Acetabular component malalignment remains the single greatest root cause for revision THA with malposition of at least half of all acetabular components placed using conventional methods. These studies repeatedly document that the concept of using local anatomical landmarks has no scientific basis over a breadth of presenting pathology. Traditional navigation and robotics can potentially lead to improved component placement but these technologies have not gained widespread use due to the increase in time of use, complexity, and cost of these systems. Robotic systems have also proven to be potentially hazardous and inaccurate in routine clinical use. The alternative of placing the cup in the supine position, even with the use of arthroscopy, has been proven to have an incidence of inaccuracy equal or greater than that in the lateral position.

A smart mechanical instrument system was developed to quickly and easily achieve accurate cup alignment (HipXpert System, Surgical Planning Associates, Boston, MA). The system is based on a low dose, low cost CT study and a customised patient-specific surgery plan. The laterally-based system docks on a patient-specific basis with 3 legs: one through the incision behind the posterior rim, one percutaneously on the lateral side of the ASIS, and a third percutaneously on the surface of the ilium. A direction indicator on the top of the instrument points in the desired cup orientation. The anteriorly-based system also docks on a patient-specific basis with one leg on the anterior ischium and one leg on each ASIS, either to skin or to bone.

The lateral system has been proven to be robust, with repeated studies showing accurate cup placement in 100% of cases and an independent study showing accurate cup placement in 98% of cases for both anteversion and inclination. This compares to a recent study of robotic methods that 88% of inclination and 84% for anteversion.

Smart mechanical navigation of cup placement offers the optimum combination of accuracy, speed, and simplicity for solving the ubiquitous problem of acetabular component malorientation.

Management of recurrent instability of the hip requires careful assessment to determine any identifiable causative factors. While plain radiographs can give a general impression, CT is the best methodology for objective measurement. Variables that can be measured include: prosthetic femoral anteversion, comparison to contralateral native femoral anteversion, total offset from the medial wall of the pelvis to the lateral side of the greater trochanter, comparison to total offset on the contralateral side, acetabular inclination, & acetabular anteversion.

Wera et al describe potential causes of instability. These are typed into I. Acetabular Component Malposition; II. Femoral Component Malposition; III. Abductor Deficiency; IV. Impingement; V. Late Wear; and VI. Unknown.

Acetabular component malposition is the most common cause of instability and so measurement of cup orientation is essential. It is well known that excessive or inadequate anteversion can lead to anterior and posterior dislocation respectively but horizontal components are also associated with posterior dislocation due to deficient posterior/inferior acetabular surface.

Similarly, excessive or inadequate femoral anteversion can be easily identified on CT as can insufficient total offset of the reconstructed joint compared to the contralateral side. This can be caused by medialization of the acetabular component.

Abductor deficiency can be a soft-tissue cause of instability, but it certainly isn't the only one. Knowledge of the prior surgical exposure can be instructive. Anterior exposures can be prone to deficient anterior capsule just as posterior exposures can be prone to deficient posterior capsule and short rotators, while anterolateral and lateral exposures can be associated with gluteus minimus and gluteus medius compromise.

Impingement, whether involving implants, bone, or soft tissue are primarily secondary to the above factors, if osteophytes were properly trimmed at the index procedure.

Correction of the incorrect variables is the primary goal of revision for instability and greatly preferable to using salvage options such as dual-mobility or constrained articulations which invoke additional concerns. Ultimately though, such salvage options are necessary if the cause of the instability cannot be determined or can be determined but not corrected. Bracing, while highly inconvenient and sometimes impractical for certain patients, still has a role in specific circumstances. Formal analysis of the unstable prosthetic reconstruction is the key to successful treatment.

Precision planning with correct sizing and placement of components is critical to proper execution of total hip arthroplasty. While the desire to achieve excellent outcomes has always been a surgeon's goal, value-based care programs such as the Comprehensive Joint Replacement (CJR) program apportion real expenditures for the cost of treating complications such as fracture or dislocation to the participants. Such accountability accentuates the importance of optimizing the planning and execution of joint replacement surgery. Acetabular component sizing and placement in particular remains the single greatest challenge to surgeons. This is simply due to the fact that the requisite spatial information is not available to the surgeon during conventional surgery. Basing component placement on local anatomical landmarks without knowing the patient-specific nature of those landmarks ensures poor component placement in many cases. As a result, studies demonstrate that at least ½ of all acetabular components placed using conventional methods are malpositioned.

Potential solutions include the using of intra-operative radiographic analysis, traditional navigation and robotics. Unfortunately, measurements of plain radiographs have repeatedly been shown to be inaccurate due to lack of knowledge of and correction for beam center location, magnification, beam divergence, and position of the pelvis itself on the image. As a result, such quantification of unquantifiable images can systematically lead to poor decisions. Intra-operative radiograph measurement methods have been shown to lead to anteversion measurement errors as high as 27 degrees. Similarly, there is a perception that performing total hip arthroplasty through the anterior exposure can result in reliable cup positioning when fluoroscopy is used, but such procedures have also been shown to have a high incidence of cup malposition.

Image-free navigation, image-based navigation, and image-based robotics can potentially lead to accurate component placement. Adoption of these technologies, however, has been limited, possibly due to the increase in time of use, complexity, and cost of these systems. Robotic systems have also proven to be potentially hazardous and inaccurate in routine clinical use. A cloud-based, patient-specific hip surgery planning and smart-tool cup navigation system was developed to address the most common technical problems affecting hip arthroplasty (HipXpert System, Surgical Planning Associates, Boston, MA). The methodology provides the surgeon with a full 3D plan of the surgery including cup size, cup orientation, stem size, head length, femoral anteversion, and planned change in leg length and offset. The application controlling the plan allows the surgeon to instantly change the plan and shows the implants in both 3D and on multiplanar cross-sectional views. The associated smart tool is adjusted specifically for that patient and when docked, provides orientation information to the surgeon.

The system has been proven to be robust, with repeated studies showing accurate cup placement in 100% of cases including by an independent study. This compares to a recent study of robotic methods that measured 88% for inclination and 84% for anteversion.

Cloud-based 3D planning combined with smart mechanical navigation of cup placement offers the optimum combination of accuracy, speed, and simplicity for solving the ubiquitous problems of acetabular component malorientation and provides critical pre-operative information including acetabular and femoral component sizes, planned femoral anteversion, and planned changes in leg length and offset of the surgery.

Introduction

Cup malposition in hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing is associated with instability, accelerated wear, and the need for revision. The current study assesses the validity of intraoperative assessment using a specialized software to analyze intraoperative radiographs.

INTRODUCTION

Evolving payment models create new opportunities for assessment of patient care based on total cost over a defined period of time. These models allow for analyses of economic data that was previously unavailable and well beyond our familiar studies which typically include length of stay, surgical complications, and post-operative clinical and radiographic assessments. In the United States, the new Federal program entitled TheBundled Payment for Care Initiative created new opportunities for the assessment of surgical interventions. The purpose of the reported study was to assess the total reimbursement for care as a function of surgical technique in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Introduction

Navigation of acetabular component orientation is still not commonly performed despite repeated studies that show that more than ½ of acetabular components placed during hip arthroplasty are significantly malpositioned1. The current study uses postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of a smart mechanical navigation instrument system for cup alignment.

INTRODUCTION

Cup malpositioning remains a common cause of dislocation, wear, osteolysis, and revision. The concept of a “Safe Zone” for acetabular component orientation was introduced more than 35 years ago¹. The current study assesses CT studies of replaced hips to assess the concept of a safe zone for acetabular orientation by comparing the orientation of acetabular components revised due to recurrent instability and to a series of stable hip replacements.

BACKGROUND

Cup malpositioning remains a common cause of dislocation, wear, osteolysis, and revision. The concept of a “Safe Zone” for acetabular component orientation was introduced more than 35 years ago. The current study assesses CT studies of replaced hips to assess the concept of a safe zone for acetabular orientation.

Introduction

Studies show that cup malpositioning using conventional techniques occurs in 50 to 74% of cases defined. Assessment of the utility of improved methods of placing acetabular components depends upon the accuracy of the method of measuring component positioning postoperatively. The current study reports on our preliminary experience assessing the accuracy of EOS images and application specific software to assess cup orientation as compared to CT.

INTRODUCTION

Young patients (< 50 years old) have been reported to have a higher risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty (THA) than older patient cohorts, possibly to due higher activity, a higher incidence of deformity and greater probability of prior surgery. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces have been proposed for use in young and active individuals due to their low wear, low risk of adverse biologic reaction, and long-term survivorship. We assessed the clinical results and long-term survivorship of uncemented ceramic-on-ceramic THA in a young patient population.

Introduction

Cup malposition in hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing is associated with instability, accelerated wear, and the need for revision. A recent study measuring cup orientation on conventional radiodiographs demonstrated an incidence of cup malpositioning of 50% according to the safe zone that they defined 1,2. A prior study of 105 conventionally placed cups using CT demonstrated a cup malpositioning incidence of 74%3. The current study similarly assesses the variation in cup position using conventional techniques as measured by CT.

Acetabular component malalignment remains the single greatest root cause for revision THA with malposition of at least ½ of all acetabular components placed using conventional methods. The use of local anatomical landmarks has repeatedly proven to be unreliable due to individual variation of these structures. As a result, the use of such landmarks without knowledge of their three-dimensional orientation may actually be a major cause of component malpositioning. Traditional navigation and robotics can potentially lead to improved component placement but these technologies have not gained widespread use due to the increase in time of use, complexity, and cost of these systems. The alternative of placing the cup in the supine position, even with the use of arthroscopy, has been proven to have an incidence of inaccuracy equal or greater than that in the lateral position.

A smart mechanical instrument system was developed to quickly and easily achieve accurate cup alignment (HipXpert System, Surgical Planning Associates, Boston, MA). The system is based on a low dose, low cost CT study and a customised patient-specific surgery plan. The laterally-based system docks on a patient-specific basis with 3 legs: one through the incision behind the posterior rim, one percutaneously on the lateral side of the ASIS, and a third percutaneously on the surface of the ilium. A direction indicator on the top of the instrument points in the desired cup orientation. The anteriorly-based system also docks on a patient-specific basis with one leg on the anterior ischium and one leg on each ASIS, either to skin or to bone.

The lateral system has been proven to be robust, with repeated studies showing accurate cup placement in 100% of cases and an independent study showing accurate cup placement in 98% of cases for both anteversion and inclination. This compares to a recent study of robotic methods with 88% for inclination and 84% for anteversion.

Smart mechanical navigation of cup placement offers the optimum combination of accuracy, speed, and simplicity for solving the ubiquitous problem of acetabular component malorientation.

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. The earlier PAO series show 20 year survivorship of 81% and 65% in Tonnis Grade 0 and 1 hips.

Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of pre-operative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis pre-operatively whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis.

Properly designed ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty has consistently shown excellent clinical outcomes without the problems associated with crosslinked polyethylene bearings such as liner dissociation, debris associated osteolysis, polyethylene fracture, clinically measurable wear, and taper-corrosion associated adverse tissue reaction when metal heads are used. The recognition of these results has been affected by the confusion with the poorer results of designs with elevated metal rims especially when coupled with the use of femoral components made of beta-titanium alloys. Our clinical experience, now at 18 years, with flush mounted liners and Ti-Al6-V4 stem and cup alloy demonstrate consistently excellent outcomes without osteolysis or ALTR. Ceramic-Ceramic THA remains the gold standard for the young active patient.

Background

Stratifying patients with Low Back Pain (LBP) using the STarT Back Tool and delivering targeted treatment has demonstrated efficacy in individual physiotherapy settings. Physiotherapy interventions for LBP patients are often delivered in groups. This study aimed to explore the sustainability and cost effectiveness of a group stratified intervention in primary care.

Several design principles were considered paramount when the surgical technique of performing total hip arthroplasty through an incision in the superior capsule without dislocation of the hip joint was developed. These design principles include: Preservation of the abductors; Preservation of the posterior capsule and short external rotators; Preparation of the femur in situ without dislocation of the hip; In-line access to the femoral shaft axis; Ability to perform a trial reduction; Independence from intraoperative imaging; Independence from a traction table; Applicable to at least 99% of THA procedures

Personal experience with more than 1950 THA using the superior capsulotomy technique over a 12-year period has demonstrated several observations: Dislocation rate of 0.15% (3 in 1950); Acute deep infection rate of 0% (0 in 1950); Universal applicability: used in 99.7% of primary THA; Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy incidence: 0/1950; Femoral nerve palsy incidence: 0/1950; Transient peroneal palsy incidence: 2/1950; Length of stay (since 2010): 1.55 days; Discharge to home: 98%; 90-day cost (2/13 to 2/14) compared to other exposures in CMS patients in the same institution: $24,200 vs $30,100; Readmission costs (CMS 2/13 to 2/14) at 90 days: $0.

Conclusion: Performing total hip arthroplasty without dislocation and with preservation of the abductors, posterior capsule and short external rotations has proven to have a low dislocation rate, a low infection rate, and wide applicability. CMS 12-month expenditure data documenting ZERO dollars spent on readmission for any reason within 90 days of surgery demonstrates the potential for simultaneously improving incomes and reducing cost, with particular benefit within the CMS BPCI and private bundled payment programs.

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Preoperative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces.

Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of preoperative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis preop whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctible problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis.

Acetabular component malalignment remains the single greatest root cause for revision THA with malposition of at least ½ of all acetabular components placed using conventional methods. The use of local anatomical landmarks has repeatedly proven to be unreliable due to individual variation of these structures. As a result, the use of such landmarks without knowledge of their three-dimensional orientation may actually be a major cause of component malpositioning. Traditional navigation and robotics can potentially lead to improved component placement but these technologies have not gained widespread use due to the increase in time of use, complexity, and cost of these systems. The alternative of placing the cup in the supine position, even with the use of arthroscopy, has been proven to have an incidence of inaccuracy equal or greater than that in the lateral position.

A smart mechanical instrument system was developed to quickly and easily achieve accurate cup alignment (HipXpert System, Surgical Planning Associates, Boston, MA). The system is based on a low dose, low cost CT study and a customised patient-specific surgery plan. The laterally-based system docks on a patient-specific basis with 3 legs: one through the incision behind the posterior rim, one percutaneously on the lateral side of the ASIS, and a third percutaneously on the surface of the ilium. A direction indicator on the top of the instrument points in the desired cup orientation. The anteriorly-based system also docks on a patient-specific basis with one leg on the anterior ischium and one leg on each ASIS, either to skin or to bone.

The lateral system has been proven to be robust, with repeated studies showing accurate cup placement in 100% of cases and an independent study showing accurate cup placement in 98% of cases. The newer anterior system has the potential for even greater accuracy.

Smart mechanical navigation of cup placement offers the optimum combination of accuracy, speed, and simplicity for solving the ubiquitous problem of acetabular component malorientation.

Surgical invention to preserve the native hip joint remains a preferred treatment option for hips in young patients with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The two most common pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity, if left uncorrected, always leads to arthrosis. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement, if present. Correction of deformities on the femoral side is now less common and reserved for only the more severe combined femoral and acetabular dysplasias or the rare isolated femoral dysplasia. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces.

Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Further, significant cam impingement is clearly associated with the development of osteoarthrosis. Treatment can be performed either by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of pre-operative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis pre-op whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with the onset of instability in the absence of significant secondary arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Similarly, caution should be exercised when considering rim-trimming for protrusion since high central contact pressures due to an enlarged acetabular notch are not corrected by rim trimming.

Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis.

While crosslinked polyethylene has reduced the rate of wear and osteolysis in THA, osteolysis still occurs and taper-corrosion induced wear has become recognised as an increasing problem especially when larger diameter metal bearings are used. Long-term follow up studies of newer polyethylene bearings continue to lag those of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings by several years.

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing surfaces have consistently demonstrated reliable clinical results with when coupled with appropriated designed femoral stems and acetabular shells and have been shown to exhibit virtually no risk of adverse biologic reaction. Further, CoC bearings have not been associated with corrosion-induced adverse tissue reactions that occur with metal taper junctions.

Revisions for squeaking have been associated with specific designs and materials, including the use of a titanium elevated metal rim on the acetabular side, and more flexible femoral components made of a beta-titanium alloy (TMZF) which had thin necks and relatively small tapers.

Multiple clinical studies document excellent long-term survival of CoC bearing couples in young patients with revision for any reason as the primary endpoint. Our own experience with 341 hips in patients under 50 with 2–15 years and average 9.1-year follow up demonstrates a 95% overall survivorship (revision for any reason) at 13 years.

CoC bearings continue to show excellent durability in young, high demand patients with an absence of osteolysis in any case. CoC bearings continue to represent an excellent alternative to bearing couples containing polyethylene.