Abstract
Backgrounds
The authors present an analysis of 30 cases of total hip prosthesis performed with minimally invasive surgical earlier compares with 30 cases of total hip prosthesis performed surgically with direct side. The intent is to demonstrate the immediate and clear advantages especially in the postoperative surgical minimally invasive front.
Methods
The authors present a randomized study of thirty cases of patients undergoing surgery for osteoarthritis of the hip prosthesis with primary surgical minimally invasive front compared to a group of 30 patients undergoing surgery with direct surgical side. All patients had the same cementless implants and instruments with the same surgeon. Patients were then evaluated in four different times: before surgery, immediate postoperative, after 1 week and 4 months after surgery.
Results and conclusions
The experience of the authors on the surgical front shows the immediate and clear advantages in postoperative species by saving the muscle tissues, little pain, little bleeding, more quick and easy re-education and rehabilitation.
