header advert
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 10 | Pages 645 - 652
19 Oct 2020
Sheridan GA Hughes AJ Quinlan JF Sheehan E O'Byrne JM

Aims

We aim to objectively assess the impact of COVID-19 on mean total operative cases for all indicative procedures (as outlined by the Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST)) experienced by orthopaedic trainees in the deanery of the Republic of Ireland. Subjective experiences were reported for each trainee using questionnaires.

Methods

During the first four weeks of the nationwide lockdown due to COVID-19, the objective impact of the pandemic on each trainee’s surgical caseload exposure was assessed using data from individual trainee logbook profiles in the deanery of the Republic of Ireland. Independent predictor variables included the trainee grade (ST 3 to 8), the individual trainee, the unit that the logbook was reported from, and the year in which the logbook was recorded. We used the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test to assess for any statistically significant predictor variables. The subjective experience of each trainee was captured using an electronic questionnaire.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 52 - 52
1 Mar 2010
O’Daly B Walsh JC Quinlan JF Stapleton R Quinlan W O’Rourke S
Full Access

Background: Protein energy malnutrition (PEM) is an accepted predictor of poor outcome in hip fracture patients. There is no universally accepted definition of PEM. Admission screening for PEM is not routinely performed for hip fracture patients. The reported incidence in elderly hip fracture patients varies widely between 9.0% and 88.6%.

Aims: To determine the prognostic relevance of admission serum albumin and total lymphocyte count (TLC), as clinical markers of PEM and predictors of outcome for hip fracture patients.

Methods: Retrospective review of 415 patients with operatively managed hip fracture. Protein-energy malnutrition was defined as albumin < 3.5g/dl and TLC < 1,500cells/mm3. Delay to operation, duration of in-patient stay, readmission (< 3 months) and in-patient, 3- and 12-month mortality were assessed as outcome variables.

Results: Survival data was available for 377 patients at 12 months. Of 377 patients, 53% (n=200) had both a serum albumin and TLC levels taken at admission (study), while 47% (n=177) had not (control). Incidence of PEM was 51%. Older patients were more likely to have lower albumin (p=0.03) and TLC (p=0.012). Nursing home patients were also more likely to have lower albumin (p=0.049). In-hospital mortality for PEM patients was 9.8%, compared with 0% for patients with normal values of both laboratory parameters. Patients with PEM had a higher 12-month mortality compared to patients who had normal values of both laboratory parameters (Odds Ratio=4.52; p=0.049).

Conclusion: Serum albumin and TLC in combination are accurate predictors of 12-month mortality in hip fracture patients. These results underscore the clinical relevance of assessing the nutritional status of patients with hip fractures at the time of admission and emphasises the relationship between nutrition and outcome in these patients.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 261 - 261
1 Sep 2005
Quinlan JF Watson RWG Kelly PM O’Byrne JM Fitzpatrick JM
Full Access

Patients with spinal cord injuries have been seen to have increased healing of attendant fractures. This for the main has been a clinical observation with laboratory work confined to rats. While the benefits in relation to quicker fracture healing are obvious, this excessive bone growth (heterotopic ossification) also causes unwanted side effects, such as decreased movement around joints, joint fusion and renal tract calculi. However, the cause for this phenomenon remains unclear.

This paper evaluates two groups with spinal column fractures – those with neurological compromise (n=10) and those without (n=11), and compares them with a control group with isolated long bone fractures (n=10). Serum was taken from these patients at five specific time intervals post injury (1 day, 5 days, 10 days, 42 days (6 weeks) and 84 days (12 weeks)). These samples were then analysed for levels of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-ß) using the ELISA technique. This cytokine has been shown to stimulate bone formation after both topical and systemic administration.

Results show TGF-ß levels of 142.79+/−29.51 ng/ml in the neurology group at 84 days post injury. This is higher than any of the other time points within this group (p< 0.001 vs day 1, day 5 and day 10 and p=0.005 vs 42 days, ANOVA univariate analysis). Furthermore, this level is also higher than the levels recorded in the non neurology (103.51+/−36.81 ng/ml) and long bone (102.28=/−47.58 ng/ml) groups at 84 days post injury (p=0.011 and p=0.021 respectively, ANOVA univariate analysis). There was statistically significant difference in TGF-ß levels seen between the clinically more severely injured patients, ie complete neurological deficit and the less severely injured patients, ie incomplete neurological deficit.

In conclusion, the results of this work, carried out for the first time in humans, offers strong evidence of the causative role of TGF-ß in the increased bone turnover and attendant complications seen in patients with acute spinal cord injuries.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 135 - 136
1 Feb 2003
Quinlan JF Watson RWG Kelly PM O’Byrne JM Fitzpatrick JM
Full Access

This basic science study attempts to explain why patients with spinal cord injuries have been seen to display increased healing of attendant fractures.

For the main part, this has been a clinical observation with laboratory work confined to rats. While the benefits in relation to quicker fracture healing are obvious, this excessive bone growth (heterotopic ossification) also causes unwanted side effects, such as decreased movement around joints, joint fusion and renal tract calculi. However, the cause for this phenomenon remains unclear.

This paper evaluates two group with spinal column fractures – those with neurological compromise (n=10) and those without (n=11), and compares them with a control group with isolated long bone fractures (n=10). Serum was taken from these patients at five specific time intervals post injury (24hrs, 120hrs, 10 days, 6 weeks and 12 weeks). The time period most closely related to the end of the acute inflammatory reaction and the laying down of callus was the 10-day post injury time period.

Serum samples taken at this time period were analysed for IGF-1 and TGF-ß levels, both known to initiate osteoblastic activity, using ELISA kits. They were also exposed to an osteoblast cell culture line and cell proliferation was measured.

Results show that the group with neurology has increased levels of IGF-1 compared to the other groups (p< 0.14, p< 0.18 respectively, Student’s t-test) but had lower TGF-ß (p< 0.05, p< 0.006) and osteoblast proliferation levels (p< 0.002, p< 0.0001). When the neurology group is subdivided into complete (n=5) and incomplete (n=5), it was shown that the complete group had higher levels of both IGF-1 and TGF-ß. This trend is reversed in the osteoblast proliferation assay.

This work, for the first time in human subjects, identifies a factor which may be regulating this complication of acute spinal cord injuries, namely IGF-1. Furthermore, the observed trend in the two cytokines seen in the complete neurology group may suggest a role for TGF-ß. However, the results do show that a direct mediation of this unwanted side effect of spinal cord injuries is unlikely as seen in the proliferation assay. Further work remains to be done to fully understand the complexities of the excessive bone growth recognised in this patient group.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 340 - 340
1 Nov 2002
Harty JA Quinlan JF Soffe KE Hassan S Walsh MG Byrne JO
Full Access

Objective: To date the principal focus of the mechanism of cervical spine fracture has been directed at head/ neck circumference and spinal canal dimensions. However the role of other measurements, including chest diameter and head/neck/chest proportional ratios, in a standard cervical fracture population has not yet been studied in detail. Cervical fractures often involve flexion/ extension type mechanisms of injury, with the head and cervical spine flexing/extending, using the thorax as a fulcrum.

Study design: We prospectively studied all patients with cervical spine fractures who were admitted to the spinal injuries unit from 1st July, 2000 to 1st March 2001. Anthropometrical measurement of head circumference, neck circumference, chest circumference, and neck length were analysed. Ages ranged from 18 – 55yrs, and all patients with concomitant cervical pathology were excluded from the study. Mechanism of injury involved flexion/extension type injuries in all cases; those with direct axial loading were excluded. A control group of 30 patients (age 18–55yrs) involved in high velocity trauma with associated long bone fractures, in whom cervical injury was suspected but without any cervical fracture, or associated pathology, were measured.

Results: Our analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in chest size in the male control group versus the fracture group 98.89cm v. 94.19cm (P< 0.05, t-test). There was a correspondingly significant increase in chest circumference between the female control versus the fracture group 94.33cm v. 88.88cm(P< 0.05, t-test). Our results revealed no statistical difference in either head circumference, neck circumference, or neck length between each of the groupings. However we found a statistically significant increase in head/neck/chest ratios between each of the groups. These results indicate a proportionately larger chest may be protective in cervical spine fractures.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 339 - 339
1 Nov 2002
Quinlan JF Watson RWG Kelly PM O’Byrne JM Fitzpatrick JM
Full Access

Patients with spinal cord injuries have been seen to have increased healing of attendant fractures. This for the main has been a clinical observation with laboratory work confined to rats. While the benefits in relation to quicker fracture healing are obvious, this excessive bone growth (heterotopic ossification) also causes unwanted side effects, such as decreased movement around joints, joint fusion and renal tract calculi. However, the cause for this phenomenon remains unclear.

This paper evaluates two groups with spinal column fractures – those with neurological compromise (n=10) and those without (n=11), and compares them with a control group with isolated long bone fractures (n=10). Serum was taken from these patients at five specific time intervals post injury (24hrs, 120hrs, 10 days, 6 weeks and 12 weeks). The time period most closely related to the end of the acute inflammatory reaction and the laying down of callus was the 10-day post injury time period.

Serum samples taken at this time period were analysed for IGF-1 and TGF-β levels, both known to initiate osteoblastic activity, using ELISA kits. They were also exposed to an osteoblast cell culture line and cell proliferation was measured.

Results show that the group with neurology has increased levels of IGF-1 compared to the other groups (p< 0.14, p< 0.18 respectively, Student’s t-test) but had lower TGF- (p< 0.05, p< 0.006) and osteoblast proliferation levels (p< 0.002, p< 0.001), despite having a significantly higher cell proliferation than a control group (p< 0.0001). When the neurology group is subdivided into complete (n=5) and incomplete (n=5), it was shown that the complete group had higher levels of both IGF-1 and TGF-. This trend is reversed in the osteoblast proliferation assay.

This work, for the first time in human subjects, identifies a factor which may be regulating this complication of acute spinal cord injuries, namely IGF-1. Furthermore, the observed trend in the two cytokines seen in the complete neurology group may suggest a role for TGF-β. However, the results do show that a direct mediation of this unwanted side effect of spinal cord injuries is unlikely as seen in the proliferation assay. Further work remains to be done to fully understand the complexities of the excessive bone growth recognised in this patient group.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 341 - 341
1 Nov 2002
Quinlan JF Mullett H Coffey L FitzPatrick D McCormack. D
Full Access

Cervical orthoses are currently used in the pre-hospital stabilization of trauma patients and also as part of the definitive non-operative treatment of injuries of the cervical spine. The construct stability of orthoses is compromised by virtue of the fact that the cervical spine exhibits the greatest range of movement amongst the spinal segments and also because of the complex composite nature of neck movements.

To date, data has been difficult to attain comparing the various orthoses, in the various planes of movement of the cervical spine. Various methods including the use of inclinometers, goniometers, radiography, computerized tomography and cineroentgenography have been used in an attempt to measure these movements but none have provided satisfactory triplanar data.

This paper uses the Zebris ultrasonic 3-D motion analysis system to measure flexion, extension, range of lateral bending and range of axial rotation in five similar male and five similar female subjects with no history of neck injuries. The subjects were tested in a soft and hard collar, Philadelphia, Miami J and Minerva.

Results show that the Minerva is significantly the most stable construct for restriction of movement in all planes in both groups (p< 0.002 vs. all groups, Student’s t-test), but more impressively in the female group. In the male group, the standard hard collar performs second best in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation. In the female group, the second most stable orthosis is the Philadelphia in flexion/extension and the hard collar in lateral bending and axial rotation (p< 0.05 vs. next most stable in all cases, Student’s t-test). The soft collar in both groups offered only minimal resistance to movement in any plane, e. g. 45.07° vs. 46.45° extension vs. normal in males and 40.15° vs. 41.8° extension vs. normal in females.

Looking at these results together allows the ranking of the measured orthoses in order of the three-dimensional stability they offer. Furthermore, they validate the Zebris as a reliable and safe method of measurement of the complex movements of the cervical spine with low intersubject variability.

In conclusion, this paper, for the first time presents reproducible data incorporating the composite triplanar movements of the cervical spine thus allowing comparative analysis of the three-dimensional construct stability of the studied orthoses.