: 91% overall; after 9 years: 95% for MCTA, and 77 % for the others aetiologies. This difference was statistically significant (p< 0,01) ; 6 implants were revised: 3 for MCTA and 3 for other aetiologies.

Discussion

According to revision of the prosthesis, there is a clear rupture in the survivorship curve about 3 years after insertion in aetiologies other than MCTA. This suggests that Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty is not appropriate in these aetiologies (particularly in cases of rheumatoid arthritis).

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two glenoid preparation techniques by analyzing periglenoid radiolucencies.

Material and methods: The series consists of 72 shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis. Shoulders were divided into 2 groups based on glenoid preparation technique:

Group 1: 37 shoulders operated on between 1991 and 1995 with flat back, polyethylene glenoid implants cemented after curettage of the keel slot.

Group 2: 35 shoulders operated on between 1997 and 1999 with the same glenoid implants cemented after cancellous bone compaction of the keel slot.

At least 3 of the following 4 fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs were analyzed: immediate postoperative, between the 3rd and 6th months, at one year and at two years postoperative. The immediate and the two year radiograph were required for study inclusion. The radiolucent line score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé, involving the summation of radiolucencies in each of six specified zones. The RLLS was compared between the two groups.

Results: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of the total RLL score of the 9 analyzes was 2.39 in Group 1 and 1.67 in Group 2 (p=0.042). There was a statistically significant association between the glenoid preparation technique and the incidence of radiolucency around the keel as well (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in radiolucency behind the faceplate between the two groups (Group 1: 1.54 and Group 2: 1.41; p=0.394). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score of the 9 analyzes were 6.44 in the Group1 (4.05 under the tray, and 2.39 around the keel), and 4.19 in Group2 (p=0.0005) (2.86 under the tray, and 1.33 around the keel). The radiolucency around the keel and behind the faceplate (p=0.0005) was significantly more important (p=0.001) in the curettage glenoid preparation population. A significantly higher degree of progression of the total RLL score (p=0.002) and of the radiolucency behind the faceplate (p=0.001) was observed in the curettage glenoid preparation group.

Discussion/conclusion: Preparation of the glenoid component keel slot with cancellous bone compaction is radiographically superior to the curettage technique with regard to periglenoid radiolucencies.

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the quality of cemented humeral stem fixation. We analysed the incidence and influence of humeral lucent lines and loosening after implantation of a shoulder prosthesis as a function of aetiology (fracture versus scapular osteoarthritis) and glenoid status (total versus partial humeral prosthesis).

Material and methods: This retrospective series included 1842 first-intention shoulder prostheses reviewed at mean five years (2–10). We selected patients whose initial diagnosis was fracture of the superior portion of the humerus (n=300) and centred osteoarthritis (n=767). All stems implanted for fracture were cemented. For osteoarthritis, there were 610 total prostheses and 157 simple humeral prostheses: 752 stems were cemented and 15 were implanted without cement. The Constant score and radiographic results (AP and lateral view at least) were noted.

Results: For cemented stems, the incidence of radiographic lucent lines and loosening was significantly higher in fractures (40% and 10% respectively) than in centred osteoarthritis (14% and 1%). Lucency and loosening did not influence functional outcome in patients with centred osteoarthritis but had a significantly negative effect on final outcome in fractures. For fractures, the incidence of lucent lines was correlated with migration of the tubercles. For osteoarthritis, there was no difference between total and partial prostheses in terms of loosening, but the functional outcome was significantly better with total prostheses.

Conclusion: Fixation of the humeral implant with cement remains the gold standard for shoulder prostheses implanted for centred osteoarthritis. However, cement fixation yields disappointing results for fractures: defective fixation of the humeral stem is correlated with migration of the tubercles. For osteoarthritis, there are not more lucent lines with a total prosthesis which provides the better functional results.

Purpose: Appropriate treatment of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff with subacromial impingement remains a subject of debate. Considering that in most patients, spontaneous tears of the long biceps tendon reduces the pain and that subacromial osteoarthritis is well tolerated by many patients, we proposed arthroscopic tenotomy of the long biceps in this indication with the aim of relieving pain. We report here the long-term outcome.

Material and methods: Between 1988 and 1999, 307 arthroscopic tenotomies of the long biceps tendon were performed in patients with unrepairable tears of the rotator cuff tendons (massive full thickness tears, old patients, non-motivated patients). The procedure was isolated in 64% and associated with acromioplasty in 36%. All patients were given prior medical treatment. Mean age at surgery was 64.3 years. The preoperative subacromial height was 6.6 mm. The tendon lesion was an isolated tear of the supraspinatus in 31%, tears of two tendons in 44.6% and tears of three tendons in 21.8%, and isolated tears of the subscapularis in 2.6%. Mean follow-up was 57 months (24–168).

Results: The Constant score improved from 48.4 to 67.6 points (p< 0.001). Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (Samilson) increased from 38% to 67% of the shoulders postoperatively. Association with acromioplasty improved the objective and subjective result solely in the group of isolated tears of the supraspinatus. The size of the tear and the degree of fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff muscles had a statistically significant influence on functional and radiographic outcome (p< 0.001) while time since surgery had no effect on radiographic outcome (p< 0.001).

Discussion: This simple easy-to-perform procedure yielded pain relief at rest and also nighttime pain. It can be recommended for massive rotator cuff tears with sub-acromial impingement in elderly or poorly-motivated patients whose pain fails to respond to medical treatment. This procedure does not allow recovery of shoulder motion or force.

We reviewed 80 shoulders (77 patients) at a mean follow-up of 44 months after insertion of a Grammont inverted shoulder prosthesis. Three implants had failed and had been revised. The mean Constant score had increased from 22.6 points pre-operatively to 65.6 points at review. In 96% of these shoulders there was no or only minimal pain. The mean active forward elevation increased from 73° to 138°. The integrity of teres minor is essential for the recovery of external rotation and significantly influenced the Constant score. Five cases of aseptic loosening of the glenoid and seven of dissociation of the glenoid component were noted.

This study confirms the promising early results obtained with the inverted prosthesis in the treatment of a cuff-tear arthropathy. It should be considered in the treatment of osteoarthritis with a massive tear of the cuff but should be reserved for elderly patients.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two different glenoid component designs by analyzing the radiolucent lines (RLL).

Methods: Sixty-three shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis were divided into two groups based on glenoid component type: thirty-five shoulders with flat back, and thirty-one shoulders with convex back, polyethylene glenoid implants. The radiolucenct lines were analyzed on fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs. The RLL Score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé. The RLLS was compared between the two groups.

Results: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of total RLL score was 1.67 in Group 1 and 0.98 in Group 2 (p< 0.0005). There was a statistically significant association between the type of implant and the incidence of radiolucency behind the faceplate as well (p< 0.0005). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score was 4.19 in the Group1 (2.86 under the tray, and 1.33 around the keel), and 3.23 in Group2 (p=0.02) (2.09 under the tray, and 1.14 around the keel). The radiolucency behind the face-plate (p< 0.0005) was significantly greater in the flat back group, but not around the keel (p=0.427). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the degree of RLL score progression.

Conclusions: The initial and mid-term RLLS is better with convex than fl at back glenoid component.

Aims: To review the early results of shoulder arthroplasty in the weight bearing shoulder of long term pareplegic patients. We have been unable to find previously published results of this subgroup of shoulder arthroplasty patients in the litterature. Method: The case notes and X-rays of 5 female patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty were analysed. These patients all had longstanding paraplegia and were wheelchair bound. All patients has been prospectively scored with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon’s (ASES) function score and the Constant score. Results: The patients had a mean age of 70 yrs (61–88) at the time of surgery. Three of the 5 shoulders and rotator cuff tears at the time of surgery, 2 of which were repaired. The results are summarised in the table. There was no radiological evidence of failure apart from the migration of the single cemented glenoid component. Conclusion: In view of the satisfactory improvement in pain in particular following these procedures, we feel that it is reasonable to continue to offer this procedure in this subgroup of patients. We will however remain vigilant with regard to any further complications arising because of the increased loading in these prostheses at the medium and long term.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two glenoid preparation techniques by analyzing periglenoid radiolucencies. Methods: Seventy-two shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis were divided into two groups based on glenoid preparation technique: thirtyseven shoulders with “curettage” of the keel slot, and thirty-five shoulders with cancellous bone compaction. The radiolucent lines were analyzed on fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs. The RLL Score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé. The RLLS was compared between the two groups. Results: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of the total RLL score was 2.39 in Group 1 and 1.67 in Group 2 (p=0.042). There was a statistically significant association between the glenoid preparation technique and the incidence of radiolucency around the keel as well (p=0.001). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score was 6.44 in the Group1, and 4.19 in Group 2 (p=0.0005). The radiolucency around the keel and behind the face-plate (p=0.0005) was significantly greater (p=0.001) in the “curettage” glenoid preparation population. A significantly higher degree of progression of the total RLL score (p=0.002) and of the radiolucency behind the face-plate (p=0.001) was observed in the “curettage” glenoid preparation group. Conclusions: Preparation of the keel slot with cancellous bone compaction is radiographically superior to the “curettage” technique.

Purpose: The purpose of this multicentric study was to report results obtained with the Aequalis system using the simple humeral or total prosthesis, at at least two years follow-up in patients with shoulder joint degeneration and non-repairable rotator cuff tears.

Material and methods: Sixty-eight Aequalis arthroplasties were performed between 1992 and 1998. Outcome was assessed on the basis of the Constant score and radiological findings. Female gender predominated (78%) in this series with a mean age of 72 years. There were 62 simple humeral implantations and six total shoulder arthroplasties. The deltopectoral approach was used in 63 cases and the superior approach in five. All stems and sockets were cemented. There were no neurological or infectious complications.

Results: Two humeral stem implants were failures and required revision with a Grammont prosthesis. There was also one reoperation for arthrolysis with preservation of the implant; the outcome was fair.

Functional outcome: Sixty-six patients were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 45 months. All implantations except one were performed to achieve pain relief. The absolute Constant score improved by 20 points (from 25 to 46) with a 7-point gain for pain (3 to 10), a 20° gain for active elevation, an 18° gain for external rotation, and a 0.4 point gain for force. Pain relief was greater with total prostheses. Only five patients stated they were dissatis-fied with the outcome despite the fact that 18 reported significant persistent pain. The Constant score was analysed as a function of follow-up, size of the humeral head, and preoperative morphology of the glenoid surface. Radiological outcome: Certain loosening was recognised for one glenoid and one humeral stem. Among 52 shoulders with strictly identical radiological results, 33 exhibited deterioration either for the vault or the glenoid or both, with no effect on the Constant score.

Discussion: In this indication the Adqualis prosthesis is implanted to achieve a “limited” objective: pain relief. The deltopectoral approach is preferable in order to preserve elements inhibiting superior migration of the humerus (in a parallel study, the absence of these elements explains the poor outcome observed in 3 out of 9 patients). Unlike other series, the present series exhibited a significant effect of a type E2 biconcave glenoid surface. The pain score was better with total shoulder prostheses than with humeral stems alone and four of the six glenoid sockets remained perfectly fixed. The long-term outcome of these glenoid surfaces remains unknown so it would be inappropriate to advise systematic use. Clinical outcome did not show any deterioration over time despite deterioration of the vault, the glenoid, or both. Indications for non-constrained pros-theses should however be retained with caution due to open questions concerning long-term outcome, particularly for shoulders which have already been operated on or with type E2 glenoids. Considering these reservations, the Aequalis prosthesis has reached, at nearly five years follow-up, the assigned objectives: significant pain relief, satisfactory overall shoulder function.

Purpose: Failure of the glenoid component is the main complication of total shoulder prostheses. When surgical revision is necessary, the surgeon has the option of a new implantation or non-prosthetic plasty (glenoido-plasty). The purpose of the present work was to analyse results obtained with these two techniques in order to propose proper indications.

Material and methods: This retrospective study included 16 patients, mean age 62 years at revision surgery. Fialures included loosening of a cemented glenoid implant (n=9) and failure of non-cemented implants (3 defective anchors, 4 unclipped polyethylene inserts). Mean time to revision was 39 months (2–178) after primary implantation. A new glenoid implant was cemented in nine patients (group A). Seven patients (group 2) had glenoidoplasty with an iliac graft in four.

Results: A mean follow-up of 37 months (19–73), the Constant score had improved from 18 points before revision to 52 points (+34). Two patients experienced a complication requiring a second revision (infection, instability) and one patient underwent subsequent surgery for biceps tenodesis. For the group with glenoidoplasty with iliac graft, insertion of an inverted prosthesis was achieved during a second operative time. In group 1, the mean Constant score at last-follow-up was 63 points (+45) with the pain score of 11, movement score of 29. In group 2, the mean Constant score was 37 (+19) with pain at 6 and motion at 16. In this group, the mean score was 48 points with a glenoid graft and 21 points with simple implant replacement.

Discussion: Revision surgery for a failed glenoid implant remains a difficult procedure but can be effective for pain relief and improved motion score. The small number of patients in this series makes it difficult to perform statistical analysis but the results do point in favour of prosthetic reimplantation when the bone stock is sufficient. For other patients, a graft would be preferable to simple implant removal. This would allow secondary revision if possible.

Purpose: The purpose of our work was to report causes and results of treatment of anterior shoulder instability after implantation of a shoulder prosthesis.

Material and methods: This retrospective multicentric study included 51 patients with prosthetic anterior instability: 42 patients after first-intention shoulder prosthesis and nine after prosthesis revision. There were 39 women (79%) and 12 men, mean age 67 years, who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (n=29, 57%) or hemiarthro-plasty (n=22, 43%). Thirty-eight patients (75%) had prosthetic dislocation and 13 (25%) subluxation associated with pain an loss of anterior elevation. The initial prosthesis was implanted for degenerative disease (n=29), rheumatoid arthritis (n=7), or fracture (n=15). Anterior prosthetic instability occurred early in 23 shoulders (first six weeks) and lat in 28 shoulders (7 after trauma, 21 without trauma). Conservative treatment by reduction-immobilisation was performed in 16 cases and prosthetic revision in 35. The patients were reviewed radiographically at mean 41 months follow-up (range 24–62).

Results: Subscapular tear or incompetence was the main cause of prosthetic anterior instability, observed in 87% of the cases. Technical errors concerning the prosthesis were also observed: oversized head, malrotation of the prosthesis. Associated complications were frequent: glenoid loosening (24%), polyethylene dissociation from the metal glenoid implant (10%), infection (10%), humeral fracture (4%). The final Constant score was 54 points and 55% of the patients were disappointed or dissatisfied. None of the shoulders were stable after consevative treatment. The prosthetic revision provided disappointing results with 51% recurrent anterior instability.

Discussion: Anterior instability of shoulder prostheses is a serious complication which responds poorly to treatment. Loosening of the subscapular suture is the main cause.

The management and outcome of treatment in 42 patients (49 shoulders) with an infected shoulder prosthesis was reviewed in a retrospective multicentre study of 2343 prostheses. The factors which were analysed included the primary diagnosis, the delay between the diagnosis of infection and treatment and the type of treatment. Treatment was considered to be successful in 30 patients (71%). Previous surgery and radiotherapy were identified as risk factors for the development of infection. All patients with an infected prosthesis had pain and limitation of movement and 88% showed radiological loosening. In 50% of the shoulders, the antibiotics chosen and the length of treatment were considered not to be optimal. The mean follow-up was 34 months. Antibiotics or debridement alone were ineffective. In acute infection, immediate revision with excision of all infected tissue and exchange of the prosthesis with appropriate antibiotic therapy gave the best results. Multidisciplinary collaboration is recommended.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse outcome of shoulder prostheses after radiotherapy, to define a specific clinicoradiological entity, and evaluate incidence of complications.

Material and methods: Fourteen shoulder prostheses were implanted in 13 women who had been treated for breast cancer with complementary radiotherapy and one man treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The time from radiothearpy to implantation was 16 years, seven months. Two forms were identified on the preoperative x-rays: seven cases with typical avascular osteonecrosis according to the Arlet and Ficat classification, and seven cases with a radiographic presentation of arthritis or degenerative disease. Humeral prostheses were used in five cases and a total shoulder arthroplasty in nine.

Results: Four implants had to be removed, three for sepsis, and five patients required revision surgery. The mean postoperative Constant score for the ten prostheses still in place was 53.1 points with a mean elevation of 111° at three years seven months follow-up. The gain in pain score was 8.5 points with a mean result of 10.9 points. The results were different depending on the initial radiological form, with less favourable outcome observed in typical osteonecrosis.

Discussion: This study demonstrated a particular radio-clinical entity independent of classical osteonecrosis of the humeral head. The surgical procedure was more difficult and the outcome was less satisfactory than in the classical forms with a high rate of complications.

Purpose: The glenoid and humeral head curvature radii are mismatched in non-constrained total shoulder prostheses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of this mismatch on radiographic lucent lines and clinical outcome.

Material and methods: The study population included 319 total shoulder prostheses issuing from a multicentric European cohort. The patients underwent surgery for primary shoulder degeneration. Mean age at surgery was 67 years. Female sex predominated (75%). Partial supraspinatous tears were present in 7% of the shoulders with full-thickness tears also in 7%. A single type of prosthesis was used composed of a humeral pivot with a modular head (seven head sizes) and a cemented polyethylene flat-surface spiked glenoid (three sizes). Variable association of humeral heads and prosthetic glenoids defined the mismatch which varied from 0 to 10 mm (difference in the curvature radii between the head and glenoid). The patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up of 53.5 months (24–110 months). Clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant score for pain (15 points), daily activity (20 points), motion (40 points), and force (25 points). The glenoid lucent line was evaluated on the AP view using a 0 to 18 point scale (0=absence, 18=lucent line in 6 zones). Analysis of variance and linear regression were used to assess the effect of mismatch on the glenoid lucent line and clinical outcome.

Results: There was a statistically significant linear relationship between mismatch and glenoid lucent lines. The lucent line score was significantly lower when the mismatch was between 6 and 10mm. Mismatch had no influence on the overall Constant score or the individual scores (pain, motion, force, daily activities) nor on early or late postoperative complications.

Discussion: Based on the results of this study, the first in vivo assessment, the “ideal” gleno-humeral mismatch for total shoulder prostheses would be between 6 and 10 mm, i.e. much greater than is classically recommended (0–5 mm).

Purpose: Nonunion of the surgical neck of the humerus can occur after orthopaedic or poorly-adapted surgery after displaced subtuberosity or cephalotuberosity fracture. The purpose of this study was to report functional and radiographic outcome after treatment with shoulder prosthesis.

Material and methods: Twenty-two patients who had a non-constrained shoulder prosthesis were included in this retrospective multicentric study. Mean age was 70 years and mean follow-up was 45 months (range 2 – 9 years). The initial fracture had two fragments in six patients and was a three-fragment fracture involving the head and the tubercle in thirteen and a four-fragment fracture in three. Orthopaedic treatment was given in ten cases and surgical osteosynthesis was used in twelve. Time from fracture to implant insertion was 20 months. The deltopectoral approach was used for 21 humeral implants and one total shoulder arthroplasty (glenohumeral degeneration). The tuberosities were fixed to the cemented humeral stem and a crown of bone grafts were placed around the nonunion of the surgical neck. All patients were reviewed after a minimum of two years and assessed with the Constant score and x-rays.

Results: The absolute Constant score improved from 23 reoperatively to 39 postoperatively with an anterior elevation of 53° to 63°. Pain score (from 3 to 9, p = 0.001) and external rotation (from 13° to 28°, p = 0.01) were significantly improved. Forty-five percent of the patients were satisfied and 55% were dissatisfied. The type of initial treatment, type of initial fracture, and time before implantation of the prosthesis did no affect final outcome. The complication rate was 36% (eight patients), and led to five revision procedures. The radiographic work-up disclosed six cases of persistent nonunion of the greater tuberosity, two proximal migrations of the prosthesis, and one humeral loosening.

Conclusion: Outcome of shoulder prosthesis for sequela after fracture of the proximal humerus with nonunion of the surgical neck is poor. No improvement in anterior elevation, force, or motion was achieved. Shoulder prosthesis for sequelae of fracture of the proximal humerus with nonunion of the surgical neck should be considered as a “limited-objective” indication only providing beneficial pain relief.

Purpose: Collapse or necrosis of the head of the humerus after fracture of the proximal humerus can be an indication for shoulder arthroplasty. The poor results classically reported have led to a search for factors predictive of the anatomic and functional outcome after arthroplasty for fracture sequelae.

Material and methods: Among the 221 Aequalis prostheses implanted for the treatment of sequelae after fracture of the proximal humerus, 137 (62%) developed post-traumatic avascular osteonecrosis of the humeral head with a deformed callus of the tuberosity. Head tilt was in a valgus position in 83 shoulders and in a varus position in 54. Mean age was 61.49 years. The initial fractures were subtuberosity fractures in 20% of the cases, three-fragment fractures in 32%, and cephalobituberosity fractures with four fragments in 48% of the cases.Twenty-five percent of the patients had undergone initial osteosynthesis. The rotator cuff was repaired in 4.5%, and two osteotomies of the less tuberosity and four osteotomies of the greater tuberosity were performed at implantation. Pre- and postoperative clinical and functional outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and a function index composed of eleven usual movements.

Results: Mean follow-up was 44 months (24–104), with a mean 42° gain in anterior elevation and a 29° gain in external rotation. The gain in the Constant score was +32 points (mean score 61), and +43% with the weighted score. The four subscores (pain, motion, activity, force) improved two-fold. Analysis of the eleven usual movements demonstrated recovery in 88% of the patients. The subjective satisfaction index was 86%. The mean Constant score improved significantly more after total arthroplasty (67 points) than after humerus prosthesis (55 points). Complications (per- or postoperative mechanical problem, infection, neurological disorder) or the need for revision were unfavourable elements.

Discussion: Deformation and deviation of the tuberosities, especially the greater tuberosity, often leads to osteotomy during the implantation procedure. In this series, osteotomies were exceptional and functional outcomes showed that deviated tuberosities could be preserved without having an unfavourable effect on functional prognosis. Much on the contrary, the absence of a tuberosity osteotomy simplified the operative procedure and produced much better functional outcome than observed in earlier studies. The rate of complication for secondary prosthetic implantation is not negligible (15%) and a simplified procedure without osteotomy is a useful criterion. Furthermore, rehabilitation may be started earlier after implantation when it is not retarded by osteotomy bone healing, found to be an unfavourable factor.

Conclusion: Implantation of a shoulder prosthesis after collapse or necrosis of the head of the humerus after proximal fracture with varus or valgus impaction has provided good functional outcome without tuberosity osteotomy since the deformation of the tuberosity is generally well tolerated.

Purpose: Centred degeneration of the shoulder joint is defined as a degeneration of the glenohumeral surfaces without ascension of the humeral head. We investigated the influence of partial or full thickness rotator cuff tears and/or fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus on the results of total shoulder arthroplasty.

Material and methods: During a multicentric review of 766 cases of centred degeneration of the shoulder joint treated with the Aequalis prosthesis, we identified 555 shoulders in 478 patients with an interpretable preoperative arthroscan. All patients were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of two years (mean 3.6 years). Constant score and radiological findings were recorded. We identified 41 shoulders with partial tears of the supraspinatus and 42 shoulders with full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus alone. Moderate fatty degeneration was observed in 90 shoulders (≤ 2) and severe fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus or the subscapularis (> 2) in 15. We analysed the Constant scores, subjective results, radiological results, and rate of complications in each of these populations.

Results: Rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus alone did not have a destabilising effect, the head of the humerus did not influence the postoperative result assessed by the overall Constant score, motion in all planes, subjective result, radiological result, or rate of complications. There was no significant difference in complication rate. Presence or not of cuff repair did not influence these results. Inversely, fatty degeneration ≥ 2 involving the infrastpinatus or the subscapularis had a significant effect, decreasing the Constant score, active external rotation, active anterior elevation, and subjective result. On the contrary, it did not influence the radiological results or the rate of complications.

Discusssion: This multicentric study confirms that the degenerated shoulder joint can remain centred with a solitary tear of the supraspinatus. This has no effect on the clinical result and does not require repair. Inversely, fatty degeneration is highly predictive of the quality of the final result.