header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ROUTINE INTRA-OPERATIVE MICROBIOLOGICAL SAMPLES IN DIRECT EXCHANGES OF TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS. A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 100 CONSECUTIVE CASES WITH MINIMUM 1 YEAR FOLLOW UP



Abstract

Introduction: Direct exchange of total hip arthroplasty as a single stage revision procedure for aseptic loosening represents a significant proportion of the revision surgeon’s case load, accounting for 38% of cases in the Sheffield Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit. In our unit current practice is to obtain preoperative negative hip aspirates and normal inflammatory markers and take 5 intraoperative deep tissue samples for microbiological culture. The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate the necessity of this technique.

Method: 100 consecutive direct exchanges to total hip replacements for aseptic loosening performed in our unit between 03/10/2005 and 31/07/2007 were identified using the arthroplasty database and their case notes reviewed. The microbiological results were evaluated by a microbiology consultant and the notes were examined. A minimum of 1 year follow-up was obtained in all patients.

Results: 42 patients were found to have one or more positive sample. Of these 37 were deemed by the microbiologist to be contaminants and 5 to have a significant growth. Of the 5 with significant growth, 2 patients were treated with systemic antibiotics as a result of microbial tissue sample growth. At the latest follow up appointment (range 22–33 months) these 5 patients were all clinically not infected.

Conclusion: The practice of obtaining routine deep tissue samples is essential for revision surgery performed for aseptic loosening. 5% of patients in our series had a significant bacterial growth despite being presumed to be aseptic which would otherwise not have been detected. The support of a microbiologist with dedicated arthroplasty interest is vital in determining the relevance of sample results.

Correspondence should be addressed to BHS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.