Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) can be complex and associated with significant cost, with an increasing burden within the UK and globally. Regional rTHA networks have been proposed aiming to improve outcomes, reduce re-revisions and therefore costs. The aim of this study was to accurately quantify the cost and reimbursement for the rTHA service and to assess the financial impact of case complexity at a tertiary referral centre within the NHS. A retrospective analysis of all revision hip procedures was performed over two consecutive financial years (2018–2020). Cases were classified according to the Revision Hip Complexity Classification (RHCC) and by mode of failure; infected or non-infected. Patients of ASA grade of 3 or greater or BMI over 40 are considered “high-risk” by the RHCC. Costs were calculated using PLICS and remuneration based on the HRG data. The primary outcome was the financial difference between tariff and cost per episode per patient. Comparisons between groups were analysed using analysis of variance and two-tailed unpaired 199 revision episodes were identified in 168 patients: 25 (13%) least complex revisions (H1), 110 (55%) complex revisions (H2) and 64 (32%) most complex revisions (H3). 76 (38%) cases were due to infection. 78 (39%) of patients were in the “high-risk” group. Median length of stay increased with case complexity from 4, to 6 to 8 days (p=0.17) and significantly for revisions performed for infection (9 vs 5 days; p=0.01). Cost per episode increased significantly between complexity groups (p=0.0002) and for infected revisions (p=0.003). All groups demonstrated a mean deficit, but this significantly increased with revision complexity (£301, £1,820 and £4,757 per case; p=0.02) and for infected failure (£4,023 vs £1,679; p=0.02). The total deficit to the trust for the two-years was £512,202. Current NHS reimbursement for rTHA is inadequate and should be more closely aligned to complexity. An increase in the most complex rTHA at major revision centres (MRC) will likely place a greater financial burden on these units.
In this phase 2 clinical trial (EudraCT 2011-000541-20) we examined the effect of denosumab versus placebo on osteolytic lesion activity in patients undergoing revision surgery after THA. Men and women ≥ 30 years old scheduled for revision surgery for symptomatic, radiologically-confirmed osteolysis were randomised (1:1) to receive either denosumab 60mg or placebo subcutaneously eight weeks prior to operation. At surgery, biopsies from the osteolytic membrane-bone interface were taken for histomorphometric analysis of osteoclast number, the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included other static histomorphometric indices and systemic bone turnover markers. Adverse events and patient-reported clinical outcome scores were recorded as safety endpoints.Abstract
Objective
Methods
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the leading cause of failure of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty. It is challenging condition which represents a growing burden on hospital resources. In-patient hospital stay for antibiotic therapy post-operatively is costly and access to out-patient IV therapy (OPAT) varies between regions. In a tertiary referral centre for revision and infection, the suitability and cost-effectiveness of Dalbavancin was reviewed as a “single-shot” therapy following DAIR or revision lower limb arthroplasty for PJI. A prospective service evaluation was carried out for consecutive patients treated for PJI of the hip or knee who received Dalbavancin. Treatment was indicated by Consultant Microbiologist advice within an MDT setting where clinical or patient factors made alternative therapies eg. OPAT inappropriate. Service-level data was collected to allow calculation of bed-day savings compared to a traditional 14-day course of IV treatment. Readmission rates to the trust within 30 days were reviewed as a marker of clinical efficacy and safety.Introduction
Methods & Materials
We aim to evaluate the outcome of debridement and implant retention (DAIR) procedures performed for primary total hip prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and to identify factors correlating with a successful outcome. Patients were identified from theatre records. Electronic and paper notes were reviewed.Introduction
Methods
Data on the outcome of THA in patients under the age of 30 years is sparse. There is a perceived reluctance to offer surgery to young patients on the basis of potential early failure of the implant. We aim to review our experience with THA in this group of patients to establish outcomes in a high volume specialist arthroplasty unit. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit of patients who underwent THA <30 years of age between 1989–2009 was undertaken. Ninety five patients (117 THAs) were identified but 25 patients (27 hips) were excluded for lack of clinical records and 6 patients (9 hips) for follow up of <5 years. Clinical records were reviewed for patients’ age at operation, underlying pathology, details of operation and any failures (revision). Radiographs were reviewed for any evidence of loosening and wear of the components. Functional assessment was also carried out using the modified Hip disability & osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), Oxford hip score and EQ5D–5L.Introduction
Material & methods
An extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is a widely used approach for revision hip arthroplasty. Following an ETO it is common practice to use a long stemmed femoral prosthesis at the second stage to bypass the osteotomy. We propose that at the second stage, if the osteotomy has united, it is appropriate to use a standard length prosthesis, which preserves bone stock for any future revisions. We performed a retrospective review of our institution's prospective arthroplasty database, identifying all patients who had undergone an ETO at the first stage revision. A radiograph review was then performed and any subsequent complications recorded. A selection of patients radiographs were individually reviewed by three reviewers and intra-class correlation (ICC) was performed to assess intra-observer reliability.Background
Methods
In this 2-year randomised clinical trial we examined whether cemented femoral prosthesis geometry affects the pattern of strain-adaptive bone remodelling in the proximal femur after THA. 128 patients undergoing primary THA were randomised to receive a Charnley (shape-closed, no taper), Exeter (force-closed, double-tapered) or C-stem (forced-closed, triple-tapered) prosthesis. All received a cemented Charnley cup. Proximal femoral BMD change over 2 years was measured by DXA. Urine and serum samples were collected at pre-operative baseline and over 1 year post-operatively. N-telopeptides of type-I-collagen (NTX) was measured in urine as a marker of osteoclast activity and Osteocalcin (OC) in serum as a maker of osteoblast activity. Clinical outcome using the Harris and Oxford hip scores, and prosthesis migration measured using digitised radiographs (EBRA-Digital) were measured over 2 years. The baseline characteristics of the subjects in each group were similar (P>
0.05). Decreases in femoral BMD were observed over the first year for all prosthesis designs. Bone loss was greatest (14%) in the proximal medial femur (region 7). The pattern and amount of bone loss observed was similar between all prosthesis designs (P>
0.05). Transient rises in both osteoclast (NTX) and osteoblast (OC) activity also occurred over year 1, and were similar in pattern in the 3 prosthesis groups (p>
0.05). All prostheses showed migration patterns that were true to their design type and similar improvements in clinical hip scores were observed over the 2 year study. Differences in the proposed mechanism of load transfer between prosthesis and host bone in force-closed versus shape-closed femoral prosthesis designs in THA are not major determinants of prosthesis-related remodelling.
The mean age at revision with allograft was 64.3 years (26 to 97). 86 hips (70%) in 74 patients were reviewed both clinically and radiologically. At the time of review 28 patients (29 hips) had died and 5 patients (5 hips) were lost to follow up. Of those patients who had died 18 hips had been followed up to a mean of 66 months (12–145). A further 3 hips were unable to attend for clinical review but had accurate implant-allograft survivorship data. Their data were included in survivorship analysis to the time of last clinical review.
One of the major surgical challenges at revision arthroplasty is the management of bone stock loss in the acetabulum. There are several options available for reconstruction; cemented sockets within thick cement mantles, custom sockets jumbo uncemented sockets, support rings and bone grafting. Slooff and others have shown good results with impaction grafting.(JBJS 80B 1998) If one is to use bone graft, does the preparation of the graft have any effect on the graft itself? There are a number of ways bone can be presented, freeze dried, fresh frozen or frozen irradiated. Concerns have been raised that irradiated bone has an altered and weakened structure. There is a paucity of clinical results on this subject. In this study we present a series of patients using gamma irradiated bone for reconstruction.23% of the cases reconstructions secondary to failure due to sepsis. Between 1987 and 2000 192 revision arthroplasties in 165 patients were performed with irradiated morcellised bone allograft for acetabular reconstruction. Only those patients with a minimum follow up of 24 months were reviewed. Clinical and radiological follow up was achieved in 130 hips in 115 patients. 9 patients had died at a range of 1 to 66 months after surgery. There were 23 (17%) re-revisions of the acetabular component. Of these 13 were for deep sepsis, 5 for persistent early dislocation and 4 for aseptic loosening. Of those hips revised for infection there was a 13% re-revision rate for reinfection. There was only one catastrophic failure of the graft and only three re-revisions for aseptic loosening to date. We feel that impaction grafting of the acetabulum is a useful technique for reconstruction even when the index arthroplasty failed for sepsis. We have found no evidence to show that gamma irradiated bone performs any worse than other types of allograft bone.
The aim of this study was to review the results of the R. Mathys Isoelastic total hip replacement as for five years in this institution. For the purposes of this study the patients were invited by letter to attend a review clinic. An examination of the hip was made and hip scores calculated. An up to date radiograph was performed and radiolucent lines assessed in comparison to the initial postoperative radiograph. 78 hips in 64 patients were identified from the records. 5 patients had died before review and 18 hips had been revised. Of the patients who died, none had died in the immediate postoperative period and all the deaths were of unrelated causes. The revised hips were revised for aseptic loosening in 17 cases and infection in one. The mean time to revision was 53 months. All the loosening was femoral. In the reviewed patients the mean length of follow up was 101 months. The mean Harris score was 80.3. The mean Merle d’Aubigne score was 13.6. Significant lucent lines were noted in 2 acetabular components and 22 of 43 femoral components. Life tables were constructed with both best and worst case scenarios. The end point for failure was taken as revision or the date revision was planned. A further set of life tables were constructed adding radiological signs of failure to the criteria. Survivorship was, at best, 53% at ten years. If radiological failure is taken into account and lost to follow-up patients are counted as failures, “the worst case scenario”, the rate falls to 18% at ten years. A second important finding was that a large number of the patients were subjectively happy with their hip and had been discharged from clinical follow-up in spite of deteriorating radiographs We feel that this is a poor implant, which needs ongoing clinical and radiological review, and cannot recommend its further use.
We describe two patients who developed gluteal compartment syndrome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) carried out under epidural analgesic infusion and light sedation. To our knowledge, this occurrence has not been described previously after TKA.
A study was undertaken to determine whether a significantly different clinical outcome could be expected following nonoperative treatment of acute partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears from that of complete tears. A detailed follow-up of 107 patients with arthroscopically confirmed tears was obtained; 72 were complete tears and 35 partial. The overall results in those with partial tears were 23% excellent, 29% good, 17% fair, and 31% poor; with complete tears the results were 11% excellent, 20% good, 15% fair, and 54% poor. The patients with partial tears had a lower incidence of associated meniscal tears, needed fewer reconstructions and more of them returned to sport than those with complete tears.
