Reaming of the acetabular cavity prior to cementless cup implantation aims to create a defined press-fit between implant and bone. The goal is to achieve full implant seating with the desired press-fit to reduce the risk of early cup loosening and the risk of excessive cup deformation. Current research concentrated on the spherical deviations of the reamed cavity compared to the reamer size, but the direct relationship between nominal press-fit, reamer geometry, cavity shape and bone-implant contact has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the reaming process, the surface coating, and the implantation force on the achieved press-fit situation. Fresh-frozen porcine acetabulae (n = 20) were prepared and embedded. Hemispherical reamers were used and the last reaming step was performed using a vertical drilling machine to ensure a proper alignment of the cavity axis. A hand-guided 3D laser scanner was used (HandySCAN 700, Creaform) to determine the reamer geometry and the cavity shape. Press-fit cups with two different surface coatings (Ø44 mm, Porocoat/Gription, DePuy Synthes) were implanted using a drop tower. The Porocoat cup was implanted with impacts from lower drop heights (low implantation force) and press-fits of 1 mm and 2 mm. The Gription cup, exhibiting a rougher surface, was implanted with low and high implantation forces and a press-fit of 1 mm. Bone-implant contact was analysed by the registration of the cup and cavity surface models, scanned prior to implantation, to the scan of the implanted cup. The cup surface was divided in areas with and without contact to the surrounding cavity. Overhang indicates that there was no adjacent cavity surface surrounding the implanted cup. The transition between contact and a gap at the cup dome was defined as contact depth and used as indicator for the cup seating.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
The aim of this study was to estimate the 90-day risk of revision for periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with design features of cementless femoral stems, and to investigate the effect of a collar on this risk using a biomechanical A total of 337 647 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) from the United Kingdom National Joint Registry (NJR) were included in a multivariable survival and regression analysis to identify the adjusted hazard of revision for periprosthetic fracture following primary THA using a cementless stem. The effect of a collar in cementless THA on this risk was evaluated in an Aims
Materials and Methods
Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) are a devastating complication associated with high mortality and are costly. Few risk factors are modifiable apart from implant choice. The design features governing risk of PFF are unknown. We estimated the 90-day risk of revision for PFF associated with design features of cementless femoral stems and to investigate the effect of a collar on early PFF risk using a biomechanical in-vitro model. 337 647 primary THAs from the National Joint Registry (UK) were included in a multivariable survival and regression analysis to identify the adjusted hazard of PFF revision following primary THA using cementless stems. The effect of a collar in cementless THA on early PFF was evaluated in an in-vitro model using paired fresh frozen cadaveric femora.Background
Patients, materials and methods
Loosening is a major cause for revision in uncemented hip prostheses due to insufficient primary stability. Primary stability after surgery is achieved through press-fit in an undersized cavity. Cavity preparation is performed either by extraction (removing bone) or compaction (crushing bone) broaching. Densification of trabecular bone has been shown to enhance primary stability in human femora; however, the effect of clinically used compaction and extraction broaches on human bone with varying bone mineral density (BMD) has not yet been quantified. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the broach design and BMD on the level of densification at the bone-cavity interface, stem seating, the bone-implant contact area and the press-fit achieved. Paired human femora (m/f=11/12, age=60±18 y) were scanned with quantitative computed tomography (QCT, Philips Brilliance 16) before broaching, with the final broach, after its removal and after stem implantation. Compaction broaching (n=4) was compared in an INTRODUCTION
METHODS
The restoration of the anatomical hip rotation center (HRC) has a major influence on the longevity of hip prostheses. Deviations from the HRC of the anatomical joint after total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to increased hip joint forces, early wear or loosening of the implant. The contact conditions of acetabular press-fit cups after implantation, including the degree of press-fit, the existence of a polar gap and cup orientation, may affect the HRC restoration, and therefore implant stability. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of acetabular press-fit, polar gap and cup orientation on HRC restoration during THA. THAs were performed by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon in full cadaveric models simulating real patient surgery (n=7). Acetabular cups with a Porocoat™ (n=3) and Gription™ surface coating (n=4) were implanted (DePuy Synthes, Leeds, UK). Computed tomography (CT) scans prior to surgery, as well as after reaming and implantation of press-fit cups were used to calculate the HRC displacement. After aligning the pelves in the anterior pelvic plane, 3D reconstruction of the HRC at each stage was performed by fitting spheres to the femoral head, the reamed cavity and the inserted cup. 3D surface models of the cups were generated using a laser scanner and were registered to the CT images. The effective press-fit was calculated using the diameters of spheres, fitted to the cavity prior to cup insertion and to the outer cup coating. The polar gap was defined as the difference between the outer cup surface and the subchondral bone at the cup pole. Anteversion and abduction angles were calculated as difference between the cup planes and the sagittal and transverse plane, respectively.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
