Follow-up of arthroplasty varies widely across the UK. The aim of this NIHR-funded study was to employ a mixed-methods approach to examine the requirements for arthroplasty follow-up and produce evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations. It has been supported by BHS, BASK, BOA, ODEP and NJR. Four interconnected work packages have recently been completed: (1) a systematic literature review; (2a) analysis of routinely collected National Health Service data from four national data sets to understand when and which patients present for revision surgery; (2b) prospective data regarding how patients currently present for revision surgery; (3) economic modelling to simulate long-term costs and quality-adjusted life years associated with different follow-up care models and (4) a Delphi-consensus process, involving all stakeholders, to develop a policy document to guide appropriate follow-up care after primary hip and knee arthroplasty.
For ODEP10A∗ minimum implants, it is safe to disinvest in routine follow-up from 1 to 10 years post non-complex hip and knee replacement provided there is rapid access to orthopaedic review For ODEP10A∗ minimum implants in complex cases, or non-ODEP10A∗ minimum implants, periodic follow-up post hip and knee replacement may be required from 1 to 10 years At 10 years post hip and knee replacement, we recommend clinical, which may be virtual, and radiographic evaluation After 10 years post hip and knee replacement, frequency of further follow-up should be based on the 10-year assessment; ongoing rapid access to orthopaedic review is still required These recommendations apply to post primary hip and knee replacement follow-up The 10-year time point in these recommendations is based on a lack of robust evidence beyond ten years The term complex cases refer to individual patient and surgical factors that may increase the risk for replacement failure
Overarching statements
To calculate how the likelihood of obtaining measurable benefit from hip or knee arthroplasty varies with preoperative patient-reported scores. Existing UK data from 222,933 knee and 209,760 hip arthroplasty patients were used to model an individual’s probability of gaining meaningful improvement after surgery based on their preoperative Oxford Knee or Hip Score (OKS/OHS). A clinically meaningful improvement after arthroplasty was defined as ≥ 8 point improvement in OHS, and ≥ 7 in OKS.Aims
Methods
The number of surgical procedures performed each year to treat
femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) continues to rise. Although there
is evidence that surgery can improve symptoms in the short-term,
there is no evidence that it slows the development of osteoarthritis
(OA). We performed a feasibility study to determine whether patient
and surgeon opinion was permissive for a Randomised Controlled Trial
(RCT) comparing operative with non-operative treatment for FAI. Surgeon opinion was obtained using validated questionnaires at
a Specialist Hip Meeting (n = 61, 30 of whom stated that they routinely
performed FAI surgery) and patient opinion was obtained from clinical
patients with a new diagnosis of FAI (n = 31).Objectives
Methods
This study examines variations in knee arthroplasty patient reported outcome measures according to patient age. We analysed prospectively collected outcome data (OKS, Eq5D, satisfaction, and revision) on 2456 primary knee arthroplasty patients. Patients were stratified into defined age groups (< 55, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84, and ≥85 years). Oxford Knee Score and Eq5D were analysed pre-operatively, and postoperatively at 6 months and 2 years. Absolute scores and post-operative change in scores were calculated and compared between age groups. Satisfaction scores (0–100) were analysed at 6 months post-operatively. Linear, logistic and ordinal regression modelling was used to describe the association between age and outcomes, for continuous, binary and ordinal outcomes, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to describe revision rates at 2 years.Objectives
Methods
Hip arthroscopy is a relatively new procedure and evidence to support its use remains limited. Well-designed prospective clinical trials with long-term outcomes are required, but study design requires an understanding of current practice. Our aim was to determine temporal trends in the uptake of non-arthroplasty hip surgery in England between 2001 and 2011. Using procedure and diagnosis codes, we interrogated the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Database for all hip procedures performed between 2001 and 2011, excluding those relating to arthroplasty, tumour or infection. Osteotomy procedures were also excluded.Introduction
Methods
Subtle deformities of the acetabulum and proximal femur are recognised as biomechanical risk factors for the development of hip osteoarthritis (OA) as well as a cause of hip and groin pain. We undertook this study to examine relationships between a number of morphological measurements of the acetabulum and proximal femur and the hip pain in a 20-year longitudinal study. In 1989 women of 45–64 years of age were recruited. Each had an AP-Pelvis radiograph at Year-2. These radiographs were analysed using a validated programme for measuring morphology. All morphological measurements were read blinded to outcome. At year 3 all participants were asked whether they experienced hip pain (side specific). This was repeated at visits up to and including 20-years. Logistic regression analysis (with robust standard errors and clustering by subject identifier) was performed using hip pain as a binary outcome. The model adjusted for baseline age, BMI and joint space and included only participants who were pain free on initial questioning.Introduction
Methods
This study reports the mid-term results of a large bearing hybrid metal on metal total hip replacement (MOMHTHR) in 199 hips (185 patients) with mean follow up of 62 months. Clinical, radiological, metal ion and retrieval analysis were performed. Seventeen patients (8.6%) had undergone revision, and a further fourteen are awaiting surgery (defined in combination as failures). Twenty one (68%) failures were females. All revisions and ten (71%) awaiting revision were symptomatic. Twenty four failures (86%) showed progressive radiological changes. Fourteen revision cases showed evidence of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). The failure cohort had significantly higher whole blood cobalt ion levels (p=0.001), but no significant difference in cup size (p=0.77), inclination (p=0.38) or cup version (p=0.12) compared to the non revised cohort. Female gender was associated with increased risk of failure (p=0.04). Multifactorial analysis demonstrated isolated raised Co levels in the absence of symptoms or XR changes were not predictive of failure (p=0.675). However the presence of pain (p<0.001) and XR changes (p<0.001) in isolation were significant predictors of failure. Wear analysis (n=5) demonstrated increased wear at the trunnion/head interface (mean out of roundness measurements 34.5 microns (normal range 8–10 microns) with normal wear levels at the articulating surfaces. Macroscopically corrosion was evident at the proximal and distal stem surfaces. Cumulative survival rate, with revision for any reason was 92.4% (95%CI: 87.4–95.4) at 5 years. Including those awaiting surgery, the revision rate would be 15.1% with 89.6% (95% CI: 83.9–93.4). Cumulative survival at 5 years. This MOMHTHR series has demonstrated unacceptable high failure rates with evidence of high wear at the head/trunnion interface and passive corrosion to the stem surface. Female gender was an independent risk factor of failure. Metal ion levels remain a useful aspect of the investigation work up but in isolation are not predictive of failure.
This study describes the prevalence of pain, functional loss and rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in a general population cohort. It is the first multidisciplinary assessment in such a cohort. The Chingford cohort is a 19-year old longitudinal population study comprising 1003 women aged between 44 and 67 at baseline. To date 183 consecutive subjects (366) shoulders have been interviewed about their shoulders. Myometric strength assessment and high-definition ultrasound examination (US) have been performed on all shoulders. Additionally pain thresholds and perceptions of pain have been tested using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and a number of validated questionnaires, including the illness attitudes scale and the pain detect score.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
This study reports the mid-term results of a large bearing hybrid metal on metal total hip replacement (MOMHTHR) in 199 hips (185 patients) with mean follow up of 62 months. Clinical, radiological outcome, metal ion levels and retrieval analysis were performed. Seventeen patients (8.6%) had undergone revision, and a further fourteen are awaiting surgery (defined in combination as failures). Twenty one (68%) failures were females. All revisions and ten (71%) of those awaiting revision were symptomatic. Twenty four failures (86%) showed progressive radiological changes. Fourteen revision cases showed evidence of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). The failure cohort had significantly higher whole blood cobalt ion levels (p=0.001), but no significant difference in cup size (p=0.77), inclination (p=0.38) or cup version (p=0.12) in comparison to the non revised cohort. Female gender was associated with an increased risk of failure (chi squared p=0.04). Multifactorial analysis demonstrated isolated raised Co levels in the absence of either symptoms or XR changes was not predictive of failure (p=0.675). However both the presence of pain (p<0.001) and XR changes (p<0.001) in isolation were both significant predictors of failure. Wear analysis (n=5) demonstrated increased wear at the trunnion/head interface (mean out of roundness measurements of 34.5 microns +/−13.3 (+/−2SD, normal range 8-10 microns) with normal levels of wear at the articulating surfaces. There was evidence of corrosion at the proximal and distal stem surfaces. The cumulative survival rate, with revision for any reason was 92.4% (95%CI: 87.4-95.4) at 5 years. Including those awaiting surgery, the revision rate would be 15.1% with cumulative survival at 5 years of 89.6% (95% CI: 83.9-93.4). This MOMHTHR series has demonstrated unacceptable high failure rates with evidence of high wear at the head/trunnion interface and passive corrosion to the stem surface. This raises concern with the use of large heads on conventional 12/14 tapers. Female gender was an independent risk factor of failure. Metal ion levels remain a useful aspect of the investigation work up but in isolation are not predictive of failure.
To examine the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty with a pre-operative Oxford Knee Score >34 (‘good’/‘excellent’), and assess the appropriateness of surgical intervention for this group. In the current cost-constrained health economy, justification of surgical intervention is increasingly sought. As a validated disease-specific outcome measure, the pre-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) has been suggested as a possible threshold measurement in knee arthroplasty. However, contrary to expectations, analysis of pre-operative OKS in the joint registry population demonstrates a normal distribution curve with a sub-group of high-scoring patients. This suggests that either the baseline OKS does not accurately define surgical threshold, or that patients with a high OKS are inappropriately having knee replacements.Purpose
Background
The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a validated and widely used PROM that has been successfully used in assessing the outcome of knee arthroplasty (KA). It has been adopted as the nationally agreed outcome measure for this procedure and is now routinely collected. Increasingly, it is being used on an individual patient basis as a pre-operative measure of osteoarthritis and the need for joint replacement, despite not being validated for this use. The aim of this paper is to present evidence that challenges this new role for the OKS. We have analysed pre-operative and post-operative OKS data from 3 large cohorts all undergoing KA, totalling over 3000 patients. In addition we have correlated the OKS to patient satisfaction scores. We have validated our findings using data published from the UK NJR.Purpose
Method
Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee (anteromedial gonarthrosis-AMG) is a common form of knee arthritis. In a clinical setting, knee arthritis has always been assessed by plain radiography in conjunction with pain and function assessments. Whilst this is useful for surgical decision making in bone on bone arthritis, plain radiography gives no insight to the earlier stages of disease. In a recent study 82% of patients with painful arthritis had only partial thickness joint space loss on plain radiography. These patients are managed with various surgical treatments; injection, arthroscopy, osteotomy and arthroplasty with varying results. We believe these varying results are in part due to these patients being at different stages of disease, which will respond differently to different treatments. However radiography cannot delineate these stages. We describe the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings of this partial thickness AMG as a way of understanding these earlier stages of the disease. 46 subjects with symptomatic partial thickness AMG underwent MRI assessment with dedicated 3 Tesla sequences. All joint compartments were scored for both partial and full thickness cartilage lesions, osteophytes and bone marrow lesions (BML). Both menisci were assessed for extrusion and tear. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) integrity was also assessed. Osteophytes were graded on a four point scale in the intercondylar notch and the lateral margins of the joint compartments. Scoring was performed by a consultant radiologist and clinical research fellow using a validated MRI atlas with consensus reached for disagreements. The results were tabulated and relationships of the interval data assessed with linear by linear Chi2 test and Pearson's Correlation.Introduction
Method
To determine the use of oral anti-inflammatory drugs use in the year before and the two years after primary total hip (THR) or knee (TKR) replacement, and to assess whether this varied according to the Body mass Index (BMI). Population based retrospective case control study.Objective
Design
