header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

S21 NEW TREATMENT FOR JUXTA-ARTICULAR INTRAOSSEOUS CYSTIC LESIONS WITH INTERCONNECTED POROUS CALCIUM HYDROXYAPATITE CERAMIC



Abstract

Background: Juxta-articular intraosseous cystic lesions (JAICL) are common lesion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and could cause spontaneous pathological fractures and extensive joint destruction. Although surgical treatment is well indicated for benign bone tumour such as solitary bone cyst, RA induced JAICL have been rarely treated surgically because of following reasons. The first is the possible re-absorption of grafted bone due to disease progression. The second is donor site problem of iliac bone autografting. The third is limitation of autograft for possible operations in the future. The fourth is the lack of bone graft substitutes with good osteoconductivity. We have developed the interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic (IP-CHA) with excellent osteoconductivity. The IP-CHA achieved major incorporation with host bone much more rapid than the other porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramics. We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of curettage and packing with the IP-CHA for the treatment of JAICL in RA patients.

Methods: Nine JAICL in 7 RA patients were treated by curettage and packing with IP-CHA. Eight lesions were impending pathological fractures. Two were male and five were female, the average age of operation was 57.8 years (range, forty-nine to seventy-two years). Follow-up assessment was based on final radiography at an average of 10.9 months after surgery (range, five to seventeen months). The expansion of the cystic lesions around the implanted IP-CHA and the re-absorption of the IP-CHA itself, which means erosion or increasing porosity of implanted IP-CHA, were assessed on the basis of the radiographies at just after operation and final follow up.

Results: The locations were as follows: distal radius, 6 lesions; distal ulna, 1; proximal tibia, 1; distal fibula, 1. No lesions showed the re-absorption of implanted IP-CHA itself. One of 9 lesions showed out-expansion of radiolucent area around the implanted IP-CHA without re-absoption of IP-CHA itself at the final follow-up. There were no postoperative fractures as complication.

Conclusions: These results suggested that surgical intervention with the IP-CHA could be useful for prevention of pathological fractures due to arthritis related JAICL. The efficacies of this technique might be augmented by amelioration of disease activity with concomitant drug therapy including biologics, since there was one case with out-expansion of cystic lesions in RA patients.

Correspondence should be addressed to ERASS Office, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, CH-8008 ZURICH, Switzerland.