Abstract
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to intra-operatively quantify the improvements in knee stability given both by anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and single-bundle with additional lateral plasty (SBLP) ACL reconstruction using a navigation system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We prospectively included 35 consecutive patients, with an isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury, that underwent both ADB and SBLP ACL reconstruction (15 ADB, 20 SBLP). The testing protocol included anterior/posterior displacement at 30° and 90° of flexion (AP30–AP90), internal/external rotation at 30° and 90° of flexion (IE 30–IE90) and varus/valgus test at 0° and 30° of flexion (VV0–VV30); pivot-shift (PS) test was used to determine dynamic laxity. The tests were manually performed before and after the ACL reconstruction and the data were acquired by means a surgical navigation system (BLU-IGS, Orthokey, USA). Comparisons of pre- and post-reconstruction laxities were made using paired Student t-test (P=0.05) within the same group; comparison between ADB and SBLP groups was indeed performed using independent Student t-test (P=0.05), analysing both starting pre-operative condition and post-operative one.
RESULTS
Statistically significant reduction of the global amount of laxity and global displacement was observed for both reconstructions (p<0.05) in all the performed clinical tests. Statistical differences was found between the two reconstruction considering the recovery (pre-post laxities) due to the each reconstruction, in VV0 (SBLP: 3.7±0.2° and ADB: 2.3±0.5°, p<0.0001) and in IE90 (SBLP: 9.2±3.1° and ADB: 5.0±2.8°, p=0.0022). Statistical differences were also found between the two reconstruction considering the recovery of global displacement, in particular for the lateral compartment during AP90 SBLP: 8.8±1.0 mm, ADB: 6.4±0.4 mm, p<0.0001), for the maximal lateral joint opening during VV0 (SBLP: 4.5±1.2 mm, ADB: 1.2±1.1 mm, p<0.0001) and VV30 (SBLP 3.5±1.3 mm, ADB 1.8±0.1 mm, p=0.0013) and both for the medial and lateral AP displacement during IE90 (in in medial compartment SBLP:5.6±0.6 mm, ADB: 2.7±0.7 mm, p<0.0001, in lateral compartment SBLP:8.2±1.0 mm, ADB: 3.9±0.8 mm, p<0.0001). During PS test ADB patients revealed less “hysteresis” after reconstruction (p=0.0005). Moreover SBLP patients presented more acceleration after the reconstruction compared to ADB and more evident displacement (p=0.0009).
DISCUSSION
Both the reconstructions worked similarly for what concerns knee static laxity. The considered extra-articular procedure plays an important role in better controlling lateral tibial compartment displacement in drawer test and in controlling maximal lateral joint opening both at 0° and 30° of flexion. On the other hand the ADB reconstruction better restores the dynamic behaviour of the joint under PS test.
