Debridement, Antibiotics, Irrigation, and implant Retention (DAIR) is a surgical treatment protocol suitable for some patients with fracture related infection (FRI). Clinically relevant pre-clinical models of DAIR are scarce and none have been developed in large animals. Therefore, this project aimed to develop a large animal model for FRI including a DAIR approach and compare outcomes after 2 or 5 weeks of infection. Swiss Alpine sheep (Aim
Method
Proximal humeral fractures occur frequently, with fixed angle locking plates often being used for their treatment. However, the failure rate of this fixation is high, ranging between 10 and 35%. Numerous variables are thought to affect the performance of the fixation used, including the length and configuration of screws used and the plate position. However, there is currently limited quantitative evidence to support concepts for optimal fixation. The variations in surgical techniques and human anatomy make biomechanical testing prohibitive for such investigations. Therefore, a finite element osteosynthesis test kit has been developed and validated - SystemFix. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of variations in screw length, configuration and plate position on predicted failure risk of PHILOS plate fixation for unstable proximal humerus fractures using the test kit. Twenty-six low-density humerus models were selected and osteotomized to create a malreduced unstable three-part fracture AO/OTA 11-B3.2 with medial comminution which was virtually fixed with the PHILOS plate. In turn, four different screw lengths, twelve different screw configurations and five plate positions were simulated. Each time, three physiological loading cases were modelled, with an established finite element analysis methodology utilized to evaluate average peri-screw bone strain, this measure has been previously demonstrated to predict experimental fatigue fixation failure. All three core variables lead to significant differences in peri-screw strain magnitudes, i.e. predicted failure risk. With screw length, shortening of 4 mm in all screw lengths (the distance of the screw tips to the joint surface increasing from 4 mm to 8 mm) significantly (p < 0 .001) increased the risk of failure. In the lowest density bone, every additional screw reduced failure risk compared to the four-screw construct, whereas in more dense bone, once the sixth screw was inserted, no further significant benefit was seen (p=0.40). Screw configurations not including calcar screws, also demonstrated significant (p < 0 .001) increased risk of failure. Finally, more proximal plate positioning, compared to the suggested operative technique, was associated with reduced the predicted failure risk, especially in constructs using calcar screws, and distal positioning increased failure risk. Optimal fixation constructs were found when placing screws 4 mm from the joint surface, in configurations including calcar screws, in plates located more proximally, as these factors were associated with the greatest reduction in predicted fixation failure in 3-part unstable proximal humeral fractures. These results may help to provide practical recommendations on the implant usage for improved primary implant stability and may lead to better healing outcomes for osteoporotic proximal fracture patients. Whilst prospective clinical confirmation is required, using this validated computational tool kit enables the discovery of findings otherwise hidden by the variation and prohibitive costs of appropriately powered biomechanical studies using human samples.
The common practice for insertion of distal locking screws of intramedullary (IM) nails is a freehand technique under fluoroscopic control. The process is technically demanding, time-consuming and afflicted to considerable radiation exposure to patient and surgical personnel. A new technique is introduced which guides the surgeon by landmarks on the X-ray projection. 18 fresh frozen human below-knee specimens (incl. soft tissue) were used. Each specimen was instrumented with an Expert Tibial Nail (Synthes GmbH, Switzerland) and was mounted on an OR-table. Two distal interlocking techniques were performed in random order using a Siemens ARCADIS C-arm system (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). The newly developed guided technique, guides the surgeon by visible landmarks projected onto the fluoroscopy image. A computer program plans the drilling trajectory by 2D-3D conversion and provides said guiding landmarks for drilling in real-time. No additional tracking or navigation equipment is needed. All four distal screws (2 mediolateral, 2 anteroposterior) were placed in each procedure. Operating time, number of taken X-rays and radiation time were recorded per procedure and for each single screw. 8 procedures were performed with the freehand technique and 10 with the guided technique. A 58% reduction in number of fluoroscopy shots per screw was found for the guided technique (7.4±3.4 vs. 17.6±10.3; p < 0.001). Total radiation time was 55% lower for the guided technique (17.1 ± 3.7s vs. 37.9 ± 9.1s) (p = 0.001). Operating time was shorter by 22% in the guided technique (3.2±1.2 min vs. 4.1±2.1 min p = 0.018). In an experimental setting, the newly developed guided freehand technique has proven to markedly reduce radiation exposure when compared to the conventional freehand technique. The method enhances established clinical workflows and does not require cost intensive add-on devices or extensive training. A newly developed simple navigated technique has proven to markedly reduce radiation exposure and time for distal locking of intramedullary nails.
