Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) can be complex and associated with significant cost, with an increasing burden within the UK and globally. Regional rTHA networks have been proposed aiming to improve outcomes, reduce re-revisions and therefore costs. The aim of this study was to accurately quantify the cost and reimbursement for the rTHA service and to assess the financial impact of case complexity at a tertiary referral centre within the NHS.

A retrospective analysis of all revision hip procedures was performed over two consecutive financial years (2018–2020). Cases were classified according to the Revision Hip Complexity Classification (RHCC) and by mode of failure; infected or non-infected. Patients of ASA grade of 3 or greater or BMI over 40 are considered “high-risk” by the RHCC. Costs were calculated using PLICS and remuneration based on the HRG data. The primary outcome was the financial difference between tariff and cost per episode per patient. Comparisons between groups were analysed using analysis of variance and two-tailed unpaired t-test.

199 revision episodes were identified in 168 patients: 25 (13%) least complex revisions (H1), 110 (55%) complex revisions (H2) and 64 (32%) most complex revisions (H3). 76 (38%) cases were due to infection. 78 (39%) of patients were in the “high-risk” group. Median length of stay increased with case complexity from 4, to 6 to 8 days (p=0.17) and significantly for revisions performed for infection (9 vs 5 days; p=0.01). Cost per episode increased significantly between complexity groups (p=0.0002) and for infected revisions (p=0.003). All groups demonstrated a mean deficit, but this significantly increased with revision complexity (£301, £1,820 and £4,757 per case; p=0.02) and for infected failure (£4,023 vs £1,679; p=0.02). The total deficit to the trust for the two-years was £512,202.

Current NHS reimbursement for rTHA is inadequate and should be more closely aligned to complexity. An increase in the most complex rTHA at major revision centres (MRC) will likely place a greater financial burden on these units.

Introduction

Data on the outcome of THA in patients under the age of 30 years is sparse. There is a perceived reluctance to offer surgery to young patients on the basis of potential early failure of the implant. We aim to review our experience with THA in this group of patients to establish outcomes in a high volume specialist arthroplasty unit.

Background

An extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is a widely used approach for revision hip arthroplasty. Following an ETO it is common practice to use a long stemmed femoral prosthesis at the second stage to bypass the osteotomy. We propose that at the second stage, if the osteotomy has united, it is appropriate to use a standard length prosthesis, which preserves bone stock for any future revisions.

Listeria monocytogenes is usually thought of as a bacterial pathogen that causes invasive disease including meningitis and bacteraemia in susceptible hosts. It remains a rare cause of bone and joint infection; there is therefore potential for clinical and laboratory delay in diagnosis and for uncertainty over optimal management. We describe our experience of two such cases of L. monocytogenes prosthetic joint infection to highlight key features in clinical presentation and management.

Two case reports of L. monocytogenes prosthetic joint infection are described with reference to previous published cases.

A 57 year old woman presented with a 10 day history of severe pain and swelling around a left knee prosthesis which had been implanted as bilateral total knee replacements three years previously. She had a background of rheumatoid arthritis, controlled with prednisolone, methotrexate and ritixumab. Cultures from the left knee isolated L. monocytogenes. The patient was commenced on IV amoxicillin and after 4 weeks underwent 1st stage revision including radical debridement and removal of prosthesis. During the procedure an antibiotic-impregnated spacer (gentamycin/clindamycin with additional vancomycin added in house) was inserted. Antibiotic therapy with intravenous amoxicillin was continued for 2 weeks post-procedure and on discharge the patient was converted to oral amoxicillin for a further 8 weeks. The patient went on to have a 2nd stage revision, making a good recovery.

An 85 year old woman presented with an 18 month history of discomfort and recurrent abscesses along the wound line of a left hip prosthesis, implanted over 20 years ago. She had a background of osteoarthritis and bullous phemphigoid, previously on steroid treatment. Fluid from the abscess was aspirated and isolated L. monocytogenes. Due to patient preference and frailty, radical revision was not thought a viable management option. Chronic suppressive therapy with oral amoxicillin was therefore instigated; one year on the infection remains well controlled and discomfort in the left hip has improved.

L. monocytogenes has previously been infrequently implicated as a pathogen in prosthetic joint infection; however, there are reports of increasing numbers of cases particularly amongst immunosuppressed individuals. With an expanding at-risk population(1), its importance as a cause of prosthetic joint infection is set to rise in the future. Optimal management has not been well studied; it is likely that the best option combines antimicrobial therapy and prosthetic removal if possible.

In this 2-year randomised clinical trial we examined whether cemented femoral prosthesis geometry affects the pattern of strain-adaptive bone remodelling in the proximal femur after THA. 128 patients undergoing primary THA were randomised to receive a Charnley (shape-closed, no taper), Exeter (force-closed, double-tapered) or C-stem (forced-closed, triple-tapered) prosthesis. All received a cemented Charnley cup. Proximal femoral BMD change over 2 years was measured by DXA. Urine and serum samples were collected at pre-operative baseline and over 1 year post-operatively. N-telopeptides of type-I-collagen (NTX) was measured in urine as a marker of osteoclast activity and Osteocalcin (OC) in serum as a maker of osteoblast activity. Clinical outcome using the Harris and Oxford hip scores, and prosthesis migration measured using digitised radiographs (EBRA-Digital) were measured over 2 years. The baseline characteristics of the subjects in each group were similar (P> 0.05). Decreases in femoral BMD were observed over the first year for all prosthesis designs. Bone loss was greatest (14%) in the proximal medial femur (region 7). The pattern and amount of bone loss observed was similar between all prosthesis designs (P> 0.05). Transient rises in both osteoclast (NTX) and osteoblast (OC) activity also occurred over year 1, and were similar in pattern in the 3 prosthesis groups (p> 0.05). All prostheses showed migration patterns that were true to their design type and similar improvements in clinical hip scores were observed over the 2 year study. Differences in the proposed mechanism of load transfer between prosthesis and host bone in force-closed versus shape-closed femoral prosthesis designs in THA are not major determinants of prosthesis-related remodelling.

Introduction: Between 1990 and 2000 we reconstructed 123 hips in 110 patients using impaction bone grafting with frozen, morsellised irradiated femoral heads and cemented sockets. This review presents the medium to long term survivorship of irradiated allograft in acetabular reconstruction in our cohort of patients.

Patients and Methods: Patients were reviewed in out-patients. Radiographs were examined for union, lucency and component migration.

The mean age at revision with allograft was 64.3 years (26 to 97). 86 hips (70%) in 74 patients were reviewed both clinically and radiologically.

At the time of review 28 patients (29 hips) had died and 5 patients (5 hips) were lost to follow up. Of those patients who had died 18 hips had been followed up to a mean of 66 months (12–145). A further 3 hips were unable to attend for clinical review but had accurate implant-allograft survivorship data.

Their data were included in survivorship analysis to the time of last clinical review.

Results: There have been 19 revisions; 9 for infection, 7 for aseptic loosening and 3 for dislocation. In surviving acetabular reconstructions, union of the graft had occurred in 64 out of 67 hips (95.5%). Radiolucent lines at the bone cement interface were seen in 12 hips (17.9%; 9 in a single DeLee zone and 3 in multiple zones) but none were considered loose. Migration of the acetabular component greater than 5mm was seen in 3 hips (4.5%). Survivorship analysis using revision as an end point for all indications at 10 years was 83.3% (95% C.I. 68 to 89%) and 71.3% (95% C.I. 58 to 84%) at 15 years

Conclusion: Acetabular reconstruction using irradiated allograft and a cemented cup is an effective reliable technique with good results in the medium to long term comparable to series using non irradiated freshly frozen bone.

The Exeter (Howmedica Ltd) and Ultima-TPS (Depuy Ltd) implants are both collarless, polished, double-tapered, cemented femoral implants. The Exeter is manufactured in stainless steel and has an excellent long-term survivorship. The Ultima-TPS is manufactured in cobalt-chrome and has been recently introduced. The aim of this study was to compare the early performance of these implants in a 2-year randomised clinical trial.

65 patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis were randomised to receive either the Exeter or TPS stem. All received a Charnley Cup. Outcome measures included the Oxford Hip Questionnaire, proximal femoral bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and implant subsidence measured using EBRA. At 2 years 43 patients (66%) were reviewed. 22 patients (mean age 70 years, 16 female, BMI 27.9Kg/m²) received the TPS implant, and 21 patients (mean age 70 years, 15 female, BMI 28.9Kg/m²) received the Exeter implant. 19 patients withdrew for reasons unrelated to the study, 2 died, and 1 was withdrawn after deep wound infection.

Complete Oxford hip scores were available pre-operatively and at 2 years in 37 patients (n=20 TPS). Median (IQR) pre-operative hip scores were 51 (43 to 54) and 48 (36 to 53) for the TPS and Exeter implants, respectively. At 2 years the hip scores improved to 24 (18 to 31) and 22 (16 to 31), respectively. There were no differences in scores between groups at each time-point. There were no differences in BMD between groups at pre-operative baseline, 3 months, 1 and 2 years (Gruen zones 1–7, all time-points; n=19 TPS, n=13 Exeter implants: P> 0.05). Maximum bone loss was seen in Gruen zone 7 at 2 years for bone implants (TPS-11%, Exeter -14%, P> 0.05). Measurement of subsidence over 2 years using EBRA was possible in 20 patients (n=7 TPS, n=13 Exeter). Mean subsidence at 2 years was 1.62mm for the TPS implant and 1.60mm for the Exeter implant (P> 0.05). There was no plain radiographic evidence of osteolysis in either group.

These data suggest that the early performance of the two implants studied is similar. However, long-term survivorship data is required to confirm their equivalency.

One of the major surgical challenges at revision arthroplasty is the management of bone stock loss in the acetabulum.

There are several options available for reconstruction; cemented sockets within thick cement mantles, custom sockets jumbo uncemented sockets, support rings and bone grafting. Slooff and others have shown good results with impaction grafting.(JBJS 80B 1998)

If one is to use bone graft, does the preparation of the graft have any effect on the graft itself? There are a number of ways bone can be presented, freeze dried, fresh frozen or frozen irradiated. Concerns have been raised that irradiated bone has an altered and weakened structure. There is a paucity of clinical results on this subject. In this study we present a series of patients using gamma irradiated bone for reconstruction.23% of the cases reconstructions secondary to failure due to sepsis.

Between 1987 and 2000 192 revision arthroplasties in 165 patients were performed with irradiated morcellised bone allograft for acetabular reconstruction. Only those patients with a minimum follow up of 24 months were reviewed. Clinical and radiological follow up was achieved in 130 hips in 115 patients. 9 patients had died at a range of 1 to 66 months after surgery. There were 23 (17%) re-revisions of the acetabular component. Of these 13 were for deep sepsis, 5 for persistent early dislocation and 4 for aseptic loosening. Of those hips revised for infection there was a 13% re-revision rate for reinfection. There was only one catastrophic failure of the graft and only three re-revisions for aseptic loosening to date.

We feel that impaction grafting of the acetabulum is a useful technique for reconstruction even when the index arthroplasty failed for sepsis. We have found no evidence to show that gamma irradiated bone performs any worse than other types of allograft bone.