The rotational alignment of the tibia is an as yet unresolved issue for arthroplasty surgeons. Functional variation may be due to minor malrotation of the tibial component. The aim was to find a reliable method for positioning the tibial component in arthroplasty. CT scans of 21 knees were reconstructed in three dimensions and oriented vertically. A plane was taken 20 mm below the tibial spines. The centre of each tibial condyle was calculated from points taken round that condylar cortex. A tibial tubercle centre was also generated as the centre of the circle that best fit points on the surface of the tubercle in the plane of its most prominent point. The derived points were identified by three observers with errors of 0.6 – 1mm. The medial and lateral tibial centres were constant features (radius 24mm ± 3mm, and 22mm ± 3mm respectively). An ‘anatomic’ axis was created perpendicular to a line joining these two points. The tubercle centre was found 20mm ± 7mm lateral to the medial tibial centre. Compared to this axis, an axis perpendicular to the posterior condylar axis was internally rotated by 6° ± 3°. An axis based on the tibial tubercle and the tibial spines was also internally rotated by 6° ± 10°. We conclude that alignment of the knee when based on this ‘anatomic’ axis is more reliable than either of the posterior surfaces. It is also more reliable than any axis involving the tubercle, which is the least reliable feature in the region. The ‘anatomic’ axis can be used in navigated knee arthroplasty for referencing the rotational alignment of the tibial component.
Radiological measurements are an essential component of the assessment of outcome following knee arthroplasty. However, plain radiographic techniques can be associated with significant projectional errors because they are a two-dimensional (2D) representation of a three-dimensional (3D) structure. Angles that are considered within the target zone on one film may be outside that zone on other films. Moreover, these parameters can be subject to significant inter-observer differences when measured. The aim of our study therefore was to quantify the variability between observers evaluating plain radiographs following Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Twenty-three observers, made up of Orthopaedic Consultants and trainees, were asked to measure the coronal and sagittal alignment of the tibial and femoral components from the post-operative long-leg plain radiograph of a Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A post-operative CT scan using the low dose Imperial knee protocol was obtained as well and analysed with 3D reconstruction software to measure the true values of these parameters. The accuracy and spread of the pain radiographic measurements were then compared with the values obtained on the CT. On the femoral side, the mean angle in coronal alignment was 1.5° varus (Range 3.8, SD 1, min 0.1, max 3.9), whereas the mean angle in sagittal alignment was 8.6° of flexion (Range 7.5, SD 1.5, Min 3.7, Max 11.2). The true values measured with CT were 2.4° and 11.0° respectively. As for the tibial component, the mean coronal alignment angle was 89.7° (Range 11.6, SD 3.3, Min 83.8, Max 95.4), and the mean posterior slope was 2.4° (Range 8.7, SD 1.6, Min -2, Max 6.7). The CT values for these were 87.6° and 2.7° respectively. We conclude that the plain radiographic measurements had a large scatter evidenced by the wide ranges in the values obtained by the different observers. If only the means are compared, the plain radiographic values were comparable with the true values obtained with CT (that is; accuracy was good) with differences ranging from 0.3° to 2.4°. The lack of precision can be avoided with the use of CT, particularly with the advent of low-dose scanning protocols.
On either end of this line, the articular surface of the trochlea can be fitted to spheres of radius 30mm (stdev 6mm) laterally and 27mm (stdev 5mm) and an rms of 0.4mm medially. The centres of the circle and the two spheres fall on a line with an rms of 1.1mm. The anterior and proximal patellar planes could be described as flat surfaces (rms of 0.4 and 0.3mm). The median ridge could be described as a straight line (rms of 0.2mm). The angle between planes was 112° (stdev 5°); the average angle between the proximal plane and the line on the medial ridge was 62° (stdev4°). The functional centre of the patella was defined as a point in the centre of 2 planes orthogonal to the sagital plane from the midpoint between the most proximal and most distal points on the median ridge. The length, width and thickness of the patellae were measured at 22mm +/−4mm, 47mm +/− 3mm and 24 mm+/− 2 mm.
The rotational alignment of the tibia is an unresolved issue in knee replacement. A poor functional outcome may be due to malrotation of the tibial component. Our aim was to find a reliable method for positioning the tibial component in knee replacement. CT scans of 19 knees were reconstructed in three dimensions and orientated vertically. An axial plane was identified 20 mm below the tibial spines. The centre of each tibial condyle was calculated from ten points taken round the condylar cortex. The tibial tubercle centre was also generated as the centre of the circle which best fitted eight points on the outside of the tubercle in an axial plane at the level of its most prominent point. The derived points were identified by three observers with errors of 0.6 mm to 1 mm. The medial and lateral tibial centres were constant features (radius 24 mm ( Alignment of the knee when based on this anatomical axis was more reliable than either the posterior surfaces or any axis involving the tubercle which was the least reliable landmark in the region.
We have used CT to describe the geometry of the patel-lofemoral joint and its relationship to the tibiofemoral joint. 33 CT scans of patients without patellofemoral disease were performed. 3D images were reconstructed and measured using computer software. The flexion axis of the tibiofemoral joint was found as the line connecting the centres of the spheres fitted to posterior femoral condyles. The deepest points on the trochlear groove can be fitted to a circle with radius of 23mm (stdev 4mm) and an rms of 0.3mm. This centre is offset by 21mm (stdev 3mm) at an angle of 68° (stdev 8°) from the line connecting the midpoint between the centres of the femoral condyles and a point in the piriform fossa. On either side of this line, the articular surface of the trochlea can be fitted to spheres of radius 30mm (stdev 6mm) laterally and 27mm (stdev 5mm) and an rms of 0.4mm medially. The centres of the circle and the two spheres fall on a line with an rms of 1.1mm. The anterior and proximal patellar planes could be described as flat surfaces (rms of 0.4 and 0.3mm). The median ridge could be described as a straight line (rms of 0.2mm). The angle between planes was 112° (stdev 5°); the average angle between the proximal plane and the line on the medial ridge was 62° (stdev4°). The length, width and thickness of the patellae were measured at 34.2mm +/−4mm, 44.8mm +/− 4.8mm and 22.4 mm+/− 2.3 mm (table). This investigation has allowed us to characterise the patello-femoral joint geometry which may help identify and explain the aetiology of patello-femoral pathologies. It may have implications for the design of patello-femoral replacements and the rules governing their position.
