Abstract
Aim: To review our experience with epiphysiodesis using three different methods to correct LLD and to establish the efficacy of these procedures.
Method: A retrospective review of 42 patients from 1999 to 2008 with at least one year follow-up recorded type and location of the epiphysiodesis, average operating time and hospital stay, complications, method of prediction, timing and the final LLD. CT scanograms and mechanical axis view with grids were used to assess LLD.
Results: Epiphysiodesis was as per Canale for 26, by Metaizeau screw in 14 and by staples in 2. Average operation time was 42 minutes for Canale type, 45 minutes for the screws and 56 minutes for the staple cases. The pre operative LLD of 3.7 cms In the Canale group, improved to 1.2 cms over an average follow-up of 2.1 yrs. There were 4 minor and 2 major complications with a 92% success rate. For the screw group, the mean change was 1.8 cms over 2.2 yrs with 2 minor and 2 major complications giving a success rate of 85%. With staples the success rate was 100% and the mean change was 1.8 cms at an average of 2.3 yrs. In 14 cases where bone age reports were available, the multiplier method seemed better at predicting estimated LLD at skeletal maturity and timing of epiphysiodesis than the Moseley chart.
Conclusions: Percutaneous epiphysiodesis by any method is reliable, minimally invasive and with acceptable complication rate when compared to a corrective osteotomy or open Phemister-type epiphysiodesis. Our experience suggests that the Canale method has the least complications and best success rate. Paleys multiplier method was better at predicting LLD and timing of epiphysiodesis than the Moseley Chart.
Correspondence should be addressed to BSCOS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.
