Hip fractures constitute the most debilitating complication of osteoporosis with a steadily increasing incidence in an aging population. Intramedullary nailing of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures can be challenging because of poor implant anchorage in the femoral head. Recently, cement augmentation of PFNA blades with Polymethylmethycrylate (PMMA) has shown promising results by enhancing the cutout resistance in proximal femoral fractures. The aim of this biomechanical study was to assess the impact of cement augmentation on the fixation strength of TFNA blades and screws within the femoral head, and compare its effect with head elements placed in a center or antero–posterior off–center positions.

Eight groups were formed out of 96 polyurethane foam specimens with low density, simulating isolated femoral heads with severe osteoporotic bone. The specimens in each group were implanted with either non–augmented or PMMA–augmented TFNA blades or screws in a center or antero–posterior off–center position, 7 mm anterior or 7 mm posterior. They were mechanically tested in a setup simulating an unstable pertrochanteric fracture with lack of postero–medial support and load sharing at the fracture gap. All specimens underwent progressively increasing cyclic loading until catastrophic construct failure. Varus–valgus and head rotation angles were monitored by an inclinometer mounted on the head. A varus collapse of 5° or a 10° head rotation were defined as the clinically relevant failure criterion.

Load at failure for specimens with augmented TFNA head elements (screw center: 3799 N ± 326 (mean ± SD); blade center: 3228 N ± 478; screw off–center: 2680 N ± 182; blade off–center: 2591 N ± 244) was significantly higher compared to the respective non–augmented specimens (blade center: 1489 N ± 41; screw center: 1593 N ± 120; blade off–center: 1018 N ± 48; screw off–center: 515 N ± 73), p<0.001. In both non–augmented and augmented specimens, the failure load in center position was significantly higher compared to the respective off–center position, regardless of head element, p<0.001. Non–augmented TFNA blades in off–center position revealed significantly higher load at failure versus non–augmented screws in off–center position, p<0.001.

Cement augmentation clearly enhances fixation stability of TFNA blades and screws. Non–augmented blades outperformed screws in antero–posterior off–center position. Positioning of TFNA blades in the femoral head is more forgiving than TFNA screws in terms of failure load. Augmentation with TFNA has not been approved by FDA.

Injury to the syndesmosis occurs in 10–13% of all operative ankle fractures and there is evidence that both incomplete treatment and malreduction of the syndesmosis can lead to poor clinical outcomes. Much attention has been given to post–operative malreduction documented by computer tomography (CT), however, there is limited data about the intact positioning and relative motion of the native syndesmosis. The aim of this study is to elucidate more detailed information on the position of the fibula in the syndesmosis during simulated weight–bearing in intact state, with sequential ligament sectioning and following two reconstructive techniques.

Fourteen paired, fresh–frozen human cadaveric limbs were mounted in a weight–bearing simulation jig. CT scans were obtained under simulated foot–flat loading (75 N) and in single–legged stance (700 N), in five foot positions: neutral, 15° external rotation, 15° internal rotation, 20° dorsiflexion, and 20° plantarflexion. The elements of the syndesmosis and the deltoid ligament were sequentially sectioned. One limb of each pair was then reconstructed via one of two methods: Achilles autograft and peroneus longus ligamentoplasty. The specimens were rescanned in all 5 foot positions following each ligament resection and reconstruction. Measurements of fibular diastasis, rotation and anterior–posterior translation were performed on the axial cuts of the CT scans, 1 cm proximal to the roof of the plafond.

Multiple measurements were made to define the position of the fibula in the incisura. Clinically relevant deformity patterns were produced. The deformity at the incisura was consistent with clinical injury, and the degree of displacement in all ligament states was dependent on the foot position. The most destructive state resulted in the most deformity at the syndesmosis. Differences between the intact and reconstructed states were found with all measurements, especially when the foot was in external rotation and dorsiflexion. There was no significant difference with direct comparison of the reconstructions.

This study has detailed the motion of the fibula in the incisura and its variation with foot position. Neither reconstruction was clearly superior and both techniques had difficulty in the externally rotated and dorsiflexed foot positions. This study design can serve as a model for future ex–vivo testing of reconstructive techniques.

Three Cannulated Screws (3CS), Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) with antirotation screw (DHS–Screw) or with a Blade (DHS–Blade) are the gold standards for fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures. Compared to 3CS, both DHS systems require larger skin incision with more extensive soft tissue dissection while providing the benefit of superior stability. The newly designed Femoral Neck System (FNS) for dynamic fixation combines the advantages of angular stability with a less invasive surgical technique. The aim of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical performance of FNS in comparison to established methods for fixation of the femoral neck in a human cadaveric model.

Twenty pairs of fresh–frozen human cadaveric femora were instrumented with either DHS–Screw, DHS–Blade, 3CS or FNS. A reduced unstable femoral neck fracture 70° Pauwels III, AO/OTA31–B2.3 was simulated with 30° distal and 15° posterior wedges. Cyclic axial loading was applied in 16° adduction, starting at 500N and with progressive peak force increase of 0.1N/cycle until construct failure. Relative interfragmentary movements were evaluated with motion tracking.

Highest axial stiffness was observed for FNS (748.9 ± 66.8 N/mm), followed by DHS–Screw (688.8 ± 44.2 N/mm), DHS–Blade (629.1 ± 31.4 N/mm) and 3CS (584.1 ± 47.2 N/mm) with no statistical significances between the implant constructs. Cycles until 15 mm leg shortening were comparable for DHS–Screw (20542 ± 2488), DHS–Blade (19161 ± 1264) and FNS (17372 ± 947), and significantly higher than 3CS (7293 ± 850), p<0.001. Similarly, cycles until 15 mm femoral neck shortening were comparable between DHS–Screw (20846 ± 2446), DHS–Blade (18974 ± 1344) and FNS (18171 ± 818), and significantly higher than 3CS (8039 ± 838), p<0.001.

From a biomechanical point of view, the Femoral Neck System is a valid alternative to treat unstable femoral neck fractures, representing the advantages of a minimal invasive angle–stable implant for dynamic fixation with comparable stability to the two DHS systems with blade or screw, and superior to Three Cannulated Screws.

Aims

To assess the effect of high tibial and distal femoral osteotomies (HTO and DFO) on the pressure characteristics of the ankle joint.

The high risk and the associated high mortality of secondary, contralateral hip fractures [1,2] could justify internal, invasive prophylactic reinforcement of the osteoporotic proximal femur to avoid these injuries in case of a low energy fall. Previous studies have demonstrated high potential of augmentation approaches [3,4,5], but to date there has no ideal solution been found. The development of optimized reinforcement strategies can be aided with validated computer simulation tools that can be used to evaluate new ideas.

A validated non-linear finite element (FE) simulation tool was used here to predict the yield and fracture load of twelve osteoporotic or osteopenic proximal femora in sideways fall based on high resolution CT images. Various augmentation strategies using bone cement or novel metal implants were developed, optimized and virtually performed on the bone models. The relative strengthening compared to the non-augmented state was evaluated using case-specific FE analyses.

Strengthening effect of the cement-based augmentation was linearly proportional to cement volume and was significantly affected by cement location. With the clinically acceptable 12.6 ± 1.2 ml volume and optimized location of the cement cloud, compared to the non-augmented state, 71 ± 26% (42 – 134%) and 217 ± 166% (83 – 509%) increase in yield force and energy was reached, respectively. These were significantly higher than previously published experimental results using the “central” cement location [5], which could be well predicted by our FE models. The optimized metal implant could provide even higher strengthening effect: 140 ± 39% (76 – 194%) increase in yield force and +357 ± 177% (132 – 691%) increase in yield energy. However, for metal implants, a higher risk of subcapital fractures was indicated. For both cement and metal, the originally weaker bones were strengthened exponentially more compared to the stronger ones.

The ideal solution for prophylactic augmentation should provide an appropriate balance between the requirements of being clinically feasible, ethically acceptable and mechanically sufficient. Even with the optimized location, the cement-based approach may not provide enough strengthening effect and adequate reproducibility of the identified optimal cement cloud position may not be achieved clinically. While the metal implant based strategy appears to be able to deliver the required strengthening effect, the ethical acceptance of this more invasive option is questionable. Further development is therefore required to identify the ideal, clinically relevant augmentation strategy. This may involve new cement materials, less invasive metal implants, or a combination of both. The FE simulation approach presented here could help to screen the potential ideas and highlight promising candidates for experimental evaluation.

Objectives

Osteosynthesis of anterior pubic ramus fractures using one large-diameter screw can be challenging in terms of both surgical procedure and fixation stability. Small-fragment screws have the advantage of following the pelvic cortex and being more flexible.

The aim of the present study was to biomechanically compare retrograde intramedullary fixation of the superior pubic ramus using either one large- or two small-diameter screws.

End caps are intended to prevent nail migration (push-out) in elastic stable intramedullary nailing. The aim of this study was to investigate the force at failure with and without end caps, and whether different insertion angles of nails and end caps would alter that force at failure.

Simulated oblique fractures of the diaphysis were created in 15 artificial paediatric femurs. Titanium Elastic Nails with end caps were inserted at angles of 45°, 55° and 65° in five specimens for each angle to create three study groups. Biomechanical testing was performed with axial compression until failure. An identical fracture was created in four small adult cadaveric femurs harvested from two donors (both female, aged 81 and 85 years, height 149 cm and 156 cm, respectively). All femurs were tested without and subsequently with end caps inserted at 45°.

In the artificial femurs, maximum force was not significantly different between the three groups (p = 0.613). Push-out force was significantly higher in the cadaveric specimens with the use of end caps by an up to sixfold load increase (830 N, standard deviation (SD) 280 vs 150 N, SD 120, respectively; p = 0.007).

These results indicate that the nail and end cap insertion angle can be varied within 20° without altering construct stability and that the risk of elastic stable intramedullary nailing push–out can be effectively reduced by the use of end caps.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:558–63.

Summary

Time-lapsed CT offers new opportunities to predict the risk of cement leakage and to evaluate the mechanical effects on a vertebral body by monitoring each incremental injection step in an in-vitro vertebroplasty procedure.

Summary Statement

Tibia plateau split fracture fixation with two cancellous screws is particularly suitable for non-osteoporotic bone, whereas four cortical lag screws provide a comparable compression in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic bone. Angle-stable locking plates maintain the preliminary compression applied by a reduction clamp.

Summary

Biomechanically, a 2° screw deviation from the nominal axis in the PFLCP leads to significantly earlier implant failure. Screw deviation relies on a technical error on insertion, but in our opinion cannot be controlled intraoperatively with the existing instrumentation devices.