Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Loosening is a major cause for revision in uncemented hip prostheses due to insufficient primary stability. Primary stability after surgery is achieved through press-fit in an undersized cavity. Cavity preparation is performed either by extraction (removing bone) or compaction (crushing bone) broaching. Densification of trabecular bone has been shown to enhance primary stability in human femora; however, the effect of clinically used compaction and extraction broaches on human bone with varying bone mineral density (BMD) has not yet been quantified. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the broach design and BMD on the level of densification at the bone-cavity interface, stem seating, the bone-implant contact area and the press-fit achieved.
METHODS
Paired human femora (m/f=11/12, age=60±18 y) were scanned with quantitative computed tomography (QCT, Philips Brilliance 16) before broaching, with the final broach, after its removal and after stem implantation. Compaction broaching (n=4) was compared in an in situ (cadaver) study against extraction broaching with blunt tooth types (n=3); in an ex situ (excised femora) study, compaction broaching was compared against extraction broaching with sharp tooth types (n=8 each). QCT data were resampled to voxel sizes of 1×1×1 mm (in situ) and 0.5×0.5×1 mm (ex situ). Mean trabecular BMD of the proximal femur was determined. The cavity volumes were segmented in the post-broach images (threshold: −250 mgHA/cm3, Avizo 9.2) and a volume of interest (VOI) of one-voxel thickness was added around the cavity to capture the interfacial bone. VOIs were transferred to the pre-broach image and bone densification was calculated within each VOI as the increase from pre- to post-broach image (MATLAB). Detailed surface data sets of broaches and stems were collected with a 3D laser-scanner (Creaform Handyscan 700) and aligned with the segmented components in the CT scans (Fig. 1). Stem seating was defined as the difference between the top edge of the stem coating and the final broach. Distance maps between the stem and cavity surface were generated to determine the bone-implant contact area and press-fit. All parameters were analysed between 5 mm distal to the coating and 1 cm distal to the lesser trochanter and analysed with related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank and Spearman's correlation tests (IBM SPSS Statistics 22).
RESULTS
Trabecular BMD ranged from 81 to 221 mgHA/cm3. Densification was higher with compaction compared to sharp (p=0.034), but not blunt extraction broaching (p=1.000). Proximal bone-implant contact area, press-fit and stem seating did not differ between broaching methods. Bone-implant contact area and bone densification increased with trabecular BMD (rs=0.658, p=0.001 and rs=0.443, p=0.034), press-fit with stem seating (rs=0.746, p<0.001) and contact area with bone densification (rs=0.432, p=0.039).
DISCUSSION
Sharp extraction broaching reduces densification at the bone-cavity interface, but does not affect the press-fit or contact area. Trabecular BMD was positively associated with contact area, and stem seating with press-fit. Future studies will aim to link these findings to primary stability and influence on periprosthetic fractures.
For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly.
