Mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), although considered the gold standard, reportedly has up to 25% of patients expressing post-operative dissatisfaction. Biomechanical outcomes following kinematic alignment (KA) in TKA, developed to restore native joint alignment, remain unclear. Without a clear consensus for the optimal alignment strategy during TKA, the purpose of this study was to conduct a paired biomechanical comparison of MA and KA in TKA by experimentally quantifying joint laxity and medial collateral ligament (MCL) strain.

14 bilateral native fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs underwent medially-stabilised TKA (GMK Sphere, Medacta, Switzerland) using computed CT-based subject-specific guides, with KA and MA performed on left and right legs, respectively. Each specimen was subjected to sensor-controlled mediolateral laxity tests. A handheld force sensor (Mark-10, USA) was used to generate an abduction-adduction moment of 10Nm at the knee at fixed flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). A digital image correlation system was used to compute the strain on the superficial medial collateral ligament. A six-camera optical motion capture system (Vicon MX+, UK) was used to acquire kinematics using a pre-defined CT-based anatomical coordinate system. A linear mixed model and Tukey's posthoc test were performed to compare native, KA and MA conditions (p<0.05).

Unlike MA, medial joint laxity in KA was similar to the native condition; however, no significant difference was found at any flexion angle (p>0.08). Likewise, KA was comparable with the native condition for lateral joint laxity, except at 30°, and no statistical difference was observed. Although joint laxity in MA seemed lower than the native condition, this difference was significant only for 30° flexion (p=0.01). Both KA and MA exhibited smaller MCL strain at 0° and 30°; however, all conditions were similar at 60° and 90°.

Medial and lateral joint laxity seemed to have been restored better following KA than MA; however, KA did not outperform MA in MCL strain, especially after mid-flexion. Although this study provides only preliminary indications regarding the optimal alignment strategy to restore native kinematics following TKA, further research in postoperative joint biomechanics for load bearing conditions is warranted.

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been recently recognized as a distinct stabilizer for internal rotation in the ACL-deficient knee and it has been hypothesized that ALL reconstruction may play an important role in improving anterolateral instability following ACL reconstruction. Both the gracilis tendon (GT) and a portion of the iliotibial band (ITB) have been suggested as graft materials for ALL reconstruction, however, there is an ongoing debate concerning whether GT or ITB are appropriate grafting materials. Furthermore, there is limited knowledge in how the mechanical properties of these potential grafts compare to the native ALL. Consequently, the aim of this study was to characterize the elastic (Young's modulus and failure load) and viscoelastic (dynamic and static creep) mechanical properties of the ALL and compare these results with the characteristics of the grafting materials (GT and ITB), in order to provide guidance to clinicians with respect to graft material choice.

Fourteen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (85.2±12.2 yr) were obtained. The ALL, ITB, and the distal (GTD) and proximal gracilis tendons (GTP) (bisected at mid portion) were harvested from each donor and tested with a dynamic material testing frame. Prior to testing, the cross-sectional area of each tissue was measured using a casting method and the force required to achieve a min-max stress (1.2–12 MPa) for the testing protocol was calculated (preconditioning (20 cycles, 3–6 MPa), sinusoidal cycle (200 cycles, 1.2–12 MPa), dwell at constant load (100 s, 12 MPa), and load to failure (3%/s)). Kruskall-Wallis tests were used to compare all tissue groups (p<0.05).

The Young's modulus of both ALL (181.3±63.9 MPa) and ITB (357.6±94.4 MPa) are significantly lower than GTD (835.4±146.5 MPa) and GTP (725.6±227.1 MPa). In contrast, the failure load of ALL (124.5±40.9 N) was comparable with GTD (452.7±119.3 N) and GTP (433±133.7 N), however, significantly lower than ITB (909.6±194.7 N). Dynamic creep of the ALL (0.5±0.3 mm) and ITB (0.7±0.2 mm) were similar (p>0.05) whereas the GTD (0.26±0.06 mm) and GTP (0.28±0.1 mm) were significantly lower. Static creep progression of the ALL (1.09±0.4 %) was highest across all tissues, while GTD (0.24±0.05 %) and GTP (0.25±0.0.04 %) were lowest and comparable with ITB (0.3±0.07 %) creep progression.

Since grafts from the ITB, GTD and GTP were comparable to the ALL only for certain mechanical properties, there was no clear preference for using one over another for ALL reconstruction. Therefore, further studies should be performed in order to evaluate which parameters play a vital role to determine the optimum grafting choice.

Poor soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most primary causes of dissatisfaction and reduced joint longevity, which are associated with postoperative instability and early implant failure¹. Therefore, surgical techniques, including mechanical instruments and 3-D guided navigation systems, in TKA aim to achieve optimum soft tissue balancing in the knee to improve postoperative outcome². Patella-in-Place balancing (PIPB) is a novel technique which aims to restore native collateral ligament behaviour by preserving the original state without any release. Moreover, reduction of the joint laxity compensates for the loss of the visco-elastic properties of the cartilage and meniscus. Following its clinical success, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the PIPB technique on collateral ligament strain and laxity behaviour, with the hypothesis that PIPB would restore strains in the collateral ligaments³.

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric legs were obtained (KU Leuven, Belgium, H019 2015-11-04) and CT images were acquired while rigid marker frames were affixed into the femur, and tibia for testing. After carefully removing the soft tissues around the knee joint, while preserving the joint capsule, ligaments, and tendons, digital extensometers (MTS, Minnesota, USA) were attached along the length of the superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL). A handheld digital dynamometer (Mark-10, Copiague, USA) was used to apply an abduction or adduction moment of 10 Nm at fixed knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°. A motion capture system (Vicon Motion Systems, UK) was used to record the trajectories of the rigid marker frames while synchronized strain data was collected for MCL/LCL. All motion protocols were applied following TKA was performed using PIPB with a cruciate retaining implant (Stryker Triathlon, MI, USA). Furthermore, tibiofemoral kinematics were calculated⁴ and combined with the strain data. Postoperative tibial varus/valgus stresses and collateral ligament strains were compared to the native condition using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test (p<0.05).

Postoperative tibial valgus laxity was lower than the native condition for all flexion angles. Moreover, tibial valgus of TKA was significantly different than the native condition, except for 0° (p=0.32). Although, tibial varus laxity of TKA was lower than the native at all angles, significant difference was only found at 0° (p=0.03) and 90° (p=0.02). No significant differences were observed in postoperative collateral ligament strains, as compared to the native condition, for all flexion angles, except for MCL strain at 30° (p=0.02) and 60° (p=0.01).

Results from this experimental study supported our hypotheses, barring MCL strain in mid-flexion, which might be associated with the implant design. Restored collateral ligament strains with reduced joint laxity, demonstrated by the PIPB technique in TKA in vitro, could potentially restore natural joint kinematics, thereby improving patient outcomes.

In conclusion, to further prove the success of PIPB, further biomechanical studies are required to evaluate the success rate of PIPB technique in different implant designs.

Understanding the long-term effects of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on joint kinematics is vital to assess the success of the implant design and surgical procedure. However, while in vitro cadaveric studies quantifying post-operative biomechanics primarily reflect joint behaviour immediately after surgery,¹in vivo studies comprising of follow-up TKA patients often reflect joint behaviour a few months after surgery.² Therefore, the aim of this cadaveric study was to explore the long-term effects of TKA on tibiofemoral kinematics of a donor specimen, who had already undergone bilateral TKA, and compare them to post-operative kinematics reported in the literature.

Two fresh-frozen lower limbs from a single donor (male, age: 83yr, ht: 1.83m, wt: 86kg), who had undergone bilateral TKA (Genesis II, Smith&Nephew, Memphis, USA) 19 years prior to his demise, were obtained following ethical approval from the KU Leuven institutional board. The specimens were imaged using computed tomography (CT) and tested in a validated knee simulator³ replicating active squatting and varus-valgus laxity tests. Tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded using an optical motion capture system and compared to various studies in the literature using the same implant – experimental studies based on cadaveric specimens (CAD)^1,4 and an artificial specimen (ART)⁵, and a computational study (COM)⁶.

Maximum tibial abduction during laxity tests for the left leg (3.54°) was comparable to CAD (3.30°), while the right leg exhibited much larger joint laxity (8.52°). Both specimens exhibited valgus throughout squatting (left=2.03±0.57°, right=5.81±0.19°), with the change in tibial abduction over the range of flexion (left=1.89°, right=0.64°) comparable to literature (CAD=1.28°, COM=2.43°). The left leg was externally rotated (8.00±0.69°), while the right leg internally rotated (−15.35±1.50°), throughout squatting, with the change in tibial rotation over the range of flexion (left=2.61°, right=4.79°) comparable to literature (CAD=5.52°, COM=4.15°). Change in the femoral anteroposterior translation over the range of flexion during squatting for both specimens (left=14.88mm, right=6.76mm) was also comparable to literature (ART=13.40mm, COM=20.20mm).

Although TKA was reportedly performed at the same time on both legs of the donor by the same surgeon, there was a stark difference in their post-operative joint kinematics. A larger extent of intraoperative collateral ligament release could be one of the potential reasons for higher post-operative joint laxity in the right leg. Relative changes in post-operative tibiofemoral kinematics over the range of squatting were similar to those reported in the literature. However, differences between absolute magnitudes of joint kinematics obtained in this study and findings from the literature could be attributed to different surgeons performing TKA, with presumable variations in alignment techniques and/or patient specific instrumentation, and the slightly dissimilar ranges of knee flexion during squatting.

In conclusion, long-term kinematic effects of TKA quantified using in vitro testing were largely similar to the immediate post-operative kinematics reported in the literature; however, variation in the behaviour of two legs from the same donor suggested that intraoperative surgical alterations might have a greater effect on joint kinematics over time.

In-situ assessment of collateral ligaments strain could be key to improving total knee arthroplasty outcomes by improving the ability of surgeons to properly balance the knee intraoperatively. Ultrasound (US) speckle tracking methods have shown promise in their capability to measure in-situ soft tissue strain in large tendons but prior work has also highlighted the challenges that arise when attempting to translate these approaches to the in-situ assessment of collateral ligaments strain. Therefore, the aim of this project was to develop and validate an US speckle tracking method to specifically assess in-situ strains of both the MCL and LCL. We hypothesize that coefficients of determination (R²) would be above 0.90 with absolute differences below 0.50% strain for the comparison between US-based and the reference strain, with better results expected for the LCL compared with the MCL.

Five cadaveric legs with total knee implants (NH019 2017-02-03) were submitted to a varus (LCL) and valgus (MCL) ramped loading (0 – 40N). Ultrasound radiofrequency (rf) data and reference surface strains data, obtained with 3D digital image correlation (DIC), were collected synchronously. Prior to processing, US data were qualitatively assessed and specimens displaying substantial imaging artefacts were discarded, leaving five LCL and three MCL specimens in the analysis. Ultrasound rf data were processed in Matlab (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA) with a custom-built speckle tracking approach adapted from a method validated on larger tendons and based on normalized cross-correlation. Digital image correlation data were processed with commercial software VIC3D (Correlated Solutions, Inc., Columbia, SC). To optimize speckle tracking, several tracking parameters were tested: kernel and search window size, minimal correlation coefficient and simulated frame rate. Parameters were ranked according to three comparative measures between US- and DIC-based strains: R², mean absolute error and strains differences at 40N. Parameters with best average rank were considered as optimal.

To quantify the agreement between US- and DIC-based strain of each specimen, the considered metrics were: R², mean absolute error and strain differences at 40N. The LCL showed a good agreement with a high average R² (0.97), small average mean absolute difference (0.37%) and similar strains at 40N (DIC = 2.92 ± 0.10%; US = 2.99 ± 1.16%). The US-based speckle tracking method showed worse performance for the MCL with a lower average correlation (0.55). Such an effect has been observed previously and may relate to the difficulty in acquiring sufficient image quality for tracking the MCL compared to the LCL, which likely arises due to structural or mechanical differences; notably MCL is larger, thinner, more wrapped around the bone and stretches less. However, despite these challenges, the MCL tracking still showed small average mean absolute differences (0.44%) and similar strains at 40N (DIC = 1.48 ± 0.06%; US = 1.44 ± 1.89%).

We conclude that the ultrasound speckle tracking method developed is ready to be used as a tool to assess in-situ strains of LCL. Concerning the MCL strain assessment, despite some promising results in terms of strain differences, further work on acquisition could be beneficial to reach similar performance.

Orthopaedic training sessions, vital for surgeons to understand post-operative joint function, are primarily based on passive and subjective joint assessment. However, cadaveric knee simulators, commonly used in orthopaedic research,¹ could potentially benefit surgical training by providing quantitative joint assessment for active functional motions. The integration of cadaveric simulators in orthopaedic training was explored with recipients of the European Knee Society Arthroplasty Travelling Fellowship visiting our institution in 2018 and 2019. The aim of the study was to introduce the fellows to the knee joint simulator to quantify the surgeon-specific impact of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the dynamic joint behaviour, thereby identifying potential correlations between surgical competence and post-operative biomechanical parameters.

Eight fellows were assigned a fresh-frozen lower limb each to plan and perform posterior-stabilised TKA using MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation. Surgical competence was adjudged using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) adapted for TKA.² All fellows participated in the in vitro specimen testing on a validated knee simulator,³ which included motor tasks – passive flexion (0°-120°) and active squatting (35°-100°) – and varus-valgus laxity tests, in both the native and post-operative conditions. Tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded with an optical motion capture system and compared between native and post-operative conditions using a linear mixed model (p<0.05). The Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relationship between the OSATS scores for each surgeon and post-operative joint kinematics of the corresponding specimen (p<0.05).

OSATS scores ranged from 79.6% to 100% (mean=93.1, SD=7.7). A negative correlation was observed between surgical competence and change in post-operative tibial kinematics over the entire range of motion during passive flexion – OSATS score vs. change in tibial abduction (r=−0.87; p=0.003), OSATS score vs. change in tibial rotation (r=−0.76; p=0.02). When compared to the native condition, post-operative tibial internal rotation was higher during passive flexion (p<0.05), but lower during squatting (p<0.033). Post-operative joint stiffness was greater in extension than in flexion, without any correlation with surgical competence.

Although trained at different institutions, all fellows followed certain standard intraoperative guidelines during TKA, such as achieving neutral tibial abduction and avoiding internal tibial rotation,⁴ albeit at a static knee flexion angle. However, post-operative joint kinematics for dynamic motions revealed a strong correlation with surgical competence, i.e. kinematic variability over the range of passive flexion post-TKA was lower for more skilful surgeons. Moreover, actively loaded motions exhibited stark differences in post-operative kinematics as compared to those observed in passive motions. In vitro testing on the knee simulator also introduced the fellows to new quantitative parameters for post-operative joint assessment.

In conclusion, the inclusion of cadaveric simulators replicating functional joint motions could help quantify training paradigms, thereby enhancing traditional orthopaedic training, as was also the unanimous opinion of all participating fellows in their positive feedback.

Joint laxity assessments have been a valuable resource in order to understand the biomechanics and pathologies of the knee. Clinical laxity tests like the Lachman test, Pivot-shift test and Drawer test are, however, subjective of nature and will often only provide basic information of the joint. Stress radiography is another option for assessing knee laxity; however, this method is also limited in terms of quantifiability and one-dimensionality.

This study proposes a novel non-invasive low-dose radiation method to accurately measure knee joint laxity in 3D. A method that combines a force controlled parallel manipulator device, a medical image and a biplanar x-ray system.

As proof-of-concept, a cadaveric knee was CT scanned and subsequently mounted at 30 degrees of flexion in the device and placed inside a biplanar x-ray scanner. Biplanar x-rays were obtained for eleven static load cases.

The preliminary results from this study display that the device is capable of measuring primary knee laxity kinematics similar to what have been reported in previous studies. Additionally, the results also display that the method is capable of capturing coupled motions like internal/external rotation when anteroposterior loads are applied.

We have displayed that the presented method is capable of obtaining knee joint laxity in 3D. The method is combining concepts from robotic arthrometry and stress radiography into one unified solution that potentially enables unprecedented 3D joint laxity measurements non-invasively. The method potentially eliminates limitations present in previous methods and significantly reduces the radiation exposure of the patient compared to conventional stress radiography.