The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee replacement (UKR) was introduced as a design to reduce polyethylene wear. There has been one previous retrieval study involving this implant, which reported very low rates of wear in some specimens but abnormal patterns of wear in others. There has been no further investigation of these abnormal patterns. The bearings were retrieved from 47 patients who had received a medial Oxford UKR for anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. None had been studied previously. The mean time to revision was 8.4 years ( These results show that very low rates of polyethylene wear are possible if the device functions normally. However, if the bearing displays suboptimal function (extra-articular, intra-articular impingement or incongruous articulation) the rates of wear increase significantly.
With medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) there is occasionally a full-thickness ulcer of the cartilage on the medial side of the lateral femoral condyle. It is not clear whether this should be considered a contraindication to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The aim of this study was to determine why these ulcers occur, and whether they compromise the outcome of UKR. Case studies of knees with medial OA suggest that cartilage lesions on the medial side of the lateral condyle are caused by impingement on the lateral tibial spine as a result of the varus deformity and tibial subluxation. Following UKR the varus and the subluxation are corrected, so that impingement is prevented and the damaged part of the lateral femoral condyle is not transmitting load. An illustrative case report is presented. Out of 769 knees with OA of the medial compartment treated with the Oxford UKR, 59 (7.7%) had partial-thickness cartilage loss and 20 (2.6%) had a full-thickness cartilage deficit on the medial side of the lateral condyle. The mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at the last follow-up at a mean of four years was 41.9 (13 to 48) in those with partial-thickness cartilage loss and 41.0 (20 to 48) in those with full-thickness loss. In those with normal or superficially damaged cartilage the mean was 39.5 (5 to 48) and 39.7 (8 to 48), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the pre-operative OKS, the final review OKS or of change in the score in the various groups. We conclude that in medial compartment OA, damage to the medial side of the lateral femoral condyle is caused by impingement on the tibial spine and should not be considered a contraindication to an Oxford UKR, even if there is extensive full-thickness ulceration of the cartilage.
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is commonly performed for osteoarthritis in young active patients. We have observed cystic or solid masses, which we have called inflammatory pseudotumours, arising around these devices. They may cause soft-tissue destruction with severe symptoms and a poor outcome after revision surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for pseudotumours that are serious enough to require revision surgery. Since 1999, 1419 metal-on-metal hip resurfacings have been implanted by our group in 1224 patients; 1.8% of the patients had a revision for pseudotumour. In this series the Kaplan-Meier cumulative revision rate for pseudotumour increased progressively with time. At eight years, in all patients, it was 4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 5.8). Factors significantly associated with an increase in revision rate were female gender (p <
0.001), age under 40 (p = 0.003), small components (p = 0.003), and dysplasia (p = 0.019), whereas implant type was not (p = 0.156). These factors were inter-related, however, and on fitting a Cox proportional hazard model only gender (p = 0.002) and age (p = 0.024) had a significant independent influence on revision rate; size nearly reached significance (p = 0.08). Subdividing the cohort according to significant factors, we found that the revision rate for pseudotumours in men was 0.5% (95% CI 0 to 1.1) at eight years wheras in women over 40 years old it was 6% (95% CI 2.3 to 10.1) at eight years and in women under 40 years it was 13.1% at six years (95% CI 0 to 27) (p <
0.001). We recommend that resurfacings are undertaken with caution in women, particularly those under 40 years of age but they remain a good option in young men. Further work is required to understand the aetiology of pseudotumours so that this complication can be avoided.
Kinematic data from in-vivo fluoroscopy measurements during a step-up activity was used to determine the relative tibial-femoral position as a function of knee flexion angle for each model. Medial and lateral force distribution was adapted from loads measured in-vivo with an instrumented implant during a step-up activity. The affect that varying the bearing thickness has on the stresses in the bearing was investigated. In addition, varus-valgus mal-alignment was investigated by rotating the femoral component through 10 degrees.
We report on a group of 20 metal-on-metal resurfaced hips (17 patients) presenting with a soft tissue mass associated with various symptoms. We describe these masses as pseudotumours. All patients underwent plain radiography and fuller investigation with CT, MRI and ultrasound. Where samples were available, histology was performed. All patients in this series were female. Presentation was variable; the most common symptom was pain or discomfort in the hip region. Other symptoms included spontaneous dislocation, nerve palsy, an enlarging mass or a rash. The common histological features were extensive necrosis and lymphocytic infiltration. Fourteen of the 20 cases (70%) have so far required revision to a conventional hip replacement and their symptoms have either settled completely or improved substantially since the revision surgery. Two of the three bilateral cases have asymptomatic pseudotumours on the opposite side. We estimate that about 1% of patients develop a pseudotumour in the first five postoperative years after a hip resurfacing. The cause of these pseudotumours is unknown and is probably multi-factorial, further work is required to define this; they may be manifestations of a metal sensitivity response. We are concerned that with time the incidence of these pseudotumours will increase.
The purpose of this study was to determine if a single physiotherapy intervention would enable patients to kneel following Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Kneeling is an important functional activity that is frequently not performed after knee arthroplasty, thus affecting a patient’s ability to carry out basic tasks of everyday life. There is however no clinical reason why patients should not kneel and many with proposed knee surgery ask about the possibility of kneeling after their operation. Sixty adults participated in a prospective randomised controlled trial with blinded assessments. At 6 weeks post-operatively UKA patients were randomised to either the Routine care group where no advice on kneeling was given or to the Kneeling intervention group where participants were taught and given advice on how to kneel and were encouraged to do so. They were re-assessed at 1 year. The primary outcome measure was Question 7 of the Oxford Knee Score which asks the question “Could you kneel down and get up again afterwards?” Pre-operatively there was no difference in the kneeling ability of the two groups. At 1 year the difference in kneeling ability between the two groups was highly significant (p<
0.05). Spearman’s correlation coefficient showed no significant association between a change in score of Question 7 at 1 year and the following factors; scar position, numbness, range of flexion, arthritic involvement of other joints and pain. Linear regression analysis also confirmed that these factors were not successful in predicting a change in kneeling ability. This study showed that the single factor predictive of kneeling ability was the physiotherapy intervention provided at 6 weeks post-operatively and it is suggested that kneeling should be incorporated into patient’s post-operative rehabilitation programmes.
revision surgery and poor functional outcome as the end-points.
Inflammatory pseudotumours occasionally occur after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and often lead to revision. Our aim was to determine the severity of this complication by assessing the outcome of revision in these circumstances and by comparing this with the outcome of other metal-on-metal hip resurfacing revisions as well as that of matched primary total hip replacements. We identified 53 hips which had undergone metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and required revision at a mean of 1.59 years (0.01 to 6.69) after operation. Of these, 16 were revised for pseudotumours, 21 for fracture and 16 for other reasons. These were matched by age, gender and diagnosis with 103 patients undergoing primary total hip replacement with the Exeter implant. At a mean follow-up of three years (0.8 to 7.2) the outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing revision for pseudotumour was poor with a mean Oxford hip score of 20.9 ( The outcome of revision for pseudotumour is poor and consideration should be given to early revision to limit the extent of the soft-tissue destruction. The outcome of resurfacing revision for other causes is good.
Varus malalignment after total knee replacement is associated with a poor outcome. Our aim was to determine whether the same was true for medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The anatomical leg alignment was measured prospectively using a long-arm goniometer in 160 knees with an Oxford UKR. Patients were then grouped according to their mechanical leg alignment as neutral (5° to 10° of valgus), mild varus (0° to 4° of valgus) and marked varus (>
0° of varus). The groups were compared at five years in terms of absolute and change in the Oxford Knee score, American Knee Society score and the incidence of radiolucent lines. Post-operatively, 29 (18%) patients had mild varus and 13 (8%) had marked varus. The mean American Knee Society score worsened significantly (p <
0.001) with increasing varus. This difference disappeared if a three-point deduction for each degree of malalignment was removed. No other score deteriorated with increasing varus, and the frequency of occurrence of radiolucent lines was the same in each group. We therefore conclude that after Oxford UKR, about 25% of patients have varus alignment, but that this does not compromise their clinical or radiological outcome. Following UKR the deductions for malalignment in the American Knee Society score are not justified.
This study reports a clinical comparison of new and old establishing whether this modified implant has maintained the established normal kinematic profile of the Oxford UKR.
Knee kinematics were assessed by analysing the movement of the femur relative to the tibia using the PTA.
We randomised 62 knees to receive either cemented or cementless versions of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. The implants used in both arms of the study were similar, except that the cementless components were coated with porous titanium and hydroxyapatite. The tibial interfaces were studied with fluoroscopically-aligned radiographs. At one year there was no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups. Narrow radiolucent lines were seen at the bone-implant interfaces in 75% of cemented tibial components. These were partial in 43%, and complete in 32%. In the cementless implants, partial radiolucencies were seen in 7% and complete radiolucencies in none. These differences are statistically significant (p <
0.0001) and imply satisfactory bone ingrowth into the cementless implants.