The long head of the biceps tendon has been proposed as a source of pain in patients with rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the objective, subjective, and radiographic results of arthroscopic biceps tenotomy in selected patients with rotator cuff tears. Three hundred seven arthroscopic biceps tenotomies were performed in patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears. All patients had previously failed appropriate nonoperative management. Patients were selected for arthroscopic tenotomy if the tear was thought to be irreparable or the patient was older and not willing to participate in the rehabilitation required following rotator cuff repair. One hundred eleven shoulders underwent a concomitant acromioplasty. The mean age at surgery was 64.3 years. The mean preoperative radiographic acromiohumeral interval measured 6.6 mm. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean 57 months follow-up (range 24 to 168 months). The mean Constant score increased from 48.4 points preoperatively to 67.6 points postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Eighty-seven percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result. Nine patients underwent an additional surgical procedure (three for attempt at rotator cuff repair and six for reverse prostheses for cuff tear arthropathy). The acromiohumeral interval decreased by a mean

1.3 mm during the follow-up period and was associated with longer duration of follow-up (p < 0.0001). Preoperatively, 38% of patients had glenohumeral arthritis; postoperatively, 67% of patients had glenohumeral arthritis. Concomitant acromioplasty was statistically associated with better subjective and objective results only in patients with an acromiohumeral distance greater than 6 mm. Fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff musculature had a negative influence on both the functional and radiographic results (p < 0.0001). Arthroscopic biceps tenotomy in the treatment of rotator cuff tears in selected patients yields good objective improvement and a high degree of patient satisfaction. Despite these improvements, arthroscopic tenotomy does not appear to alter the progressive radiographic changes that occur with long standing rotator cuff tears.

Background: Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis are less common than those involving the posterior superior rotator cuff. The purpose of this study is to report the results of repair of isolated tears of the subscapularis.

Methods: Eighty-four shoulders that had undergone open repair of the subscapularis tendon were reviewed. The mean age at surgery was 53.2 years. The mean interval from onset of symptoms to surgery was 12.5 months. Fifty-seven tears were traumatic, and twenty-seven were degenerative in etiology. Twenty-three of the tears involved the superior third of the subscapularis tendon, forty-one involved the superior two thirds, and twenty were complete tears. Fifty-four shoulders had a dislocation or subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon, while ten shoulders had a rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon. Forty-eight shoulders underwent concomitant biceps tenodesis; thirteen shoulders underwent concomitant biceps tenotomy; and four shoulders underwent concomitant recentering of the biceps. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean fortyfive month follow-up (range 24 to 132 months).

Results: The mean Constant score increased from 55.0 points preoperatively to 79.5 points postoperatively (p< 0.001). Seventy-five patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result. Preoperatively, four patients had mild glenohumeral arthritis. Postoperatively, twenty-five patients had mild glenohumeral arthritis and two patients had moderate glenohumeral arthritis. Tenodesis or tenotomy of the biceps tendon at the time of subscapularis repair was associated with improved subjective and objective results independent of the preoperative condition of the biceps tendon.

Purpose: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly common for a variety of indications. The most common postoperative complication is instability. The objectives of this study are to describe causes of RSA instability and preventive and treatment recommendations.

Method: All members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society were asked for cases of RSA instability. We retrospectively reviewed 52 cases in 52 patients, performed by 13 surgeons. The mean age was 67.5 years (range, 36–83). The mean follow-up was 32.7 months (range, 3–43).

Results: The etiology included: cuff tear arthropathy (14 patients); revision arthroplasty (13 patients); fracture sequelae (6 patients); and other (6 patients). Twenty-four patients had previous shoulder surgery. All patients had a deltopectoral approach. Anterior deltoid deficiency was noted in 3 cases. Subscapularis insufficiency was noted in 27 cases. Humeral component dissociation occurred in 2 patients. The instability was: anterior (27 patients); posterior (5 patients); or inferior (3 patients). Instability occurred: in the first 48 hours (10 cases); between 2 to 30 days (13 cases); or after one month (12 cases). Causes of instability included: inadequate soft-tissue tension (23 patients); a large antero-inferior release (22 patients); subscapularis insufficiency (7 patients); hematoma (2 patients); trauma (2 patients), deltoid insufficiency (2 patients); glenosphere malposition (2 patients); acromion fracture (2 patients); and other (4 patients). Initial treatment included: non-operative (6 patients); closed reduction (23 patients); open reduction (3 patients); and revision arthroplasty (11 patients). Final outcomes included: persistent instability (7 patients); humeral revision (19 patients); glenoid revision (one patient); hemiarthroplasty (3 patients); and resection arthroplasty (2 patients).

Conclusion: Main causes of RSA instability include inadequate soft tissue tension, large anteroinferior release and subscapularis insufficiency. Preventive measures include careful patient selection, restoration of humeral length, minimizing anteroinferior releases, maximizing soft-tissue tension, maintaining or restoring subscapularis integrity, immobilization in the case of subscapularis insufficiency and use of a postoperative drain. Treatment recommendations include restoration of humeral length, soft-tissue retensioning and prolonged immobilization.

Scapular notching is of concern in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and has been suggested as a cause of glenoid loosening. Our purpose was to analyze in a large series the characteristics and the consequences of the notch and then to enlighten the causes in order to seek some solutions to avoid it. 430 consecutive patients (457 shoulders) were treated by a reverse prosthesis for various etiologies between 1991 and 2003 and analyzed for this retrospective multicenter study. Adequate evaluation of the notch was available in 337 shoulders with a follow-up of 47 months (range, 24–120 months). The notch has been diagnosed in 62% cases at the last follow-up. Intermediate reviews show that the notch is already visible within the first postoperative year in 82% of these cases. Frequency and grade extension of the notch increase significantly with follow-up (p< 0.0001) but notch, when present, is not always evolutive. At this point of follow-up, scapular notch is not correlated with clinical outcome. There is a correlation with humeral radiolucent lines, particularly in metaphyseal zones (p=0.005) and with glenoid radiolucent lines around the fixation screws (p=0.006). Significant preoperative factors are: cuff tear arthropathy (p=0.0004), muscular fatty infiltration of infraspinatus (p=0.01), narrowing of acromio-humeral distance (p< 0.0001) and superior erosion of the glenoid (p=0.006). It was more frequent with superolateral approach than with deltopectoral approach (p< 0.0001) and with standard cup than with lateralized cup (p=0.02). We conclude that scapular notching is frequent, early and sometimes evolutive but not unavoidable. Preoperative superior glenoid erosion is significantly associated with a scapular notch, possibly due to the surgical tendency to position the baseplate with superior tilt and/or in high position which has been demonstrated to be an impingement factor. Preoperative radiographic planning and adapted glenoid preparation are of concern.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of radiolucent lines (RLL) is the main component of the radiographic analysis of the glenoid component. The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two glenoid preparation techniques by analyzing periglenoid radiolucencies.

MATERIEL AND METHODS: The series consists of seventy-two shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis. Shoulders were divided into two groups based on glenoid preparation technique:

Group 1: Thirty-seven shoulders operated on between 1991 and 1995 with flat back, polyethylene glenoid implants cemented after “curettage” of the keel slot.

Group 2: Thirty-five shoulders operated on between 1997 and 1999 with flat back, polyethylene glenoid implants cemented after cancellous bone compaction of the keel slot.

At least three of the following four fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs were analyzed: immediate postoperative, between the 3rd and 6th postoperative months, at one year postoperative and at two years postoperative. The immediate and the two year radiograph were required for study inclusion. The radiolucent line score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé, involving the summation of radiolucencies in each of six specified zones. The RLLS was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of the total RLL score of the 9 analyzes was 2.39 in Group 1 and 1.67 in Group 2 (p=0.042). There was a statistically significant association between the glenoid preparation technique and the incidence of radiolucency around the keel as well (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in radiolucency behind the faceplate between the two groups (Group 1: 1.54 and Group 2: 1.41; p=0.394). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score of the 9 analyzes were 6.44 in the Group1 (4.05 under the tray, and 2.39 around the keel), and 4.19 in Group2 (p=0.0005) (2.86 under the tray, and 1.33 around the keel). The radiolucency around the keel and behind the faceplate (p=0.0005) was significantly more important (p=0.001) in the “curettage” glenoid preparation population. A significantly higher degree of progression of the total RLL score (p=0.002) and of the radiolucency behind the faceplate (p=0.001) was observed in the “curettage” glenoid preparation group.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Preparation of the glenoid component keel slot with cancellous bone compaction is radiographically superior to the “curettage” technique with regard to periglenoid radiolucen-cies. Although new techniques of glenoid preparation may help to decrease the rate of RLL, this study shows that even with better technique, the RLL are evolutive and may appear after few years in initially perfectly implanted glenoid.

Purpose of the study: Posterior shoulder instability is a rare condition. Several surgical treatments have been proposed.

Material and methods: This was a retrospective series of 21 posterior bone block procedures performed between 1984 and 2001 and analyzed with mean follow-up of six years. Fifteen patients (n=16) had experienced one or more episodes of posterior dislocation. Thirteen patients were athletes and five had traumatic subluxation with chronic posterior instability. Voluntary recurrent dislocations were not observed in these patients. Male gender predominated (n=19 men, 1 woman). Mean age at surgery was 24.8 years (range 17–40). The dominant side was involved in 12 patients (57%). The Constant and Duplay scores were noted as were the pre- and postoperative x-ray findings. There were ten glenoid fractures, two glenoid impactions, ten anterior humeral notches. Mean retroversion, measured on the scans (n=17) was 9.6° (range 0–21°).

Results: All patients (n=20) were satisfied or very satisfied. At last follow-up, the mean Constant score was 93.3 (range 80–103) and the mean Duplay score (n=21) 85.6 (40–100); 68.2% of patients (n=15) resumed sports activities at the same level. Failure was noted in three patients, one with recurrent posterior dislocation and two with major apprehension. For two patients, glenohumeral osteoarthritis developed postoperatively.

Discussion: Most of the series in the literature have reported results for patients with recurrent posterior subluxations and not for traumatic posterior dislocation, the much more uncommon entity presented here. The rate of bony lesions was high in our series compared with former series in the literature. These results can be explained by two facts. The first that this was a group of recurrent posterior dislocations and second that the analysis of the osteoarticular lesions was made on plain x-rays and/or CT scans. For the two cases of glenohumeral osteoarthritis which developed postoperatively, the position of the bone block does not appear to be involved.

Conclusion: The posterior bone block remains the treatment of choice for recurrent posterior dislocation. The risk of developing osteoarthritis appears to be low but a longer follow-up would be necessary for confirmation.

Purpose of the study: Latissimus dorsi transfer is proposed for irreparable superior and posterior rotator cuff tears, particularly in the effect of deficient active external rotation. The purpose of this study was to analyzed outcome at minimum two years follow-up.

Material and methods: Between 2001 and 2002, eleven patients underwent latissimus dorsi transfer for an irreparable tear of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. Surgery was proposed because of the patient’s young age and occupational activity level, or because of a disabling deficit of active external rotation. There were six men and five women, mean age 52.5 years (range 36–66 years). There were seven right shoulders and nine dominant shoulders. Symptom onset was progressive in seven with a mean duration of 33 months (range 2–144 months). Active external rotation was measured at −14° to 29° in five patients with a positive dropping test. Three patients presented pseudoparalysis. The preoperative Constant score was 52±12 points. Preoperative the subacromial space measured less than 6 mm in all patients. Muscle degeneration of the infraspinatus was noted grade 2 or greater (Goutallier).

Results: Mean follow-up was 26 months (range 24–36). Subjective outcome was very satisfactory for eight patients, satisfactory for one and disappointing for two. Seven of nine patients resumed their occupational activity. The postoperative Constant score was 73±10 points. None of the patients presented pseudoparalysis at review. Pain was improved in all. Active external rotation was significantly improved in six. Postoperative, the dropping test persisted in two patients. The subacromial space was still 6 mm. Better results were obtained when active deficit was predominant than when anterior elevation (pseudoparalytic shoulder) or external rotation (positive dropping test) were predominant.

Discussion and conclusion: Latissimus dorsi transfer provides a solution for irreparable superior and posterior rotator cuff tears. The pain relief is significant. Active external rotation is improved. This is an interesting alternative in young patients or when the motor deficit is a severe handicap.

Purpose of the study: Revision shoulder arthroplasty is generally considered to be a difficult procedure yielding modest improvement.

Material and methods: We report a prospective study of 45 patients, aged 69.8 years (range 49–85 years). Thirty-two patients had a simple humeral prosthesis and thirteen a total prosthesis. A reversed prosthesis was used for all revisions. The reasons for the revisions were classified into five groups: failure of prosthesis implanted for fracture (36%), glenoid problems of a total shoulder arthroplasty (24%), prosthetic instability (18%), failure of a hemiarthroplasty implanted for rotator cuff tear (11%), failure of a hemiarhtroplasty implanted for post-traumatic osteoarthritis (11%). The revision consisted in replacement with a reversed prosthesis. Patients were assessed pre and postoperatively using the Constant score for the clinical assessment and plain x-rays for the radiological assessment.

Results: Forty-one patients were reviewed at mean follow-up of 42.1 months (range 24–92). The four other patients died during the first two postoperative years. Subjectively, 73% of patients were satisfied. The Constant score improved from 187.7 to 55.6 on average. The best gain was obtained for the pain and daily activities scores.

Discussion: Revision shoulder arthroplasty provides only moderate improvement. Neer called a limited goal surgery. Results published on revision shoulder arthroplasty using a non-constrained prosthesis show that the functional gain is moderate. Revisio with a reversed total prosthesis gives better results because of the lesser impact of the cuff deficiency. The rate of complications after revision is greater than with first intention implantations.

Conclusion: Use of a reversed total shoulder prosthesis for revision shoulder arthroplasty provides encouraging results in terms of the mid-term functional outcome.

Purpose of the study: When repairing rotator cuff tears, injury to the infraspinatus is generally a posterior extension of a supraspinatus tear. The description of isolated tears of the infraspinatus has not been to our knowledge reported in the literature. We report a series of 13 cases with more than one year follow-up.

Material and methods: Thirteen patients underwent surgery for an isolated tear of the infraspinatus between 1995 and 2004. There were ten men and three women. Mean age at surgery was 47 years (range 34–62). The right shoulder was involved in seven of the thirteen cases, and the dominant shoulder in eight. A progressive onset was observed in eleven patients and nine had a history of treated calcified tendinopathy. Clinically, pain was the predominant symptom. The Jobe test was deficient in all patients as was external rotation (except one patient). The preoperative Constant score was 70 (range 62–87). X-rays revealed type C posterior calcification in nine patients. A full-thickness tear was observed in seven cases, a partial deep tear in three, and a partial superficial tear in three. Isolated fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus noted Goutallier grade 2 or greater was observed in seven patients. Open surgical repair was preformed in all patients.

Results: Mean time to revision was 29 months (range 12–82). Subjectively, six patients were very satisfied, six were satisfied, and one was disappointed (failure by secondary tear). Two shoulder-hand syndromes were noted in the postoperative period. At last follow-up, the Constant score was 83.5 (range 64–97). All patients except one were satisfied with pain relief but the lack of force was significant.

Discussion and conclusion: Isolated tears of the infra-spinatus are rare, but there is a notable relationship with calcifying tendinopathy of the same tendon. Repair should be undertaken before the development of fatty degeneration in order to improve the chances of force recovery.

Over the long term, the results of the insertion of a Grammont inverted shoulder prothesis are unknown. The present study reports survivorship curves and the role of the initial aetiology in patients re-examined after 5 to 10 years.

Patients and methods Eighty prostheses (for 77 patients) were implanted between 1992 and 1998: 66 cases of massive cuff tear arthropathy (MCTA) and 24 cases for another aetiology (mainly rheumatoid arthritis and revision).

At the time of follow-up, 18 patients had died and 2 could not be traced. The remaining patients (57 representing 60 prostheses) were seen by an independent examiner. The minimum follow-up was 5 years. The average follow-up was 69,6 months.

Kaplan-Meir survivorship curves for the 60 prostheses were established in order to show the probability of failure as defined by: revision of the prothesis, glenoid loosening, and a functional level< 30 points according to the Constant score.

Results The survivorship curves were as follow:

- for non revision of the prosthesis at 10 years: 91% overall; after 9 years: 95% for MCTA, and 77 % for the others aetiologies. This difference was statistically significant (p< 0,01) ; 6 implants were revised: 3 for MCTA and 3 for other aetiologies.

Discussion

According to revision of the prosthesis, there is a clear rupture in the survivorship curve about 3 years after insertion in aetiologies other than MCTA. This suggests that Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty is not appropriate in these aetiologies (particularly in cases of rheumatoid arthritis).

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two glenoid preparation techniques by analyzing periglenoid radiolucencies.

Material and methods: The series consists of 72 shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis. Shoulders were divided into 2 groups based on glenoid preparation technique:

Group 1: 37 shoulders operated on between 1991 and 1995 with flat back, polyethylene glenoid implants cemented after curettage of the keel slot.

Group 2: 35 shoulders operated on between 1997 and 1999 with the same glenoid implants cemented after cancellous bone compaction of the keel slot.

At least 3 of the following 4 fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs were analyzed: immediate postoperative, between the 3rd and 6th months, at one year and at two years postoperative. The immediate and the two year radiograph were required for study inclusion. The radiolucent line score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé, involving the summation of radiolucencies in each of six specified zones. The RLLS was compared between the two groups.

Results: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of the total RLL score of the 9 analyzes was 2.39 in Group 1 and 1.67 in Group 2 (p=0.042). There was a statistically significant association between the glenoid preparation technique and the incidence of radiolucency around the keel as well (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in radiolucency behind the faceplate between the two groups (Group 1: 1.54 and Group 2: 1.41; p=0.394). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score of the 9 analyzes were 6.44 in the Group1 (4.05 under the tray, and 2.39 around the keel), and 4.19 in Group2 (p=0.0005) (2.86 under the tray, and 1.33 around the keel). The radiolucency around the keel and behind the faceplate (p=0.0005) was significantly more important (p=0.001) in the curettage glenoid preparation population. A significantly higher degree of progression of the total RLL score (p=0.002) and of the radiolucency behind the faceplate (p=0.001) was observed in the curettage glenoid preparation group.

Discussion/conclusion: Preparation of the glenoid component keel slot with cancellous bone compaction is radiographically superior to the curettage technique with regard to periglenoid radiolucencies.

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the quality of cemented humeral stem fixation. We analysed the incidence and influence of humeral lucent lines and loosening after implantation of a shoulder prosthesis as a function of aetiology (fracture versus scapular osteoarthritis) and glenoid status (total versus partial humeral prosthesis).

Material and methods: This retrospective series included 1842 first-intention shoulder prostheses reviewed at mean five years (2–10). We selected patients whose initial diagnosis was fracture of the superior portion of the humerus (n=300) and centred osteoarthritis (n=767). All stems implanted for fracture were cemented. For osteoarthritis, there were 610 total prostheses and 157 simple humeral prostheses: 752 stems were cemented and 15 were implanted without cement. The Constant score and radiographic results (AP and lateral view at least) were noted.

Results: For cemented stems, the incidence of radiographic lucent lines and loosening was significantly higher in fractures (40% and 10% respectively) than in centred osteoarthritis (14% and 1%). Lucency and loosening did not influence functional outcome in patients with centred osteoarthritis but had a significantly negative effect on final outcome in fractures. For fractures, the incidence of lucent lines was correlated with migration of the tubercles. For osteoarthritis, there was no difference between total and partial prostheses in terms of loosening, but the functional outcome was significantly better with total prostheses.

Conclusion: Fixation of the humeral implant with cement remains the gold standard for shoulder prostheses implanted for centred osteoarthritis. However, cement fixation yields disappointing results for fractures: defective fixation of the humeral stem is correlated with migration of the tubercles. For osteoarthritis, there are not more lucent lines with a total prosthesis which provides the better functional results.

Purpose: Appropriate treatment of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff with subacromial impingement remains a subject of debate. Considering that in most patients, spontaneous tears of the long biceps tendon reduces the pain and that subacromial osteoarthritis is well tolerated by many patients, we proposed arthroscopic tenotomy of the long biceps in this indication with the aim of relieving pain. We report here the long-term outcome.

Material and methods: Between 1988 and 1999, 307 arthroscopic tenotomies of the long biceps tendon were performed in patients with unrepairable tears of the rotator cuff tendons (massive full thickness tears, old patients, non-motivated patients). The procedure was isolated in 64% and associated with acromioplasty in 36%. All patients were given prior medical treatment. Mean age at surgery was 64.3 years. The preoperative subacromial height was 6.6 mm. The tendon lesion was an isolated tear of the supraspinatus in 31%, tears of two tendons in 44.6% and tears of three tendons in 21.8%, and isolated tears of the subscapularis in 2.6%. Mean follow-up was 57 months (24–168).

Results: The Constant score improved from 48.4 to 67.6 points (p< 0.001). Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (Samilson) increased from 38% to 67% of the shoulders postoperatively. Association with acromioplasty improved the objective and subjective result solely in the group of isolated tears of the supraspinatus. The size of the tear and the degree of fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff muscles had a statistically significant influence on functional and radiographic outcome (p< 0.001) while time since surgery had no effect on radiographic outcome (p< 0.001).

Discussion: This simple easy-to-perform procedure yielded pain relief at rest and also nighttime pain. It can be recommended for massive rotator cuff tears with sub-acromial impingement in elderly or poorly-motivated patients whose pain fails to respond to medical treatment. This procedure does not allow recovery of shoulder motion or force.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two different glenoid component designs by analyzing the radiolucent lines (RLL).

Methods: Sixty-three shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis were divided into two groups based on glenoid component type: thirty-five shoulders with flat back, and thirty-one shoulders with convex back, polyethylene glenoid implants. The radiolucenct lines were analyzed on fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs. The RLL Score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé. The RLLS was compared between the two groups.

Results: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of total RLL score was 1.67 in Group 1 and 0.98 in Group 2 (p< 0.0005). There was a statistically significant association between the type of implant and the incidence of radiolucency behind the faceplate as well (p< 0.0005). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score was 4.19 in the Group1 (2.86 under the tray, and 1.33 around the keel), and 3.23 in Group2 (p=0.02) (2.09 under the tray, and 1.14 around the keel). The radiolucency behind the face-plate (p< 0.0005) was significantly greater in the flat back group, but not around the keel (p=0.427). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the degree of RLL score progression.

Conclusions: The initial and mid-term RLLS is better with convex than fl at back glenoid component.

Aims: To review the early results of shoulder arthroplasty in the weight bearing shoulder of long term pareplegic patients. We have been unable to find previously published results of this subgroup of shoulder arthroplasty patients in the litterature. Method: The case notes and X-rays of 5 female patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty were analysed. These patients all had longstanding paraplegia and were wheelchair bound. All patients has been prospectively scored with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon’s (ASES) function score and the Constant score. Results: The patients had a mean age of 70 yrs (61–88) at the time of surgery. Three of the 5 shoulders and rotator cuff tears at the time of surgery, 2 of which were repaired. The results are summarised in the table. There was no radiological evidence of failure apart from the migration of the single cemented glenoid component. Conclusion: In view of the satisfactory improvement in pain in particular following these procedures, we feel that it is reasonable to continue to offer this procedure in this subgroup of patients. We will however remain vigilant with regard to any further complications arising because of the increased loading in these prostheses at the medium and long term.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic results of two glenoid preparation techniques by analyzing periglenoid radiolucencies. Methods: Seventy-two shoulder arthroplasties with primary osteoarthritis were divided into two groups based on glenoid preparation technique: thirtyseven shoulders with “curettage” of the keel slot, and thirty-five shoulders with cancellous bone compaction. The radiolucent lines were analyzed on fluoroscopically positioned, postoperative AP radiographs. The RLL Score (RLLS) was calculated using the technique of Molé. The RLLS was compared between the two groups. Results: On the immediate postoperative radiographs the average of the total RLL score was 2.39 in Group 1 and 1.67 in Group 2 (p=0.042). There was a statistically significant association between the glenoid preparation technique and the incidence of radiolucency around the keel as well (p=0.001). On the 2-year postoperative radiographs the average RLL score was 6.44 in the Group1, and 4.19 in Group 2 (p=0.0005). The radiolucency around the keel and behind the face-plate (p=0.0005) was significantly greater (p=0.001) in the “curettage” glenoid preparation population. A significantly higher degree of progression of the total RLL score (p=0.002) and of the radiolucency behind the face-plate (p=0.001) was observed in the “curettage” glenoid preparation group. Conclusions: Preparation of the keel slot with cancellous bone compaction is radiographically superior to the “curettage” technique.

Purpose: Failure of the glenoid component is the main complication of total shoulder prostheses. When surgical revision is necessary, the surgeon has the option of a new implantation or non-prosthetic plasty (glenoido-plasty). The purpose of the present work was to analyse results obtained with these two techniques in order to propose proper indications.

Material and methods: This retrospective study included 16 patients, mean age 62 years at revision surgery. Fialures included loosening of a cemented glenoid implant (n=9) and failure of non-cemented implants (3 defective anchors, 4 unclipped polyethylene inserts). Mean time to revision was 39 months (2–178) after primary implantation. A new glenoid implant was cemented in nine patients (group A). Seven patients (group 2) had glenoidoplasty with an iliac graft in four.

Results: A mean follow-up of 37 months (19–73), the Constant score had improved from 18 points before revision to 52 points (+34). Two patients experienced a complication requiring a second revision (infection, instability) and one patient underwent subsequent surgery for biceps tenodesis. For the group with glenoidoplasty with iliac graft, insertion of an inverted prosthesis was achieved during a second operative time. In group 1, the mean Constant score at last-follow-up was 63 points (+45) with the pain score of 11, movement score of 29. In group 2, the mean Constant score was 37 (+19) with pain at 6 and motion at 16. In this group, the mean score was 48 points with a glenoid graft and 21 points with simple implant replacement.

Discussion: Revision surgery for a failed glenoid implant remains a difficult procedure but can be effective for pain relief and improved motion score. The small number of patients in this series makes it difficult to perform statistical analysis but the results do point in favour of prosthetic reimplantation when the bone stock is sufficient. For other patients, a graft would be preferable to simple implant removal. This would allow secondary revision if possible.

Purpose: The purpose of our work was to report causes and results of treatment of anterior shoulder instability after implantation of a shoulder prosthesis.

Material and methods: This retrospective multicentric study included 51 patients with prosthetic anterior instability: 42 patients after first-intention shoulder prosthesis and nine after prosthesis revision. There were 39 women (79%) and 12 men, mean age 67 years, who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (n=29, 57%) or hemiarthro-plasty (n=22, 43%). Thirty-eight patients (75%) had prosthetic dislocation and 13 (25%) subluxation associated with pain an loss of anterior elevation. The initial prosthesis was implanted for degenerative disease (n=29), rheumatoid arthritis (n=7), or fracture (n=15). Anterior prosthetic instability occurred early in 23 shoulders (first six weeks) and lat in 28 shoulders (7 after trauma, 21 without trauma). Conservative treatment by reduction-immobilisation was performed in 16 cases and prosthetic revision in 35. The patients were reviewed radiographically at mean 41 months follow-up (range 24–62).

Results: Subscapular tear or incompetence was the main cause of prosthetic anterior instability, observed in 87% of the cases. Technical errors concerning the prosthesis were also observed: oversized head, malrotation of the prosthesis. Associated complications were frequent: glenoid loosening (24%), polyethylene dissociation from the metal glenoid implant (10%), infection (10%), humeral fracture (4%). The final Constant score was 54 points and 55% of the patients were disappointed or dissatisfied. None of the shoulders were stable after consevative treatment. The prosthetic revision provided disappointing results with 51% recurrent anterior instability.

Discussion: Anterior instability of shoulder prostheses is a serious complication which responds poorly to treatment. Loosening of the subscapular suture is the main cause.

Purpose: The purpose of this multicentric study was to report results obtained with the Aequalis system using the simple humeral or total prosthesis, at at least two years follow-up in patients with shoulder joint degeneration and non-repairable rotator cuff tears.

Material and methods: Sixty-eight Aequalis arthroplasties were performed between 1992 and 1998. Outcome was assessed on the basis of the Constant score and radiological findings. Female gender predominated (78%) in this series with a mean age of 72 years. There were 62 simple humeral implantations and six total shoulder arthroplasties. The deltopectoral approach was used in 63 cases and the superior approach in five. All stems and sockets were cemented. There were no neurological or infectious complications.

Results: Two humeral stem implants were failures and required revision with a Grammont prosthesis. There was also one reoperation for arthrolysis with preservation of the implant; the outcome was fair.

Functional outcome: Sixty-six patients were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 45 months. All implantations except one were performed to achieve pain relief. The absolute Constant score improved by 20 points (from 25 to 46) with a 7-point gain for pain (3 to 10), a 20° gain for active elevation, an 18° gain for external rotation, and a 0.4 point gain for force. Pain relief was greater with total prostheses. Only five patients stated they were dissatis-fied with the outcome despite the fact that 18 reported significant persistent pain. The Constant score was analysed as a function of follow-up, size of the humeral head, and preoperative morphology of the glenoid surface. Radiological outcome: Certain loosening was recognised for one glenoid and one humeral stem. Among 52 shoulders with strictly identical radiological results, 33 exhibited deterioration either for the vault or the glenoid or both, with no effect on the Constant score.

Discussion: In this indication the Adqualis prosthesis is implanted to achieve a “limited” objective: pain relief. The deltopectoral approach is preferable in order to preserve elements inhibiting superior migration of the humerus (in a parallel study, the absence of these elements explains the poor outcome observed in 3 out of 9 patients). Unlike other series, the present series exhibited a significant effect of a type E2 biconcave glenoid surface. The pain score was better with total shoulder prostheses than with humeral stems alone and four of the six glenoid sockets remained perfectly fixed. The long-term outcome of these glenoid surfaces remains unknown so it would be inappropriate to advise systematic use. Clinical outcome did not show any deterioration over time despite deterioration of the vault, the glenoid, or both. Indications for non-constrained pros-theses should however be retained with caution due to open questions concerning long-term outcome, particularly for shoulders which have already been operated on or with type E2 glenoids. Considering these reservations, the Aequalis prosthesis has reached, at nearly five years follow-up, the assigned objectives: significant pain relief, satisfactory overall shoulder function.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse outcome of shoulder prostheses after radiotherapy, to define a specific clinicoradiological entity, and evaluate incidence of complications.

Material and methods: Fourteen shoulder prostheses were implanted in 13 women who had been treated for breast cancer with complementary radiotherapy and one man treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The time from radiothearpy to implantation was 16 years, seven months. Two forms were identified on the preoperative x-rays: seven cases with typical avascular osteonecrosis according to the Arlet and Ficat classification, and seven cases with a radiographic presentation of arthritis or degenerative disease. Humeral prostheses were used in five cases and a total shoulder arthroplasty in nine.

Results: Four implants had to be removed, three for sepsis, and five patients required revision surgery. The mean postoperative Constant score for the ten prostheses still in place was 53.1 points with a mean elevation of 111° at three years seven months follow-up. The gain in pain score was 8.5 points with a mean result of 10.9 points. The results were different depending on the initial radiological form, with less favourable outcome observed in typical osteonecrosis.

Discussion: This study demonstrated a particular radio-clinical entity independent of classical osteonecrosis of the humeral head. The surgical procedure was more difficult and the outcome was less satisfactory than in the classical forms with a high rate of complications.