header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

SPINAL SURGERY: DO CURRENT MEASURES MEASURE WHAT NEEDS TO BE MEASURED?



Abstract

Aims

  • to determine what aspects of people’s lives (domains of impact) where most affected by their spinal problems,

  • to determine the extent to which the SF-36 and ODI represent these domains,

  • to compare the domains of impact resulting from neck and low back pain.

Methods & Results: Data was collected prospectively. New patients attending the spinal clinic completed a questionnaire about their symptoms. They were also asked to list, in order of importance to them, the 3 aspects of their daily life most affected by their symptoms. Responses were in free text format, summarised with the most appropriate single word response (e.g. walking) and grouped. Thoraco-lumbar and cervical pain/pathology were analyzed separately. We computed: (1) the total number of domains of impact identified; (2) the frequency (%) each domain was listed 1st; (3)the frequency (%) each domain was listed 1st, 2nd, or 3rd

Cervical pathology (n=200 people).

19 domains were identified. Of domains identified as first most important (n=164) 3 domains predominated: work (28%), sleep (24%), walking (24%). Others ranged from 0 – 7.6%. Of all domains identified by all people (n=399), 4 predominated: sleep (62%), work (54%), walking (41%) sitting (36%). Others ranged from 0.6% to 9.8%.

Thoraco-Lumbar pathology (n=537 people).

25 domains were identified. Of domains identified as first most important (n=429) 4 domains predominated: walking (49%), working (18%), sitting (12%) and sleeping (11%). Others ranged from 0 – 7.6%. Of all domains identified by all people (n=1096), 4 predominated: sleep (76%), work (50%), walking (47%) sitting (45%). Others ranged from 0.2% to 11.9%.

Conclusions: People with spinal problems consistently identify 4 main domains of impact: working, walking, sleeping and sitting. This is not reflected by SF-36 and ODI. Further work is required to ensure that scale selection for assessing the impact of spinal pathology and its management is evidence based.

Ethics approval: none

Interest statement: none

Correspondence should be addressed to BASS/BCSS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.