Abstract

Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) is an available option for the management of massive bone loss around failed knee implants. The aim of this study was to determine the results of knee EPRs performed for non-tumour indications. Since 2007, 85 EPRs were performed for in a single tertiary centre by seven surgeons. Mean age at surgery was 73.5 years (range:35–95) with infection as the most common indication (49%), followed by aseptic loosening (18%), complex primary replacement (16%), fracture (15%) and mechanical failure (2%). Mean follow up was 4 years (range:1–9). Functional outcome was determined using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). At follow-up, 21 patients were deceased and 2 lost to follow-up. Complication rate was 19%. Of the 7 infected cases, 6 were treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention) and one underwent above knee amputation. Four of the patients undergoing DAIR were cleared of infection and 2 are on long-term antibiotics. Accounting for implant revision, loss to follow-up and those on long-term antibiotics as failures, 5-year survival was 89% with an average OKS of 25 (SD=10). This mid-term study shows that distal femur EPR is a valuable option for the increasing burden of complex revision knee surgery

The evidence to help the surgeon decide on the merits of which type of replacement to offer their patients is steadily mounting and comes from large datasets such as joint registries.

There are many advantages of UKR vs TKR such as satisfaction, function, recovery, morbidity, mortality and cost but there is one major disadvantage. All registries show a higher failure rate with UKRs.

Registries show that there are more excellent and fewer poor Patient Reported Outcome Measure Scores (PROMS) with UKR compared to TKR and the higher revision rate is in major part due to the threshold of revision. For instance, 60% of UKR are revised vs 10% of TKR with an Oxford score that is worse post-operation than pre-operation. Ease of revision with UKR is a major determinant of the higher revision rate.

The real issue with UKR relates to usage. Most surgeons perform very few UKR on young patients with early arthritis viewing the procedure as a pre-TKR. Low surgeon volume equates to high revision rate in the national registries. Surgeons should either abandon UKR or do an adequate number to ensure success.

Surgeons can improve their results by increasing their usage of UKR. The Unicompartmental Knee National Joint Registry (UKNJR) data shows that the optimal usage of the mobile UKR is between 20 and 50% of replacements. Fixed bearing usage is optimal at 20% but not higher.

The other major advantage concerns the lower mortality rate with UKR. At 90 days it is less than half that of TKR and even at 8 years it is 10% less. For every 10 UKRs performed rather than TKR then one life is saved at 8 years.

There is very little evidence suggesting that bi-UKR is necessary certainly with the mobile UKR. There is evidence, however that patellofemoral joint problems are a problem with fixed bearing UKR in the second decade.

Achieving a primary outcome with revision UKR is possible but it depends on an understanding of the main failure modes and avoiding the obvious pitfalls. The most common failure mode in the long term is lateral compartment progression at 2.5% at 28 years. The most common failure overall is misdiagnosis of a painful radiolucency leading to unnecessary revision.

There are a number of potential pitfalls:

Do not revise for unexplained pain. 75% of patients will go on to fail because of continuing pain. A distinction must be made to differentiate between a physiological radiolucency (with a narrow lucency accompanied by a sclerotic margin which is normal) and a pathological radiolucency (with a poorly defined lucency without surrounding sclerotic margin which is indicative of loosening and/or infection)

Femoral loosening can present with subtle findings. Flexion/extension views are helpful to diagnose this problem.

Wear can be a problem with fixed bearing in the second decade and can present with subtle findings. Infection can present with contralateral compartment joint space narrowing.

The approach and exposure is usually straightforward and component removal is generally easy. Tibial resection is undertaken referenced from the normal lateral condyle removing 10mm of bone. Femoral preparation is generally straightforward but care must be taken to dial in correct rotation in the absence of the posterior medial condyle which was resected in the first operation. Generally a CR or PS primary implant is used with 2–4mm extra polyethylene thickness than is used in primary case.

Revision for infection and stress fracture led to difficult revisions where revision components are usually required.

The results for Revision UKR approach those of a primary procedure in all cases except revision for unexplained pain, infection and a stress fracture.

Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is associated with fewer complications, faster recovery and better function than Total Knee Replacement (TKR). However, joint registries demonstrate a higher revision rate in UKR, limiting its use. Currently most UKRs are cemented and performed using a minimally invasive technique. In joint registries, common reasons for revision include aseptic loosening and pain. These problems could potentially be addressed by using cementless implants, which may provide more reliable fixation.

The objectives of this study were to compare the quality of fixation (determined by the incidence and appearance of radiolucencies), and clinical outcomes of cemented and cementless UKR at five years.

A randomised controlled trial was established with 63 knees (62 patients) randomised to either cemented (32 patients) or cementless UKR (30 patients). Fixation was assessed with fluoroscopic radiographs aligned to the bone-implant interface at one and five years. Outcome scores were collected pre-operatively and at one, two and five years, including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Score, objective and functional (AKSS-O/F) and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), expressed as absolute scores and 0–5 year change (δ) scores.

Four patients died during the study period. There were no revisions. Mean operative time was 11 minutes shorter in the cementless group (p=0.029). At five years, there was no significant difference in any outcome measure except AKSS-F and δAKSS-F which were significantly better in the cementless group (both p=0.003). There were no femoral radiolucencies in either group. There were significantly more tibial radiolucencies in the cemented group (20/30 vs 2/27, p< 0.001). There were nine complete radiolucencies in the cemented group and none in the cementless group (p< 0.001).

Cementless fixation provides improved fixation at five years compared to cemented fixation in UKR, maintaining equivalent or superior clinical outcomes with a shorter operative time and no increase in complications.

Indications for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) vary between units. Some authors have suggested, and many surgeons believe, that medial UKA should only be performed in patients who localise their pain to the medial joint line. This is despite research showing a poor correlation between patient-reported location of pain and radiological or operative findings in osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of patient-reported pre-operative pain location and functional outcome of UKA at one and five years.

Pre-operative pain location data were collected for 406 knees (380 patients) undergoing Oxford medial UKA. Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Scores and Tegner activity scale were recorded preoperatively and at follow-up. 272/406 (67%) had pure medial pain, 25/406 (6%) had pure anterior knee pain and 109/406 (27%) had mixed or generalised pain. None had pure lateral pain. The primary outcome interval is one year; 132/406 patients had attained five years by the time of analysis and their five year data is presented.

At one and five years, each group had improved significantly by each measure (mean δOKS 15.6 (SD 8.9) at year one, 16.3 (9.3) at year five). There was no difference between the groups, nor between patients with and without anterior knee pain or isolated medial pain.

We have found no correlation between preoperative pain location and outcome. We conclude that localised medial pain should not be a prerequisite to UKA and that it may be performed in patients with generalised or anterior knee pain.

Introduction

The peri-operative analgesic management of patients having either Total Knee Replacement (TKR) or Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is an area that continues to have prominence, driven in part by the desire to reduce hospital stay, while maintaining high patient satisfaction. This is particularly relevant in the current climate of healthcare cost savings. We evaluated the role of “top up” intra-articular local anaesthetic injection after identifying that an appreciable number of patients in the unit suffered “breakthrough pain” on the first post-op day, when the effects of local analgesia are wearing off.

Introduction

The options for the treatment of the young active patient with unicompartmental symptomatic osteoarthritis and pre-existing Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) deficiency are limited. Patients with ACL deficiency and end-stage medial compartment osteoarthritis are usually young and active. The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKA) is a well established treatment option in the management of symptomatic end-stage medial compartmental osteoarthritis, but a functionally intact ACL is a pre-requisite for its satisfactory outcome. If absent, high failure rates have been reported, primarily due to tibial loosening. Previously, we have reported results on a consecutive series of 15 such patients in whom the ACL was reconstructed and patients underwent a staged or simultaneous UKA. The aim of the current study is to provide an update on the clinical and radiological outcomes of a large, consecutive cohort of patients with ACL reconstruction and UKA for the treatment of end-stage medial compartment osteoarthritis and to evaluate, particularly, the outcome of those patients under 50.

Introduction

Radiolucencies beneath the tibial component are well recognized in knee arthroplasty; the aetiology and significance are poorly understood. Non-progressive narrow radiolucencies with a sclerotic margin are thought not to be indicative of loosening. Factors which decrease the incidence of radiolucencies include cementless fixation and the use of pulse lavage. Leg/component alignment or BMI do not influence radiolucency. We are not aware of any studies that have looked at the effect of load type on radiolucency.

The Oxford domed lateral tibial component was introduced to decrease the bearing dislocation rate that was unacceptably high with the flat tibial tray. However, the introduction of the domed tibial component alters the forces transmitted through the implant-cement-bone interface. As the Oxford UKR uses a fully congruent mobile bearing, the forces transmitted through the interface with a flat tray are compressive, except for the effect of friction. However, with the domed tibial component shear forces are introduced. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of radiolucency beneath the previous flat design and the new domed tibial tray.

INTRODUCTION

Establishing a full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment and functionally intact ACL is vital before proceeding with unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The aim of this study is to assess whether MRI is a useful adjunct in predicting suitability for UKR, as compared to standard and stress radiographs.

Introduction

Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee (anteromedial gonarthrosis-AMG) is a common form of knee arthritis. In a clinical setting, knee arthritis has always been assessed by plain radiography in conjunction with pain and function assessments. Whilst this is useful for surgical decision making in bone on bone arthritis, plain radiography gives no insight to the earlier stages of disease. In a recent study 82% of patients with painful arthritis had only partial thickness joint space loss on plain radiography. These patients are managed with various surgical treatments; injection, arthroscopy, osteotomy and arthroplasty with varying results. We believe these varying results are in part due to these patients being at different stages of disease, which will respond differently to different treatments. However radiography cannot delineate these stages. We describe the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings of this partial thickness AMG as a way of understanding these earlier stages of the disease.

Introduction

Anteromedial gonarthrosis is a common well described pattern of knee osteoarthritis with cartilage wear beginning in the anteromedial quadrant of the medial tibial plateau in the presence of an intact and functioning ACL. It is well known that mechanical factors such as limb alignment and meniscal integrity affect the progression of arthritis and there is some evidence that the morphology of the tibial plateau may be a risk factor in the development of this disease. The extension facet angle is the angle of the downslope of the anterior portion of the medial tibial plateau joint surface in relation to the middle portion on a sagittal view. If this is an important factor in the development of AMG there may be potential for disease modifying intervention.

This study investigates if there is a significant difference in this angle as measured on MRI between a study cohort with early AMG (partial thickness cartilage damage and intact ACL) and a comparator control cohort of patients (no cartilage damage and ACL rupture).

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) accounts for 84% of all knee replacement surgery in the UK (NJR 2009) despite published epidemiological data showing that single compartment disease is most prevalent. We investigated this incompatibility further by describing the compartmental pattern and stage of cartilage loss of all patients with osteoarthritis (OA) presenting to a specialist knee clinic over one year.

Introduction

The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and thus ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component.

Introduction

Obesity has been considered a relative contra-indication in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to fear of high wear rates, loosening and tibial collapse. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of high body mass index (BMI) on ten-year survivorship and five-year functional outcome after Oxford UKA, a fully congruous mobile bearing design with large contact area and low wear rate.

Purpose of study

To investigate the linear penetration rate of the polyethylene bearing in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at twenty years.

Introduction

Kozinn and Scott have made recommendations about contra-indications for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). They suggest that patients younger than 60, weight > 82 kilograms, patients with exposed bone in patella-femoral compartment or patients who are physically active/perform heavy labour should not be offered a UKR. In addition, chondrocalcinosis is a contra-indication. These strict selection criteria are based on the experience with fixed bearing UKAs and are more intuitive than evidence based. The Oxford UKR has a fully congruous mobile bearing and has been shown to have minimal wear. Over the past 25 years, the Oxford Group has followed a standardised protocol for patient selection for UKR. We ignore patella-femoral joint pathology, chondrocalcinosis, patient's age, weight and activity level when deciding the suitability for UKR.

Purpose of Study

To assess the incidence of radiolucency in cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement at two years.

Introduction: The results of the mobile bearing Oxford partial knee replacement (PKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Bearing dislocation is a particular concern, and to address this issue a new domed implant was introduced with a modified surgical technique. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of dislocation between a domed and flat lateral PKR.

Methods: Separate kinematic models were generated for the domed and flat bearings. The femoral component, tibial tray and bearing were aligned in a neutral position; the flat bearing was positioned centrally on the tibial tray and 2 mm from the side wall; the domed bearing was placed concentrically on the domed tibial tray. Dislocation in the Posterior (A-P), Lateral (M-L) and Medial against the tray wall (L-M-wall) were investigated. For each dislocation the tibial tray was restrained in all degrees of freedom (DOF) and the femoral component was restrained in five DOF; A-P and M-L displacements; A-P, M-L and Superior-Inferior (S-I) rotations. The bearing was restrained from rotating about the S-I axis for each dislocation. For the L-M-wall dislocation the underside of the bearing was held in contact with the tibial tray wall such that the lowest S-I displacement of the femoral component was achieved. The least amount of distraction required for bearing dislocation to occur was calculated for the seven bearing sizes available. The effect of medial-lateral positioning of the femur on dislocation was investigated.

Results: The minimum femur distraction to cause A-P flat and domed bearing dislocation ranged from 4.68mm to 3.91mm and 6.29mm to 5.59mm respectively as the bearing thickness increased from 3.5mm to 9.5mm. The minimum femur distraction to cause L-M-wall flat and domed bearing dislocation ranged from 3.42mm to 4.16mm and 4.55mm to 5.44mm respectively as the bearing thickness increased from 3.5 mm to 9.5 mm. The femur distraction required for L-M-wall bearing dislocation increased from 4.55mm to 6.3mm with a 2 mm medial movement of the femoral component. A 4 mm lateral movement of the femoral component decreased the distraction from 4.55mm to 2.35mm.

Discussion: A domed bearing can lead to an increased femoral distraction of between 25% and 37%, significantly reducing the likelihood of dislocation. This may be significant during everyday activities and demonstrates that the new domed design should reduce the incidence of bearing dislocation by increasing the amount of entrapment; our current series of 200 patients has no dislocations. Increasing the thickness of the bearing has a small effect on the distraction required to allow bearing dislocation. The medial-lateral placement of the femoral component has a pronounced effect on the femoral distraction required for bearing dislocation over the tray wall; medial placement of the femoral component is advisable.

Introduction: Approximately 20% of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) revisions are related to polyethylene wear. The Phase 1 Oxford UKR was introduced as a design against wear, with a fully congruent mobile bearing. The Phase 2 implant was introduced with new instrumentation (femoral mill) and changes to the bearing shape (lower anterior wall) to reduce the incidence of anterior impingement. We have previously shown that the Oxford UKR has a wear rate of 0.02 mm/year at ten years, in well functioning devices, but that higher wear rates can be seen with impingement or if the congruous articulation is lost. The aim of this study was to determine the 20 year in-vivo wear of the Oxford Phase 1 and Phase 2 UKR, using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA).

Method: We measured the in-vivo wear of 6 Phase 1 (5 patients, mean age 65.24 years) and 7 Phase 2 (4 patients, mean age 63.43) Oxford UKR bearings. Average time since surgery was 22.37 years and 19.46 years for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 implants respectively. Selection criteria included patients who were mobile, with an exercise tolerance greater than 100m as per the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) functional questionnaire. RSA x-rays were taken with the knee in the normal anatomical position on standing and with the knee flexed to 30o. The Oxford knee score (OKS) and AKSS were gained at the RSA examination. Phase 1 and 2 components were reverse engineered by laser scanning, and converted to CAD models. The CAD models of the tibia and femur were pose-estimated in the RSA software (Medis Specials, Leiden, Netherlands). A sphere was fit to the femoral component and the minimum bearing thickness was determined by measuring the shortest perpendicular distance between the sphere and the plane contained on the tibial tray articular surface. The linear wear for each bearing was calculated by subtracting the measured thickness from the corrected nominal bearing thickness. Non-parametric statistics were used to compare the two Phases.

Results: There was no significant difference in age, OKS and AKSS between the two groups. The median wear rate was 0.078 mm/year for Phase 1 and 0.023 mm/year for Phase 2. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.027).

Discussion: The difference in wear rate is explained by impingement in Phase 1, which was reduced by design changes with the introduction of Phase 2; the Phase 2 is designed to avoid impingement between the femur and the bearing. This study demonstrates that very low wear rates can be maintained with the Phase 2 implant to the end of the second decade after implantation. This is of particular importance when the device is used in younger patients and demonstrates that the Oxford UKR can be a definitive implant for the treatment of isolated compartmental osteoarthritis.

Introduction: Partial Knee Replacement (PKR) is an appealing alternative to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) when the patient has isolated compartment osteoarthritis (OA). In nearly all cases there is a radiolucency observed between the tibial tray wall and the boney interface. The reasons why radiolucencies appear are unknown, but the bone will adapt to its altered mechanical environment by bone remodelling in accordance with ‘Wollf’s Law’. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical environment of the tibia bone adjacent to the tray wall, following cemented and cementless PKR, in order to determine whether this region of bone resorbs.

Methods: A validated finite element (FE) model of a cadaver tibia implanted with an Oxford PKR was used in this study. Kinematic data from fluoroscopy measurements during a step-up activity were used to determine the relative tibio-femoral positioning for the Oxford PKR model. Load data were adapted from the in-vivo measured loads using an instrumented implant during a step-up activity. The standard operating protocol was simulated for the Oxford PKR FE models, with the tibial tray implanted in a neutral position. The tibia was sectioned around the tray. Zone 7 was defined as parallel to the vertical tray wall, corresponding to the region on screened x-rays where radiolucencies are observed. It was assumed that the bone in the implanted tibia will attempt to normalise its stress-strain patterns locally to its equilibrium state, the intact tibia, for the same loading conditions. Forty patients (20 cemented, 20 cementless) who had undergone PKR were randomly selected from a database, and their screened x-rays assessed for radiolucency in region 7.

Results: The SED in region 7 was 80% lower in the cemented and cementless tibia, compared to the intact tibia (Figure 2). The maximum tensile stress was 63% lower in the cemented and cementless tibia, compared to the intact tibia. The corresponding maximum compressive stress was 52% lower. Radiolucency was observed in all forty radiographs in region 7.

Discussion: After implantation with a cemented or cementless PKR the bone strains and SED in region 7 are reduced. This reduction may provide the signal for adaptive bone remodelling and bone will be resorbed from this region, decreasing the volume and increasing the SED. Bone resorption will continue until the equilibrium state is reached. If a ‘lazy’ zone between 35% and 50% of the remodelling signal is considered, bone resorption will still occur due to the large decrease in SED for this region. For region 7 to return its SED to the equilibrium state, its volume will need to be reduced by 80%. This is likely to be the reason why a radiolucency is observed clinically in this region in almost every case, whether a cemented or cementless implant is used.

The results of mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing (five-year survival: 82%). Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to a high dislocation rate. A detailed analysis confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor to bearing dislocation. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from the distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and therefore ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications included use of a domed tibial component.

The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series (series I), those with improved surgical technique (series II) and the domed tibial component (series III). The primary outcome measure was bearing dislocation at one year. One year was chosen as all the dislocations in the first series occurred within a year. In the original series (n=53), implanted using a standard open approach, there were six dislocations in the first year, the average flexion 110°, and 95% had no/mild pain on activity. In the second series (n=65), there were 3 dislocations, the average flexion was 117°, and 80% had no/mild pain on activity.

In the third series with the modified technique and a convex domed tibial plateau, there was one dislocation, average flexion was 125° and 94% had no/mild pain on activity. At four years the cumulative primary dislocation rates were 10%, 5% and 0% respectively, and were significantly different (p=0.04).

The improved surgical technique and implant design has reduced dislocation rate to an acceptable level so a mobile bearing can now be recommended for lateral UKR.

About ten years ago we introduced sophisticated instrumentation and an increased range of component sizes for the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) to facilitate a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach. The device is now routinely implanted through an incision from the medial pole of the patella to the tibial tuberosity. This has resulted in a more rapid recovery and an improved functional result. As the access to the knee is limited there is a concern that the long term results may be compromised. The aim of this study was to determine the 10 year survival.

A prospective follow up of all Phase 3 minimally invasive Oxford UKR implanted by two senior authors (DWM & CAFD) has been undertaken. So far 1015 UKRs have been implanted for anteromedial osteoarthritis. All patients received a cemented implant through a MIS approach and were followed up prospectively by an independent observer. The data was collected prospectively regarding pre-operative status, complications and clinical as well as functional outcome at predetermined intervals.

The average age of patients was 66.4 years (range: 33 – 88) with mean Oxford Knee Score 41 (SD: 7.9) at the time of last follow up, Knee Society Score (objective) of 84 (SD: 13) and Knee Society Score (functional) of 83 (SD: 21). At ten years the survival of this cohort is 96%. There were 22 revisions including 7 for progression of arthritis, 5 for infection, 5 for bearing dislocation, 4 for unexplained pain and one for rupture of ACL secondary to trauma.

We conclude that the Oxford Knee can be implanted reliably through a minimally invasive approach, giving excellent long term results.

Introduction: This study explores whether modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with improved cartilage sequencing is able to show a more detailed view of antero-medial osteoarthritis of the knee (AMOA) than previously, so enabling a radiographic description of this common phenotype of disease. Modern MRI technology allows us to visualize in great detail the structures and cartilage within the knee, providing a better understanding of the pathoanatomy of AMOA. This description of the end stage of disease is useful as a baseline when investigating the progression of arthritis through the knee. Preoperative assessment of patients and selection of intervention is very important and preoperative imaging forms an integral part of this. This will also be useful in preoperative assessment and surgical management of patients.

Methods: 50 patients with a radiographic diagnosis of anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee and had been listed for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) had MRI as part of their pre-op workup. At operation all were deemed suitable for UKA using the current Oxford indications. The image sequences were coronal, axial and sagittal with a predetermined cartilage protocol. The state of the ACL, cartilage wear degree and location, presence and pattern of osteophytes, meniscal anatomy and subchondral high signal were assessed.

Results: All the ACLs were visualized and in continuity, however 40% showed intrasubstance high signal. 100% of medial compartments showed full thickness anteromedial loss with preservation of the posteromedial cartilage. When present, the meniscus was extruded in 75% of cases.

90% of lateral compartments were normal and none had full thickness cartilage loss. However 10% showed high signal in the tibial plateau. There was a highly reproducible pattern of osteophyte formation; 94% posteromedial and posterolateral aspect of medial femoral condyle; 90% medial tibial; 80% medial femoral and 84% lateral intercondylar notch.

Discussion: This study maps the pattern of anteromedial osteoarthritis using modern MRI techniques. This creates a baseline description of disease which is useful when investigating disease progression. This also has importance in determining preoperative indications (preservation of ACL and posteromedial cartilage); surgical technique (determine pattern of osteophytes requiring resection) and potentially important for long-term outcome (early lateral compartment changes).

Patello-femoral instability (PFI) affects 40 individuals per 100,000 population and causes significant morbidity. The causes of patello-femoral instability are multi-factorial, and an isolated anatomical abnormality does not necessarily indicate instability. Patello-femoral subluxation ranges from 0% (stable patella tracking) to 100% (dislocation) and there is an established relationship between the amount of subluxation and anterior knee pain. Traditionally, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and standard radiographs are used to guide the clinician towards a suitable corrective procedure for PFI. The multi-factorial nature of patello-femoral instability is not addressed with current imaging techniques. This study aims to address which anatomical variables assessed on MR images are most relevant to patello-femoral subluxation. This information will aid surgical decision making, particularly in selecting the most appropriate reconstructive surgery.

A retrospective analysis of MR studies of 60 patients with suspected patello-femoral instability was performed. All patients were graded for degree of subluxation using a dynamic MR scan.

The patient scans were assessed for the presence of a specific range of anatomical variables:

patella alta, (modified Insall-Salvatti)

The Wilk’s Lambda test for multi-variate analysis was used to establish whether any relationship was present between the degree of patello-femoral instability and bony or soft tissue anatomical variables. Non-parametric statistical tests were applied across the groups and within the groups to assess their relative significance.

The following variables showed a significant relationship with patellofemoral subluxation; distance of the VMO from the patella (< 0.001), TTD (< 0.001), patella engagement (0.001), sulcus angles (0.004) and patella alta (0.005).

This study agrees with previous work showing a significant correlation between subluxation and trochlea sulcus angle and TTD.

This is the first study to establish a significant correlation between patella engagement and radiological instability. The lower the percentage engagement of the patella in the trochlea, the greater the degree of patello-femoral instability. Patella engagement showed a more significant relationship with subluxation than patella alta.

We report a new method of predicting patello-femoral instability by measuring the overlap of the patella in the trochlea groove.

Introduction: Most unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) employ cement for fixation of the prosthetic components to the bone. The information in the literature about the relative merits of cemented and cementless UKR is contradictory, with some favouring cementless fixation while others favouring cemented fixation. There is concern about the radiolucency which frequently develops around the tibial component with cemented fixations. The exact cause of the occurrence of radiolucency is unknown but according to some, it may suggest suboptimal fixation.

Method: Following ethical approval, 62 patients with medial OA were randomised to receive either cemented (n=31) or cementless components (n=31). All patients underwent identical surgical procedure with either a cemented or cementless Oxford UKR. Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically. The x-rays were taken with an image intensifier (I.I.). The position of the I.I. was adjusted until it was perfectly aligned with the tibial bone-implant interface thereby allowing accurate assessment of presence and extent of the radiolucency.

Results: The patients in the two groups were well matched. There was no significant difference in the clinical scores between the two groups. The mean OKS for the cemented group was 40 (± 8.3) and 42 (± 4.6) for cementless group. Narrow radiolucent lines were seen at the bone-implant interfaces of 75% of the cemented tibial components; partial in 43% and complete in 32%. In the cementless implants, partial radiolucencies were seen in 7% and complete radiolucencies in none. The differences are statistically highly significant (p< 0.0001) and imply satisfactory bone ingrowth into the cementless implants.

Conclusions: The method of fixation influences the incidence of radiolucency. With identical designs, no patient with cementless components developed any complete radiolucency. The observation raises the question as to whether cementless rather than cemented components should be routinely used for UKR.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report the mid-term survival results of Oxford UKAs in patients of 50 years of age or less, using (1) revision surgery and (2) Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) as outcome measures.

Method: A literature review identified studies of Oxford mobile bearing UKAs containing individuals 1) 50 years old or less with 2) medial osteoarthritis and 3) 2 years or longer follow-up. Authors were approached to participate in a multi-centre survival analysis by submitting all their patients, 50 years of age or less, who received a medial UKA for osteoarthritis. Patients who had died, been lost to follow-up or who underwent revision were identified. OKS were established for all patients with surviving implants.

Results: Seven centres submitted 107 patients. The mean age was 47 years (range 32–50). The average follow-up was 4 years (range 1–25). Forty-seven patients had follow-up into their fifth year or longer. The cumulative 7-year survival using revision as the endpoint was 96% (CI 8). The mean post-operative OKS for surviving implants was 38 (CI 2) out of a possible 48.

Conclusion: While early survival rates and function are encouraging, long-term follow-up is required before concluding UKA is a viable treatment option in young patients with unicompartmental knee arthritis.

Introduction: This study explores whether modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with improved cartilage sequencing is able to show a more detailed view of anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee (AMOA). Preoperative assessment of patients and selection of intervention is very important and preoperative imaging forms an integral part of this. Modern MRI technology may allow us to visualize in great detail the structures and cartilage within the knee, providing a better understanding of the pathoanatomy of AMOA. This will be useful in preoperative assessment and surgical management of patients.

Methods: 50 patients with a radiographic diagnosis of anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee and had been listed for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) had MRI as part of their pre-op workup. At operation all were deemed suitable for UKA using the current Oxford indications. The image sequences were coronal, axial and sagittal with a predetermined cartilage protocol. The state of the ACL, cartilage wear location and pattern, presence of osteophytes and subchondral high signal were assessed.

Results: All the ACLs were visualized and in continuity, however 40% showed intrasubstance high signal.

100% of medial compartments showed full thickness anteromedial loss with preservation of the posteromedial cartilage. When present, the meniscus was extruded in 96% of cases.

Discussion: This study maps the pattern of anteromedial osteoarthritis using modern MRI techniques. This has importance in determining preoperative indications (preservation of ACL and posteromedial cartilage); surgical technique (determine pattern of osteophytes requiring resection) and potentially important for long-term outcome (early lateral compartment changes).

Introduction: Radiolucent lines (RLL) underneath the tibial component are common findings following the Oxford Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty (OUKA)[1]. Many theories have been proposed to explain the cause of RLL, such as poor cementing, osteonecrosis, micromotion, and thermal necrosis, however, the true aetiology and clinical significance remain unclear. We undertook a retrospective study analysing the association between RLL and pre-operative, intra-operative factors, as well as clinical outcome scores.

Method: One hundred and sixty-one knees which had undergone primary Phase 3 medial Oxford OUKA were included in the study. Fluoroscopic radiography films were assessed at five years post-operatively for areas of tibial RLL. The presence of RLL was compared to

patients’ pre-operative demographics for age, weight, height, BMI,

Results: Of the 161 knees in the study, 126 (78%) were found to have tibial RLL. No statistical difference was found between knees with RLL and those without in terms of preoperative demographics, intra-operative factors, or clinical assessment criteria.

Discussion: No clear relationship between RLL, preoperative demographics, and intra-operative factors has been identified in this study. We conclude that tibial RLL following OUKA is a common finding but do not seem to affect medium term clinical outcome.

Statement of purpose: Finite element (FE) models of bone can be used to evaluate new and modified knee replacements. Validation of FE models is seldom used, and the quantification of modelling parameters has a considerable effect on the results obtained. The aim of this study is to develop a FE model of a cadaveric tibia and validate it against a comprehensive set of experiments.

Summary of Methods: Seventeen tri-axial rosettes were attached to a cleaned, fresh frozen cadaveric human tibia and the tibia was subjected to 13 loading conditions. Deflection and strain data were used for comparison with the FE model. A geometric model was created on the basis of computed tomography (CT) scans. The CT data was used to map 600 orthotropic material properties to the tibia. All experiments were simulated on the FE model. Measured principal strains were compared to their corresponding FE values using regression analysis. The validated tibia model was reduced in size (75mm to the proximal) and then re-modelled to represent only the proximal tibia. This re-modelled tibia was validated against the reduced size FE model. Virtual surgery was performed on the validated proximal model to implant a UKR.

Summary of Results: For the whole tibia model, the regression line for all axial loads combined had a slope of 0.999, an intercept of −6.24 micro-strain, and an R2 value of 0.962. The root mean square error as a percentage was 5%. For the proximal tibia model, correlation coefficients of 0.989 and 0.976 were obtained for the maximum and minimum principal strains respectively.

Statement of Conclusions: An FE model of an implanted proximal tibia has been validated against experimental data. This model is able to accurately predict the deflection and stresses in a replaced knee joint to obtain clinically relevant information. This will provide a virtual model of unicompartmental arthroplasty, where variables such as fixation method and bearing mechanics can be assessed.

Introduction: The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from the distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and therefore ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component.

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series [series I], Series II with improved surgical technique and the domed tibial component [Series III].

Method: The primary assessment of outcome was bearing dislocation at one year. One year was chosen as all the dislocations in the first series occurred within a year. In series I, there were 53 knees, in series II 65 knees and in series III 60 knees, all with a minimum of one year follow up.

Results: In series I, there were 6 bearing dislocations (11%) and the average range of movement (ROM) was 110°. In the second series, there were 2 dislocations (3%) and the average ROM was 118°. In the third series, there were no primary dislocations and the average ROM was 125°.

Conclusions: The improved surgical technique and implant design has reduced the dislocation rate to an acceptable level so a mobile bearing can now be recommended for lateral UKR.

Purpose: To compare the site of lesions in medial and lateral unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

Methods: Patients with medial (n=35) and lateral (n=15) OA, having unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, were recruited. Intra-operatively, the distance between the anterior, posterior, medial and lateral margins of the full-thickness lesion and reference lines dividing the condyles was measured. The midpoints of lesions were calculated and groups were compared. Lateral radiographs were used to determine the relationship between the lesion site and knee flexion angle (KFA).

Results: Femoral lesion: In lateral OA, the midpoint of lesions was 25.0mm (SD:8.8) posterior to the reference line passing transversely through the apex of the inter-condylar notch. This was significantly different (p< 0.001) from midpoint in medial OA, which was 10.7mm (SD:9.4) posterior to the reference line.

Tibial lesion: In lateral OA, the midpoint of lesions was 2.0mm (SD:6.5) posterior to the reference line passing through the mid-coronal plane of the resected tibia. This was located significantly more posterior (p=0.038) than midpoint in medial OA, which was 2.2mm (SD:5.7) anterior to the reference line.

Knee Flexion Angle: In lateral OA, the midpoint of lesions was on average at 40° flexion and sites of smaller lesions were very variable. The lesion expanded both anteriorly and posteriorly. In medial OA, smaller femoral lesions occurred in full extension and extended further posteriorly with disease progression.

No significant difference was demonstrated in medial and lateral localisation of the lesions.

Conclusion: Medial OA begins near full extension, progresses in a predictable manner and is perhaps initiated by events occurring at heel strike. Lateral OA begins in flexion in a less predictable manner, at KFA above that seen during the gait cycle. The different sites of lesions in medial and lateral OA suggest different aetiology and pathophysiology. Therefore, prevention and treatment strategies should be different.

The purpose of this study was to determine if a single physiotherapy intervention would enable patients to kneel following Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Kneeling is an important functional activity that is frequently not performed after knee arthroplasty, thus affecting a patient’s ability to carry out basic tasks of everyday life. There is however no clinical reason why patients should not kneel and many with proposed knee surgery ask about the possibility of kneeling after their operation.

Sixty adults participated in a prospective randomised controlled trial with blinded assessments. At 6 weeks post-operatively UKA patients were randomised to either the Routine care group where no advice on kneeling was given or to the Kneeling intervention group where participants were taught and given advice on how to kneel and were encouraged to do so. They were re-assessed at 1 year. The primary outcome measure was Question 7 of the Oxford Knee Score which asks the question “Could you kneel down and get up again afterwards?”

Pre-operatively there was no difference in the kneeling ability of the two groups. At 1 year the difference in kneeling ability between the two groups was highly significant (p< 0.05). Spearman’s correlation coefficient showed no significant association between a change in score of Question 7 at 1 year and the following factors; scar position, numbness, range of flexion, arthritic involvement of other joints and pain. Linear regression analysis also confirmed that these factors were not successful in predicting a change in kneeling ability.

This study showed that the single factor predictive of kneeling ability was the physiotherapy intervention provided at 6 weeks post-operatively and it is suggested that kneeling should be incorporated into patient’s post-operative rehabilitation programmes.

Introduction: Treatment options for the young active patient with isolated symptomatic medial compartment OA and pre-existing ACL deficiency are limited. Implant longevity and activity levels may preclude TKA, whilst HTO and unicompartmentasl knee arythroplasty (UKA) are unreliable due to ligamentous instability. UKAs tend to fail because of wear or tibial loosening resulting from eccentric loading. Combined UKA and ACL reconstruction may therefore be a solution.

Method: Fifteen patients with combined ACL reconstruction and Oxford UKA (ACLR group), were matched (age, gender and follow-up period) with 15 patients with Oxford UKA with intact ACL (ACLI group). Prospectively collected clinical and x-ray data from the last follow-up (minimum 3 years, range: 3 – 5) were compared. Ten patients from each group also underwent in-vivo kinematic assessment using a standardised protocol.

Results: At the last follow-up, the clinical outcome for the two groups were similar. One ACLR patient needed revision due to infection. Radiological assessment did not show any significant difference between relative component positions and none of the patients had pathological radiolucencies suggestive of component loosening. Kinematic assessment showed posterior placement of the femur on tibia in extension for the ACLR group, which corrected with further flexion.

Conclusions: The short-term clinical results of combined ACL reconstruction and UKA are excellent. Lack of pathological radiolucencies and near normal knee kinematics suggest that early tibial loosening due to eccentric loading is unlikely.

Aim: The aim of this study was to asses the accuracy of skyline radiographs in the assessment of the patellofemoral joint, when compared to open intraoperative assessment.

Methods: Eighty nine patients undergoing knee replacement surgery were included in the study. Skyline radiographs were obtained preoperatively. These radiographs were assessed and graded by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist using the Altman and Ahlbäck classifications. The grades were calculated for both the medial and lateral facets of the PFJ. Intraoperative assessment of the Patellofemoral joint was undertaken at the time of surgery. The damage was graded using the modified Collins classification (0: Normal, 1: Superficial damage, 2: Partial thickness cartilage loss, 3: Focal Full thickness cartilage loss < 2cm2, 4: Extensive full thickness cartilage loss < 2cm2). Data was obtained for the Medial Facet, Lateral Facet and Trochlea.

Results: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the radiographic and macroscopic changes within the lateral PFJ were poor with both the Altman 0.22 (p=0.0350) and Ahlbäck 0.24 (p=0.018). The correlation of the medial PFJ was slightly better with a coefficient for Altman 0.42 (P< 0.0001) and Ahlbäck 0.34 (P> 0.001).

Conclusion: In conclusion skyline radiographs provide a poor to moderate preoperative assessment of the degree of osteoarthritis within the patella-femoral joint. This has significant implications for establishing radiographic criteria for planning patella-femoral joint replacement.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the long-term survival results of TKA in patients under the age of 60, using

revision surgery and

Method: From our knee database we identified a cohort of 60 total knee replacements that had been performed over 15 years previously. We identified those who had died, those who had been revised and established the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) for all those still surviving.

Results Using the following endpoint criteria the cumulative 15-year survival was (A) revision surgery alone = 78% (CI 12), (B) revision surgery or an OKS less than or equal to 24 (50% of total OKS) = 63% (CI 13), and (C) revision surgery or moderate pain = 48% (CI 14).

Conclusion The functional survival of TKA in patients under the age of 60 decreases in the second decade following implantation with a significant number of prostheses failing the patient due to knee pain

Introduction: The information in the literature about the relative merits of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is contradictory, with some favouring cementless fixation while others favouring cemented fixation. Cemented fixations give good survivorship but there is concern about the radiolucency which frequently develops around the tibial component. The exact cause of the occurrence of radiolucency is unknown but according to some, it may suggest suboptimal fixation.

Method: Sixty-two knees (31 in each group) were randomised to receive either cemented or cementless UKR components. The components were similar except that the cementless had a porous titanium and hydroxyappatite (HA) coating. Patients were prospectively assessed by an independent observer pre-operatively and annually thereafter. The clinical assessment included Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Scores and Tegner activity score. Fluoroscopically aligned radiographs were assessed for thickness and extent of radiolucency under the tibial implant.

Results: At one year there were no differences in the clinical outcome between the groups and there were no loose components. No radiolucencies thicker than 1mm were seen. At one year none of the cementless tibias and 30% of the cemented tibias had complete radiolucencies. One out of 31 cementless (3%) and 12 out of 31 cemented (39%) had partial radiolucencies. This difference between these two groups was high significant (p< 0 0001).

Conclusions: This study clearly demonstrates that the incidence of radiolucency beneath the tibial component is influenced by component design and method of fixation. With identical designs of tibial component none of the cementless components developed complete radiolucences whereas 30% of the cemented components did. We conclude that HA achieves better bone integration than cement.

Introduction: Treatment options for the young active patient with isolated symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis and pre-existing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency are limited. Implant longevity and activity levels may preclude total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whilst high tibial osteotomy HTO and unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) are unreliable due to ligamentous instability. UKA’s tend to fail because of wear or tibial loosening resulting from eccentric loading. Combined UKA and ACL reconstruction may therefore be a solution.

Method: Fifteen patients with combined ACL reconstruction and Oxford UKA (ACLR group), were matched (age, gender and follow-up period) with 15 patients with Oxford UKA with intact ACL (ACLI group). Prospectively collected clinical and x-ray data from the last follow-up (minimum 3 years, range: 3–5) were compared. Ten patients from each group also underwent in-vivo kinematic assessment using a standardised protocol.

Results: At the last follow-up, the clinical outcome for the two groups were similar (ACLR: OKS 46, KSS (objective): 99, ACLI: OKS 43, KSS (objective): 94). One ACLR patient needed revision due to infection. Radiological assessment did not show any significant difference between relative component positions and none of the patients had pathological radiolucencies suggestive of component loosening. Kinematic assessment showed posterior placement of the femur on tibia in extension for the ACLR group, which corrected with further flexion.

Conclusions: The short-term clinical results of combined ACL reconstruction and UKA are excellent. Lack of pathological radiolucencies and near normal knee kinematics suggest that early tibial loosening due to eccentric loading is unlikely. Similarly, wear is unlikely to be a problem because of the wear resistance of mobile bearing devices.

Introduction: The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) use in the lateral compartment has been associated with a reduced flexion range and increased medial compartment pain than seen with its medial counterpart due to, in part, the inadequacy of a flat tibial tray replacing the domed anatomy of the lateral tibia. A new design incorporating a domed tibial component and a biconcave meniscal bearing has been developed to overcome these problems.

This study reports a clinical comparison of new and old establishing whether this modified implant has maintained the established normal kinematic profile of the Oxford UKR.

Method: Patients undergoing lateral UKR for OA were recruited for the study. Fifty one patients who underwent UKR with the domed design were compared to 60 patients who had lateral UKR with a flat inferior bearing surface. Kinematic evaluation was performed on 3 equal subgroups (n = 20); Group 1-Normal volunteer knees, Group 2-Flat Oxford Lateral UKR’s and Group 3-Domed Oxford Lateral UKR’s. The sagittal plane kinematics of each knee was assessed using videofluoroscopic analysis whilst performing a step up and deep knee bend activity. The fluoroscopic images were recorded digitally, corrected for distortion using a global correction method and analysed using specially developed software to identify the anatomical landmarks needed to determine the Patella Tendon Angle (PTA) (the angle the patella tendon and the tibial axis).

Knee kinematics were assessed by analysing the movement of the femur relative to the tibia using the PTA.

Results: PTA/KFA values, for both devices, from extension to flexion did not show any significant difference in PTA values in comparison to the normals as measured by a 3-way ANOVA. The Domed implant achieved higher maximal active flexion during the lunge exercise than those with a flat implant. Only 33% of the flat UKR’s achieved KFA of 130° or more under load whilst performing a lunge, compared with 75% of domed UKR’s and 90% of normal knees. No flat UKR achieved a KFA of 140° or more, yet 50% of all domed UKR’s did, as did 60% of all normal knees.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in sagittal plane kinematics of the domed and flat Oxford UKR’s. Both designs had favorable kinematic profiles closely resembling that of the normal knee, suggesting normal function of the cruciate mechanism. The domed knees had a greater range of motion under load compared to the flats, approaching levels seen with the normal knee, suggesting that limited flexion for the flat plateau results from over tightening in high flexion and that this is corrected with the domed plateau. Problems with the second generation of lateral Oxford UKA have been rectified by a new bi-concave bearing without losing bearing stability and normal kinematics.

Anteromedial osteoarthritis is a distinct phenotype of osteoarthritis. The arthritic lesion on the tibia is localised to the anteromedial quadrant with an intact ACL. Deficiency of the ACL leads to a progression to tricompartmental disease. Within the spectrum of intact ACL a varying degree of ligament damage is seen. Our aim was to correlate the progression of ACL damage to the geographical extent of disease and the degree of cartilage loss on the tibial plateau.

We systematically digitally mapped 50 tibial plateau resection specimens from clinical photographs of patients undergoing unicompartmental arthroplasty, additionally the damage to their ACL was graded (0: normal, 1:synovium loss, 2:longitudinal splits)

These images were imported into image analysis software. Accurate measurements were made of the dimensions of the specimen. Measurements included the AP distance to the anterior and posterior aspect of the lesion, and the distance to the start of the macroscopically non damaged cartilage. The areas of cartilage damage and full thickness loss were also recorded. The results were represented as a % of total area to account for variation in size of the resection specimens. We compared % of full thickness loss in patients with normal to those with damaged, but functionally intact ligaments.

All specimens had a similar macroscopic appearance. A significant difference was seen with the progression of ACL damage and area of eburnation of bone. Using an unpaired t test, a significant difference in area of % full thickness cartilage loss (P=0.047) was seen between patients with a normal and longitudinal splits within their ACL. No correlation between the clinical status of the ACL and start or finish point of cartilage loss on the tibial plateau

We surmise that the progression from anteromedial to tricompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee may be related to the graduated damage of the ACL.

A sibling risk study that shows a statistically significant increase in risk for anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee.

Anteromedial osteoarthritis is a distinct phenotype of osteoarthritis. Previous studies have shown a genetic aetiology to both hip and knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to determine the sibling risk of antero-medial osteoarthritis of the knee.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 132 probands with primary anteromedial osteoarthritis, who had undergone unicompartmental arthroplasty. Sibling were identified as having symptomatic knee problems by postal Oxford Knee Score (OKS). A positive OKS was defined as an OKS+/− 2SD of the mean of the proband group. Sibling spouses were used as controls. Those siblings & spouses that were symptomatic from the OKS were invited to undergo Knee X-rays, to look for radiological signs of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis was diagnosed as greater than Grade II on the Kell-gren Lawrence classification. The pattern of disease was noted and it was considered if the sibling were suitable for a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The prevalence and sibling risk of anteromedial osteoarthritis was determined using a randomly selected single sibling per proband family. The prevalence was determined in the 103 single proband sibling pairs.

There was a statistically significant risk within the sibling group P= 0.024 using the Chi square test. The relative risk of anteromedial osteoarthritis was. 3.21(95% CI 1.08 to 9.17)

Genetic factors play a major role in the development of anteromedial osteoarthritis.

Background: The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) use in the lateral compartment has been associated with a reduced flexion range, increased medial compartment pain and a higher dislocation rate than seen with its medial counterpart due to the inadequacy of a flat tibial tray replacing the domed anatomy of the lateral tibia. A new design incorporating a domed tibial component and a biconcave meniscal bearing has been developed to overcome these problems. This current study was designed to establish whether this modi-fied ‘domed’ implant has maintained the established normal kinematic profile of the Oxford UKR.

Methods: The study population consisted of 60 participants from three equal groups; Group 1- Normal volunteer knees (n = 20), Group 2 – Flat Oxford Lateral UKR’s (n = 20) and Group 3 – Domed Oxford Lateral UKR’s (n = 20). The sagittal plane kinematics of each involved knee was assessed continuously using videofluoroscopic analysis. A standardised protocol of step-up and deep lunge was used to assess loadbearing range of motion during which the patella tendon angle (PTA) was measured as a function of the knee flexion angle (KFA).

Results: PTA/KFA values compared at 10 degree KFA increments from maximal extension to maximal flexion for all 3 groups did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference in PTA values between any group as measured by a 3-way ANOVA. The Domed implant achieved higher maximal active flexion during the lunge exercise than those with a Flat implant. Only 33% of the Flat UKR’s achieved KFA of 130 degrees or more under load whilst performing a lunge, compared with 75% of domed UKR’s and 90% of normal knees. No Flat UKR achieved a KFA of 140 degrees or more, yet 50% of all domed UKR’s did, as also did 60% of all normal knees.

Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the sagittal plane kinematics of the domed and flat Oxford UKR’s. Both implant designs have a favourable kinematic profile closely resembling the normal knee. The domed knees though do have a greater range of motion under load as compared to the flats, approaching levels seen with the normal knee.

The purpose of the study: to determine if Patient height-and gender could be used to predict component size With a minimally invasiveapproach for unicompartmental knee replacement.

Material and methods: One hundred x-rays of patients (44 men, 56 women), who had undergone Oxford UKR, were reviewed. The preoperative radiographs were assessed for component size using the standard template. The postoperative x-rays were reviewed to determine-whether the ideal component size had been used or if not what could be the most appropriate. Patient’s height was recorded. The proportion of patients for whom an appropriate size could be selected by either template or height measurements was calculated.

Current templating system accurately predicted the ideal size in 67%. In no case was the size incorrect by more than one size. The following size bands were set according to height. For men: size small in patients less than160 cm, medium less than 170 cm and large less than 180cm. For women: size small in patients less than 165 cm, medium less than 175cm and large less than 185 cm. Height accurately predicted the ideal size in75%. In no case was the assessment of component size incorrect by more than one size.

As the Oxford femoral component is spherical, its size is not critical and it is acceptable to use one size too large or too small. Both height and templating safely predicted an acceptable size in all cases and predicted the ideal size in about 70% > Conclusion: Gender specific height should be used to predict the component size in situations were templating is difficult as in digital x-rays orsuperimposition of the two femoral condyles, and non-standardised x-raymagnification.

The indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain controversial; in particular the threshold of disease in the patellofemoral compartment is debated. Whilst some authorities ignore the condition of the patellofemoral joint, others consider pre-existing patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) a contra-indication to UKA. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of PFOA on the outcome of medial UKA.

This prospective study involved one hundred consecutive patients who had undergone cemented medial Oxford UKA (phase 3), via a minimally invasive approach, at least one year previously. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of full thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) on the patella or trochlea at operation. A pre-operative skyline radiograph was graded using the Altman score, by an independent Musculoskeletal Radiologist. Outcome was evaluated with the Knee Society Score (AKSS) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS, maximum 48). Groups were compared for differences in knee score and Altman grade using a one way ANOVA. Repeat analysis was performed using the presence of anterior knee pain (AKP) as the group defining variable.

There were 28 patients with FTCL, and both groups were well matched for age, gender and activity levels. Analysis showed no significant difference in post operative knee scores between groups with either the presence of FTCL or the presence of AKP pre-operatively as a factor. There was no significant difference in Altman grade between groups.

Intra-operative evidence of PFOA in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis does not prejudice the outcome of UKA. Even the inclusion of patients with symptomatic AKP, without necessarily having PFOA, does not affect the outcome after UKA. These short results are encouraging, but longer follow up is required.

Proprioception protects joints against injurious movements and is critical for joint stability maintenance under dynamic conditions. Knee replacement effect on proprioception in general remains elusive. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in proprioceptive performance after knee replacement; comparing Total (TKA) to Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA).

Thirty-four patients with osteoarthritis were recruited; 15 patients underwent TKA using the AGC prosthesis and 19patients underwent UKA using the Oxford prosthesis. Both cruciate ligaments were preserved in the UKA group, while only the PCL was preserved in TKA patients. Patients’ age was similar in both groups.> Joint Position Sense (JPS) and postural sway were used as measures of proprioception. Both groups were assessed pre- and 6 months post-operatively in both limbs. JPS was measured as the error in actively and passively reproducing five randomly ordered knee flexion angles between 30 and 70°using an isokinetic dynamometer. Postural sway (area and path) was measured during single leg stance using a Balance Performance Monitor. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Pre-operatively, no differences in JPS or sway were found between limbs in either group. No differences existed between the two groups. Post-operatively, both groups had significant improvement of JPS in the operated limb (UKA mean4.64°, SD1.44° and TKA mean5.18°, SD1.35°). No changes in JPS were seen in the control side. A significant improvement (P< 0.0001) in sway area and path was found in the UKA group only in both limbs. No significant changes in sway occurred in either limb of TKA patients. The OKS improved from 21.4 to 35.5 for TKA patients and from 23.9 to 38for UKA patients.

Both UKA and TKA improve proprioception as assessed by JPS. However, UKA alone improves postural sway in both limbs. This may impart explain why UKA patients function better than TKA patients

Oxford Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is now performed using a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique. Although early results are encouraging, the studies assessing outcome could be criticised for the restricted number of patients and limited follow-up. Aim of this study was to assess clinical outcome and prosthetic survival rate inpatients with minimally invasive Oxford medial UKA.

This prospective study assessed 500 consecutive patients, who underwent cemented Oxford UKA for medial OA using MIS technique. Patients were assessed using objective and functional Knee Society Score (KSS).

This study has confirmed preliminary findings that Oxford UKA using a minimally invasive approach is safe, reliable and effective.

Introduction: Numerous studies in the orthopaedic literature have reported changes in knee kinematics following rupture of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL). Gait analysis is currently the preferred method for studying these in vivo kinematics. The accuracy of this method of analysis remains limited due to errors related to skin movement artefact. Most studies have therefore been limited to analysing subjects performing simple tasks such as straight-line walking, since results become increasingly inaccurate as the subject moves faster. Standard skin marker formats allow measurements of knee flexion angle and varus/valgus angles to be recorded relatively accurately during such tasks. Accurate measurements of rotations and translations at the knee joint, however, are not possible with these set-ups.

Aim: To produce a new method for interpretation of kinematic data from gait analysis, to allow accurate measurement of 3-D displacements at the knee joint during dynamic activity.

Method: We employed two different sets of skin markers in an attempt to increase the accuracy of our data, by diminishing the effects of skin movement. The Kabada¹ marker set was used with retroreflective spheres of 14.5mm diameter. This marker set was used to establish 3-D femoral and tibial co-ordinate systems. We then established a femoral and tibial co-ordinate centre within the distal femur and proximal tibia respectively. A second set of markers was used similar to the “point-cluster” method described by Andriacchi et al². This involved groups of eight smaller spheres (9.5mm diameter) placed in a non-uniform distribution on each of the thigh and shank segments. The positions of all these remaining markers, relative to the co-ordinate centres were then established. 15 subjects were then recorded while performing a series of running and cutting tasks. For each trial that was then analysed, we used all visible markers to optimize the recorded position of the tibial and femoral co-ordinate centres, using a method similar to that described by Soderkvist³. The displacements of these co-ordinate centres were then used to calculate the 3-D tibio-femoral kinematics. Reliability and repeatability tests suggest that this method produces results accurate to 3–4mm.

Conclusion: We believe we have developed a practical and accurate method to analyse 3-D joint kinematics from gait laboratory data.

Introduction: Knee joint arthroplasty (total or unicompartmental) is the standard operative treatment for osteoarthritis (OA). Survival rate is good for both types but functional outcome is different. The function of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is substantially better than that of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As function can be strongly influenced by proprioceptive ability, it is possible that improved outcome seen in patients with UKA results from retaining proprioceptive function associated with the cruciate ligaments. This prospective longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the change in proprioceptive performance after knee replacement; comparing TKA to UKA.

Methods and Materials: Two groups of patients with OA as diagnosed clinically and by X-ray were recruited. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients (mean age 65.8 years range 57–72 years, 10 females and 5 males) listed for TKA with the AGC prosthesis (Biomet, UK). Group 2 consisted of 19 patients (mean age 65.5 years range 52–75 years; 9 females and 10 males) listed for UKA with the Oxford UKA (Biomet, UK) for medial compartment OA. The ACL and PCL were present and preserved in all patients in Group 2, while only the PCL was preserved in Group 1 patients. Joint Position Sense (JPS) and postural sway were used as measures of proprioception performance. Both groups were assessed pre-and 6 months post-operatively in both limbs. JPS was measured using a dynamometer (KinCom, Chatanooga Ltd) as the error in actively and passively reproducing five randomly ordered knee flexion angles (30°, 40°, 50°, 60° and 70°). Postural sway (area, path and velocity) was measured during single leg stance using a Balance Performance Monitor (SMS Medical) for 30 seconds interval. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Results: Pre-operatively, no differences in JPS or sway were found between limbs in either group. No differences existed between the two groups. Post-operatively, both groups had significant improvement of JPS in the operated limb only (Mean ± standard deviation for UKA 4.64±1.44° and for TKA 5.18±1.35°). No changes in JPS were seen in the control side. An improvement in sway was found in the UKA group only. UKA patients showed significant improvement in both sway area and path (p< .0001) for both limbs post-operatively. No significant post-operative changes in sway occurred in either limb of TKA patients. The OKS improved postoperatively in both groups, rising from 21.4 to 35.5 for TKA patients and from 23.9 to 38 for UKA patients.

Conclusion: Interestingly, joint position sense improved for both groups but did not seem to show any difference between UKA and TKA. Postural sway was influenced by joint replacement type. Ligament retention may contribute to improved global postural control seen after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and may explain the higher level of function seen in these patients.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to determine the causes of failed medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and assess the outcome after revision surgery.

Materials And Methods: From 1993 to 2003, sixty-nine Oxford UKA (58 patients) were revised to a total knee replacements (TKR) at this centre. The type of implant used at revision surgery, pre- and post-revision American Knee Society (AKS) and Tegner scores were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: The patient’s mean age at the time of UKA was 64.5 years (range: 50–79). The average pre-revision scores were as follows: AKS-Objective score was 41.2 (± 10.4), the AKS-functional score was 56.8 (±10.0) and the average Tegner score was 1.5 (±0.6). The mean follow-up period was 38.3 (range: 12–107) months. The common causes of failure were: lateral compartment osteoarthritis (34.0%), component loosening (30.4%) and early or late infection requiring two-stage revision surgery (14.3%). The majority were revised using a standard primary TKR implant and only six (9%) requiring augmentation stems. Patellar resurfacing was performed in 25% of cases. The mean polyethylene liner width of the revision TKR was 13.4mm (±3.7). The average post-revision scores were: AKS-Objective score 77.4 (±13.1), the AKS-functional AKS score 70 (±21.1) and the average Tegner score of 2.2 (±0.8). Three knees needed rerevision for infection of the revised implant.

Conclusions: Lateral compartment osteoarthritis was the commonest indication for revision surgery for a failed medial Oxford UKA. Revision of a UKA is technically easier and the results are superior to the published results of revision of a primary TKR. In more than 90% cases, no augmentation or stemmed implants were necessary.

Introduction: The indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain controversial; in particular, those relating to the state of the patello-femoral joint (PFJ). Some authorities consider the presence of anterior knee pain (AKP) and/or full thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) to be a contraindication. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of patello-femoral problems on the outcome of medial UKA.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study involved one hundred knees with cemented medial Oxford UKA (phase 3), via a minimally invasive approach. Pre-operatively presence or absence of AKP was noted. The cartilage status of medial and lateral patello-femoral joint was grade and recorded intra-operatively. Outcome was evaluated at one-year with the Knee Society Score and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Results: 54% of patients had pre-operative AKP. The clinical outcome at one year was not dependent on the presence or absence of pre-operative AKP [OKS: 40.2 (± 8.2) for patients without pre-op. AKP and OKS: 40.8 ((± 6.8) for patients with pre-operative AKP]. 35% of patients had FTCL seen at operation in the PFJ. The outcome at one year was independent of the state of the medial and/or lateral PFJ [OKS = 40.7 (± 7) with normal or partial thickness cartilage loss and OKS = 39.8 (± 7) with full thickness cartilage loss in PFJ]

Conclusions: These short-term results suggest that for the Oxford UKA the presence of anterior knee pain or full thickness cartilage damage in patello-femoral joint should not be considered to be a contraindication.