header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL ORTHOSES – A THREE DIMENSIONAL MOVEMENT STUDY



Abstract

Cervical orthoses are currently used in the pre-hospital stabilization of trauma patients and also as part of the definitive non-operative treatment of injuries of the cervical spine. The construct stability of orthoses is compromised by virtue of the fact that the cervical spine exhibits the greatest range of movement amongst the spinal segments and also because of the complex composite nature of neck movements.

To date, data has been difficult to attain comparing the various orthoses, in the various planes of movement of the cervical spine. Various methods including the use of inclinometers, goniometers, radiography, computerized tomography and cineroentgenography have been used in an attempt to measure these movements but none have provided satisfactory triplanar data.

This paper uses the Zebris ultrasonic 3-D motion analysis system to measure flexion, extension, range of lateral bending and range of axial rotation in five similar male and five similar female subjects with no history of neck injuries. The subjects were tested in a soft and hard collar, Philadelphia, Miami J and Minerva.

Results show that the Minerva is significantly the most stable construct for restriction of movement in all planes in both groups (p< 0.002 vs. all groups, Student’s t-test), but more impressively in the female group. In the male group, the standard hard collar performs second best in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation. In the female group, the second most stable orthosis is the Philadelphia in flexion/extension and the hard collar in lateral bending and axial rotation (p< 0.05 vs. next most stable in all cases, Student’s t-test). The soft collar in both groups offered only minimal resistance to movement in any plane, e. g. 45.07° vs. 46.45° extension vs. normal in males and 40.15° vs. 41.8° extension vs. normal in females.

Looking at these results together allows the ranking of the measured orthoses in order of the three-dimensional stability they offer. Furthermore, they validate the Zebris as a reliable and safe method of measurement of the complex movements of the cervical spine with low intersubject variability.

In conclusion, this paper, for the first time presents reproducible data incorporating the composite triplanar movements of the cervical spine thus allowing comparative analysis of the three-dimensional construct stability of the studied orthoses.

Abstracts prepared by Mr. A. J. Stirling, FRCS, and Miss A. Weaver. Correspondence should be addressed to Miss A. Weaver at the Research and Teaching Centre, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Northfield, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK

BritSpine 2002, the second combined meeting of the British Association of Spinal Surgeons, the British Cervical Spine Society, The British Scoliosis Society and the Society for Back Pain Research, took place at the International Convention Centre in Birmingham UK between 27th February and 1st March 2002. The following presentations and posters were given and displayed.