At our tertiary, large, academic healthcare system, we have access to an academic medical center (AMC), a community based, orthopedic friendly, efficient hospital (CBH) and several ambulatory care centers (ASC) which are being prepared to provide same day discharge (SDD) TJA and UKA. We had a near-capacity AMC with an excellent ability to care for medically and technically complicated TJA patients. However, efficiency was less than desired regardless of case complexity with an average effective case time of 4 hours. Concurrently, the orthopaedically, under-utilized community-based hospital (CBH) wanted to increase volume, improve margins, and become a TJA Center of Excellence with the ability to provide an efficient Hospital Outpatient Department (HOPD) and SDD TJA surgery experience. The CBH had a main operating floor and a separate floor of four OR suites which were repurposed with the goal of utilizing these rooms for TJA four days per week with an average of 3.5 cases per room per day. We preferentially performed primary, uncomplicated TJA, UKA, and minimally invasive TJA at the CBH. Revision surgeries, patients with extensive medical comorbidities, and complex primary surgeries would be performed at the AMC. Our goals were to decrease costs, readmissions, length of stay, and increase margins at the CBH while increasing efficiency, revenue and volume. Protocols were developed to facilitate SDD UKA and THA at both hospitals as well as rapid recovery protocols for TKA at both hospitals with the understanding that the CBH would perform more of these cases but the efficiency could also be implemented at the AMC when possible. We also needed a strategy to deal with TKA and eventually THA being removed from the Inpatient Only (IPO) list. CMS has utilized the “Two-Midnight Rule” to define outpatient status for both THA and TKA. This has distinct financial implications for the facility's reimbursement with outpatient being $10,123 on average versus $12,380 for inpatient status. A protocol-based system was put in place to make both hospitals compliant with the removal of TKA from the IPO List in order to avoid Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) and Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) after implementation. Comparing FY 2018 to FY 2019, volume increased 26.4% at the CBH. Outpatient case volume rose substantially from 14 cases to 243. Volumes were slightly decreased at the AMC (−4.57%) resulting in a substantial increase in margin contribution for the parent enterprise. Quality metrics at the CBH (surgical site infections (SSI), length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and mortality) were improved. LOS improved from 52% to 71% discharge before 48 hours. The LOS decreased 12% for THA and 8.1% for TKA. CBH readmission rates decreased from 1.38% to 0.9% with no deaths. Surgeon satisfaction is greatly improved as their volume, efficiency, quality metrics, and finances were enhanced. Financial performance was improved in aggregate and per case for the CBH. Although the CBH per-case revenue was 80.3% and 74.4% of the AMC for THA and TKA: the net margins were 3.6% and 18.8% higher for THA and TKA, respectively. The increased efficiency, lower hospital cost and higher volume at the CBH allowed for an increase in revenue despite lower reimbursement per case.Methods
Results
A staging system has been developed to revise the 1994 ARCO classification for ONFH. The final consensus resulted in the following 4-staged system: stage I—X-ray is normal, but either magnetic resonance imaging or bone scan is positive; stage II—X-ray is abnormal (subtle signs of osteosclerosis, focal osteoporosis, or cystic change in the femoral head) but without any evidence of subchondral fracture, fracture in the necrotic portion, or flattening of the femoral head; stage III—fracture in the subchondral or necrotic zone as seen on X-ray or computed tomography scans. This stage is further divided into stage IIIA (early, femoral head depression ≤2 mm) and stage IIIB (late, femoral head depression >2 mm); and stage IV—X-ray evidence of osteoarthritis with accompanying joint space narrowing, acetabular changes, and/or joint destruction. Radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) scans may all be involved in diagnosing ONFH; however, the optimal diagnostic modality remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify: 1) how ONFH is diagnosed at a single academic medical center, and 2) if CT is a necessary modality for diagnosing/staging OFNH. The EMR was queried for the diagnosis of ONFH between 1/1/2008–12/31/2018 at a single academic medical center. CT and MRI scans were reviewed by the senior author and other contributors. The timing and staging quality of the diagnosis of ONFH were compared between MRI and CT to determine if CT was a necessary component of the ONFH work-up.Introduction
Methods
In November 2017, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized the 2018 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule that removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures from the Medicare inpatient-only (IPO) list of procedures. This action had significant and unexpected consequences. For several years, CMS has utilized a rule called the “Two-Midnight Rule” to define outpatient status for all procedures not on the IPO list. CMS made TKA subject to the “Two-Midnight Rule” in conjunction with the decision to move TKA off the IPO list. According to the “Two-Midnight Rule,” a hospital admission should be expected to span at least two midnights in order to be covered as an inpatient procedure. If it can be reliably expected that the patient will not require at least two midnights in the hospital, the “Two-Midnight Rule” suggests that the patient is considered an outpatient and is therefore subject to outpatient payment policies. Under prior guidance related to the “Two-Midnight Rule;” however, CMS also states that Medicare We looked at 3 different levels of the IPO rule impact on TKA for Medicare beneficiaries: a national comparison of fee for service (FFS) inpatient and outpatient classification for 2017 vs 2018; a survey of AAHKS surgeons completed in April of 2019; and an in-depth analysis of a large academic medical center experience. An analysis of change in inpatient classification of TKA patients over time, number of Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) audits, compliance solutions of organizations for the new rule and cost implications of those compliance solutions were evaluated.Introduction
Methods
Without intervention 80% of hips with osteonecrosis (ON) will progress. Core decompression has shown favorable results (60–80% survivorship) in early stage ON, and recently, bone marrow aspirate concentration (BMAC) injection into the decompressed femoral head has been proposed to stimulate healing of the necrotic lesion and improve outcomes and survivorship. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 42 hips in 26 patients who underwent core decompression with BMAC for ON with a minimum of 1 year follow up. We evaluated pre-op visual analog pain scores (VAS), Steinberg class based on radiographs, as well as Kerboul angle as measured on MRI. Clinical outcomes were reported as change in VAS at final follow up, advancement in Steinberg classification based on radiographs at final follow up, or decision to proceed with THA.Introduction
Methods
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from inpatient-only status in 2018. Our goal was to measure the adoption of outpatient TKAs, the impact on re-treatment rates, and the economic implications for hospitals. We utilized 100% national Medicare Part A fee-for-service (FFS) patient-level claims data for 2017–2018. We excluded DRG 469 TKAs since they are unlikely to be outpatient candidates, which left 257,107 primary TKAs in 2017 and 264,393 in 2018. We examined the time trend in monthly case volume and 30-day retreatment rate (defined as percent of patients having a second TKA within 30 days of the first. We calculated the loss in revenue for a hospital by multiplying the decrease in payment rate between inpatient and outpatient by the outpatient and total 2018 TKA volume.Introduction
Methods
A variety of surgical approaches are used for total hip arthroplasty (THA), all with reported advantages and disadvantages. A number of common complications can occur following THA regardless of the approach used. The purpose of this study was to compare five commonly used surgical approaches with respect to the incidence of surgery-related complications. The electronic medical records of all patients who underwent primary elective THA at a single large-volume arthroplasty centre, between 2011 and 2016, with at least two years of follow-up, were reviewed. After exclusion, 3574 consecutive patients were included in the study. There were 1571 men (44.0%) and 2003 women (56.0%). Their mean age and body mass index (BMI) was 63.0 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
We studied the impact of direct anterior (DA) A total of 6086 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a single institution between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data obtained from electronic patient medical records included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgical approach, and presence of deep PJI. There were 3053 male patients (50.1%) and 3033 female patients (49.9%). The mean age and BMI of the entire cohort was 62.7 years (18 to 102, Aims
Patients and Methods
Narcotic administration within the inpatient setting is highly variable any may benefit from the implementation of standardized multi-modal pain management protocols. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) candidates have historically received high doses of opioids within the perioperative period for the management of surgical pain. Healthcare systems have responded by improving opioid prescribing documentation and implementing narcotic-sparing pain protocols into TJA integrate care pathways (ICP). Despite these efforts, there are few technological platforms designed to curtail excessive inpatient narcotic administration. Here we present an early iteration of an inpatient narcotic administration reporting tool which normalizes patient narcotic consumption as an average daily morphine milligram equivalence (MME) per surgical encounter (MME/day/encounter) among total hip arthroplasty (THA) recipients. This information may help orthopaedic surgeons visualize their individual granular inpatient narcotic prescribing habits individually and compared to other surgeons, while taking into consideration patient and procedure specific variables.Summary
Introduction
There has been a renewed interest in the surgical approach used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been well studied over the past decade, yet PJI remains one of the most devastating complications following THA. We studied the impact of direct anterior (DA) versus non-direct anterior (NA) surgical approaches on PJI, and examined the impact of new perioperative protocols on PJI rates following all surgical approaches at a single institution. 6086 continuous patients undergoing primary THA at a single institution from 2013–2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data obtained from electronic patient medical records included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgical approach, and presence of deep PJI. Deep PJI was defined according to National Healthcare Safety Network's (NHSN) criteria for joint space infection following prosthetic hip replacement. Infection rates were calculated yearly for the DA and NA approach groups. Covariates were assessed and used in multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios for risk of development of PJI with DA compared to NA approaches. In order to determine the effect of adopting a set of infection prevention protocols and patient optimization on PJI, we calculated odds ratios for PJI comparing patients undergoing THA for two distinct time periods: 2013–2014 and 2015–2016. These periods corresponded to before and after we implemented a set of perioperative infection protocols.Introduction
Methods
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, costly, and morbid complication following TJA. Consequently, the current standard of care recommends that all TJA candidates receive some form of thromboprophylaxis postoperatively. Chemoprophylaxis, however, is not without its own risks and has been associated with greater risk of perioperative complications such as major bleeding, infection, stroke, and increased wound drainage. Mechanical compression devices serve as an alternative to chemoprophylaxis. Compression devices are thought to function by decreasing venous stasis and activating fibrinolysis. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCD) function by providing pressure at a constant cycle; whereas continuous enhanced circulation therapy (CECT) devices such as ActiveCare portable system (Medical Compression Systems, Or Akiva, Israel) function in a synchronized manner with the patient's own respiratory cycles. While both of these systems are widely utilized, there is scarce data comparing their effectiveness as thromboprophylatic agents following TJA. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of ActiveCare to IPCDs in the prevention of thromboembolic events following TJA. A literature search using PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were used to identify all articles published between January 2000 and August 2016. Key words used to conduct the search were venous foot pump, intermittent pneumatic compression, total hip arthroplasty/replacement, total knee arthroplasty/replacement, deep vein thrombosis, thromboembolic disease and pulmonary emboli. Two independent investigators carried out the literature review using the PRISMA guidelines (Figure 1). Analysis of risk ratio was performed by evaluation of studies which compared IPCD with any control chemoprophylaxis regiment or ActiveCare with any control chemoprophlaxis regiment. Assessment of heterogeneity and analysis of data were operated by Review Manager 5.3.Background
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine the optimal regimen for
the management of pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by
comparing the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of different protocols
implemented at a large, urban, academic medical centre. Between September 2013 and September 2015, we used a series of
modifications to our standard regimen for the management of pain
after TKA. In May 2014, there was a department-wide transition from
protocols focused on femoral nerve blocks (FNB) to periarticular
injections of liposomal bupivacaine. In February 2015, patient-controlled analgesia
(PCA) was removed from the protocol while continuing liposomal bupivacaine
injections. Quality measures and hospital costs were compared between
the three protocols.Aims
Patients and Methods
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a debilitating, painful, progressive, and refractory disease that has multiple etiologic risk factors. It is caused by bone cell death, which itself has various causes, leading to femoral head collapse and subsequent osteoarthritis. ONFH primarily influences patients aged from 20 to 50 years; in addition, bilateral hip joints are involved in 75% of patients. Causes include use of corticosteroids, alcohol abuse, previous trauma, hemoglobinopathy, Gaucher disease, coagulopathies, and other diseases. No pharmacologic treatment has been shown to be effective for early ONFH. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for these young and active patients have some drawbacks, primarily due to the young age of these patients, limited lifetime and durability of the implants and their fixation, and the skeletal manifestations of osteonecrosis. As a result of these concerns, there has been an increased focus on early interventions for ONFH aimed at preservation of the native articulation. Core decompression is currently the most widely accepted surgical treatment at the early stage of avascular osteonecrosis (AVN); however, due to limited efficacy, its use has been debated. There is currently no standardised protocol for evaluating and treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head in adults in the United States. Although total hip replacement is the most frequent intervention for treatment of post-collapse (Steinberg stage-IIIB, IVB, V, and VI) osteonecrosis; core decompression is the most commonly offered intervention for symptomatic, pre-collapse (Steinberg stage-IB and IIB) osteonecrosis. Less frequently offered treatments include non-operative, pharmacologic or modality management, osteotomy, vascularised and non-vascularised bone-grafting, hemiarthroplasty, resurfacing and arthrodesis. A promising, minimally invasive, core decompression procedure combined with a mesenchymal stem cell grafting technique which restores vascularity and heals osteonecrotic lesions has become popularised. This procedure is called a bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) procedure. During a BMAC, mesenchymal stem cells (in the form of concentrated iliac crest bone marrow) are injected through a core decompression tract into the area of necrosis in the femoral head. Most patients with early (pre-collapse) disease have excellent results at 2 to 5 years of clinical follow-up. Patients are weight bearing as tolerated on crutches after the procedure for 6 weeks, and are able to go home on the same day or next day after surgery with minimal pain. We can report on the early, promising results of 300 patients with ONFH treated with BMAC in the United States by two expert hip surgeons with at least 75%-80% survivorship. The care of adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head is highly variable. This paper will discuss the various non-operative and operative treatment algorithms for ONFH available today. We will also report on a promising, new technique (BMAC), which improves the efficacy of traditional core decompression for early ONFH. The goal of treatment of early ONFH is to avoid THA in young, active patients and this talk will discuss those interventions and treatments which help accomplish that goal.
Pain control is critical in the management of TKA patients and is crucial to allow for early ambulation and accelerated physical therapy. Currently data suggests that 19% of patients are not satisfied with their results following TKA, and failure to control pain may result in prolonged hospitalization, worse outcomes, and increased patient dissatisfaction. Studies suggest that local analgesics coupled with both pre- and post-operative multimodal pain management may result in improved pain control and increased patient satisfaction. Minimization of opioid use is helpful in decreasing complications, accelerating physical therapy milestones, minimizing length of stay and increasing discharge to home. Femoral nerve blocks (FNB) can reduce pain scores for up to 48 hours post-operatively, but may delay ambulation and result in an increased rate of falls. Periarticular injection (PAI) with local analgesics can provide significant short term relief comparable to FNB and can also facilitate decreased opioid consumption. One commonly used local anesthetic is bupivacaine, but the average half-life of this drug is only 2.7 hours. An alternative to this for PAI during TKA is liposomal bupivacaine (LB). LB is a multivesicular drug designed for rapid absorption, prolonged release of bupivacaine, and analgesia that is maintained for up to 72 hours with a single injection. LB exhibits a bimodal peak of distribution, one immediate associated with extra-liposomal bupivacaine, and a second 10–36 hours later associated with the release of liposomal encapsulated bupivacaine. The safety profile of LB has been investigated and adverse events are similar to standard bupivacaine and demonstrate acceptable tolerability. Multiple studies have demonstrated efficacy of this drug compared to other pain control modalities. LB is highly technique dependent and only one piece of a multimodal pain management protocol. Our study consisted of 1808 consecutive primary TKA patients from Sept 2013 to Sept 2015. Three patient cohorts were compiled by date, from Sept 2013 to May 2014 was cohort 1, consisting of FNB and PCA. Department wide adoption of LB began in May 2014 and became routinely used in all patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty at our institution. Cohort 2 entailed a PCA along with LB injection from May 2014 through Feb 2015. Cohort 3 consisted of LB injection only and was from Feb 2015 through Sept 2015. All patients undergoing TKA were eligible and there were no exclusion criteria as long as the protocols were followed. The standard multi-modal analgesia protocol was provided to all patients in all three cohorts. Prior to entering the operating room, patients received preemptive oral analgesics, consisting of: 200 mg celecoxib, 1000 mg acetaminophen, and 50 mg pregabalin. Intra-operative analgesia was chosen at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and preferentially consisted of spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia as an alternate. For all three cohorts, a peri-incisional analgesic cocktail was injected prior to closure consisting of: 40 cc 0.25% Marcaine, 5 cc of (1 mg/cc) morphine, and 1 cc of (30 mg/cc) ketorolac. Cohorts 1 and 2 received PCA post-operatively for pain control post-operatively with prn oral narcotic administration as well. Cohort 3 did not receive a PCA. The cohort treated without FNB and without a PCA using a multimodal pain management protocol including a short acting periarticular injection and a longer acting periarticular injection with LB, had equivalent pain control, less narcotic use, faster achievement of physical therapy milestones, earlier and more frequent discharge home, less complications and a lower cost of the episode of care.
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming increasingly prevalent as the number of TKA procedures grow in a younger, higher-demand population. Factors associated with patients requiring multiple revision TKAs are not yet well understood. The purpose of this study is to investigate the epidemiology of re-revision TKA, and identify risk factors that are associated with failure of re-revision TKA. A retrospective analysis was performed on 358 patients who underwent revision TKA at a single institution between 1/2012 and 12/2013. Patients who underwent revision knee arthroplasty two or more times were included. Patients were excluded if their indication for the first revision was periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Patient demographics, surgical indications, revision details, and available follow-up information were collected. Re-revision failure was defined as the need for any additional operative intervention. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for significant predictors of re-revision failure.Introduction
Methods
The epidemiology of re-revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to investigate the epidemiology of re-revision THA, and identify risk factors that are associated with failure of re-revision THA. A retrospective analysis was performed on 288 patients who underwent revision THA at a single institution between 1/2012 and 12/2013. Patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty two or more times were included. Patients were excluded if their indication for their first revision was due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Patient demographics, surgical indications, revision details, and available follow-up information were collected through the electronic medical record. Re-revision failure was defined as the need for any additional return to the operating room, regardless of indication. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for significant predictors of re-revision failure.Introduction
Methods
Alternative payment models, such as bundled payments, aim to control rising costs for total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Without risk adjustment for patients who may utilize more resources, concerns exist about patient selection and access to care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether lower socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with increased resource utilization following TKA and THA. Using the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) database, we reviewed a consecutive series of 4,168 primary TKA and THA patients over a 3-year period. We defined lowest SES based upon the median household income of the patient's ZIP code. An Introduction
Methods
Reducing readmissions after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is challenging. Pre-operative risk stratification and optimization pre surgical care may be helpful in reducing readmission rates after primary TJA. Assessment of the predictive value of individual modifiable risk factors without a tool to properly stratify patients may not be helpful to the surgical community to reduce the risk of readmission. We developed a scoring system: Readmission Risk Assessment Tool (RRAT) as part of a Perioperative Orthopaedic Surgical Home model that allows for risk stratification in patients undergoing elective primary TJA at our institution. We analyzed the relationship between the RRAT score and readmission following primary hip or knee arthroplasty. The RRAT, which is scored incrementally based on the number and severity of modifiable comorbidities was used to generate readmission scores for a cohort of 207 readmitted and 2 cohorts of 234 (random and age-matched) non-readmitted patients each. Regression analysis was performed to assess the strength of association between individual risk factors, RRAT score and readmissions. We also calculated the odds and odds ratio (OR) at each level of RRAT score to identify patients with relatively higher risk of readmission.Introduction
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 161 revision THAs with diaphyseal fitting, mid- modular femoral components performed by ten surgeons at two academic medical centers. The average follow-up was 6.1 years. At final follow-up, 4 patients required re-revision for failure of the femoral component; 3 (2%) for aseptic loosening and 1 for mechanical failure of stem in setting of periprosthetic fracture. There were a total of 24 (14.9%) revisions for any reason, with the most common reason being septic failure (10 of 24). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of mid-term survivorship and complications of revision THA with mid-modular femoral components. Our results show that these stems have a low rate of aseptic loosening, subsidence, and mechanical failure.
The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy and reliability of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) based Patient Match Technology (PMT) system (VISIONAIRE, Smith & Nephew, Inc, Memphis, Tenn) by intraoperative use of VectorVision knee navigation software from BrainLAB (Redwood City, California, USA). Between February 2011 and May 2011, 15 patients with primary gonarthrosis were selected for unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The first three patients were excluded from this study, as they were considered as a warm up to set up the procedure. Therefore 12 patients entered the study. Preoperatively all patient underwent a full-length weight-bearing radiograph in antero-posterior (AP) and a MRI according to the protocol suggested and approved by the manufacturer. All patients were operated with cemented posterior stabilised prosthesis cruciate ligament sacrificing (Journey BCS, Smith & Nephew, Inc, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) by the same surgeon using the VISIONAIRE patient matched cutting jigs. During surgery, once the guides were placed and fixed, the orientation was checked by the navigator. The following parameters were evaluated: size of the implant, alignment in coronal and sagittal plane. An unsatisfactory result was considered an error ≥ 2° in both plane for each component as a possible error of 4° could result in aggregate.Introduction
Methods
In total knee arthroplasty extramedullary tibial guides could not to be as accurate as requested in obtaining proper alignment perpendicular to the mechanical axis. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of an accelerometer-based system (KneeAlign 2; OrthAlign Inc, Aliso Viejo, California) as evaluated by post-op X-rays analysis. Between March 2012 and May 2012 thirty consecutive patients with primary gonarthrosis were selected for unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a handheld surgical navigation system to perform the tibial resection.
Postoperatively, standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiographs and lateral knee-to-ankle radiographs were performed to determine the varus/valgus alignment and the posterior slope of the tibial components relative to the mechanical axis in both the coronal and sagittal planes. The difference between the intraoperative reading of the tibial varus/valgus alignment and posterior slope provided by the system was compared to the radiographic measurements obtained postoperatively for each respective case. Differences were analysed via standard t test. The critical level of significance was set at P <0.05.Introduction
Methods
