header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

EFFECT OF PAMIDRONATE ON CLINICAL OUTCOME, BONE LOSS AND OSTEOLYSIS OVER 5 YEARS AFTER THA



Abstract

Peri-prosthetic bone loss may contribute to aseptic loosening after THA. The aims of this randomised controlled trial extension study were to study the effect of pamidronate therapy on Peri-prosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) and Peri-prosthetic osteolysis over 5 years after primary THA.

50 patients were enrolled in the study in 1998. All received a hybrid THA (Ultima-TPS stem, Plasmacup) for osteoarthritis. Subjects were randomised to receive either 90mg of pamidronate or placebo by intravenous infusion on the 5th post-operative day. At 5 years 36 patients (41 Hips: placebo n=21, pamidronate n=20) returned for measurement of BMD and clinical and plain radiographic assessment. Five patients had died and nine had withdrawn from the study.

The effect of pamidronate in maintaining femoral bone mass in the region of the calcar previously reported at 2 years was maintained at 5 years (Gruen zone 6 pamidronate versus placebo ANOVA P=0.038; Gruen zone 7 ANOVA P=0.048). No differences in pelvic BMD were found between treatment groups at 5 years. Harris hip scores used to evaluate clinical outcome did not show any significant difference between the 2 groups over the 5-year period. (Mann Whitney p> 0.05). Isolated expansile osteolytic lesions were identified on AP radiographs of the hip at 5 years in 4 patients (2 placebo, 2 pamidronate; P> 0.05). One patient had a 5x9mm lytic lesion in the region of the femoral calcar, and 3 patients had pelvic lytic lesions in the region of the acetabular dome (largest measuring 20x10mm).

Single-dose peri-operative pamidronate therapy preserves femoral calcar bone mass over a 5 year period after THA. However, although the number of subjects with osteolysis is small, we have seen no difference in the rate of osteolytic lesions between treatment groups. Long term study of this patient group is required to examine the rate of aseptic loosening between the treatment groups.

Editoral Secretary Mr Peter Howard. Correspondence should be addressed to BHS at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35 - 43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN.