header advert
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 9 | Pages 594 - 604
24 Sep 2020
James HK Pattison GTR Griffin J Fisher JD Griffin DR

Aims

To develop a core outcome set of measurements from postoperative radiographs that can be used to assess technical skill in performing dynamic hip screw (DHS) and hemiarthroplasty, and to validate these against Van der Vleuten’s criteria for effective assessment.

Methods

A Delphi exercise was undertaken at a regional major trauma centre to identify candidate measurement items. The feasibility of taking these measurements was tested by two of the authors (HKJ, GTRP). Validity and reliability were examined using the radiographs of operations performed by orthopaedic resident participants (n = 28) of a multicentre randomized controlled educational trial (ISRCTN20431944). Trainees were divided into novice and intermediate groups, defined as having performed < ten or ≥ ten cases each for DHS and hemiarthroplasty at baseline. The procedure-based assessment (PBA) global rating score was assumed as the gold standard assessment for the purposes of concurrent validity. Intra- and inter-rater reliability testing were performed on a random subset of 25 cases.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 2, Issue 9 | Pages 200 - 205
1 Sep 2013
Amarasekera HW Campbell PC Parsons N Achten J Masters J Griffin DR Costa ML

Objectives

We aimed to determine the effect of surgical approach on the histology of the femoral head following resurfacing of the hip.

Methods

We performed a histological assessment of the bone under the femoral component taken from retrieval specimens of patients having revision surgery following resurfacing of the hip. We compared the number of empty lacunae in specimens from patients who had originally had a posterior surgical approach with the number in patients having alternative surgical approaches.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 1, Issue 5 | Pages 86 - 92
1 May 2012
Amarasekera HW Roberts P Costa ML Parsons N Achten J Griffin DR Williams NR

Objectives

To study the vascularity and bone metabolism of the femoral head/neck following hip resurfacing arthroplasty, and to use these results to compare the posterior and the trochanteric-flip approaches.

Methods

In our previous work, we reported changes to intra-operative blood flow during hip resurfacing arthroplasty comparing two surgical approaches. In this study, we report the vascularity and the metabolic bone function in the proximal femur in these same patients at one year after the surgery. Vascularity and bone function was assessed using scintigraphic techniques. Of the 13 patients who agreed to take part, eight had their arthroplasty through a posterior approach and five through a trochanteric-flip approach.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 4 | Pages 442 - 445
1 Apr 2008
Amarasekera HW Costa ML Foguet P Krikler SJ Prakash U Griffin DR

We used Laser Doppler flowmetry to measure the effect on the blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction of two surgical approaches during resurfacing arthroplasty. We studied 24 hips undergoing resurfacing arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Of these, 12 had a posterior approach and 12 a trochanteric flip approach. A Laser probe was placed under radiological control in the superolateral part of the femoral head/neck junction. The Doppler flux was measured at stages of the operation and compared with the initial flux. In both groups the main fall in blood flow occurred during the initial exposure and capsulotomy of the hip joint.

There was a greater reduction in blood flow with the posterior (40%) than with the trochanteric flip approach (11%).


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 81-B, Issue 4 | Pages 604 - 606
1 Jul 1999
Griffin DR Villar RN

Although arthroscopy of the hip is being carried out increasingly, little is known about the rate of associated complications. We describe a prospective study of 640 consecutive procedures in which a consistent technique was used. The overall complication rate was 1.6%. Complications, none of which was major or long-term, included transient palsy of the sciatic and femoral nerves, perineal injury, bleeding from the portal wounds, trochanteric bursitis and intra-articular breakage of the instrument. We believe that it is possible to undertake this operation safely using the technique described.