Current evidence suggests that superior surgical team performance is linked to fewer intra-operative errors, reductions in mortality and even improved patient outcomes. Virtual reality has demonstrated excellent efficacy in training surgeons and scrub nurses individually, however its impact on training teams is currently unknown. This study aimed to assess if training together (scrub nurse and surgeon) in an innovative multiplayer virtual reality program was superior to single player training for novices learning anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (AA-THA).

40 participants (20 novice surgeons (CT1-ST3 level) and 20 novice scrub nurses) were enrolled in this study and randomised to individual or team virtual reality training. Individually-trained participants played with virtual avatar counterparts, whilst teams trained live in pairs (surgeon and scrub nurse). Both groups underwent 5 VR training sessions over 6 weeks. Subsequently, they underwent a real-life assessment in which they performed AA-THA on a high-fidelity model with real equipment in a simulated operating theatre. Teams performed together and individually-trained participants were randomly paired up with a solo player of the opposite role. Videos of the assessment were marked by two blinded expert assessors. The primary outcome was team performance as graded by the validated NOTECHs II score. Secondary outcomes were procedure time and number of technical errors from an expert pre-defined protocol.

Teams outperformed individually-trained participants for non-technical skills in the real-world assessment (NOTECHS-II score 50.3 ± 6.04 vs 43.90 ± 5.90, p=0.0275). They completed the assessment 28.1% faster (31.22 minutes ±2.02 vs 43.43 ±2.71, p=0.01), and made close to half the number of technical errors when compared to the individual group (12.9 ± 8.3 vs 25.6 ± 6.1, p=0.001).

Multiplayer, team training appears to lead to faster surgery with fewer technical errors and the development of superior non-technical skills.

Evidence supporting the use of virtual reality (VR) training in orthopaedic procedures is rapidly growing. However, the impact of the timing of delivery of this training is yet to be tested. We aimed to investigate whether spaced VR training is more effective than massed VR training.

24 medical students with no hip arthroplasty experience were randomised to learning the direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty using the same VR simulation, training either once-weekly or once-daily for four sessions. Participants underwent a baseline physical world assessment on a saw bone pelvis. The VR program recorded procedural errors, time, assistive prompts required and hand path length across four sessions. The VR and physical world assessments were repeated at one-week, one-month, and 3 months after the last training session.

Baseline characteristics between the groups were comparable (p > 0.05). The daily group demonstrated faster skills acquisition, reducing the median ± IQR number of procedural errors from 68 ± 67.05 (session one) to 7 ± 9.75 (session four), compared to the weekly group's improvement from 63 ± 27 (session one) to 13 ± 15.75 (session four), p < 0.001. The weekly group error count plateaued remaining at 14 ± 6.75 at one-week, 16.50 ± 16.25 at one-month and 26.45 ± 22 at 3-months, p < 0.05. However, the daily group showed poorer retention with error counts rising to 16 ± 12.25 at one-week, 17.50 ± 23 at one-month and 41.45 ± 26 at 3-months, p<0.01. A similar effect was noted for the number of assistive prompts required, procedural time and hand path length. In the real-world assessment, both groups significantly improved their acetabular component positioning accuracy, and these improvements were equally maintained (p<0.01).

Daily VR training facilitates faster skills acquisition; however weekly practice has superior skills retention.

Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

We evaluated the accuracy of augmented reality (AR)-based navigation assistance through simulation of bone tumours in a pig femur model.

Extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation of a bone segment is a technique employed in bone sarcoma surgery for limb salvage in the setting of reasonable bone stock. There is neither consensus nor rationale given for the dosage of irradiation used in previous studies, with values of up to 300Gy applied. We investigated the influence of extracorporeal irradiation on the elastic and viscoelastic properties of bone. Bone specimens were extracted from mature cattle and subdivided into thirteen groups; twelve groups exposed to increasing levels of irradiation and a control group. The specimens, once irradiated, underwent mechanical testing in saline at 37°C.

Mechanical properties were calculated by experimental means which included Young's Modulus, Storage Modulus and Loss Modulus. These were all obtained for comparison of the irradiated specimens to the control group.

There were non-significant negligible changes in all of the mechanical properties of bone that were assessed with increasing dosage of irradiation. Therefore, we conclude that the overall mechanical effect of high levels of extracorporeal irradiation (300Gy) is minute, and can be administered to reduce the risk of malignancy recurrence.

High-intensity narrow-spectrum (HINS) light is a novel violet-blue light inactivation technology which kills bacteria through a photodynamic process, and has been shown to have bactericidal activity against a wide range of species. Specimens from patients with infected hip and knee arthroplasties were collected over a one-year period (1 May 2009 to 30 April 2010). A range of these microbial isolates were tested for sensitivity to HINS-light. During testing, suspensions of the pathogens were exposed to increasing doses of HINS-light (of 123mW/cm² irradiance). Non-light exposed control samples were also used. The samples were then plated onto agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours before enumeration. Complete inactivation (greater than 4-log₁₀ reduction) was achieved for all of the isolates. The typical inactivation curve showed a slow initial reaction followed by a rapid period of inactivation. The doses of HINS-light required ranged between 118 and 2214 J/cm². Gram-positive bacteria were generally found to be more susceptible than Gram-negative.

As HINS-light uses visible wavelengths, it can be safely used in the presence of patients and staff. This unique feature could lead to its possible use in the prevention of infection during surgery and post-operative dressing changes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:283–8.

Current Department of Health guidelines state that medical personnel should be ‘bare below the elbows’. Critics of this policy have raised concerns over the impact of these dress regulations on the portrayed image and professionalism of doctors. However, the importance of the doctor's appearance in relation to other professional attributes is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinion of patients and their relatives on the importance of appearance and the style of clothing worn by orthopaedic doctors. The secondary aim was to establish how patients would prefer orthopaedic doctors to be dressed.

The study consisted of the administration of a survey questionnaire to 427 subjects attending the orthopaedic outpatient clinics in four hospitals across Scotland. Subjects were asked about the importance or otherwise of various aspects of the doctors’ appearance and responded using a modified Likert 5-point scale. Subjects’ rank preferences for four different styles of doctors’ clothing were also determined. The study was appropriately powered to identify a 0.5 difference in mean rank values with 0.90 power at a = 0.05.

The majority of respondents felt doctors’ appearance was important but not as important as compassion, politeness and knowledge. Only 50% felt that the style of doctors clothing mattered; what proved more important was an impression of cleanliness and good personal hygiene. In terms of how patients would prefer doctors to dress in clinic, the most popular choice proved to be the smart casual style of dress, which conforms with the ‘bare below the elbows’ dress code policy. Indeed, the smart casual clothing style was the highest ranked choice irrespective of patient age, gender, regional or socioeconomic background.

Primary bony tumours of the elbow account for approximately 1% of all osseous tumours. The delayed diagnosis is commonly reported in the literature as a result of lack of clinician familiarity. We present the largest series of primary bone tumours of the elbow in the English literature.

We sought to identify characteristics specific to primary elbow tumours and compare these to the current literature. We discuss cases of misdiagnosis and reasons for any delay in diagnosis. The authors also recommend a collaborative protocol for the diagnosis and management of these rare tumours.

A prospectively collected national database of all bone tumours is maintained by an independent clerk. The registry and case notes were retrospectively reviewed from January 1954 until June 2013. Eighty cases of primary osseous elbow tumours were studied. Tumours were classified as benign or malignant and then graded according to the Enneking spectrum.

There were no benign latent cases in this series. All cases in this series required surgical intervention. These cases presented with persistent rest pain, with or without swelling. The distal humerus was responsible for the majority and most aggressive of cases. The multidisciplinary approach at a specialist centre is integral to management. Misdiagnosis was evident in 12.5 % of all cases. Malignant tumours carried a 5-year mortality of 61%. Benign tumours exhibited a 19% recurrence rate and in particular, giant cell tumour was very aggressive. The evolution in treatment modalities has clearly benefited patients.

Clinicians should be aware that elbow tumours can be initially misdiagnosed as soft tissue injuries or cysts. The suspicion of a tumour should be raised in the patient with unremitting, unexplained non-mechanical bony elbow pain. We suggest an investigatory and treatment protocol to avoid a delay to diagnosis. With high rates of local recurrence, we recommend regular postoperative reviews.

Infection rates following arthroplasty surgery are between 1–4%, with higher rates in revision surgery. The associated costs of treating infected arthroplasty cases are considerable, with significantly worse functional outcomes reported. New methods of infection prevention are required. HINS-light is a novel blue light inactivation technology which kills bacteria through a photodynamic process. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of HINS-light for the inactivation of bacteria isolated from infected arthoplasty cases.

Specimens from hip and knee arthroplasty infections are routinely collected to identify causative organisms. This study tested a range of these isolates for sensitivity to HINS-light. During testing, bacterial suspensions were exposed to increasing doses of HINS-light of (123mW/cm² irradiance). Non-light exposed control samples were also set-up. Bacterial samples were then plated onto agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours before enumeration.

Complete inactivation was achieved for all Gram positive and negative microorganisms

More than a 4-log reduction in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus populations were achieved after exposure to HINS-light for doses of 48 and 55 J/cm², respectively. Current investigations using Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae show that gram-negative organisms are also susceptible, though higher doses are required.

This study has demonstrated that HINS-light successfully inactivated all clinical isolates from infected arthroplasty cases. As HINS-light utilises visible-light wavelengths it can be safely used in the presence of patients and staff. This unique feature could lead to possible applications such as use as an infection prevention tool during surgery and post-operative dressing changes.

Infection rates following arthroplasty surgery are between 1–4%, with higher rates in revision surgery. The associated costs of treating infected arthroplasty cases are considerable, with significantly worse functional outcomes reported. New methods of infection prevention are required. HINS-light is a novel blue light inactivation technology which kills bacteria through a photodynamic process. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of HINS-light for the inactivation of bacteria isolated from infected arthroplasty cases.

Specimens from hip and knee arthroplasty infections are routinely collected to identify causative organisms. This study tested a range of these isolates for sensitivity to HINS-light. During testing, bacterial suspensions were exposed to increasing doses of HINS-light of (123 mW/cm² irradiance). Non-light exposed control samples were also set-up. Bacterial samples were then plated onto agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours before enumeration.

Complete inactivation (greater than a 4-log reduction) was achieved for all of the clinical isolates from infected arthroplasty cases. The typical inactivation curve showed a slow initial reaction followed by a period of rapid inactivation. The doses of HINS-light exposure required ranged from 118–2214 J/cm² respectively. Gram-positive bacteria were generally found to be more susceptible than Gram-negative.

This study has demonstrated that HINS-light successfully inactivated all clinical isolates from infected arthroplasty cases. As HINS-light utilises visible-light wavelengths it can be safely used in the presence of patients and staff. This unique feature could lead to possible applications such as use as an infection prevention tool during surgery and post-operative dressing changes.

Currently, the cement being used for hemiarthroplasties and total hip replacements by the authors and many other surgeons in the UK is Palacos® (containing 0.5g Gentamicin). Similar cement, Copal® (containing 1g Gentamicin and 1g Clindamycin) has been used in revision arthroplasties, and has shown to be better at inhibiting bacterial growth and biofilm formation. We aim to investigate the effect on SSI rates of doubling the gentamicin dose and adding a second antibiotic (clindamycin) to the bone cement in hip hemiarthroplasty.

We randomised 848 consecutive patients undergoing cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured NOF at one NHS trust (two sites) into two groups: Group I, 464 patients, received standard cement (Palacos®) and Group II, 384 patients, received high dose, double antibiotic-impregnated cement (Copal®). We calculated the SSI rate for each group at 30 days post-surgery. The patients, reviewers and statistician were blinded as to treatment group.

The demographics and co-morbid conditions (known to increase risk of infection) were statistically similar between the groups. The combined superficial and deep SSI rates were 5 % (20/394) and 1.7% (6/344) for groups I and II respectively (p=0.01). Group I had a deep infection rate 3.3 %(13/394) compared to 1.16% (4/344) in group II (p=0.082). Group I had a superficial infection rate 1.7 % (7/394) compared to 0.58% (2/344) in group II (p=0.1861). 33(4%) patients were lost to follow up, and 77 (9%) patients were deceased at the 30 day end point. There was no statistical difference in the 30 day mortality, C. difficile infection, or the renal failure rates between the two groups.

Using high dose double antibiotic-impregnated cement rather than standard low dose antibiotic-impregnated cement significantly reduced the SSI rate (1.7% vs 5%; p=0.01) after hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur in this prospective randomised controlled trial.

Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Raised blood pressures (BP) are associated with increased cardiovascular risks such as myocardial infarction, stroke and arteriosclerosis. During surgery the haemodynamic effects of stress are closely monitored and stabilised by the anaesthetist. Although there have been many studies assessing the effects of intraoperative stress on the patient, little is known about the impact on the surgeon.

A prospective cohort study was carried out using an ambulatory blood pressure monitor to measure the BP and heart rates (HR) of three consultants and their respective trainees during hallux valgus, hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. Our principle aim was to assess the physiological effects of performing routine operations on the surgeon. We noted if there were any differences in the stress response of the lead surgeon, in comparison to when the same individual was assisting. In addition, we recorded the trainee's BP and HR when they were operating independently. The intraoperative measurements were compared with their baseline readings and their stress response, assessed using the Bruce protocol.

Many trends were noted in this pilot study. All of the surgeons had higher BP and HR readings on operating days compared to baseline. The physiological parameters normalised by one hour post-theatre list in all subjects. When the trainer was leading the operation, their BP gradually increased until implant placement, while their trainees remained stable. On the other hand, when the trainee was operating and the trainer assisting, the trainer's BP peaked at the beginning of the procedure, and slowly declined as it progressed. The trainee's BP remained elevated throughout. The highest peaks for trainees were noted during independent operating.

We conclude that all surgery is stressful, and that trainees are more likely to be killing themselves than their trainers.

Anterior knee pain following primary total knee replacement (TKR) is a common problem with average reported rates in the literature of approximately 10%. Symptoms are frequently attributed to the patellofemoral joint, and the treatment of the patella during total knee replacement is controversial.

There is no article in the literature that the authors know of that has specifically evaluated the effect of patella rim cautery on TKR outcome. This is a denervation technique that has historically been employed, with no evidence base. A prospective comparative cohort study was performed to compare the outcome scores of patients who underwent circumferential patella rim cautery, with those who did not.

Patients who had undergone a primary TKR were identified from the unit's arthroplasty database. Two cohorts, who were age and gender matched, were established. None of the patients had their patella resurfaced, but all had a patellaplasty. The Low Contact Stress TKR (Depuy International) was used in all cases.

The effect of circumferential patella rim cautery on the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the more anterior knee pain specific Patellar Score (PS) a minimum of 2 years post surgery was evaluated. Previous reports have suggested that a change of 5 points in the OKS represents a clinical difference. A sample size calculation based on an effect size of 5 points with 80% power and a p-value of 0.05 would require a minimum of 76 patients in each group.

There were 94 patients who had undergone patellaplasty only, and 98 patients who had supplementary circumferential patella rim cautery during their primary TKR. The mean OKS were 34.61 and 33.29 respectively (p=0.41), while the PS scores were 21.03 and 20.87 (p=0.87).

No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups for either outcome score. Patella rim cauterisation is unnecessary in primary TKR.