header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY AFTER ACETABULAR FRACTURE



Abstract

Because there are a number of complicating factors, total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed following acetabular fractures has a less favourable prognosis than when done for primary degenerative arthritis. Patients who have had ace-tabular fracture and present for consideration of THA need careful clinical and radiological assessment. Investigation should include AP and lateral radiographs, 45° inlet/outlet views, obturator and iliac obliques, Judet views and CT scan, with or without 3D reconstruction. There are various classifications defining whether the bone deficiency is contained or uncontained and the extent of the structural defect. Treatment options include autograft, allograft together with mesh, screws, plates, rings, cages, etc.

It is probably preferable to undertake THA sooner (as soon as there is radiological evidence of incongruent articular surfaces) rather than later, as this reduces the delay between fracture and recovery from THA, and any inadequate reduction can be minimised or corrected. The surgical approach must allow adequate access for the intended reconstruction. Small contained or uncontained defects can be treated with cemented or cementless implants and limited grafting. Large defects require structural reinforcement, bone grafting, a retaining cage and, unless a custom-made implant is used, cemented fixation.

Potential problems at the time of surgery include sciatic nerve injury (beware the ‘double crush syndrome’) obstructive hardware, heterotopic ossification, avascular necrosis of the acetabulum and occult infection. Patients who are elderly or who present with markedly impacted fracture, extensive abrasion or fracture of the femoral head, displaced femoral neck fracture, and extensive acetabular comminution in the presence of osteopoenic bone, may warrant acute management with THA.

Early experience of THA in the treatment of selected acute fractures is encouraging. However, the clinical results of THA after fractures of the acetabulum are often disappointing, and there is no current evidence that open reduction and internal fixation improves the success of the subsequent THA.

THA following acetabular fractures is a challenging procedure with a high complication rate. Appropriate investigation and preoperative planning reduces the risk of complications.

The abstracts were prepared by Professor M. B. E. Sweet. Correspondence should be addressed to him at The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School, University of Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193 South Africa