Abstract
Introduction
A staging system has been developed to revise the 1994 ARCO classification for ONFH. The final consensus resulted in the following 4-staged system: stage I—X-ray is normal, but either magnetic resonance imaging or bone scan is positive; stage II—X-ray is abnormal (subtle signs of osteosclerosis, focal osteoporosis, or cystic change in the femoral head) but without any evidence of subchondral fracture, fracture in the necrotic portion, or flattening of the femoral head; stage III—fracture in the subchondral or necrotic zone as seen on X-ray or computed tomography scans. This stage is further divided into stage IIIA (early, femoral head depression ≤2 mm) and stage IIIB (late, femoral head depression >2 mm); and stage IV—X-ray evidence of osteoarthritis with accompanying joint space narrowing, acetabular changes, and/or joint destruction. Radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) scans may all be involved in diagnosing ONFH; however, the optimal diagnostic modality remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify: 1) how ONFH is diagnosed at a single academic medical center, and 2) if CT is a necessary modality for diagnosing/staging OFNH.
Methods
The EMR was queried for the diagnosis of ONFH between 1/1/2008–12/31/2018 at a single academic medical center. CT and MRI scans were reviewed by the senior author and other contributors. The timing and staging quality of the diagnosis of ONFH were compared between MRI and CT to determine if CT was a necessary component of the ONFH work-up.
Results
There were 803 patients with ONFH over the 10 years of study. 382 had CT only, 166 had MRI only, and 255 had both a CT and MRI. Of the 255 patients who had both CT and MRI, 228 actually had ONFH after inspection. A diagnosis of ONFH was made by MRI only in 57% (129/228) while another 21% (48/228) used MRI and CT simultaneously. 22% (51/228) of cases were diagnosed by CT scan first. 94% (48/51) of these cases involved a cancer (CA) diagnoses, the CT scans were used for CA staging and were not helpful with ARCO staging of ONFH. The other 3 cases identified asymptomatic ONFH. MRI scans performed after diagnosis with CT in symptomatic patients were then utilized for staging.
Conclusion
Although CT scan was a useful adjunct for diagnosing ONFH during a staging workup for CA, it was not useful for ARCO staging of ONFH and treatment decisions. Based on this retrospective study, CT scan is not necessary when using the Revised ARCO Staging System.
