header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

The Cam Impinging Femur Has Multiple Morphologic Abnormalities

The International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA)



Abstract

Introduction

Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is a common source of impaired motion of the hip, often attributed to the presence of an aspherical femoral head. However, other types of femoral deformity, including posterior slip, retroversion, and neck enlargement, can also limit hip motion. This study was performed to establish whether the “cam” impinging femur has a single deformity of the head/neck junction or multiple abnormalities.

Materials and Methods

Computer models of 71 femora (28 normal and 43 “cam” impinging) were prepared from CT scans. Morphologic parameters describing the dimensions of the head, neck, and medullary canal were calculated for each specimen. The anteversion angle, alpha angle of Notzli, beta angle of Beaulé, and normalized anterior heads offset were also calculated. Average dimensions were compared between the normal and impinging femora.

Results

Compared to the normal controls, the impinging femora had wider necks (AP: 15.2 vs 13.3 mm, p<0.0001), larger heads (diameter: 48.3mm vs 46.0mm, p=0.032) and decreased head/neck ratios (1.60 vs 1.74, p=0.0002). However, there was no difference in neck/shaft angle (125.7° vs 126.5°, p=0.582) or anteversion angle (8.70 vs 8.44°, p=0.866). Most significantly, 53% of impinging femora also had a significant posterior slip (>2mm), compared to only 14% of normal controls. Average head displacements for the two groups were: FAI: 1.93mm vs Normals: 0.78mm (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

The CAM impinging femur has many abnormalities apart from the “bump” at the head/neck junction. These femora have increased neck width and head/neck ratio, a smaller spherical bearing surface, and reduced neck offset from the medullary canal. Therefore, surgical treatment limited to localized re-contouring of the head–neck profile may fail to address significant components of the underlying abnormality.


Email: