Aims

The aims of this study were to compare the use of resources, costs, and quality of life outcomes associated with subacromial decompression, arthroscopy only (placebo surgery), and no treatment for subacromial pain in the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS), and to estimate their cost-effectiveness.

This protocol describes a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic and open surgery in the management of rotator cuff tears. This trial began in 2007 and was modified in 2010, with the removal of a non-operative arm due to high rates of early crossover to surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:155–60.

Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford and the Nuffield Orthopaedic Hospital, Oxford

Objective: To investigate the effect of lab based simulator training, on the ability of basic surgical trainees to perform diagnostic knee arthroscopy.

Method: 20 orthopaedic SHO’s with minimal arthroscopic experience were randomised to 2 groups. 10 received a fixed protocol of simulator based arthroscopic skills training. This consisted of 3 sessions of 6 simulated arthroscopies using a Sawbones bench-top knee model. Their learning curve was assessed objectively using motion analysis. Time taken, path length and number of movements were recorded. All 20 then spent an operating list with a blinded consultant trainer. They received instruction and demonstration of diagnostic knee arthroscopy before performing the procedure independently. Their performance was assessed using the intra- operative section of the Orthopaedic Competence Assessment Project (OCAP) procedure based assessment (PBA) protocol for diagnostic arthros-copy and further quantified with a global rating assessment scale.

Results: In theatre, simulator-trained SHO’s outscored all but one untrained SHO. The simulator trained group were scored as competent on more than 70% of occasions compared to less than 15% for the un-trained group (p< 0.05). The mean global rating score of the trained group was 24.4 out of 45 compared with 12.4 for the untrained group (p< 0.05). Motion analysis demonstrated objective and significant improvement in performance during simulator training.

Conclusion: The use of lab based arthroscopic skills training leads to subsequent significant improvement in operating theatre performance. This may suggest that formalised lab based training should be a standardised part of future surgical curricula. OCAP PBA’s appear to provide a useful framework for assessment however potential questions are raised about the ability of OCAP to truly distinguish levels of surgical competence.

Introduction: A new procedure has been recently adopted to implant the Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UCA). All cases are now implanted through a short incision without dislocation of the patella. The aims of this study were to assess the one-year results using this new technique and to determine if the outcome is dependent on surgical experience.

Method: The first 104 Oxford UCA’s (Phase 3) implanted by six surgeons under the care of two consultants were reviewed at one year. All operations were performed using the new technique. The average age at surgery was 68 years. All knees were scored pre-operatively and at review with the American Knee Society score. The cohort was divided into two groups; the first ten cases for each surgeon were included in a ‘learning’ group, whilst the remaining cases were included in an ‘experienced’ group.

Results: Overall the average ‘knee score’ improved from 37 points to 94 and the average ‘functional score’ from 50 points to 92. Average maximum flexion improved from 117° to 131°. The ‘knee score’ for the ‘learning’ group was 91 points. This was significantly less (p = 0.008) than the score of the ‘experienced’ group (96 points).

Conclusions: These results are significantly better than the best historical results of the Oxford (UCA), performed through an open approach with dislocation of the patella.

Despite impressive overall results at one year, lower knee scores were associated with a surgeons ‘learning curve’. After this ‘learning curve’, increased surgical experience led to further improvement with 90% achieving an excellent result, 8% a good, 2% a fair and 0% a poor result.

Introduction: In conjunction with a bilateral randomised control trial comparing the clinical outcome of two total knee arthroplasties (TKA), we carried out an in-vivo fluoroscopic analysis of both knees in the trial. Knee A, is a new mobile bearing posterior cruciate retaining TKA and Knee B, an established fixed bearing posterior cruciate retaining TKA.

Method: In an ethically approved study, video fluoroscopy was taken of both knees of seven patients performing three exercises; extension against gravity, flexion against gravity and a step up exercise. Ten images at ten-degree intervals over the flexion range were frame grabbed and digitised. The relationship of patella tendon angle (PTA) to knee flexion angle (KFA) was assessed using a newly developed computer system. Five normal knees in fit volunteers were also fluoroscoped and assessed.

Results: A similar pattern of results was obtai ed for all three exercises. Knee A behaved in a linear, more consistent fashion than Knee B, which behaved non-linearly. Analysis of variance showed this difference was significant for all three exercises (p < 0.039).

Conclusions: This bilateral study provides a powerful way of assessing the kinematics of two different knee implants. Knee A behaves in a linear predictable fashion that is nearer normal than Knee B. These results will be used in conjunction with a clinical outcome study and an RSA study to provide a complete assessment of a new TKA.

Introduction: The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UCA) is now routinely performed through a short incision without Dislocation of the patella. The aim of this study was to assess the one-year results of this new technique to determine whether it enhances the quality of outcome, as well as the speed of its achievement.

Method: The first 88 consecutive Oxford UCA’s (Phase 3) implanted into 75 patients by two consultant surgeons were scored pre-operatively and at review with the American Knee Society Score. The average age of the patients was 68.1 years; the male to female ratio was 0.9 to 1.

Results: At review, one patient (one knee) had died and one knee had been revised for infection. The other patients (86 knees) were examined at a mean of 1.3 years from surgery. The average ‘knee score’ improved from 37 points to 95 and the average ‘functional score’ from 51 points to 93. Average maximum flexion improved from 117° to 132°. The ‘knee score’ outcome categories at review were 87% excellent, 8% good, 2.5% fair and 2.5% poor.

Conclusions: Historical comparison of these results with the best results of the Oxford UCA, performed through an open approach with dislocation of the patella, suggest that the minimally invasive approach, in addition to faster recovery, improves the quality of outcome at one year.

A pilot study was performed to assess the feasibility of discharging patients undergoing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) within a day of surgery; both clinical and administrative issues were examined.

Logistics and responsibilities were organised prior to the study. Representatives of anaesthetics, pain team, orthopaedics, admissions, bed management, nursing, theatres, physiotherapy, radiology and outpatients were involved. Patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis undergoing unicompartmental knee replacement who passed strict exclusion criteria were recruited. Factors included; unsuitable home situation (no phone, excessive stairs, no support person), low tolerance to NSAIDS, and not living within a 25 mile radius of the hospital. To date seven NHS patients (mean age 60 years) have been recruited. All patients underwent preoperative assessment and counselling. The mean preoperative Oxford Knee Score was 24/48, the mean Knee Society Score (KSS) was 43/100 and average pain score was 14/50 indicating all patients had significant dysfunction and pain before operation. Average knee flexion was 111° and the average flexion deformity was 5°.

Each patient had a medial UKR using the minimally invasive approach and then underwent the accelerated recovery program. The program included pain control, accelerated rehabilitation, dedicated instructions and self assessment. Post operative pain was controlled by an intra-operative infiltration of local anaesthetic around the knee and large doses of NSAIDs. All patients were mobilised on the day of surgery and all except one who was delayed for administrative reasons) were discharged the following day. Patients were discharged in an extension splint and provided with post operative instructions including an emergency back up telephone number. A designated clinician made regular contact with the patient at home to assess progress. Patients were then assessed in clinic at 6 days, 13 days, and 6 weeks after surgery.

Patients average pain scores at 7 days and 14 days were 2/10 and 2.2/10 respectively. At 6 week follow up the average knee flexion was 124° and average flexion deformity was 1°. All patients were walking independently and painfree. No complications were encountered except one patient required further manipulation for limited knee flexion.

The new pain control protocol permits early mobilisation and discharge for patients undergoing UKR. Potential benefits include increased patient comfort, functional rehabilitation, avoidance of hospital induced infection and substantial cost benefits to the NHS. The pilot study demonstrates that, provided adequate communication is maintained between involved personnel, the program is both practical and safe. It now is planned to implement the accelerated recovery program for UKR as routine.