Metal artefact reduction (MAR) MRI is now widely considered to be the standard for imaging metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has recommended cross-sectional imaging for all patients with symptomatic MoM bearings. This paper describes the natural history of MoM disease in a 28 mm MoM total hip replacement (THR) using MAR MRI. Inclusion criteria were patients with MoM THRs who had not been revised and had at least two serial MAR MRI scans. All examinations were reported by an experienced observer and classified as A (normal), B (infection) or C1–C3 (mild, moderate, severe MoM-related abnormalities). Between 2002 and 2011 a total of 239 MRIs were performed on 80 patients (two to four scans per THR); 63 initial MRIs (61%) were normal. On subsequent MRIs, six initially normal scans (9.5%) showed progression to a disease state; 15 (15%) of 103 THRs with sequential scans demonstrated worsening disease on subsequent imaging.

Most patients with a MoM THR who do not undergo early revision have normal MRI scans. Late progression (from normal to abnormal, or from mild to more severe MoM disease) is not common and takes place over several years.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1035–9.

Hip resurfacing procedures have gained increasing popularity for younger, higher demand patients with degenerative hip pathologies. However, with concerns regarding revision rates and possible adverse metal hypersensitivity reactions with metal-on-metal articulations, some authors have questioned the hypothesised superiority of hip resurfacing over total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and complication rates of these two procedures.

A systematic review was undertaken of all published and unpublished research up to January 2010. The primary search was of the databases Medline, CINAHL, AMED and EMBASE, searched via Ovid using MeSH terms and Boolian operators ‘hip’ AND ‘replacement’ OR ‘arthroplasty’ AND ‘resurfacing’. A secondary search of unpublished literature was conducted using the databases SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK), the British Library's Integrated Catalogue and Current Controlled Trials databases using the same search terms as the primary search. All included studies were critically appraised with the CASP appraisal tool.

In total, 46 studies were identified from 1124 citations. These included 3799 hip resurfacings and 3282 total hip arthroplasties. On meta-analysis, functional outcomes for subjects following hip resurfacing were better than or the same as subjects with a total hip arthroplasty, with significantly higher WOMAC score (Mean Difference (MD)=−2.41; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): −3.88, −0.94; p=0.001), and significantly better Harris Hip Score (range of motion component) (MD=−0.05; 95% CI: (−0.07, −0.03; p<0.0001) and overall Harris Hip Score (MD=2.51; 95% CI: 1.24, 3.77; p=0.0001) in the hip resurfacing compared to total hip arthroplasty cohorts. However, there were significantly greater incidences of heterotopic ossification (Risk Ratio (RR)=1.62; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.14; p=0.006), aseptic loosening (RR=3.07; 95% CI:1.11, 8.50;p=0.03) and revision surgery (RR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.45; p=0.003) with hip resurfacing compared to total hip arthroplasty. The evidence-base presented with a number of methodological inadequacies such as the limited use of power calculations and poor or absent blinding of both patients and assessors, potentially giving rise to assessor bias. In respect to these factors, the current evidence-base, whilst substantial in its size, may be questioned in respect to its quality in determining superiority of hip resurfacing over total hip arthroplasty.

Purpose of Study

To investigate the proprioceptive function of patients with an ACL rupture before and after reconstruction and correlate these findings with ligament laxity testing and clinical outcome measures.

The most frequent cause of failure after total hip replacement in all reported arthroplasty registries is peri-prosthetic osteolysis. Osteolysis is an active biological process initiated in response to wear debris. The eventual response to this process is the activation of macrophages and loss of bone.

Activation of macrophages initiates a complex biological cascade resulting in the final common pathway of an increase in osteolytic activity. The biological initiators, mechanisms for and regulation of this process are beginning to be understood. This article explores current concepts in the causes of, and underlying biological mechanism resulting in peri-prosthetic osteolysis, reviewing the current basic science and clinical literature surrounding the topic.

Metal-on-metal total hip replacement has been targeted at younger patients with anticipated long-term survival, but the effect of the production of metal ions is a concern because of their possible toxicity to cells. We have reviewed the results of the use of the Ultima hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement, with a cemented polished tapered femoral component with a 28 mm diameter and a cobalt-chrome (CoCr) modular head, articulating with a 28 mm CoCr acetabular bearing surface secured in a titanium alloy uncemented shell.

Between 1997 and 2004, 545 patients with 652 affected hips underwent replacement using this system. Up to 31 January 2008, 90 (13.8%) hips in 82 patients had been revised. Pain was the sole reason for revision in 44 hips (48.9%) of which 35 had normal plain radiographs. Peri-prosthetic fractures occurred in 17 hips (18.9%) with early dislocation in three (3.3%) and late dislocation in 16 (17.8%). Infection was found in nine hips (10.0%).

At operation, a range of changes was noted including cavities containing cloudy fluid under pressure, necrotic soft tissues with avulsed tendons and denuded osteonecrotic upper femora. Corrosion was frequently observed on the retrieved cemented part of the femoral component. Typically, the peri-operative findings confirmed those found on pre-operative metal artefact reduction sequence MRI and histological examination showed severe necrosis.

Metal artefact reduction sequence MRI proved to be useful when investigating these patients with pain in the absence of adverse plain radiological features.

Aim: To determine the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery of the knee.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone knee arthroscopy at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital was performed from a prospectively gathered database. Pre-operative diagnosis was compared with operative diagnosis to determine the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the clinical diagnosis. The data was then analysed to determine how many patients underwent a beneficial procedure, which was defined as “a procedure from which the patient is likely to have benefited, either as a result of confirming the diagnosis or therapeutic intervention”. Finally, the results were compared with those from studies where the accuracy of MRI was assessed, to determine whether MRI is a more accurate diagnostic modality than clinical examination.

Results: The data of 698 patients was analysed. Of these 64% were male and 36% were female. The mean age at operation was 41 years (9 to 92). The overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis was 99%, 70% and 99% respectively. 90% of patients underwent a beneficial procedure, while 10% had a normal knee diagnosed at operation. Medial meniscal tear was the hardest pathology to diagnose, with accuracy, sensitivity and specificity rates of 82%, 92% and 79%. The results fell within the range of those found in studies, which examined the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of MRI.

Conclusion: Our results show that clinical examination remains an accurate method of diagnosing intra-articular pathologies of the knee. Medial meniscal tear appears to be the hardest pathology to diagnose, and was the only condition with an accuracy rate under the 90th percentile. This is probably because medial tibio-femoral articular dysfunction has similar clinical findings. MRI was found to be no more effective than clinical examination at diagnosing pathologies of the knee.

We retrospectively studied the major complications occurring after one- and two-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR). Between 1999 and 2008, 911 patients underwent 1150 UKRs through a minimally invasive approach in our unit. Of these, 159 patients (318 UKRs) had one-stage and 80 patients (160 UKRs) had two-stage bilateral UKRs.

The bilateral UKR groups were comparable in age and American Society of Anaesthesiology grade, but more women were in the two-stage group (p = 0.019). Mechanical thromboprophylaxis was used in all cases. Major complications were recorded as death, pulmonary embolus, proximal deep-vein thrombosis and adverse cardiac events within 30 days of surgery. No statistical differences between the groups were found regarding the operating surgeon, the tourniquet time or minor complications except for distal deep-vein thrombosis. The anaesthetic times were longer for the two-stage group (p = 0.0001).

Major complications were seen in 13 patients (8.2%) with one-stage operations but none were encountered in the two-stage group (p = 0.005). Distal deep-vein thrombosis was more frequent in the two-stage group (p = 0.036).

Because of the significantly higher risk of major complications associated with one-stage bilateral UKR we advocate caution before undertaking such a procedure.

60 out of total series of 643 metal-on-metal hip replacements, carried out over the last nine years, have so far required revision, 13 for peri-prosthetic fracture and 47 for extensive, symptomatic, peri-articular soft-tissue changes.

Dramatic corrosion of generally solidly fixed, cemented stems has been observed and is believed to have resulted in the release of high levels of cobalt chrome ions from the stem surface. The contribution of the metal-to-metal articulation is, as yet, unclear.

Not including the fracture cases, plain films have demonstrated little or no abnormality to account for patients’ progressive symptoms. MRI scanning, on the other hand, utilising a technique designed to minimise implant artefact, has correlated very closely with findings at the time of revision surgery.

The histological changes, typified by extensive lymphocytic infiltration and a severe vasculitis leading to, in some cases, extensive tissue necrosis are demonstrated and discussed.

The failure of any of the existing protective mechanisms or regulatory restrictions to identify and limit the exposure of large numbers of patients to unsatisfactory implants has again been demonstrated.

We performed two independent, randomised, controlled trials in order to assess the potential benefits of immediate weight-bearing mobilisation after rupture of the tendo Achillis. The first trial, on operatively-treated patients showed an improved functional outcome for patients mobilised fully weight-bearing after surgical repair. Two cases of re-rupture in the treatment group suggested that careful patient selection is required as patients need to follow a structured rehabilitation regimen. The second trial, on conservatively-treated patients, provided no evidence of a functional benefit from immediate weight-bearing mobilisation. However, the practical advantages of immediate weight-bearing did not predispose the patients to a higher complication rate. In particular, there was no evidence of tendon lengthening or a higher re-rupture rate. We would advocate immediate weight-bearing mobilisation for the rehabilitation of all patients with rupture of the tendo Achillis.

One of the factors that influence the outcome after rupture of the tendo Achillis is abnormality of gait. We prospectively assessed 14 patients and 15 normal control subjects using an in-shoe plantar pressure measurement system. There was a significant reduction in peak mean forefoot pressure in the early period of rehabilitation (p < 0.001). There was a concomitant rise in heel pressure on the injured side (p = 0.05). However, there was no difference in cadence, as determined by the duration of the terminal stance and pre-swing phases as a proportion of total stance. The forefoot pressure deficit in the group with tendon ruptures was smaller when assessed six months after the injury but was still significant (p = 0.029). Pedobarographic assessment confirms that there are marked abnormalities within the gait cycle. Rehabilitation programmes which address these abnormalities may improve outcome.

We prospectively studied 217 patients who underwent 234 Elite Plus total hip arthroplasties. At a mean of 6.4 (SD 0.7) years post-operatively, 39 patients had died and 22 were either lost to follow-up or had no radiographs available. Clinical (Oxford hip score) and radiological assessments were performed on 156 patients (168 hip arthroplasties) who had a mean age of 67.7 (SD 9.7) years at operation.

In the assessed group, 26 of 159 (16.4%) of femoral stems which had not already been revised and 19 of 159 (11.9%) of acetabular cups were definitely loose. In total, 52 of 168 (31%) of hips had either been revised or had definite evidence of loosening of a component. We could not establish any relationship between clinical and radiological outcomes.

Despite the fact that the clinical outcome and rate of revision for the Elite Plus appeared to meet international standards, our findings give us cause for concern. We believe that joint registries should include radiological surveillance in order to provide reliable information about medium-term outcomes for hip prostheses.

Imaging techniques including MR scanning and ultrasound were discussed. However it was noted that for standard orthopaedic practice in the UK plain films were the initial imaging available. The importance of taking a skyline view was stressed.

The Dejour protocol was then outlined where the lateral Xray of the knee assesses the patellar height, the presence of dysplasia of the trochlear groove, and, if present, its boss height. A CT scan defines the patellar tilt angle, and with cuts through the tibial tubercle, the offset of the tibial tubercle from the trochlear groove (TTTG). The four abnormalities that can be defined are then corrected at operation. All patients undergo a lateral release. If the patellar tilt angle is greater than 20° then a medial reefing is performed. If the patellar height is greater than 1.2, a distalisation of the tibial tubercle to correct this to 1.0 is done. A MG of greater than 2Omm leads to a correction by an Elmsie medial tubercle transfer. A boss height of greater than 6mm suggests a trochleoplasty should be performed. However the Dejour protocol is yet to be validated.

It was concluded that imaging is essential for analysing patellofemoral instability. Plain films alone do not give enough information. Patterns of patellofemoral instability as assessed by CT scan (and MRI scan) are yet to be established. Postoperative imaging to confirm correction of abnormalities should be done. The measurements are worthwhile but their validation is awaited.

The positioning of components in knee replacement is related to outcome and for this reason a study has been conducted to compare the exact position of the tibial and femoral components in total knee arthroplasty with the placement as judged by the surgeon at the time of operation.

Operating surgeons of a range of grades completed a pro-forma immediately after operating on 25 patients having total knee replacement. Patients were entered into the study by consent providing that they had osteoarthritis and this was their first ever lower limb joint replacement. The form detailed where the surgeon considered he had placed the femoral component in the coronal plane and in terms of rotation upon the femur. They were asked to state what lines or angles of reference they had used and whether they had used intra or extra medullary jigs. Likewise for the tibia, implant position was detailed for coronal, sagittal and transverse planes. The proforma stated the grade of operating surgeon but were otherwise kept anonymous.

All study patients had pre and postoperative CT scans. These involved an AP scannogram and transverse sections, according to a protocol, through the femoral neck, femoral condyles, tibial plateau and ankle. By comparing bony landmarks seen on the pre-operative CT scans with lines of reference from the components post-operatively the exact position of the implant was determined in the transverse and coronal planes. For the sagittal plane (slope) the standard lateral X-ray was used.

For the femur all operations were carried out using intra-medullary jigs. For the femoral component the difference was not significant between the measured position and the surgeons estimate in any plane (p=0.937 for coronal and p=0.432 for transverse). The measured position of the component was not related to the grade of the operating surgeon nor to the axis nor technique of reference used.

For the tibial component, coronal alignment was significantly different (p=0.001) with the measured position being in more varus than was estimated. The range of transverse placement was from 4° of external rotation to 35° of internal rotation of the tibial prosthesis with reference to the tibial tubercle centre. This was significantly different to that estimated by the surgeon (p< 0.001). Estimation of slope in the sagittal plane was good. None of these differences were related to operator grade. For 15 of the TKR’s the tibail component was aligned using intra-medullary techniques. This was related to the accuracy of positioning of the prosthesis with significantly better estimation compared to those in which extra-medulary jigs had been used (p=0.002 for the transverse plane and p=0.065 for the coronal plane).

This study has demonstarted that surgeons are able to accurately judge the position of insertion of the femoral component in total knee replacement. Surgeons are poor at estimating the position of the tibial component in the transverse and coronal planes but better in the sagittal plane. Due to the difficulty in its assessment rotational alignment has been ignored in arthroplasty but as with alignment in the other planes it is likely to have a bearing on outcome. Improved techniques to help us judge placement of knee components are needed.