Study Design: Retrospective review.

Objectives: Rugby union has recently become a highly-paid professional sport. Players requiring anterior cervical discectomy wish to know the effect this will have on their career. To answer this question, the result of the above procedure in professional rugby players was studied.

Methods: A retrospective notes review and telephone interview were conducted on 19 professional rugby players who had a cervical discectomy between 1998 and 2003. Pre and post operative symptoms and numbers returning to rugby after surgery were assessed.

Results: Neck pain was eradicated in eight (42%) of the players, nine (47%) achieved partial relief and two were not helped. Brachalgia was eradicated in fifteen (79%) individuals, improved in two (10.5%) and two (10.5%) had no relief. Fourteen (74%) returned to rugby union, the majority at six months post operatively (range – five to 17 months). Thirteen (68.5%) returned to their pre-operative level of rugby; one dropped to a lesser division and five have never played rugby again (three due to physical inability, one due to club reluctance to insure and one because of a separate injury). Two of the players that returned to rugby have subsequently retired because of neck symptoms. They played three and two years post-operatively at first-class level.

Conclusion: Return to rugby union after anterior cervical discectomy is both likely and safe and therefore need not be a career ending procedure.

Introduction and Aims: Odontoid fractures are quite common in the elderly following minor falls. As there are a few articulations in the upper cervical spine, degeneration in any one particular joint may affect the biomechanics of loading of the upper cervical spine. We aimed to analyse the pattern and relationship of odontoid fractures to the upper cervical spine osteoarthritis in the elderly.

Method: Between July 1999 and March 2003, 185 patients had CT scan of the cervical spine for cervical spine injuries. Twenty-three out of 47 patients over the age of 70 years had odontoid fractures. The CT scan pictures of these patients were studied to analyse the type of fracture and its displacement, the severity of osteoarthritis in each articulation in the upper cervical spine, namely lateral atlantoaxial, atlantooccipital, atlantoodontoid and subaxial facetal joints, evaluation of osteopenia in the dens-body junction and in the body and odontoid process of the axis, and calcification of the ligaments.

Results: Twenty-one of the 23 patients had Type II odontoid fracture with posterior displacement in seven (33.3%) and posterior angulation in nine (42.8%) patients. In these patients with Type II dens fracture, the atlantodens interval was obliterated in 19 (90.48%) patients, with only two of them (9.52%) having lateral atlantoaxial osteoarthritis.

Conclusion: Type II fracture is the commonest odontoid fracture in the elderly. Posterior displacement of the fracture is common in elderly, unlike the younger population. There is a significant relationship between the upper cervical spine osteoarthritis, apart from osteopenia, to the incidence of Type II odontoid fractures. Significant atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis in the presence of normal lateral atlantoaxial joints increases the risk of sustaining Type II odontoid fracture.

Objective: Surgical correction of scoliosis in small stature children is challenging due to the profile of the posterior instrumentation traditionally available. Concerns are also raised with the use of 5 mm rods for posterior correction. The Paediatric USS is a small stature System.

We studied the correction achieved and the maintenance of the correction at a minimum 15 months follow up using the Paediatric USS.

Design: 20 patients with a minimum 15 months follow up were included in the study. Measurements were made for the initial correction of the Cobb angle to assess correction. At 15 months follow up the cobb angle was measured to assess maintenance of correction.

Results: The average age of the patients was 12 ½ years. The average weight was 32 kgs. The commonest etiology was paralytic(40%) followed by congenital (30%), idiopathic (25%) and collagen disorder (5%). King type II (45%) and type IV (35%) were the commonest type of curves. Combined anterior release and posterior stabilization and fusion was the commonest procedure performed. The average pre op Cobb angle was 77.7°, which corrected to 37.6° i.e. 49%. There was no significant loss of correction at 15 months follow-up.

Conclusions: Thus the Paediatric USS allows adequate correction of the curve and does maintain the correction achieved at a minimum 15 months follow up

Objectives: Quantitative research methods have highlighted the psychological implications of spinal deformities in adolescence. However these methods are limited in exploring the adolescent’s perception of the illness and the expectations from treatment. Hence we carried out detailed qualitative interviews with these adolescents and where applicable with their families to examine these issues

Design: Individual contact was made with the adolescents attending the spinal deformity clinic in a specialist centre in Cardiff. Following their consent an interview was carried out using a qualitative semistructured format

Subjects: A total of 10 adolescents and their families attending the spinal clinic for treatment were interviewed

Results All the adolescents and their families had sufficient information and fairly good understanding of their condition and of the treatments available. The impact the deformity had on the individual’s life was variable. Social impairment was higher in these individuals and this was reflected in their interaction with their peers. Most of the families desired an expected timetable of treatemnt and sequence of events. They also felt the lack of buddy or self help gropus. It also gave a better understanding into these teenagers perception of their condition and their attitude towards treatment

Conclusions: These issues probably need to be understood while dealing with these individuals and their families and as health professionals we need to be sensitive to these issues.

To assess the results of this technique for stabilisation of severe spondylolisthesis, 12 patients with symptomatic severe spondylolisthesis underwent this procedure. The slipped L5 vertebra was stabilized using a hollow medullary screw through the posterior part of the body of S1 into the slipped L5 body, supplemented with pedicle screws into L5 and S1 with posterolateral fusion.

At one year follow-up, all but one patient had improved in leg pain. 2 patients were aware of the prominent pedicle screws. 360° fusion was achieved without any progression of spondylolisthesis. Thus 360° fusion for severe L5-S1 spondylo-listhesis can be achieved effectively using this technique.

The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the benefits of intra discal electrothermal treatment (IDET) for discogenic back pain.

40 patients with chronic discogenic back pain underwent this therapy. All the patients had a failed trial of conservative treatment. Patients with a positive provocative discogram were selected for IDET. The outcome is assessed using a SF36 questionnaire pre-procedure and then at 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-operatively.

The mean age group of the patients was 37 years (range 15–58 years). All the patients had a minimum follow up of 18 months. Out of the 40 patients 5(12.5%) had no improvement and had to undergo an interbody fusion within 6 months following IDET and hence were excluded from the study. No patient developed any neurological complications. Of the rest of the 35 patients at a minimum of 18 months follow-up 56 % (p=0.042) patients had improvement in physical function scores and 52% (p=0.034) had improvement in pain scores as per the SF36.

Conclusion: IDET appears to be an effective alternative to control pain in patients who might otherwise be candidates for spinal fusion.

Controversy exists as to whether the biomechanical properties of a 360 lumbar fusion are influenced by the order in which the anterior and posterior components of the procedure are performed.

The fusion technique used Magerl screws to effect the posterior fusion and a Syncage implant (Stratec) to effect the anterior component of the fusion.

Isolated motion segments from calf spines were tested in each of two groups of five. In the first group the posterior fusion was performed first and in the second group the anterior fusion was performed first. Loads were applied as a dead weight of 2Nm in each range of movement of the spine (flexion/extension, lateral flexion and rotation). The range of movement was measured using the Qualisys motion analysis software linked to a set of five cameras, using external marker clusters attached to the vertebral bodies. Each motion segment was tested prior to instrumentation, post anterior or posterior instrumentation and with both anterior and posterior instrumentation.

Ranges of movement following 360 instrumentation were increased in all planes tested when posterior fixation was performed first; flexion/extension 26% v 55% (p=0.020), lateral flexion 18% v 34% (p=0.382), and rotation 18% v 73% (p=0.034).

It was concluded that posterior fixation should not be performed prior to anterior fixation as this results in a significant loss of stability in both flexion/extension and rotation

Objective: Controversy exists as to whether the biomechanical properties of a 360° lumbar fusion are influenced by the order in which the anterior and posterior components of the procedure are performed.

Methods: The fusion technique used Mager screws to effect the posterior fusion and a Syncage implant (Stratec) to effect the anterior component of the fusion. Isolated motion segments from five calf spines were tested in each of two groups. In the first group the posterior fusion was performed first and in the second group the anterior fusion was performed first. Loads were applied as a dead weight of 2Nm in each range of movement of the spine (flexion/extension, lateral flexion and rotation). The range of movement was measured using the Qualisys motion analysis system, using external marker clusters attached to the vertebral bodies. Each motion segment was tested prior to instrumentation, post anterior or posterior instrumentation and with both anterior and posterior instrumentation.

Results: Ranges of movement following 360° instrumentation were decreased in all planes. When posterior fixation was performed first; flexion/extension reduced to 55% compared to 26% with anterior fixation first (p=0.020), in lateral flexion 34% v 18% (p=0.382), and in rotation 73% v 18%(p=0.034).

Conclusions: The 360° fusion construct has reduced range of movement if the anterior first approach is used as compared to posterior first approach. Posterior fixation should not be performed prior to anterior fixation as this results in a significant loss of stability in both flexion/extension and rotation.

Aim: To determine the histological changes in discs retrieved at the time of fusion following failed Intra-Discal Electrothermal Therapy (IDET).

Method: Three patients who had failed IDET treatment underwent lumbar interbody fusion. At the time of the operation the disc material and the endplate were sent for histopathology. The histological changes were compared to a degenerate disc and endplate. The staining techniques used were Haematoxylin Eosin stain, Elastic Van Geison and Alcian stains.

Results: In the post IDET specimens there was stromal disorganisation, paucity of chondrocytes and chondrocyte degeneration. These changes were seen in the nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosis and the endplate as well. Comparatively cadaveric studies using intra-discal radiofrequency thermocoagulation showed histological change only in the nucleus pulposus.

Conclusion: The endplate changes at the cellular level can be widespread following IDET therapy, which can potentially cause alteration of its mechanical properties.

Purpose: To assess the results of this technique for stabilisation of severe spondylolisthesis.

Method: Twelve patients with symptomatic severe spondylolisthesis were treated with this technique. All the patients had significant symptoms, inspite of conservative measures. The mean duration of symptoms was 3.5 years. The fixation technique was purely done through a posterior approach, with extensive posterior decompression. Stabilisation of the slipped L₅ vertebra was achieved with a trans sacral screw. The point of entry of the screw being the posterior part of the body of S₁ and it traverses the L₅-S₁ disc space into the L₅ body. A hollow medullary screw passed over a guide wire helps achieve the fixation. This fixation is supplemented with pedicle screws into L₅ and S₁ and posterolateral bone grafting. Thus an anterior and posterior fusion was achieved and the severe slip fixed in-situ.

Results: The mean follow-up was 1 year. All but one (8%) patient had improvement in leg pain. 2(16%) patients were aware of the prominent metalwork (pedicle screws). Good 360° fusion was achieved using this technique in all the patients. There was no progression of spondylolisthesis.

Conclusion: Thus, anterior and posterior in-situ fusion for severe L₅-S₁ spondylolisthesis can be achieved effectively using a single incision via a transsacral approach.

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the benefits of this treatment for discogenic back pain.

Method: Thirty-four patients with chronic discogenic back pain underwent this therapy. All the patients had a failed trial of conservative treatment. Patients with a positive provocative discogram were selected for intra-discal electrothermal therapy (IDET). The outcome is assessed using a SF 36 questionnaire filled in pre-procedure and then at three, six, twelve and eighteen months and two years post-operatively.

Results: The mean age group of the patients was 37 years (range 15–58 years). All the patients had a minimum follow up of 12 months (range 6–2 years). Out of the 34 patients 5(14%) had no improvement and had to undergo an interbody fusion following IDET. No patient developed any neurological complications. At a minimum of one year follow-up 56% patients had improvement in physical function scores and 52% had improvement in pain scores as per the SF 36.

Conclusion: Thus IDET appears to be an effective procedure in the short-term relief of discogenic back pain in patients who otherwise might be candidates for fusion.