Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of the outcomes of revision
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing the use
of different types of graft. A search was performed of Medline and Pubmed using the terms
“Anterior Cruciate Ligament” and “ACL” combined with “revision”,
“re-operation” and “failure”. Only studies that reported the outcome
at a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Two authors reviewed
the papers, and outcomes were subdivided into autograft and allograft. Autograft
was subdivided into hamstring (HS) and bone-patellar tendon-bone
(BPTB). Subjective and objective outcome measures were analysed
and odds ratios with confidence intervals were calculated.Aims
Materials and Methods
The purpose of this study is to report results from a prospective multicenter study of a bioresorbable type I collagen scaffold used to replace tissue loss following irreparable lateral meniscus injuries. 49 non-consecutive patients (33M/16F; mean age 30.5 yrs, range 14.7–54.7 yrs) with irreparable lateral meniscus tears or loss requiring surgical treatment were prospectively enrolled at one of 7 EU centers. 11 patients (22%) had acute injuries of the lateral meniscus, while 38 (78%) had prior surgeries to the involved meniscus. Implantation of the LCMI (now Lateral Menaflex) was performed arthroscopically using an all-inside suturing technique (FASTFIX) combined with inside-out sutures in the more anterior meniscus aspect. Forty-three patients were evaluated with a 2 to 4-year follow-up (FU); mean FU duration was 45 months (range, 33–53 m). Patients were evaluated clinically and by self-assessment using Tegner activity and Lysholm function scores, as well as the Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for pain, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Evaluations were performed pre-operatively, 6 months, 1 year, 2 and 4 years after surgery. X-ray and/or MR-images were taken pre-operatively, and at 1 year and 2 years after surgery.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
This study aimed to intra-operatively quantify the improvements in knee stability given both by anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and single-bundle with additional lateral plasty (SBLP) ACL reconstruction using a navigation system. We prospectively included 35 consecutive patients, with an isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury, that underwent both ADB and SBLP ACL reconstruction (15 ADB, 20 SBLP). The testing protocol included anterior/posterior displacement at 30° and 90° of flexion (AP30–AP90), internal/external rotation at 30° and 90° of flexion (IE 30–IE90) and varus/valgus test at 0° and 30° of flexion (VV0–VV30); pivot-shift (PS) test was used to determine dynamic laxity. The tests were manually performed before and after the ACL reconstruction and the data were acquired by means a surgical navigation system (BLU-IGS, Orthokey, USA). Comparisons of pre- and post-reconstruction laxities were made using paired Student t-test (P=0.05) within the same group; comparison between ADB and SBLP groups was indeed performed using independent Student t-test (P=0.05), analysing both starting pre-operative condition and post-operative one.INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
