ACCURACY OF CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS IN KNEE ARTHROSCOPY

Abstract

Aim: To determine the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery of the knee.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone knee arthroscopy at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital was performed from a prospectively gathered database. Pre-operative diagnosis was compared with operative diagnosis to determine the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the clinical diagnosis. The data was then analysed to determine how many patients underwent a beneficial procedure, which was defined as “a procedure from which the patient is likely to have benefited, either as a result of confirming the diagnosis or therapeutic intervention”. Finally, the results were compared with those from studies where the accuracy of MRI was assessed, to determine whether MRI is a more accurate diagnostic modality than clinical examination.

Results: The data of 698 patients was analysed. Of these 64% were male and 36% were female. The mean age at operation was 41 years (9 to 92). The overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis was 99%, 70% and 99% respectively. 90% of patients underwent a beneficial procedure, while 10% had a normal knee diagnosed at operation. Medial meniscal tear was the hardest pathology to diagnose, with accuracy, sensitivity and specificity rates of 82%, 92% and 79%. The results fell within the range of those found in studies, which examined the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of MRI.

Conclusion: Our results show that clinical examination remains an accurate method of diagnosing intra-articular pathologies of the knee. Medial meniscal tear appears to be the hardest pathology to diagnose, and was the only condition with an accuracy rate under the 90th percentile. This is probably because medial tibio-femoral articular dysfunction has similar clinical findings. MRI was found to be no more effective than clinical examination at diagnosing pathologies of the knee.