Sagittal pelvic tilt (SPT) can change with spinal pathologies and fusion. Change in the SPT can result in impingement and hip instability. Our aim was to determine the magnitude of the SPT change for hip instability to test the hypothesis that the magnitude of SPT change for hip instability is less than 10° and it is not similar for different hip motions. Hip implant motions were simulated in standing, sitting, sit-to-stand, bending forward, squatting and pivoting in Matlab software. When prosthetic head and liner are parallel, femoral head dome (FHD) faces the center of the liner. FHD moves toward the edge of the liner with hip motions. The maximum distance between the FHD and the center in each motion was calculated and analyzed. To make the results more reliable and to consider the possibility of bony impingement, when the FHD approached 90% of the distance between the liner-center and liner-edge, we considered the hip “in danger for dislocation”. The implant orientations and SPT were modified by 1-degree increments and we used linear regression with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) to determine the magnitude of SPT change that could cause instability.Introduction
Methods
Most of studies on Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) are focused on acetabular cup orientation. Even though the literature suggests that femoral anteversion and combined anteversion have a clinical impact on THA stability, there are not many reports on these parameters. Combined anteversion can be considered morphologically as the addition of anatomical acetabular and femoral anteversions (Anatomical Combined Anatomical Anteversion ACA). It is also possible to evaluate the Combined Functional Anteversion (CFA) generated by the relative functional position of femoral and acetabular implants while standing. This preliminary study is focused on the comparison of the anatomical and functional data in asymptomatic THA patients. 50 asymptomatic unilateral THA patients (21 short stems and 29 standard stems) have been enrolled. All patients underwent an EOS low dose evaluation in standing position. SterEOS software was used for the 3D measurements of cup and femur orientation. Cup anatomical anteversion (CAA) was computed as the cup anteversion in axial plane perpendicular to the Anterior Pelvic Plane. Femoral anatomical anteversion (FAA) was computed as the angle between the femoral neck axis and the posterior femoral condyles in a plane perpendicular to femoral mechanical axis. Functional anteversions for the cup (CFA) and femur (FFA) were measured in the horizontal axial patient plane in standing position. Both anatomical and functional cumulative anteversions were calculated as a sum. All 3D measures were evaluated and compared for the repeatability and reproducibility Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney U-test considering the non-normal distribution of data and the short number of patients (<30 for each group).Introduction
Material and methods
Minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity in recent years as better postoperative functional recovery and lower risk of postoperative dislocation are claimed. However, difficulties for femur exposure and intraoperative complications during femoral canal preparation and component placement have been reported. This study analyzes the anatomical factors likely to be related with intraoperative complications and the difficulties of access noted by the surgeons through a modified minimally invasive ALA. The aim is to define the profile for patient at risk of intraoperative complications during minimally invasive ALA. We retrospectively included 310 consecutive patients (100 males, 210 females) who had primary unilateral THA using the same technique in all cases. The approach was performed between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteus medius and minimus, without incising or detaching muscles and tendons. Posterior translation was combined to external rotation for proximal femur exposure (Fig. 1). All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically. For the radiological evaluation, all patients underwent pre- and postoperative standing and sitting full-body EOS acquisitions. Pelvic [Sacral slope, Pelvic incidence (PI), Anterior pelvic plane angle] and femoral parameters were measured preoperatively. We assessed all intraoperative and postoperative complications for femoral preparation and implantation. Intraoperative complications included the femoral fractures and difficulties for femoral exposure (limitations for exposure and lateralization of the proximal femur). The patients were divided into two groups: patients with or without intraoperative complications.Purpose
Methods
Limb-length discrepancy (LLD) is a common postoperative complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study focuses on the correlation between patients’ perception of LLD after THA and the anatomical and functional leg length, pelvic and knee alignments and foot height. Previous publications have explored this topic in patients without significant spinal pathology or previous spine or lower extremity surgery. The objective of this work is to verify if the results are the same in case of stiff or fused spine. 170 patients with stiff spine (less than 10° L1-S1 lordosis variation between standing and sitting) were evaluated minimum 1 year after unilateral primary THA implantation using EOS® images in standing position (46/170 had previous lumbar fusion). We excluded cases with previous lower limbs surgery or frontal and sagittal spinal imbalance. 3D measures were performed to evaluate femoral and tibial length, femoral offset, pelvic obliquity, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), knee flexion/hyperextension angle, tibial and femoral rotation. Axial pelvic rotation was measured as the angle between the line through the centers of the hips and the EOS x-ray beam source. The distance between middle of the tibial plafond and the ground was used to investigate the height of the foot. For data with normal distribution, paired Student's t-test and independent sample t-test were used for analysis. Univariate logistic regression was used to determine the correlation between the perception of limb length discrepancy and different variables. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the correlation between the patient perception of LLD and variables found significant in the univariate analysis. Significance level was set at 0.05.Introduction
Methods
Post op cup anatomical and functional orientation is a key point in THP patients regarding instability and wear. Recently literature has been focused on the consequences of the transition from standing to sitting regarding anteversion, frontal and sagittal inclination. Pelvic incidence (PI) is now considered as a key parameter for the analysis of sagittal balance and sacral slope (SS) orientation. It's influence on THP biomechanics has been suggested. Interestingly, the potential impact of this morphological angle on cup implantation during surgery and the side effects on post op functional orientation have not been studied. Our study explores this topic from a series of standing and sitting post-op EOS images 310 patients (mean age 63,8, mean BMI 30,2) have been included prospectively in our current post-operative EOS protocol. All patients were operated with the same implants and technique using anterior approach in lateral decubitus. According to previous literature, 3 groups were defined: low PI less than 45° (57 cases), high PI if more than 60° (63 cases), and standard PI in 190 other cases.Introduction
Material and methods
Postural change after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still a matter of discussion. Previous studies have mainly concentrated on the pelvic motions. We report the postoperative changes of the global sagittal posture using pelvic, spinal and lower extremities parameters. 139 patients (primary THA, without previous spinal or lower extremity surgery) were included. We measured pelvic parameters [SS: Sacral Slope, PI: Pelvic Incidence, PT: Pelvic Tilt, APP angle: Anterior Pelvic Plane angle] and the global posture parameters (SVA: Sagittal Vertical Angle, GSA: Global Sagittal Angle, TPA: T1 pelvic angle). Patients were categorized into low PI group <45°, 45°< medium PI <65° and high PI >65°.Background
Methods
Spatial orientation of the pelvis in the sagittal plane is a key parameter for hip function. Pelvic extension (or retroversion) and pelvic flexion(or anteversion) are currently assessed using Sacral Slope (SS) evaluation (respectively SS decrease and SS increase). Pelvic retroversion may be a risk situation for THA patients. But the magnitude of SS is dependant on the magnitude of pelvic incidence (PI) and may fail to discriminate pelvic position due to patient's anatomy and the potential adaptation mechanisms: a high PI patient has a higher SS but this situation can hide an associated pelvic extension due to compensatory mechanisms of the pelvic area. A low PI patient has a lower SS with less adaptation possibilities in case of THA especially in aging patients. The individual relative pelvic version (RPV) is defined as the difference between « measured SS » (SSm) minus the « normal SS »(SSn) described for the standard population. The aim of the study was to evaluate RPV in standing and sitting position with a special interest for high and low PI patients. 96 patients without THA (reference group) and 96 THA patients were included. Pelvic parameters (SS and PI) were measured on standing and sitting EOS images. RPV standing (SSm-SSn) was calculated using the formula SSm – (9 + 0.59 × PI) according to previous publications. SSn in sitting position was calculated according to PI using linear regression: RPV sitting was calculated using the formula RPV = SS – (3,54+ 0,38 × PI). Three subgroups were defined according to pelvic incidence (PI): low PI <45°, 45°<normal PI<65° or high PI>65°.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Literature describes pelvic rotation on lateral X rays from standing to sitting position. EOS full body lateral images provide additional information about the global posture. The projection of the vertical line from C7 (C7 VL) is used to evaluate the spine balance. C7 VL can also measure pelvic sagittal translation (PST) by its horizontal distance to the hip center (HC). This study evaluates the impact of a THA implantation on pelvic rotation and sagittal translation. Lumbo-pelvic parameters of 120 patients have been retrospectively assessed pre and post- operatively on both standing and sitting acquisitions (primary unilateral THA without complication). PST is zero when C7VL goes through the center of the femoral heads and positive when C7VL is posterior to the hips' center (negative if anterior). Three subgroups were defined according to pelvic incidence (PI): low PI <45°, 45°<normal PI<65° or high PI>65°.Introduction
Materials and Method
Few studies are published about total hip arthroplasties (THA) in Parkinson's disease as it is often considered as a contraindication for hip replacement. THA for fracture is reported as a high complication rate surgery. Regarding bone quality these cases are assimilated to elderly patients and cemented implants are generally preferred. However, due to the improved length and quality of life, we face more potential indications for joint replacement. The aim of this study is to report our experience of cementless dual mobility implants for primary THAs for osteoarthrosis and THA revisions focusing on the risks and benefits of surgery. 65 THA were performed in 59 patients (34 men, 25 women, mean age 73 years, 55–79). Mean latest follow-up was 8,3 years (4–14). Indications were 42 primary THA (osteoarthrosis) and 21 revisions (11 recurrent dislocation, 6 acetabular PE wear, 4 femoral loosening). Surgical approach was always antero-lateral. All patients were implanted with the same dual mobility cementless cup. The same cementless corail-type stem was used for primary THA cases. All the cemenless implants were hydroxyapatite coated. The disability caused by the disease was classified according to Hoehn and Yahr. (19 stage 1, 21 stage 2,16 stage 3)Introduction
Material and methods
Optimal implant position is critical to hip stability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent literature points out the importance of the evaluation of pelvic position to optimize cup implantation. The concept of Functional Combined Anteversion (FCA), the sum of acetabular/cup anteversion and femoral/stem neck anteversion in the horizontal plane, can be used to plan and control the setting of a THA in standing position. The main purpose of this preliminary study is to evaluate the difference between the combined anteversion before and after THA in weight-bearing standing position using EOS 3D reconstructions. A simultaneous analysis of the preoperative lumbo pelvic parameters has been performed to investigate their potential influence on the post-operative reciprocal femoro-acetabular adaptation. 66 patients were enrolled (unilateral primary THAs). The same mini-invasive anterolateral approach was performed in a lateral decubitus for all cases. None of the patients had any postoperative complications. For each case, EOS full-body radiographs were performed in a standing position before and after unilateral THA. A software prototype was used to assess pelvic parameters (sacral slope, pelvic version, pelvic incidence), acetabular / cup anteversion, femoral /stem neck anteversion and combined anteversion in the patient horizontal functional plane (the frontal reference was defined as the vertical plane passing through centers of the acetabula or cups). Sub-analysis was made, grouping the sample by pelvic incidence (<55°, 55°–65°, >65°) and by pre-operative sacral slope in standing position (<35°, 35°–45°, >45°). Paired t-test was used to compare differences between preoperative and postoperative parameters within each subgroup. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Introduction
Material and Methods
Understanding hip-spine relationships and accurate evaluation of the pelvis position are key- points for the optimization of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip surgeons know the importance of pelvic parameters and the adaptation mechanisms of pelvic and sub-pelvic areas. Literature about posture after THA remains controversial and adaptations are difficult to predict. One explanation can be the segmental analysis focused on pelvic parameters and local planning. In a significant number of patients a global analysis may be important as a cascade of compensatory mechanisms is implemented, the hip being only one of the links of this chain reaction. 3 parameters can be measured on full body images: SVA (sagittal vertical axis) : horizontal distance between the vertical line through the center of C7 and the postero-superior edge of S1. T1 pelvic angle (TPA) : line from femoral heads to T1center and line from the femoral heads to S1center. TPA combines informations from both the sagittal vertical axis and pelvic tilt. Global Sagittal Angle (GSA) : line from the midpoint of distal femoral condyles to C7 center and line from the midpoint between distal femoral condyles to the postero-superior S1corner. The objective of this preliminary study is to report the post-operative evolution of posture after THA. 49 patients (28 women, 21 men, mean age 61 years) were enrolled for full-body standing EOS images before and after THA. The sterEOS software was used to measure pelvic parameters (sacral slope SS, pelvic incidence PI) and global postural parameters (TPA, GSA, SVA). Sub-analysis was made, grouping the sample by TPA (<14°, 14°–22°, >22°), by PI (<55°, 55°–65°, >65°) and by SS (<35°, 35°–45°, >45°). Paired t-test was used to compare differences between preoperative and postoperative parameters within each subgroup. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Introduction
Material and Method
Rottinger published a description of an anterior muscle sparing approach to the hip. It utilizes the same muscle interval as the classic WatsonJones approach between the gluteus medius laterally and tensor fascia lata medially. However, this technique has the disadvantage of needing asplit table and a sterile bag to mobilize the operative leg as extension, adduction and external rotation are the key points for femoral preparation. This study describes our experience for an equivalent of the Watson Jones approach with a simplified technique for the femoral preparation. Incision starts 1cm distal and 3cm posterior to the ASIS and continues distally for about 8–10 cm along the straightline joining the lateral edge of the patella. It can be extended proximally or distally if necessary. The surgeon is placed posteriorly and the assistant anteriorly. The hip is dislocated with extension and external rotation to osteotomize the femoral neck. During the preparation of the acetabulum the femur is pushed posteriorly with internal rotation. Steinman pins are placed around the acetabulum to improve visualization for reaming and implanting theacetabular components. The femur is then exposed in a simplified way. The operated limb remains on the table. It is adducted above the contralateral limb and rotated outward to allow the femoral metaphysis to protrude. The foot is placed on the edge of the table beside the assistant, the knee is maintained with 45° flexion. The hip capsule is released postero-laterally to improve the femur exposure using Hohman retractors without cutting the short external rotator muscles. Femoral preparation is performed in this position. Once the appropriate implant is selected, the desired head trials are placed. The hip is reduced and the length and stability can be checked with the leg free. In case of isolated cup revision, the femoral head can be conserved. In case of femoral revision, a femorotomy can be easily performed due to the possibility of extended and stable exposure of the femur. Table 1 summarizes the main data of the series.Introduction
Material and Methods
The combination of spinal fusion and THP is not exceptional. Disorders of the pelvic tilt and stiffness of the lumbosacral junction modify the adaptation options while standing or sitting. Adjusting the cup can be difficult and THP instability is a potential risk. This study reports an experience with EOS® simultaneous measurements on AP and lateral views of spine and hips in THP patients. 29 men and 45 women were included in this prospective study. 21cases had bilateral THP. Patients were separated into two groups: long fusions including the thoraco-lumbar junction (group 1) and shorter fusions below L1 (group 2). We analyzed the impact of the arthrodesis on the position of the pelvis by measuring variations of the sacral slope (SS) and APP angle. Cup position was defined by coronal inclination and functional anteversion in the horizontal plane standing and sitting. We compared the data to a previous series of 150 THP patients with asymptomatic and non fused spine.Introduction
Material and methods
The assessment of leg length is essential for planning the correction of deformities and for the compensation of length discrepancy, especially after hip or knee arthroplasty. CT scan measures the “anatomical” lengths but does not evaluate the “functional” length experienced by the patients in standing position. Functional length integrates frontal orientation, flexion or hyperextension. EOS system provides simultaneously AP and lateral measures in standing position and thus provides anatomical and functional evaluations of the lower limb lengths. The objective of this study was to measure 2D and 3D anatomical and functional lengths, to verify whether these measures are different and to evaluate the parameters significantly influencing these potential differences 70 patients without previous surgery of the lower limbs (140 lower extremities) were evaluated on EOS images obtained in bipodal standing position according to a previously described protocol. We used the following definitions: anatomical femoral length between the center of the femoral head (A) and center of the trochlea (B) anatomical tibial length between the center tibial spine (intercondylar eminence) (C) and the center of the ankle joint (D) functional length is AD global anatomical length is AB + CD Other parameters measured are HKA, HKS, femoral and tibial mechanical angles (FMA, TMA), angles of flexion or hyperextension of the knee, femoral and tibial torsion, femoro-tibial torsion in the knee, and cumulative torsional index (CTI). All 2D et3D measures were evaluated and compared for their repeatability.Introduction
Material and Methods
The gold standard for knee surgery is the restoration of the so-called «neutral mechanical alignment ». Recent literature as pointed out the patients with «constitutional varus »; in these cases, restoring neutral alignment could be abnormal and even undesirable. The same situation can be observed in patients with «constitutional valgus alignment ». To date, these outliers cases have only been explored focusing on the lower limb; the influence of the pelvic morphotype has not been studied. Intuitively, the pelvic width could be a significant factor. The EOS low dose imaging technique provides full body standing X-rays to evaluate the global anatomy of the patient. This work explores the influence of the pelvic parameters on the frontal knee alignment. – We included 170 patients (340 lower extremities). 2 operators performed measurements once per patient on AP X-rays. The classical anatomical parameters were: Femoral mechanical angle (FMA) Tibial mechanical angle (TMA) Hip knee shaft angle (HKS) Hip knee ankle angle (HKA) Femoral and tibial lengths The morphotype was evaluated by: the distances between the center of two femoral heads (FHD), between knees (KD) and between ankles (AD) the medial neck-shaft angle (MNSA) the femoral offset The horizontal distance between the limb mechanical axis (line passing from center of the femoral head to the center of the ankle) and the center of the knee was called the intrinsic mechanical axis deviation (IMAD) (fig 1). The horizontal distance between the pelvic mechanical axis (line from the center of the sacral plate to the center of the ankle) and the center of the knee was called the global mechanical axis deviation (GMAD) (fig 2). Inter-Operator Reliability was calculated with Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Inter-Reader Agreement was assessed with Bland-Altman test. A relationship between IMAD and GMAD to the other parameters was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.Introduction
Material and methods
Coronal misalignment of the lower limbs is closely related to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. In cases of severe genu varus or valgus, evaluating this alignment can assist in choosing specific surgical strategies. Furthermore, restoring satisfactory alignment after total knee replacement promotes longevity of the implant and better functional results. Knee coronal alignment is typically evaluated with the Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle. It is generally measured on standing AP long-leg radiographs (LLR). However, patient positioning influences the accuracy of this 2D measurement. A new 3D method to measure coronal lower limb alignment using low-dose EOS images has recently been developed and validated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relevance of this technique when determining knee coronal alignment in a referral population, and more specifically to evaluate how the HKA angle measured with this 3D method differs from conventional 2D methods. 70 patients (140 lower extremities) were studied for 2D and 3D lower limb alignment measurements. Each patient received AP monoplane and biplane acquisition of their entire lower extremities on the EOS system according the classical protocols for LLR. For each patient, the HKA angle was measured on this AP X-ray with a 2D viewer. The biplane acquisition was used to perform stereoradiographic 3D modeling. Valgus angulation was considered positive, varus angulation negative. Student's T-test was used to determine if there was a bias in the HKA angle measurement between these two methods and to assess the effect of flexion/hyperextension, femoral rotation and tibial rotation on the 2D measurements. One operator did measurements 2 times.Introduction
Materials and methods
The position and orientation of the lower extremities are fundamental for planning and follow-up imaging after arthroplasty and lower extremity osteotomy. But no studies have reported the reproducibility of measurements over time in the same patient, and experience shows variability of the results depending on the protocols for patient positioning. This study explores the reproducibility of measurements in the lower extremity with the patients in “comfortable standing position” by the EOS® imaging system. Two whole-body acquisitions were performed in each of 40 patients who were evaluated for a spine pathology. The average interval between acquisitions was 15 months (4–35 months). Patients did not have severe spine pathology and did not undergo any surgery between acquisitions. The “comfortable standing position” is achieved without imposing on the patient any specific position of the lower limbs and pelvis. All the measurements were performed and compared in both 2- and 3-dimensional images. Distances between the centers of the femoral heads and between the centers of the knees and ankles were measured from the front. The profile is shown by the flexion angle between the axis of the femur (center of the femoral head and the top of the line Blumensaat) and the axis of the tibia.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Accurate evaluation of femoral offset is difficult with conventional anteroposterior (AP) X-rays. Routine CT imaging is costly and exposes patients to a significant dose of radiation. The EOS® imaging system is an innovative slot-scanning radiography system that makes possible the acquisition of simultaneous and orthogonal AP and lateral images of the patient in standing position. These 2-dimensional (2D) images are equivalent to standard plane X-rays. Three-dimension (3D) reconstructions are obtained from these paired images according to a validated protocol. This prospective study explores for the first time the value of the EOS® imaging system for comparing measurements of femoral offset obtained from 2D images and 3D reconstructions. Following our standard protocol, we included a series of 100 patients with unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). The 2D offset was measured on the AP view with the same protocol as for standard X-rays. The 3D offset was calculated from the reconstructions based on the orthogonal AP and lateral views. Reproducibility and repeatability studies were conducted for each measurement. We compared the 2D and 3D offsets for both hips (with and without THA).Introduction
Materials and Methods
Femoral stem anteversion after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has always been assessed using CT scan in supine position. In this study, we evaluated the anteversion of the femoral prosthesis neck in functional standing position using EOS® technology with repeatability and reproducibility of the measurements. The data obtained were compared with conventional anatomic measurements. We measured the anteversion of the femoral prosthesis neck in 45 consecutive patients who had THA performed in nine hospitals. All measurements were obtained using the EOS® imaging system with patients in comfortable standing position. The orientation of the final vector representing the femoral neck was measured on 3-dimensional reconstructions. The anatomic femoral anteversion was calculated as in a transverse plane relative to the scanner and to the plane of the reconstructed bicondylar femoral segment (femoral prosthesis neck against the femoral condyles). Functional femoral anteversion (FFA) was measured in the horizontal plane relative to the frontal plane of the patient through the center of two femoral heads. FFA embodies true anteversion of the femoral prosthesis neck relative to the pelvis, representing the combined lower extremity anteversion.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The routine use of posterior hip dislocation precautions is typically utilized postoperatively following total hip arthroplasty via a posterior surgical approach. This has included use of an abduction pillow and limiting adduction, internal rotation and flexion more than 90 degrees for a minimum of 6 weeks postoperatively. This may slow the course of rehabilitation, increase the length of hospital stay and the total cost of the procedure, and add additional anxiety to the patient. We conducted this study to see if posterior hip precautions are necessary after total hip arthroplasty via a posterior approach when the hip meets certain intraoperative criteria for stability. All patients in our institute undergo routine hip stability testing during primary total hip arthroplasty via a posterior approach. Before October 2010, all of our primary total hip arthroplasty patients were placed on routine hip precautions. We stopped hip precautions in October 2010 for all the patients who were noted to meet hip stability criteria intraoperatively. We prospectively compared the consecutive patients who underwent this procedure without hip precautions with a retrospective control group of patients who had hip precautions.Introduction:
Methods and Materials:
