Due to their immunomodulatory and regenerative capacity, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hBMSCs) are promising in the treatment of polytrauma patients. However, few studies evaluated the effects of sera from polytraumatized patients on hBMSCs. The aim of this study was to explore changes in hBMSCs exposed to serum from polytrauma patients from different time points after trauma.

Sera from 84 patients on day 1 (D1), 5 (D5) and 10 (D10) after polytrauma (ISS ≥ 16) were pooled respectively to test the differential influence on hBMSC. As a control, sera from three healthy age- and gender-matched donors (HS) were collected. The pooled sera were analyzed by Multicytokine Array for pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokines. For the cell culture experiments, hBMSCs from four healthy donors were used. The influence of the different sera on hBMSC regarding cell proliferation, colony forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) assay, cell viability and toxicity, cell migration, as well as osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation was analyzed. One-Way-ANOVA and LSD-test were used for the parametric, Kruskal-Wallis-test for non-parametric data. p≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

The results showed that D5 serum reduced hBMSCs cell proliferation capacity by 41.26% (p=0.000) compared with HS and increased the proportion of dead cells by 3.19% (p=0.008) and 2.25% (p=0.020) compared with D1 and D10. The frequency of CFU-F was reduced by 49.08% (p=0.041) in D5 and 53.99% (p=0.027) in D10 compared with HS, whereas the other parameters were not influenced.

The serological effect of polytrauma on hBMSCs was related to the time after trauma. It is disadvantageous to use BMSCs in polytraumatized patients five days after the incidence as obvious cytological changes could be found at that time point. However, it is promising to use hBMSCs to treat polytrauma after 10 days, combined with the concept of “Damage Control Orthopaedics” (DCO).

Sarcopenia is an age-related geriatric syndrome which is associated with subsequent disability and morbidity. Currently there is no promising therapy approved for the treatment of sarcopenia. The receptor activator of nuclear factor NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and its receptor (RANK) are expressed in bone and skeletal muscle. Activation of the NF-κB pathway mainly inhibits myogenic differentiation, which leads to skeletal muscle dysfunction and loss. LYVE1 and CD206 positive macrophage has been reported to be associated with progressive impairment of skeletal muscle function with aging. The study aims to investigate the effects of an anti-RANKL treatment on sarcopenic skeletal muscle and explore the related mechanisms on muscle inflammation and the polarization status of macrophages.

Sarcopenic senescence-accelerated mouse P8 (SAMP8) mice at month 8 were treated intraperitoneally with 5mg/kg anti-RANKL (IK22/5) or isotype control (2A3; Bio X Cell) antibody every 4 weeks and harvested at month 10. Senescence accelerated mouse resistant-1 (SAMR1) were collected at month 10 as the age-matched non-sarcopenic group. Ex-vivo functional assessment, grip strength and immunostaining of C/EBPa, CD206, F4/80, LYVE1 and PAX7 were performed. Data analysis was done with one-way ANOVA, and the significant level was set at p≤0.05.

At month 10, tetanic force/specific tetanic force, twitch force/specific twitch force in anti-RANKL group were significantly higher than control group (all p<0.01). The mice in the anti-RANKL treatment group also showed significantly higher grip strength than Con group (p<0.001). The SAMP8 mice at month 10 expressed significantly more C/EBPa, CD206 and LYVE1 positive area than in SAMR1, while anti-RANKL treatment significantly decreased C/EBPa, CD206 and LYVE1 positive area.

The anti-RANKL treatment protected against skeletal muscle dysfunctions through suppressing muscle inflammation and modulating M2 macrophages, which may represent a novel therapeutic approach for sarcopenia.

Acknowledgment: Collaborative Research Fund (CRF, Ref: C4032-21GF)

Aims

There are two techniques widely used to determine the rotational alignment of the components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR). Which technique is the best remains controversial. We aimed to investigate this in a systematic review and meta-analysis.