header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ACETABULAR STRAIN DISTRIBUTION AT THE BONE-CEMENT AND BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE, A COMPARISON OF CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS SOCKETS.



Abstract

Objective: To develop in-vitro experiments that measure the strain distributions at the bone-implant and bone-cement interface of the acetabular region under physiological loading conditions for cemented and cementless sockets.

Experimental model: Four hemi-pelvic specimens of saw bones were used. Following careful placement of six protected precision strain gauges, two specimens were prepared to receive a cemented polyethylene cup (Depuy Charnley Elite 53/28). Another two specimens were prepared and implanted with un-cemented Duraloc 58/28 cups. Press-fit technique was validated by torque measurements.

Background: Symptoms associated with prosthetic migration result from osteoclast induced bone resorption at the interface adjacent to bone. We aim to develop a new and more accurate method of measuring strains at this critical interface.

Methods: To simulate quasi-static loading, selected variables of hip joint force relative to the cup during normal walking was used for quasi-static tests on an Instron 1603 testing machine. The magnitude and orientation of the principal strains (maximum and minimum) were calculated based on the readings of strains from a 32 channel digital acquisition system.

Results: The magnitude and distribution of acetabular trabecular bone strains are dependent on the type of cup material (un-cemented/cemented) implanted.

At the position of maximum load, the maximum principal strain in the un-cemented specimens was 14.4 times higher than that for the cemented specimens (T-value = −96.40, P-value = 0.007). The highest recorded tensile strains in these specimens were localised to the acetabular rim of the posterior-superior quadrant.

For the cemented specimens, the maximum principal strains are highest in the dorsal acetabulum, at a location that approximates to the centre of rotation of the replaced hip joint.

Shear strains in the posterior-superior quadrant of both cementless and cemented acetabuli surpass the maximum principal strains.

Conclusion: In both cemented and un-cemented specimens, the maximum shear and principal strains magnitude show similar spatial and statistical distribution. As indicators of local failure prospect within the acetabulum, these strains suggest that the posterior-superior quadrant is the most likely site for load-induced micro-fractures, in both cemented and cementless acetabuli.

Honorary Secretary Mr Bimal Singh. Correspondence should be addressed to BOSA (British Orthopaedic Specialists Association), c/o Royal College of Surgeons, 35 – 43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.