Abstract
Evidence supporting the use of virtual reality (VR) training in orthopaedic procedures is rapidly growing. However, the impact of the timing of delivery of this training is yet to be tested. We aimed to investigate whether spaced VR training is more effective than massed VR training.
24 medical students with no hip arthroplasty experience were randomised to learning the direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty using the same VR simulation, training either once-weekly or once-daily for four sessions. Participants underwent a baseline physical world assessment on a saw bone pelvis. The VR program recorded procedural errors, time, assistive prompts required and hand path length across four sessions. The VR and physical world assessments were repeated at one-week, one-month, and 3 months after the last training session.
Baseline characteristics between the groups were comparable (p > 0.05). The daily group demonstrated faster skills acquisition, reducing the median ± IQR number of procedural errors from 68 ± 67.05 (session one) to 7 ± 9.75 (session four), compared to the weekly group's improvement from 63 ± 27 (session one) to 13 ± 15.75 (session four), p < 0.001. The weekly group error count plateaued remaining at 14 ± 6.75 at one-week, 16.50 ± 16.25 at one-month and 26.45 ± 22 at 3-months, p < 0.05. However, the daily group showed poorer retention with error counts rising to 16 ± 12.25 at one-week, 17.50 ± 23 at one-month and 41.45 ± 26 at 3-months, p<0.01. A similar effect was noted for the number of assistive prompts required, procedural time and hand path length. In the real-world assessment, both groups significantly improved their acetabular component positioning accuracy, and these improvements were equally maintained (p<0.01).
Daily VR training facilitates faster skills acquisition; however weekly practice has superior skills retention.
