Abstract
Introduction
Understanding hip-spine relationships and accurate evaluation of the pelvis position are key- points for the optimization of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip surgeons know the importance of pelvic parameters and the adaptation mechanisms of pelvic and sub-pelvic areas. Literature about posture after THA remains controversial and adaptations are difficult to predict. One explanation can be the segmental analysis focused on pelvic parameters and local planning.
In a significant number of patients a global analysis may be important as a cascade of compensatory mechanisms is implemented, the hip being only one of the links of this chain reaction.
3 parameters can be measured on full body images:
-
SVA (sagittal vertical axis) : horizontal distance between the vertical line through the center of C7 and the postero-superior edge of S1.
-
T1 pelvic angle (TPA) : line from femoral heads to T1center and line from the femoral heads to S1center. TPA combines informations from both the sagittal vertical axis and pelvic tilt.
-
Global Sagittal Angle (GSA) : line from the midpoint of distal femoral condyles to C7 center and line from the midpoint between distal femoral condyles to the postero-superior S1corner.
The objective of this preliminary study is to report the post-operative evolution of posture after THA.
Material and Method
49 patients (28 women, 21 men, mean age 61 years) were enrolled for full-body standing EOS images before and after THA. The sterEOS software was used to measure pelvic parameters (sacral slope SS, pelvic incidence PI) and global postural parameters (TPA, GSA, SVA).
Sub-analysis was made, grouping the sample by TPA (<14°, 14°–22°, >22°), by PI (<55°, 55°–65°, >65°) and by SS (<35°, 35°–45°, >45°). Paired t-test was used to compare differences between preoperative and postoperative parameters within each subgroup. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
TPA, SVA and GSA may change independently following THA surgery.
In the 2 groups with TPA< 19° and 14° <TPA< 22°, GSA and SVA decreased significantly after THA (p < 0.05). The difference was not significant in the group with TPA>22°.
In the group with SS between 35° and 45°, the GSA and SVA decreased after THA (p < 0.05). In the group with SS > 45° only GSA decreased. In the group with PI < 55°, GSA and SVA decreased after THA. There was no significant change in the remaining subgroups.
Discussion
This preliminary study confirms a decrease of GSA and SVA after THA. Some preoperative characteristics are observed in patients with significant global sagittal postural modifications: low to standard TPA, low PI or standard to high SS.
Conclusion
Planning and prediction of sagittal postural changes after THA implantation is challenging. It is an important topic in patients with stiff and degenerative spine or in case of spinal fusion. In case of complex hipspine cases, the timing of the procedures can be a real concern. The combined analysis of SVA, TPA and GSA may open new perspectives for a more rationale planning of THA.
