A sibling risk study that shows a statistically significant increase in risk for anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee.

Anteromedial osteoarthritis is a distinct phenotype of osteoarthritis. Previous studies have shown a genetic aetiology to both hip and knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to determine the sibling risk of antero-medial osteoarthritis of the knee.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 132 probands with primary anteromedial osteoarthritis, who had undergone unicompartmental arthroplasty. Sibling were identified as having symptomatic knee problems by postal Oxford Knee Score (OKS). A positive OKS was defined as an OKS+/− 2SD of the mean of the proband group. Sibling spouses were used as controls. Those siblings & spouses that were symptomatic from the OKS were invited to undergo Knee X-rays, to look for radiological signs of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis was diagnosed as greater than Grade II on the Kell-gren Lawrence classification. The pattern of disease was noted and it was considered if the sibling were suitable for a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The prevalence and sibling risk of anteromedial osteoarthritis was determined using a randomly selected single sibling per proband family. The prevalence was determined in the 103 single proband sibling pairs.

There was a statistically significant risk within the sibling group P= 0.024 using the Chi square test. The relative risk of anteromedial osteoarthritis was. 3.21(95% CI 1.08 to 9.17)

Genetic factors play a major role in the development of anteromedial osteoarthritis.

Background: The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) use in the lateral compartment has been associated with a reduced flexion range, increased medial compartment pain and a higher dislocation rate than seen with its medial counterpart due to the inadequacy of a flat tibial tray replacing the domed anatomy of the lateral tibia. A new design incorporating a domed tibial component and a biconcave meniscal bearing has been developed to overcome these problems. This current study was designed to establish whether this modi-fied ‘domed’ implant has maintained the established normal kinematic profile of the Oxford UKR.

Methods: The study population consisted of 60 participants from three equal groups; Group 1- Normal volunteer knees (n = 20), Group 2 – Flat Oxford Lateral UKR’s (n = 20) and Group 3 – Domed Oxford Lateral UKR’s (n = 20). The sagittal plane kinematics of each involved knee was assessed continuously using videofluoroscopic analysis. A standardised protocol of step-up and deep lunge was used to assess loadbearing range of motion during which the patella tendon angle (PTA) was measured as a function of the knee flexion angle (KFA).

Results: PTA/KFA values compared at 10 degree KFA increments from maximal extension to maximal flexion for all 3 groups did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference in PTA values between any group as measured by a 3-way ANOVA. The Domed implant achieved higher maximal active flexion during the lunge exercise than those with a Flat implant. Only 33% of the Flat UKR’s achieved KFA of 130 degrees or more under load whilst performing a lunge, compared with 75% of domed UKR’s and 90% of normal knees. No Flat UKR achieved a KFA of 140 degrees or more, yet 50% of all domed UKR’s did, as also did 60% of all normal knees.

Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the sagittal plane kinematics of the domed and flat Oxford UKR’s. Both implant designs have a favourable kinematic profile closely resembling the normal knee. The domed knees though do have a greater range of motion under load as compared to the flats, approaching levels seen with the normal knee.

The purpose of the study: to determine if Patient height-and gender could be used to predict component size With a minimally invasiveapproach for unicompartmental knee replacement.

Material and methods: One hundred x-rays of patients (44 men, 56 women), who had undergone Oxford UKR, were reviewed. The preoperative radiographs were assessed for component size using the standard template. The postoperative x-rays were reviewed to determine-whether the ideal component size had been used or if not what could be the most appropriate. Patient’s height was recorded. The proportion of patients for whom an appropriate size could be selected by either template or height measurements was calculated.

Current templating system accurately predicted the ideal size in 67%. In no case was the size incorrect by more than one size. The following size bands were set according to height. For men: size small in patients less than160 cm, medium less than 170 cm and large less than 180cm. For women: size small in patients less than 165 cm, medium less than 175cm and large less than 185 cm. Height accurately predicted the ideal size in75%. In no case was the assessment of component size incorrect by more than one size.

As the Oxford femoral component is spherical, its size is not critical and it is acceptable to use one size too large or too small. Both height and templating safely predicted an acceptable size in all cases and predicted the ideal size in about 70% > Conclusion: Gender specific height should be used to predict the component size in situations were templating is difficult as in digital x-rays orsuperimposition of the two femoral condyles, and non-standardised x-raymagnification.

The indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain controversial; in particular the threshold of disease in the patellofemoral compartment is debated. Whilst some authorities ignore the condition of the patellofemoral joint, others consider pre-existing patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) a contra-indication to UKA. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of PFOA on the outcome of medial UKA.

This prospective study involved one hundred consecutive patients who had undergone cemented medial Oxford UKA (phase 3), via a minimally invasive approach, at least one year previously. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of full thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) on the patella or trochlea at operation. A pre-operative skyline radiograph was graded using the Altman score, by an independent Musculoskeletal Radiologist. Outcome was evaluated with the Knee Society Score (AKSS) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS, maximum 48). Groups were compared for differences in knee score and Altman grade using a one way ANOVA. Repeat analysis was performed using the presence of anterior knee pain (AKP) as the group defining variable.

There were 28 patients with FTCL, and both groups were well matched for age, gender and activity levels. Analysis showed no significant difference in post operative knee scores between groups with either the presence of FTCL or the presence of AKP pre-operatively as a factor. There was no significant difference in Altman grade between groups.

Intra-operative evidence of PFOA in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis does not prejudice the outcome of UKA. Even the inclusion of patients with symptomatic AKP, without necessarily having PFOA, does not affect the outcome after UKA. These short results are encouraging, but longer follow up is required.

Proprioception protects joints against injurious movements and is critical for joint stability maintenance under dynamic conditions. Knee replacement effect on proprioception in general remains elusive. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in proprioceptive performance after knee replacement; comparing Total (TKA) to Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA).

Thirty-four patients with osteoarthritis were recruited; 15 patients underwent TKA using the AGC prosthesis and 19patients underwent UKA using the Oxford prosthesis. Both cruciate ligaments were preserved in the UKA group, while only the PCL was preserved in TKA patients. Patients’ age was similar in both groups.> Joint Position Sense (JPS) and postural sway were used as measures of proprioception. Both groups were assessed pre- and 6 months post-operatively in both limbs. JPS was measured as the error in actively and passively reproducing five randomly ordered knee flexion angles between 30 and 70°using an isokinetic dynamometer. Postural sway (area and path) was measured during single leg stance using a Balance Performance Monitor. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Pre-operatively, no differences in JPS or sway were found between limbs in either group. No differences existed between the two groups. Post-operatively, both groups had significant improvement of JPS in the operated limb (UKA mean4.64°, SD1.44° and TKA mean5.18°, SD1.35°). No changes in JPS were seen in the control side. A significant improvement (P< 0.0001) in sway area and path was found in the UKA group only in both limbs. No significant changes in sway occurred in either limb of TKA patients. The OKS improved from 21.4 to 35.5 for TKA patients and from 23.9 to 38for UKA patients.

Both UKA and TKA improve proprioception as assessed by JPS. However, UKA alone improves postural sway in both limbs. This may impart explain why UKA patients function better than TKA patients

Oxford Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is now performed using a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique. Although early results are encouraging, the studies assessing outcome could be criticised for the restricted number of patients and limited follow-up. Aim of this study was to assess clinical outcome and prosthetic survival rate inpatients with minimally invasive Oxford medial UKA.

This prospective study assessed 500 consecutive patients, who underwent cemented Oxford UKA for medial OA using MIS technique. Patients were assessed using objective and functional Knee Society Score (KSS).

This study has confirmed preliminary findings that Oxford UKA using a minimally invasive approach is safe, reliable and effective.

Introduction: Numerous studies in the orthopaedic literature have reported changes in knee kinematics following rupture of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL). Gait analysis is currently the preferred method for studying these in vivo kinematics. The accuracy of this method of analysis remains limited due to errors related to skin movement artefact. Most studies have therefore been limited to analysing subjects performing simple tasks such as straight-line walking, since results become increasingly inaccurate as the subject moves faster. Standard skin marker formats allow measurements of knee flexion angle and varus/valgus angles to be recorded relatively accurately during such tasks. Accurate measurements of rotations and translations at the knee joint, however, are not possible with these set-ups.

Aim: To produce a new method for interpretation of kinematic data from gait analysis, to allow accurate measurement of 3-D displacements at the knee joint during dynamic activity.

Method: We employed two different sets of skin markers in an attempt to increase the accuracy of our data, by diminishing the effects of skin movement. The Kabada¹ marker set was used with retroreflective spheres of 14.5mm diameter. This marker set was used to establish 3-D femoral and tibial co-ordinate systems. We then established a femoral and tibial co-ordinate centre within the distal femur and proximal tibia respectively. A second set of markers was used similar to the “point-cluster” method described by Andriacchi et al². This involved groups of eight smaller spheres (9.5mm diameter) placed in a non-uniform distribution on each of the thigh and shank segments. The positions of all these remaining markers, relative to the co-ordinate centres were then established. 15 subjects were then recorded while performing a series of running and cutting tasks. For each trial that was then analysed, we used all visible markers to optimize the recorded position of the tibial and femoral co-ordinate centres, using a method similar to that described by Soderkvist³. The displacements of these co-ordinate centres were then used to calculate the 3-D tibio-femoral kinematics. Reliability and repeatability tests suggest that this method produces results accurate to 3–4mm.

Conclusion: We believe we have developed a practical and accurate method to analyse 3-D joint kinematics from gait laboratory data.

Introduction: Knee joint arthroplasty (total or unicompartmental) is the standard operative treatment for osteoarthritis (OA). Survival rate is good for both types but functional outcome is different. The function of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is substantially better than that of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As function can be strongly influenced by proprioceptive ability, it is possible that improved outcome seen in patients with UKA results from retaining proprioceptive function associated with the cruciate ligaments. This prospective longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the change in proprioceptive performance after knee replacement; comparing TKA to UKA.

Methods and Materials: Two groups of patients with OA as diagnosed clinically and by X-ray were recruited. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients (mean age 65.8 years range 57–72 years, 10 females and 5 males) listed for TKA with the AGC prosthesis (Biomet, UK). Group 2 consisted of 19 patients (mean age 65.5 years range 52–75 years; 9 females and 10 males) listed for UKA with the Oxford UKA (Biomet, UK) for medial compartment OA. The ACL and PCL were present and preserved in all patients in Group 2, while only the PCL was preserved in Group 1 patients. Joint Position Sense (JPS) and postural sway were used as measures of proprioception performance. Both groups were assessed pre-and 6 months post-operatively in both limbs. JPS was measured using a dynamometer (KinCom, Chatanooga Ltd) as the error in actively and passively reproducing five randomly ordered knee flexion angles (30°, 40°, 50°, 60° and 70°). Postural sway (area, path and velocity) was measured during single leg stance using a Balance Performance Monitor (SMS Medical) for 30 seconds interval. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Results: Pre-operatively, no differences in JPS or sway were found between limbs in either group. No differences existed between the two groups. Post-operatively, both groups had significant improvement of JPS in the operated limb only (Mean ± standard deviation for UKA 4.64±1.44° and for TKA 5.18±1.35°). No changes in JPS were seen in the control side. An improvement in sway was found in the UKA group only. UKA patients showed significant improvement in both sway area and path (p< .0001) for both limbs post-operatively. No significant post-operative changes in sway occurred in either limb of TKA patients. The OKS improved postoperatively in both groups, rising from 21.4 to 35.5 for TKA patients and from 23.9 to 38 for UKA patients.

Conclusion: Interestingly, joint position sense improved for both groups but did not seem to show any difference between UKA and TKA. Postural sway was influenced by joint replacement type. Ligament retention may contribute to improved global postural control seen after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and may explain the higher level of function seen in these patients.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to determine the causes of failed medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and assess the outcome after revision surgery.

Materials And Methods: From 1993 to 2003, sixty-nine Oxford UKA (58 patients) were revised to a total knee replacements (TKR) at this centre. The type of implant used at revision surgery, pre- and post-revision American Knee Society (AKS) and Tegner scores were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: The patient’s mean age at the time of UKA was 64.5 years (range: 50–79). The average pre-revision scores were as follows: AKS-Objective score was 41.2 (± 10.4), the AKS-functional score was 56.8 (±10.0) and the average Tegner score was 1.5 (±0.6). The mean follow-up period was 38.3 (range: 12–107) months. The common causes of failure were: lateral compartment osteoarthritis (34.0%), component loosening (30.4%) and early or late infection requiring two-stage revision surgery (14.3%). The majority were revised using a standard primary TKR implant and only six (9%) requiring augmentation stems. Patellar resurfacing was performed in 25% of cases. The mean polyethylene liner width of the revision TKR was 13.4mm (±3.7). The average post-revision scores were: AKS-Objective score 77.4 (±13.1), the AKS-functional AKS score 70 (±21.1) and the average Tegner score of 2.2 (±0.8). Three knees needed rerevision for infection of the revised implant.

Conclusions: Lateral compartment osteoarthritis was the commonest indication for revision surgery for a failed medial Oxford UKA. Revision of a UKA is technically easier and the results are superior to the published results of revision of a primary TKR. In more than 90% cases, no augmentation or stemmed implants were necessary.

Introduction: The indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain controversial; in particular, those relating to the state of the patello-femoral joint (PFJ). Some authorities consider the presence of anterior knee pain (AKP) and/or full thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) to be a contraindication. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of patello-femoral problems on the outcome of medial UKA.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study involved one hundred knees with cemented medial Oxford UKA (phase 3), via a minimally invasive approach. Pre-operatively presence or absence of AKP was noted. The cartilage status of medial and lateral patello-femoral joint was grade and recorded intra-operatively. Outcome was evaluated at one-year with the Knee Society Score and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Results: 54% of patients had pre-operative AKP. The clinical outcome at one year was not dependent on the presence or absence of pre-operative AKP [OKS: 40.2 (± 8.2) for patients without pre-op. AKP and OKS: 40.8 ((± 6.8) for patients with pre-operative AKP]. 35% of patients had FTCL seen at operation in the PFJ. The outcome at one year was independent of the state of the medial and/or lateral PFJ [OKS = 40.7 (± 7) with normal or partial thickness cartilage loss and OKS = 39.8 (± 7) with full thickness cartilage loss in PFJ]

Conclusions: These short-term results suggest that for the Oxford UKA the presence of anterior knee pain or full thickness cartilage damage in patello-femoral joint should not be considered to be a contraindication.

Introduction: With a minimally invasive approach for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKA), it is difficult to determine the femoral component size intra-operatively. It can be difficult to template pre-operative radiographs due to superimposition of the two femoral condyles, and non-standardised x-ray magnification.

Aim: The purpose of the study was to find an easy, reliable, alternative method for this assessment such as height and gender.

Material and methods: One hundred x-rays of patients (44 men, 56 women), who had undergone Oxford UKR, were reviewed. Preoperative radiographs were templated, and postoperative x-rays were reviewed to determine the ideal component size. Patient’s height was recorded. The proportion of patients for whom an appropriate size could be selected by either template or height measurements was calculated.

Results: Current templating system accurately predicted the ideal size in 67 patients. The following size bands were set according to height. For men: size small in patients less than160 cm, medium less than 170 cm and large less than 180 cm. For women: size small in patients less than 164 cm, medium less than 174 cm and large less than 184 cm. Height accurately predicted the ideal size in 75 patients. In no case was the assessment of component size incorrect by more than one size.

Conclusion: Gender specific height safely predicted the ideal component size in 75 percent of patients undergoing UKA. Component size can be determined satisfactorily from patient height and gender and can be used as adjunct to existing templating method.

Introduction and Aims: The effects of injury to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posterior-lateral corner (PLC) on physical function are not as well documented compared to the more common injury to the anterior cruciate ligament. This study aimed at improving our understanding of PCL/PLC injury through gait analysis and electromyographic (EMG) testing.

Method: We studied 19 patients, average age 30 years (20–55) with clinically and radiologically confirmed PCL/PLC deficiency in isolation. Ninety percent of patients complained of instability when performing the activities of daily living and all complained of pain. All patients were assessed using the Lysholm and Gillquist functional knee score as well as gait analysis, including Kinematics, Kinetics and EMG of the quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles. Findings were compared to our normal database. The mean Lysholm score was 51/100 (24–90). Those with a Lysholm greater than 50 were designated as ‘copers’.

Results: There were 12 ‘non-copers’ and seven ‘copers’. Fifty percent of patients demonstrated a varus thrust through stance. Forty-two percent of patients demonstrated hyperextension of the knee through stance. Sixty-three percent of patients demonstrated premature and prolonged hamstring activity. Thirty-seven percent of patients had premature activity of the gastrocnemius muscle in stance. Fifty-seven percent of the ‘copers’ demonstrated premature and prolonged hamstring activity through the gait cycle compared to forty-five percent of ‘non-copers’ (non-significant p=0.25 Fishers Exact Test). Fifty-five of ‘non-copers’ demonstrated premature activity of the gastrocnemius muscle in stance compared to none of the ‘copers’ (significant p=0.025 Fishers Exact Test).

Conclusion: The observed varus thrust may be responsible for the development of medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis, a recognised problem in PCL deficient knees. Hyperextension that occurs dynamically during gait could explain failure of PCL/PLC reconstruction over time. The observed abnormal hamstrings activity is unlikely to be a compensatory mechanism.

Introduction and Aims: Since existing data relating to the kinematics of ACL-deficient knee joints relates mainly to walking, the kinematics during more dynamic activities remains unknown; therefore, the aim of this unique study was to describe in vivo ACL-deficient knee kinematics and muscle activity during running and cutting.

Method: Fifteen subjects with proven unilateral ACL rupture were measured performing running and cutting tasks prior to surgical reconstruction. Gait analysis was used to determine inter-limb differences in displacements at the knee joint during stance phase. Simultaneous EMG analysis was performed to give temporal measures of lower limb muscle activity.

Results: No significant inter-limb difference was seen for tibio-femoral translation in the sagittal or coronal planes during any part of stance phase. The ACLD limb showed a significantly reduced maximum knee flexion angle (40.4 vs. 44.0 degrees) compared to the ACL-intact (ACLI) limb (p=0.04). Internal tibial rotation was significantly greater (7.3 vs. 0.7 degrees) in the ACLD limb at toe-off (p=0.03). The quadriceps muscle group was found to be active for a significantly greater percentage of stance phase in the ACLD limb compared to the ACLI limb (p=0.001).

Conclusion: The ACL-deficient gait involves consistently greater knee extensor activity than ACL-intact gait during running, and as a consequence maximum knee flexion angle is reduced. These findings contrast with the description of ‘quadriceps-avoidance’ gait often described for ACL-deficient subjects. ACL-deficient gait also demonstrates increased rotational instability during terminal stance phase.

Introduction and Aims: Single compartmental replacement procedures are increasingly preferred over total knee replacement (TKR) for single compartment osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Theoretically, reduced disruption of the native joint should produce more normal kinematics. This study aimed to describe and compare the sagittal plane kinematics of four different, commonly used devices.

Method: Four groups of patients who had undergone successful single compartment replacement at least two years previously were recruited. Fifteen following Oxford medial UKA, 12 following medial St Georg Sled UKA, five following Oxford lateral UKA, and 12 following Avon PFJ replacement. Patients performed flexion/extension against gravity, and a step-up during video fluoroscopy. The Patellar Tendon Angle (PTA), the angle between the long axis of the tibia and the patella tendon, was obtained as a function of knee flexion. This relationship provides indication of sagittal movement between femur and tibia through range and has been validated as a reliable measure of joint kinematics.

Results: The kinematic profile for each group was compared to that of the profile for 12 normal and 30 TKR (AGC) knees. All three tibiofemoral devices produced knee kinematics similar to the normal knee. The PTA was found to have a linear relationship to flexion angle, decreasing with increasing knee flexion angle. No such linear relationship exists for the TKR joint, which display abnormal kinematics. The PF device also reflected similar trends to that for normal knees except that the PTA was moderately increased throughout the entire range of flexion (three degrees).

Conclusion: In contrast to TKR, all single compartmental knee replacements provided kinematics similar to the normal joint. The kinematic pattern of the PFJ replacement may be of most interest as the observed increase in PTA through range could influence patello-femoral contact forces

Introduction and Aims Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is appropriate for one in three osteoarthritic knees requiring replacement. An accelerated protocol enables patients undergoing UKA to be discharged within 24 hours of surgery. Before such an approach is universally accepted it must be safe, effective and economically viable. A study was performed to compare the new accelerated protocol with current standard care in a state healthcare system.

Method A single blind RCT design was used. Patients eligible for UKA were screened for NSAID tolerance, social circumstances and geographical location before allocation to either an accelerated recovery group (Group A) or a standard non accelerated group (Group S). The accelerated protocol included dedicated pain management and discharge support. Primary outcome was the Oxford Knee Assessment at 6 months post operation, compared using independent t tests. Pain, range of movement and incidence of complications were also recorded by assessors blind to group allocation. Cost effectiveness was calculated in quality life adjusted years (QLAY) using the Euroqual instrument. The study power was sufficient to avoid type 2 errors. The study was supported by a NHS Regional R& D grant.

Results Forty one patients (21 group A, 20 group S) were included. Groups had comparable age and patient profiles. Average discharge time was 37 hours (1.5 days) for group A and 114 hours (4.3 days) for group S. Pain on hospital discharge was similar for both groups. No significant difference was found between groups for pain or range of movement at any time, although patients in group S regained pre-operative flexion faster than group A. One major complication occurred in each group; one infection (group S) and one manipulation for poor movement (group A). The cost per QLAY for the new protocol was 59% of the standard care.

Conclusion The new protocol allows for safe accelerated discharge from hospital after UKA. The approach is cost effective and should help to increase the throughput of patients who require knee replacement.

Introduction: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an increasingly popular procedure for young osteoarthritic patients whose age and activity levels preclude the use of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, successful reconstruction using an unconstrained mobile bearing implant requires an intact and functioning ACL. Patients with isolated medial compartment OA and an absent ACL therefore provide a management dilemma for the treating surgeon. One option is to perform a combined ACL reconstruction and mobile bearing UKA. This paper presents early results of this new procedure using an Oxford UKA and ACL reconstruction using an autograft.

Materials and Methods: Eleven patients who underwent one or two-staged ACL reconstruction and Oxford UKA for treatment of symptomatic medial compartment OA were reviewed at one year after surgery. The combined procedure required specific precautions and considerations; care had to be taken to place the tibial tunnel as far laterally as possible to avoid impingement of the graft by the tibial implant. Also, the presence of a posteromedial, rather than an anteromedial cartilage defect has the potential to reduce accuracy for placement of the initial tibial cut.

Results: All patients were male with an average age of 49 years (range: 36 – 52) and mean follow up of 1.3 years. One patient needed revision to TKA due to infection. The objective and functional knee society scores improved pre to post operatively from 55 to 98, and 85 to 100, respectively.

Conclusions: ACL reconstruction and simultaneous or staged UKA is a viable treatment option for patients with symptomatic medial compartment arthritis in whom the ACL is absent. Early results of this technically demanding procedure are encouraging but longer follow-up is required.

Purpose of the study Function is strongly infl uenced by proprioceptive ability, this prospective longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the change in proprioceptive performance after knee replacement; comparing total to unicompartment replacement.

Methods and Results Two groups of patients with OA as diagnosed clinically and by X-ray were recruited. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients (mean age 65.8yrs range 57-72yrs, 10 females & 5 males) listed for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with the AGC (Biomet, UK). Group 2 consisted of 19 patients (mean age 65.5yrs range 52–75yrs; 9 females & 10 males) listed for Oxford Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty (OUKA) for medial compartment OA. The ACL and PCL were present and preserved in all patients in Group 2, while only the PCL was preserved for Group 1 patients.

Joint Position Sense (JPS) & sway were used as measures of proprioception performance. Both groups were assessed pre- and 6 months post-op. JPS was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (KinCom, Chatanooga Ltd) as the error in actively and passively reproducing fi ve randomly ordered knee fl exion angles (30°, 40°, 50°, 60° and 70°). Sway (area, path and velocity) was measured during single leg stance using a Balance Performance Monitor (SMS Medical) for 30-second interval. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Pre-operatively, no differences in JPS or sway were found between limbs in either group. No differences existed between the two groups.

Post-operatively, both groups had signifi cant improvement of JPS in the operated limb only (Mean ± standard deviation for UKA 4.64±1.44° and for TKA 5.18±1.35°). No changes in JPS were seen in the control side. Group 2 patients showed signifi cant improvement in both sway area and path (p< .0001) for both limbs post-operatively. No signifi cant post-operative changes in sway occurred in either limb of Group 1 patients.

The OKS improved post-operatively in both groups, rising from 21.4 to 35.5 for Group 1 patients and from 23.9 to 38 for Group 2 patients.

Conclusion Interestingly, joint position sense improved for both groups but did not seem to show any difference between UKA and TKA. Postural sway was infl uenced by joint replacement type. Ligament retention may contribute to improved global postural control seen after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and may explain the higher level of function seen in these patients.

Introduction and Aims A randomised controlled trial (RCT) and a multi-centre unilateral cohort study were performed as part of the stepwise introduction of a new mobile bearing knee. The aim was to ensure that outcome for the new device was at least as good as that for an established fixed bearing device. This paper presents three year follow up of the published one year results. Instability and prevalence of “clicking” from the joint were examined in detail.

Method 1. A multi-centre RCT of patients undergoing bilateral knee replacement compared functional outcome between two different prostheses, the new mobile bearing device (TMK) and an established fixed bearing device (AGC). 2. A separate multi-centre cohort of 166 patients who had undergone a unilateral mobile bearing procedure at least six months previously was used to assess complication rate and corroborate any findings from the bilateral trial. Outcome measures included Oxford Knee Scores, American Knee Society ratings and complication rate.

Results The bilateral trial revealed no significant differences in outcome between the two devices. Revision rate for all (199) mobile bearing knees was less than 2%. The mean Oxford Knee Score for outcome for all mobile bearing knees was 37.1 ± 10.1. About 7% of patients reported instability. Clicking was more common in the TMK (48%) than in the AGC (30%) and was reported as a problem in 16% of TMK’s in the cohort study. However, clicking was unrelated to outcome score in both studies.

Conclusion At three years, the mobile bearing device was as good as the fixed bearing device. There was a relatively high prevalence of “clicking” in the TMK but the cause remains unclear. Furthermore, the symptom was not associated with poor functional outcome. The bilateral RCT and cohort study allows assessment of function and potential problems. It provides rigourous scientific justification for the introduction and early assessment of new implants.

Introduction: Oxford Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is now performed using a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique. Although early results are encouraging, the studies assessing outcome could be criticised for the restricted number of patients and centres involved. A multi-centre follow-up of patients is required to confirm the preliminary findings.

Aim: To examine early clinical outcome in patients with minimally invasive Oxford medial UKA using a multi-centre, multi-surgeon design.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out in three centres with involvement of six surgeons. All patients undergoing cemented Oxford UKA for medial OA using MIS were included. 231 consecutive UKAs with a minimum follow up of 2 years (mean: 2.84) were assessed using objective and functional Knee Society Score (KSS).

Results: There were 108 females and 102 males (21-bilateral) with average age of 66.8 years (42 – 86). No significant difference was noted between various age groups or between different surgeons. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for unexplained pain and one for bearing dislocation. Cumulative survival rate at 2 years was 98.6% with 93% patients having good or excellent KSS rating.

Conclusions: This multi-centre study has confirmed preliminary findings that Oxford UKA using a minimally invasive approach is safe and effective.

The aim of the study was to measure in-vivo the 10-year linear and volumetric polyethylene wear of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA).

We studied six OUKA’s that had all been implanted 10 years previously. Each patient was examined in even double leg stance at a range of knee flexion angles, in a calibration cage. A stereo pair of X-ray films was acquired for each patient at 0°, 15° and 30° of flexion. The films were analysed using an RSA style calibration and a CAD model silhouette-fitting technique. The position and orientation of each femoral and tibial component was found relative to each other and the bearing position inferred. Penetration of the femoral component into the original volume of the bearing was our estimate of linear wear. The volumetric wear is calculated from the measured linear wear and the known surface area of the bearing. In addition eight control patients were examined less than 3 weeks post-operation where no wear would be expected.and 30We studied seven OUKA’s that had all been implanted at least 10 years previously. A stereo pair of X-ray films was acquired for each patient at 0 Results: The control group showed no measured wear. The seven OUKA’s had an average maximum depth of linear penetration of 0.40 mm at a mean follow-up of 10.9 years. The linear wear rate was 0.033 mm/year. The volumetric material loss was 79.8 mm3. If a steady gradual material loss is assumed, 8 mm3 of UHMWPE was lost per year.

Polyethylene particulate wear debris continues to be implicated in the aetiology of component loosening and implant failure knee following arthroplasty. The OUKA employs a spherical femoral component and a fully congruous meniscal bearing to increase contact area and theoretically reduce the potential for polyethylene wear. The results from this in-vivo study confirm that the device has low 10-year linear and volumetric wear in clinical practice. This may protect the device from component loosening in the long term.