The aim of this study was to describe the pattern of revision indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and any change to this pattern for UKA patients over the last 20 years, and to investigate potential associations to changes in surgical practice over time. All primary knee arthroplasty surgeries performed due to primary osteoarthritis and their revisions reported to the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017 were included. Complex surgeries were excluded. The data was linked to the National Patient Register and the Civil Registration System for comorbidity, mortality, and emigration status. TKAs were propensity score matched 4:1 to UKAs. Revision risks were compared using competing risk Cox proportional hazard regression with a shared γ frailty component.Aims
Methods
Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) is an advised treatment for anteromedial knee osteoarthritis. While long-term survival after mUKA is well described, reported incidences of short-term surgical complications vary and the effect of surgical usage on complications is less established. We aimed to describe the overall occurrence and treatment of surgical complications within 90 days of mUKA, as well as occurrence in high-usage centres compared to low-usage centres. mUKAs performed in eight fast-track centres from February 2010 to June 2018 were included from the Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement Database. All readmissions within 90 days of surgery underwent chart review and readmissions related to the surgical wound or the prosthesis were recorded. Centres were categorized as high-usage centres when using mUKA in ≥ 20% of annual knee arthroplasties. The occurrence of complications between high- and low-usage centres were compared using Fisher’s exact test.Aims
Methods
In metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA large femoral metal heads are designed to increase stability and to reduce dislocation risk. The increased head size could lead to increased taper corrosion with the release of metal ions and adverse reactions. Using blood ion measurements, we aimed to investigate the association between femoral head size and metal-ion release after MoP THA. 96 patients were enrolled at two centers and randomized to receive either a 32-mm metal head or a 36–44 mm metal head (the largest possible fitting the thinnest available polyethylene insert). Blood metal ions and PROMs (OHS, UCLA) were measured at two- and five-year follow-ups. Both 2- and 5-year median chrome, cobalt, and titanium levels were below taper corrosion indicative ion levels. At 5 years, median chrome, cobalt, and titanium levels were 0.5 μg/L (0.50–0.62), 0.24 μg/L (0.18–0.30), and 1.16 μg/L (1.0–1.68) for the 32-mm group, and 0.5 μg/L (0.5–0.54), 0.23 μg/L (0.17–0.39), and 1.30 μg/L (1–2.05) for the 36–44 mm group, with no difference between groups 5 years after the insertion of MoP THAs, we found no differences in the blood metal ion levels between 32 mm heads and 36–44 mm heads and no corrosion-related revisions. As taper corrosion can debut after 5 years, there is still a need for long-term follow-up studies on the association between head size and corrosion in MoP THA.
The interest in day-case hip arthroplasty is increasing; however, there are conflicting results regarding readmission risk, and little is known about patients’ attitude towards day-case surgery. We aimed to investigate differences in 30-day readmission rates between day-case patients and single-overnight-stay patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and explore patients’ attitude towards day-case surgery. From the Danish National Patient Register we identified 29,486 THAs (1353 day-case THAs and 28,133 single-overnight-stay THAs) performed between 2010 and 2020. Day-case surgery was defined as discharge on the day-of-surgery. Overnight admissions within 30 days of surgery were considered readmissions. Differences in readmission rates between day-case and single-overnight-stay patients were investigated using logistic regression adjusted for patient characteristics and year of surgery. In a single-center descriptive study, 2395 hip arthroplasty patients from 2016 to start-2023 answered a questionnaire on patient characteristics, attitude towards day-case surgery and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). The overall 30-day readmission rate was 4.4% (CI: 4.2–4.6%) with no difference between day-case (4.4%) and single-overnight-stay THAs (4.4%) (odds-ratio: 1.2 [CI: 0.91–1.6]). In the descriptive study answers to the question whether patients were interested in being discharged on the day of surgery, were: “Yes” = 41%, “Do not know” = 20%, “No” = 39%. Patients responding “No” had lower preoperative PROM-scores, were older (“No” = 70.2 y vs. “Yes” = 65.3 y), and more often female (“No” = 72% vs. “Yes” = 52% female). Based on nationwide data from 2010–2020, day-case THA patients were not more likely to be readmitted compared to single-overnight-stay patients. However, most patients were not positive towards day-case surgery. While surgeons may consider day-case surgery to be safe, patients are not intuitively positive, indicating an attitude mismatch. To achieve high success rate and patient satisfaction in day-case surgery, shared-decision making initiatives within day-case surgery are needed.
Treatment of end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) of the knee is commonly approached using one of two surgical strategies: medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study we aim to investigate if there is any difference in outcome for patients undergoing UKA or TKA, when treated by high-volume surgeons, in high-volume centres, using two different clinical guidelines. The two strategies are ‘UKA whenever possible’ vs TKA for all patients with AMOA. A total of 501 consecutive AMOA patients (301 UKA) operated on between 2013 to 2016 in two high-volume centres were included. Centre One employed clinical guidelines for the treatment of AMOA allowing either UKA or TKA, but encouraged UKA wherever possible. Centre Two used clinical guidelines that treated all patients with a TKA, regardless of wear pattern. TKA patients were included if they had isolated AMOA on preoperative radiographs. Data were collected from both centres’ local databases. The primary outcome measure was change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and the proportion of patients achieving the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) at one-year follow-up. The data were 1:1 propensity score matched before regression models were used to investigate potential differences.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of posterior tibial slope (PTS) and posterior condylar offset (PCO) on patient-reported pain and function one year after TKA. A total of 500 patients from 11 clinics in 6 countries were enrolled into a prospective, multicenter study. All patients were indicated for primary TKA for OA and received components from a single manufacturer. All liners were made from vitamin-E stabilized, highly crosslinked (95 kGy) polyethylene; 54.7% were posterior stabilized (PS) and the remaining were cruciate-retaining. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was administered at the one-year follow-up visit. The KOOS pain and activities in daily life (ADL) sub-scores were dichotomized and served as the primary outcomes. Dichotomization was done with the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), defined by previous studies as the value of the PROM above which patients deem their state as acceptable (84.5 points for KOOS pain and 83.0 points for KOOS ADL). Plain lateral radiographs were taken and assessed for PTS (Figure 1) and PCO (Figure 2). PTS was categorized as above (excessive flexion), within (ideal), or below (extension) the safe zone of 0° − 7° of flexion. PCO increases or decreases of greater than 3mm were compared against no change (≤ 3mm). Each of the two sagittal positioning metrics was tested against the KOOS pain and ADL PASS at one year.Introduction
Methods
The goal of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is to delay or prevent osteoarthritic development in dysplastic hips. However, it is unclear whether the surgical goals are achieved and if so in which patients. This information is essential to select appropriate patients for a durable PAO that achieves its goals. We therefore (1) determined hip survival rates; (2) determined how many preserved hips were functionally successful after PAO; and (3) identified demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors predicting failure after PAO. We reviewed 316 patients (401 hips) who had PAO. We evaluated radiographic parameters and obtained WOMAC scores. Through inquiry to the National Registry of Patients, we identified conversions to THA. Risk factors for conversion to THA were assessed. Mean followup was 8 years (range, 4–12 years). We conclude that PAO can be performed with a good outcome at medium to long term follow-up, suggesting that it may be applied by experienced surgeons with satisfactory results. To further improve the outcome, focus should be on the potential negative influence of parameters that are easily assessed, such as the patients age (>45) preoperative grade of osteoarthritis, incongruency, and severe acetabular dysplasia. Perioperatively, the surgeon should attempt to achieve hip congruence and a CE angle between 30° to 40° to improve the durability of PAO. Level II, prognostic study.
Our aim was to evaluate cementless one-stage revision in chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection. The study was performed as a multicentre, In total 56 PJI patients with a median age of 72 years and a median pre-operative ASA score of 2 met the established eligibility criteria and accepted to participate; 31 (55%) were males. The cohort had a mean follow-up time of 4.0 years, with all patients followed for minimum 2 years. The primary outcome were relapse described as re-revision due to infection (regardless of considered as a relapse or new infection). This was evaluated by competing risk analysis (competing risks: aseptic revisions and death). Secondary, all-cause mortality was evaluated by survival analysis. The study was approved by the local Committees on Biomedical Research Ethics.Aim
Method and patients
Studies of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) have reported high complication and failure rates due to elevated metal ion levels. These rates were shown to be especially high for the Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) HRA, possibly due to its unique design. Associations between metal ion concentrations and various biological and mechanical factors have been reported. Component positioning as measured by acetabular inclination has been shown to be of especially strong consequence in metal ion production in ASR HRA patients, but few studies have evaluated acetabular anteversion as an independent variable. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the associations between component orientation, quantified by acetabular inclination and anteversion, and blood metal ions. Secondly, we sought to report whether conventional safe zones apply to MoM HRA implants or if these implants require their own positioning standards. We conducted a multi-center, prospective study of 512 unilateral ASR HRA patients enrolled from September 2012 to June 2015. At time of enrollment our patients were a mean of 7 (3–11.5) years from surgery. The mean age at surgery was 56 years and 24% were female. All subjects had complete demographic and surgical information and blood metal ions. In addition, each patient had valid AP pelvis and shoot-though lateral radiographs read by 5 validated readers measuring acetabular abduction and anteversion, and femoral offset. A multivariate logistic regression was used with high cobalt or chromium (greater than or equal to 7ppb) as the dependent variable. The independent variables were: female gender, UCLA activity score, age at surgery, femoral head size, time from surgery, femoral offset, acetabular abduction, and acetabular anteversion.Introduction
Methods
48 patients (52 hips), with osteoarthritis, participated in a 5 year RSA study. Each patient received a VEPE liner, a porous titanium coated shell, and an uncemented stem with a 32mm head. Tantalum beads were inserted into the VEPE and the femur to measure head wear and stem stability using RSA. RSA and PROM follow-up was obtained postoperatively, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after surgery. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test determined if changes in penetration or migration were significant (p≤0.05).Introduction
Methods
There is an apparent need for easily accessible research data on Periprosthetic hip joint infections (PJI)(1). Administrative discharge registers could be a valuable single-sources for this purpose, and studies originating from such registers have been published(2–4). However, the quality of routinely collected data for administrative purposes may be questionable for use in epidemiological research. The aim of this study was to estimate the positive predictive value of the International Classification of Disease 10th revision (ICD-10) periprosthetic hip joint infection diagnose code T84.5. The study was performed as a cross-sectional study on data extracted from the Danish National Patient Register. Patients with a registration of performed surgical treatment for hip PJI were identified via the ICD-10 code T84.5 (Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal joint prosthesis) in association with hip-joint associated surgical procedure codes. Medical records of the identified patients (n=283) were verified for the existence of a periprosthetic hip joint infection. Positive predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. A T84.5 diagnosis code irrespective of the associated surgical procedure code had a positive predictive value of 85 % (95% CI: 80–89). Stratified to T84.5 in combination with an infection-specific surgical procedure code the positive predictive value increased to 86% (95% CI: 80–91), and in combination with a noninfection-specific surgical procedure code decreased to 82% (95% CI: 72–89). This study is the first to evaluate the only discharge diagnose code of prosthesis-related infection in an administrative discharge register. It is apparent, that codes in administrative discharge registers are prone to misclassification on an administrative level, either by wrongful coding by the physician or administrative personal in the registration process. Misclassification must be expected and taken into consideration when using single-source administrative discharge registers for epidemiological research on periprosthetic hip joint infection. We believe that the periprosthetic hip joint infection diagnose code can be of use in single-source register based studies, but preferably should be used in combination with alternate data sources to ensure higher validity(5) This study is funded in part by the Lundbeck foundation Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Surgery, Denmark.
